They’ve gone too far. “Donald Trump’s supporters are angry“, or “uneducated”, or “unenlightened”, or (fill_In_The_Blank). This hate-filled sentiment is clear within the latest vile,… nay,… evil and horrific smears directed toward Kanye West and anyone who dare defy the Marxist ideology of the political left.
Now the media narrative controllers are fully engaged along with their political brethren. Do not look away. The vulgar lies and filth are extreme as ideological entities utilize their microphones in a brutal attempt to advance their position in the mid-term election…
It’s a bit lengthy to post in it’s entirety, so click on the link to read the whole thing. Thanks, Jim.
Unless you’ve been asleep or out in the boonies, it’s mid-term campaign season again. As you can see, there are lovely campaign workers everywhere. Persistent folk, they are. Reasonable in their approach, also.
And here we have candidate Claire McCaskill from Missouri admitting that she’s strongly advocating gun control but not in her campaign rhetoric. She has to get votes, you know, to get the job. The article from Daily Wire has a video of her admitting strongly to her stance on gun control, when her campaigning appears to suggest just the opposite.
You see, the object of Democrat political campaigning is to lie your ass off to get the job, and then reveal your real agenda.
Someone, some Democrat politician is objecting in the video to the undercover effort to get the truth out of this mendacious bimp and her bunch of followers. I guess his objection is to the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which clearly states that we have freedom of the press. Now, they would argue that it means only printed material but it was written before the Age of Electronic Media, and yes, it does apply to undercover news collection.
By comparison, if it’s okay for ABC News to expose an eye doctor doing unnecessary surgery on eye patients and bilking Medicare for several million dollars in the 1990s, then why is it not okay for an undercover journalist to expose this blatant hyprocrisy to the light of day?
While some of you thought that I had gone overboard with my bit of satire on how to resist the Fascist Tits Gun Grabbers down the road, the objective is and should always be to thoroughly embarrass these frauds publicly as much as possible, to show them for the lying sacks of absolute crap they are, which is clearly demonstrated in the Daily Wire undercover video.
I lean toward that, rather than toward the alternative suggestion, which involves the wasted energy and wasted resources generated in the course of violence.
I wanted to give a short update on things in general.
It has taken many of us to fill the void. Most of what we needed to do behind the scenes has been taken care of. TSO will finish the legal stuff here shortly. I realize that there have not been a lot of posers posted lately, that is on purpose and my fault. I apologize for the lapse but there are reasons for it. We will be back to exposing these fake and embellishing frauds very soon. Believe me, it’s not like there is a sudden shortage of them.
I make more than my share of mistakes. I realize things are not running as smoothly as they were when Jonn was alive…but we are getting there. I post what seems to serve the mission Jonn set for this blog. Yes, some articles are probably a bit of old news to some of you and other articles may be on the edge of acceptable to some others.
It’s all I can do some days to stop a certain woman with a gravy ladle from turning the site background pink and posting pictures of kitty cats chasing rainbows. This is going to hurt a little…she has done a remarkable job of keeping up with things behind the scenes. Thank you, Gravy Lady. You are the best EX I could ever hope for.
So many others have stepped up as well. Your submissions have been very, very, very helpful. AW1Ed is exactly the kind of person you want around when the shit hits the fan. He is thoughtful, well organized and the epidemy of what a team player should be. A huge ATTABOY goes out to Ed.
I have been trying to get a certain Lawyer to do her job for a change. I don’t think she likes me much. I tried to introduce myself to her. Caragh Fay pretends she is the authority on all things Beirut from time to time. Seems to me Caragh Fay likes to do it when there is something in it for her. Maybe she is just sweet on me…hard to tell at this point.
The Soviet may be correct about me when I try to multitask. She claims I can talk to people and piss them off all at the same time. I just get a little pissy when a lawyer who has made millions off of the blood of my dead brothers seems to think its ok to ignore the needs of so many others. How can someone know I am an Asshole without knowing me? Is it really that obvious?
In response to a recent comment, yes I do get embarrassed sometimes…but its not over anything to do with this blog. I try to read all of the comments, you people have issues too. Never met a better group of deplorable trouble causers in my life.
Forgive us if the content sucks or just gets thin from time to time. Most of us do have another life. Best regards to all, and most of all… THANK YOU FOR BELIEVING IN SOMETHING.
Another fine piece from our own Poetrooper, who informs me that he finally got his ire up and felt like taking a whack at the Gasbags of the Democrat party. If his ire is up, he must be feeling better, so wish him well. Fair warning: there’s a photo of the two of them included, so try to keep your breakfast down.
