Category: Liberals suck

Living many years as a bachelor, I learned early on that when taking the last couple of hotdogs from a package in the fridge, it was wise to scan them closely for any iridescent signs of spoilage, which usually presented as a tell-tale, greenish, and sometimes, when in an advanced state of putrefaction a purplish sheen. That tint of taint was enough to warn me off and prevent my eating such a suspect substance. Even then, young and dumb as I was, I had to question what poisonous consequences might arise from the ingestion of such a fluorescently fouled frank?

Unfortunately, it appears that too many voters in New York City are oblivious to this florid, tell-tale tint of taint on one of their current candidates and are willing to swallow whole, a truly toxic Weiner in their upcoming mayoral race. Little Anthony, as I came to view him in his former incarnation as a corrosively combative congressman, is attempting to sell himself to New York voters as a political hotdog when he is, in fact, a poisonously green wienie, who, with his dangerous, risk-taking proclivities could expose the city to all sorts of financial liabilities through his attempts at Internet intercourse.

New Yorkers would do well to look westward to San Diego where another mayor with Anthony Weiner’s unzipped urges is about to unleash an avalanche of sexual harassment litigation against the citizenry who elected him. The mayor likely will never pay a dime of his own funds, but the already overtaxed people of San Diego can count on coughing up the big bucks for the simple offense of electing a lecher who used the power of his office to further his sexual depredations.

The office of the mayor of New York City is one of the most powerful elected offices in the world. To hand all that power to a man who has clearly demonstrated his inability to control his sexual impulses should give thinking New Yorkers pause for thought. If ever there were a wienie with the green sheen of spoilage on it, that arrogant hotdog seeking renewed political power in New York is it. And considering little Anthony’s ongoing, continued, sexual predations, he may have advanced his own wienie’s spoilage to the purple stage.

And that could cost New Yorkers a lot of green…

Crossposted from American Thinker

According to the Washington Times, Nanny Bloomberg tried to make the New York City cab industry green and, yet again, was dealt a blow in the courts when a judge said that he exceeded his authority with his “Taxi of Tomorrow” program. Then the diminutive tyrant ran into Taxi Club Management CEO Gene Freidman at Madison Square Garden;

“[I will] destroy your [expletive] industry,” Mr. Bloomberg said to Taxi Club Management CEO Gene Freidman, The New York Post reported.

[…]

“It was like Gene had kidnapped his child,” the witness told The Post. “He used the f-word twice.”

[…]

Mr. Friedman said, in The Post. “When we walked away, I asked a friend who was with me, ‘Did the mayor just threaten me?’ My friend responded, ‘No, he threatened you twice.’ “

It’s terrible that Bloomberg, the little Cesar, can’t always get his own way and that sometimes the courts come down on the side of the people instead of blindly acting on hizoner’s behalf and force us all into the square holes he’s mandated for us. That’s twice this year his vision for a Bloomerica has been shut down by the courts. But, yeah, he’d be a great successor to the Obama Administration, wouldn’t he?

So, some guy named Bill Richardson is telling us that Ted Cruz, you know, a guy with an actual Hispanic name isn’t Latino enough to represent the concerns of brown people. Or something. Hell, I’m more Latino than Richardson; at least I have an “a” on the end of my last name and have to speak the language everyday of my life in my house. And I watch Azteca TV’s weird news program, Al Extremo, every night. From Breitbart;

ABC News: Do you think he represents most Hispanics with his politics?

“No, no. He’s anti-immigration. Almost every Hispanic in the country wants to see immigration reform. No, I don’t think he should be defined as a Hispanic. He’s a politician from Texas. A conservative state. And I respect Texas’ choice. But what I don’t like is… when you try to get things done, it’s okay to be strong and state your views, your ideology. But I’ve seen him demean the office, be rude to other senators, not be part of, I think, the civility that is really needed in Washington.”

So, apparently, you can’t be an Hispanic if you don’t adhere to the liberal line. I think Cruz represents the core beliefs of the Latino community better than Richardson and a majority of the community understand. My wife, a legal immigrant who jumps through hoops every couple of years to remain here, doesn’t think much of immigration reform. I suppose she’s not Hispanic enough for Richardson, either.

Ex-PH2 sends us a link from Politicker in which Nanny Bloomberg tells us that we to start looking at our Constitutional rights differently after the Boston bombing;

“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry,” Mr. Bloomberg said during a press conference in Midtown. “But we live in a complex word where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

So, if the mayor will allow me to translate; you have no expectation of privacy (except to allow you to have an abortion), you have no expectation of making your own choices. Nanny thinks you should trade your own happiness for his type of security. Remember that his type of security led to the shooting of nine people outside the Empire State Building last year when NYPD cops shot innocent people trying to take down a single shooter.