The American conservative community is rejoicing over the belated news that Hillary Clinton supposedly volunteered to surrender her high-level security clearance back in August at the same time the clearances of five of her staffers were lifted. Those of you thinking we might have finally skunked the queen of political skunks had better take a deep breath and realize that, once again, the Clintons are attempting to pull another fast one on the American public.
While the employable dollar worth of Hillary’s five staffers’ is now seriously reduced by the loss of those high-level clearances, the Queen of Sore Losers is not negatively impacted in any way. How can this be, you ask? Well, she isstill married to predator-in-chief, Bill Clinton, who presumably still has his access to the inner sanctums of American intelligence operations, as do most ex-POTUSes. Frankly, I don’t know how broad or deep this ex-POTUS privilege of access to current intelligence is because the principle of need to know generally limits the dissemination of classified material to those who have a role in acting on such intelligence. But there is no doubt in my mind that the Clintons, thoroughly practiced grifters that they are, as well as their increasingly shady daughter, will not hesitate to use such classified information as they may be able to access for personal and political enrichment. They’ve been doing it for decades, and they’re not about to stop now.
A question niggling at me right now is, what is the security clearance status of Huma Abedin? Was she, as Hillary’s constant consort, one with close familial connections to the militant jihadist organization in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood, one of those with access to top-level American intelligence who lost that privilege? If not, that is a lapse in our own national security that needs to be addressed immediately, when one takes into consideration the rock-bottom morals of her pedophile predator, weenie-wagging husband, who absolutely should never have any sort of access to any intelligence feeds.
Lastly, our knowing bwa-ha-ha-ha’s of disbelief simply will not be loud enough to counter this latest Clinton misinformation campaign to convince the American public that their family, and by extension the party they have long led, is not a completely corrupt political and criminal enterprise, one that the devious Democratic Party leadership and a compliant mainstream media recently tried to foist on this country as the best choice to head our national government. So we must look at this most recent Clinton maneuver for what it is: just more misdirection from reality to make it appear that Hillary graciously surrendered her security clearance. Trust your own common sense: there is no way the avaricious Hillary would have voluntarily surrendered something as commercially valuable as a high-level security clearance if she didn’t have an ulterior motive as well as a safe fallback position. The more likely truth in all this is that Clinton is looking at possible prosecution for federal felony security and corruption charges from her secret server security violations. So this ostensibly sacrificial act by Hillary is no more than a way to head off the negative implications of an announcement by the DOJ of her top-level clearance’s revocation, possibly ahead of a future criminal indictment.
I read an article on the “revolution” against gun grabbing/confiscation and the numbers, math, how gun owners could form a civilian army, etc. And it won’t work well, because – well, lack of subtlety is the response.
A few observations on my part. Guerrilla warfare, as anyone who was in-country in Vietnam will tell you, is not necessarily made up of shoot-shoot-bang-bang. It’s a lot more subtle than that. Pretty girls, for instance, will distract any male human animal (exceptions are noted) enough to take his mind off his target and plant it elsewhere.
For example, there is black & white film stored on video showing Army trucks with replacement troops rolling into Bien Hoa, while alongside the road, on the dirt berm, all these young Vietnamese women dressed in traditional ao-dais and wearing that common coolie hat were watching and counting. When they thought the camera was on them, they immediately dropped the hat over the face. They were spies, as were the mama-sans and papa-sans who worked on the bases, counting empty racks and newly-made up racks and new duffel bags.
If you really want to stop the gun grabbers, that asinine scene in conservation area in Oregon state in the winter of 2016 is THE dumbest thing EVER concocted by an egotistical asshole. No wonder it failed.
You must be far more subtle, if you expect to win a war against Grabbing Your Guns By the Fascist Tits.
Distracting the Gun Grabbing Fascist Tits while someone sabotages the vehicles isn’t all that hard. Here are some suggestions:
– Sabotaging vehicles does not require incendiary devices. That thinking is far too narrow and amateurish. You get a transceiver that picks up the remote key signal which is a radio frequency, clones it, open the door, pop the gas tank lid, and pour sugar into the gas tank. About two pounds should do it. Car thieves are using this cloning technology now to steal cars without doing any damage to them, especially those with keyless ignitions. Piece of cake.
– Cut their brake lines enough for the brake fluid to drain out slowly.
– Pop the hood and cut the battery cables. Or just remove the batteries when you’re done messing with the vehicles.
– Drain the antifreeze/coolant out of the radiator. There is a plug for that, you know.
– Removing all the lugnuts from the wheels but leaving the tires in place will result in – what?
– Try letting most of the air out of three of the tires until they are nearly flat, along with removing the lug nuts and mailing them back to their HQ.
– As long as you have the vehicle doors open, pour fluorescent neon pink or orange or green paint on the seats, so that it gets on the Gun Grabbing Fascist Tits and stays there for weeks.
– Remove all the license plates from the rear ends of all vehicles. Mail them back to their HQ from a city you don’t live in. Or use UPS.
– Have a device that sets off all the alarms in all their vehicles, one after another, and they can’t shut it off because they are locked out. Keys no longer work. How come? Cloned radio frequency on each vehicle changed to a single frequency for all and they don’t have it. Like I said, car thieves do this all the time now.
– Clone the same GPS signal for as many escape vehicles as possible, and once the Gun Grabbing Fascist Tits are distracted by the signal scatter, shut them off and remove them from your own vehicles, then turn them back on and leave them behind. (And yes, you can shut off your vehicle’s installed GPS, despite what people think.) Just make sure that you have these pursuers so far out in the boonies that they have to ask for directions back to Chicago or NYC or whatever at a local gas station, and maybe buy paper maps to get home.
– And when they find them and open the doors, make sure you’ve left behind some very angry wasps in their nest.
– Let them think they are closing in on the “lead escape vehicle” and when they’re all gathered together, release the balloons packed inside. Make sure the balloons have candy bars tied to them, and a way to rupture so that the candy lands on the Gun Grabbing Fascist Tits.
– Plant a small transmitter in the target Gun Grabbing Fascist Tits’ vehicles that has a recording on it of Woody Woodpecker’s laugh or maybe Bugs Bunny ‘What’s up, Doc?’ – something inane and insane like that, which they can’t shut off because you have to stomp on it to stop it. Maybe under the carpeting next to the door on the driver’s side is a good spot.
– Peel and put those large self-stick sheets on their windshields and back windows and outside mirrors, and be sure to include messages of “love” on them. Obscene drawings are okay, in this instance. Put them over the headlights and brake lights, too.
– Know the area so well that you can drive home in the dark with no headlights, only using infrared on the road. Make sure you’re driving a dark-colored car, too.
Come on, use your imagination. Don’t be so shoot-shoot-bang-bang about it. That’s too amateurish. You don’t want people sending you bags of fruit-flavored dicks in the mail, do you?
You all remember Emma Gonzales, don’t you? Lovely young girl, despite the shaved head. Such crocodile tears she wept for as long as she was onstage, and then hey! Presto! They vanished. She was also good at reddening her eyeballs. One can only hope she’ll get glaucoma out of it, or worse.
And that bald head? I thought it was only nuns and Marines that shaved their heads. Well, nuns sort of are Marines, wearing black habits – the Army of God or something like that.
But I digress… somewhat.
It seems that Ms. Gonzalez is back, in fine fettle, arguing for confiscation but insisting that she is so very 2nd Amendment-friendly… except for those parts about confiscation and banning guns and – well, such a plan she has for Others (that’s us) to follow that you have to read it for comprehension, not just context. And you have to do it without throwing things, too. She thinks the Australian confiscation plan was just great! And ditto, the UK, except that in both Oz and Merry Olde England, people are still allowed to have weapons – for hunting, target shooting, and other such endeavors.
Just to make it clear where she stands: “… if she actually read the website of the gun control group for which she is a national spokesperson, she would learn a “comprehensive semi-automatic assault rifle ban” is among its agenda items. The ban it has in mind not only “prohibits the future production and sale of these weapons” but “provides a solution for dealing with those semi-automatic assault rifles that are already owned,” such as “a buyback program” for lawfully obtained guns. Needless to say, this measure by definition would affect those who are “already … responsible gun owner[s]” and force them to give up their property.”
“That’s not all. Even if we assume she doesn’t know what her own organization wants, we have her own words delivered on other occasions to explain exactly what she means.”
“At a public appearance in May, Gonzalez told her audience, “It’s just cheaper to take away the guns that aren’t imperative to living in America,” adding, “You don’t need an AR-15 to protect yourself in bed from a robber at night.” She even hinted on that occasion that guns should be limited to the military: “Go join the Army if you want to have fun shooting off a weapon, and serve your f***ing country.” – NRA article
I really do appreciate her referring to this nation of ours as ‘your fucking country’. She can leave any time. I’m sure either Venezuela or Cuba would welcome the little bitch with open arms. As nasty as she is, she might even fascinate or amuse Vlad Putin for a brief moment or two.
Now, don’t be too easy on her. She’s only 18, hasn’t really seen the world for the vicious, gangbanging place it is, nor does she have even a vague understanding of the conflict of meanings manifest in everything she says.