And to prove that he is serious about his total disregard for the Constitution, there’s a law suit against the city, that you probably need to hear about in a link sent to us by Dominick;

“I was texting while I was walking and by the time I looked up an officer was in front of me,” he tells theGrio. “He took my phone, told me to put my hands against the wall, and then patted me down.”

From there, Peart says the officers asked for his ID, took his keys and asked which building he lived in. He complied, telling them which key opened the front entrance to his building and which key corresponded with his unit’s front door.

“Not only did he enter my building, but he went to my door. I know that because my younger sister called me later and told me,” he says.

Meanwhile, Peart says he was held outside and handcuffed by the other officer, who then ordered Peart to get into the backseat of their police cruiser.

“It was the first time I had ever felt cold handcuffs on my wrists,” he says.

From there, Peart says the officer asked if he was carrying marijuana, and proceeded to take off his sneakers. While one officer searched Peart’s clothing, the other returned from the apartment. After discovering that Peart was clean, the officers let him go, he says.

I guess there’s no such thing as unreasonable search and seizure in New York City. And this is the millionaire who wants spend his millions so he can craft our gun laws.

Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755; Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Andrew Cuomo, the legacy governor of New York couldn’t help but push his liberal agenda today in the pall over the nation in regards to the terrorist attack in Boston. Apparently, the attack on completely innocent people watching the end of the Boston Marathon is due to global warming;

“So much of society is changing so rapidly. We talk about a ‘new normal’ when it comes t0 climate change and adjusting to a change in the weather patterns. ‘New normal’ when it comes to public security in a post-9/11 world. Where these random acts of violence, which at one time were implausible, now seem all-too-frequent.”

Yeah, so we can adapt more liberal crap to our daily lives and society can sink even further into the morass of idiocy generated by mindless morons like this guy. This guy whose father single-handedly destroyed a state’s entire economy. This guy who crammed totally illogical gun regulations down the citizenry’s throat.

Y’all New Yorkers were better off with the accidental governor, or even the whore-monger than this blithering idiot. Make sure y’all vote for him again because you recognize his last name.

Ann Coulter raised an excellent issue on Geraldo at Large when, in a debate with a liberal supporter of New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg’s self-declared war on personal bad health habits, she asked in so many words, “Why doesn’t he close down the gay bathhouses?”

For those of you out here in flyover country who may be unfamiliar with bi-coastal sexual practices, gay bathhouses are gathering places for men who are seeking anonymous, promiscuous, and frequently public sex with like-minded men. Such facilities first became more widely known to unsophisticated provincials back in the eighties with the rise of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. As it turned out, these bathhouses were the primary incubators for HIV. Following that discovery, many of them closed down when fearful gays quit patronizing them and government health departments increased their oversight. Within the gay community there was even a term for the relationship between bathhouses and AIDS: the Bathhouse Phenomenon.

Apparently, as treatment regimens for HIV infection became more efficacious, and a diagnosis of being HIV-positive was no longer a sentence of certain death, gay men began reverting to old habits, and the bathhouses returned in even greater numbers. A quick Google search shows fourteen operating in New York City, and that’s only the ones willing to be advertised on that particular gay website.

So, to get back to Ann’s question, just why is Mayor Bloomberg so hell-bent on protecting his constituents from their bad sugar consumption habits and potential obesity and diabetes, while apparently allowing these bathhouses to operate openly? Why, indeed, when they are known to be incubators of the deadly HIV and many of their patrons to be carriers of not just that virus, but also many other sexually transmitted diseases that are of significant public concern? Just this past week, the NYC Health Department issued a warning about a potential meningitis epidemic where gay men and promiscuous sexual activities appear to be the vectors.

So Ann’s question is legitimate to ask of Bloomberg. It is neither anti-gay nor unfair. It is recognition of a simple truth: liberalism tends to target disfavored practices while ignoring others possibly more injurious, even though those ignored may result in grievous illness and even death for their favored liberal adherents. Mayor Bloomberg is a glaring example of such biased selection even at a critical time when the rate of infection of the dreaded HIV virus appears to be on the rise among gay men. Where is Nanny Bloomberg’s stern admonition to those gay men whose behaviors spread deadly disease? Where’s the ban on the bathhouses where such behaviors take place? Where’s his concern for the costs of their very expensive, possibly lifelong treatments to the rest of us?

An epidemic to concern us all is the growing rate of delusional hypocrisy among liberals.

Crossposted at American Thinker