Deep down inside, she’s an apprentice bitch on wheels, practicing on the unsuspecting souls who support her as-yet-unspoken agenda without realizing what sort of quagmire they’ll be marching into by that very support of her.
Just wanted you to know that I’m not snoozing here.
Charles Clymer, a transgender man now known as Charlotte, has filed a formal discrimination complaint with the D.C. Office of Human Rights after a Washington restaurant asked him to show his ID before entering a woman’s bathroom. According to the attendant, the women’s bathrooms were reserved for– you got it, women.
Clymer said he was then asked to leave the restaurant after insisting on his right to use the female restroom. The police were eventually called and reportedly said the law was on Clymer’s side.
After the incident, Clymer took to Twitter stating, “Last night, I was told by the manager of @CubaLibreDC that I couldn’t use the women’s restroom, and after challenging his discrimination with D.C. law and responding to his threat of calling the police w/ ‘please do so’, I was forcibly removed from the restaurant.”
Last night, I was told by the manager of @CubaLibreDC that I couldn’t use the women’s restroom, and after challenging his discrimination with D.C. law and responding to his threat of calling the police w/ “please do so”, I was forcibly removed from the restaurant. (thread)
In response to Clymer’s Tweet, Washington D.C. mayor Muriel Bowser said, “I’m so sorry this happened to you. While I’m glad to hear that @DCPoliceDept were there to represent our true #DCValues, we won’t accept this type of discrimination in Washington, DC. It’s not just illegal, it’s against all we stand for.”
The following day the restaurant offered a formal apology to Clymer saying, “We are extremely sorry for the incident that occurred…” The statement went on to say, “As a rule, we support safe bathrooms and welcome guests of all gender identifications. Clearly our staff did not do so last night and treated you in an unacceptable manner. We are immediately retraining our entire staff to ensure this does not happen again.”
But that apology didn’t stop Clymer from filing a formal discrimination complaint with the D.C. Office of Human Rights. In a follow up Tweet, Clymer said, “I spoke with several lawyers about what justice would look like in this situation. I greatly appreciate everyone’s support, and I’ll continue to keep you updated on the resolution.”
UPDATE: Today, I filed a formal discrimination complaint with the D.C. Office of Human Rights and spoke with several lawyers about what justice would look like in this situation. I greatly appreciate everyone’s support, and I’ll continue to keep you updated on the resolution.
A few years ago a petition was established on Change.org to have Clymer removed as a contributor on Huffington Post. According to the creator of the petition, “Clymer has been known to ban women from the Facebook page he created and administers, Equality for Women, for seemingly just disagreeing with his point of view…”
The husband of a woman banned from Charles’ Equality for Women Facebook page wrote:
My wife, a life long feminist commented on this page months ago. Charles did not like her post. He berated her publicly and privately. He deleted her comments and banned her from posting… She started another page which served as a place where other people who had been unjustly silenced by him could come together and exercise their right to be heard. This page continued to grow, by request of more and more victims of his treatment… Today she was notified by FB that she can not post for 24 hours, and it appears that her page has been shut down. FB did not give her any warning which is the usual procedure… [Charles’] page is not about equality for women. It is about equality for women who don’t piss him off. It is highly censored.
In 2013 HuffPost ran a piece titled, Should a Man Teach Women About Feminism?. In the piece, blogger Darlena Cunha wrote, “When a man becomes a feminism advocate, and then a feminist leader, the lines become blurry…”
Cunha went on to say, “Unfortunately, many comments on Equality for Women that have been deleted are by women, and many of the people who have been banned are women. And this angered the women, as you can imagine, because now you have a man running a feminist page essentially silencing women he doesn’t agree with. And the disenchantment begins.”
So, what’s the solution?
Nah…my “disenchantment” began a long time ago. People prancing around for special attention are little more than attention whores. I could care less why they are doing it.
The Washington Times reports that Hillary Clinton, also known as Felonia McPantsuit or Das Hildebeast, has lost her security clearance in the wake of the scandal over her handling of secret information on her email server, the Senate Judiciary Committee revealed Friday.
Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley also revealed top Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and four others no longer have clearance.
Mrs. Clinton’s clearance expired at the end of August. The others lost their access privileges in September.
The State Department, in a letter to Mr. Grassley, had said Mrs. Clinton and her aides retained clearance in order to conduct research after she left office.
The names of the four additional aides besides Ms. Mills were redacted from the State Department letter that the committee released.
Well that only took what, three years? Had it been any who post or comment here with a clearance, well, you know. Clearance stripped in about 30 seconds and frog-marched to the Special Handling Unit in a Federal pen at the ass-end of Nowhere, North Dakota.
(@cmclymer) 
