Yesterday, the Washington Post published some anti-gun propaganda an article. Its title tells you all you really need to know about it:
The “legal loophole” that allowed Dylann Roof to get a gun
I’ve put “legal loophole” there in quotes for a couple of reasons. The first reason is – it’s absolute bullsh!t, and it’s misleading as hell. IMO, that’s by intent.
The second reason is that it the whole article appears to be factually incorrect. No “legal loophole” – imaginary or otherwise – appears to have been involved at all.
Here are the facts of the case.
The apparently-racist bastard named Dylann Roof who murdered 9 innocents in Charleston was arrested for felony drug possession 28 February of this year. According to the WaPo propaganda article, he obtained the weapon used in his crime as a birthday present this April. (This now appears to have been proven false – I’ll cover that below).
The WaPo writer seizes on this, claiming that this is the result of the “gun show loophole”. He does so after acknowledging that it was already illegal under current Federal law for him to have been given a weapon as a gift while under indictment for a felony crime – see 18 USC 922(d)(1).
So, even if the original reports of Roof receiving the firearm he used in his murders as a gift had been true, the reporter’s article would still have been bullsh!t. Why? Because there was no freaking “legal loophole” here. Roof was facing felony charges – and his family had to know he’d been arrested. They thus had good reason to suspect he could be facing felony charges – and therefore giving him a weapon would have already been illegal under Federal law. There’s no “loophole” there, folks.
In fact, later news reports indicate that Roof in fact bought the gun himself at a local gun shop. My guess is that he probably falsified the purchase form (ATF Form 4473) and claimed he was not under “indictment or information” for any felony crime. (I’m pretty sure that being out on bail after arrest while awaiting further court action virtually guarantees the latter – e.g., that Roof was legally considered “under information” of a felony, even if he hadn’t been formally indicted by a grand jury.) Falsifying an ATF 4473 is also a Federal felony. I suppose it’s theoretically possible that the gun shop was “dirty” and ignored a truthful answer – but since that’s kinda easily discovered, I rather doubt it. Most business owners want to stay in business and stay out of jail.
I’ll spell it out for any logic-challenged “liberal brethren” who might be reading this. Roof was apparently willing to lie on the purchase form in order to purchase a firearm himself. That is itself a felony. So, how would requiring him to take a firearm received as a gift down to the same firearms shop to “complete the transfer” for a gift have made any difference?
Answer: it wouldn’t have. He’d have simply lied on the ATF 4473 then, too.
However . . . having him do that to “complete the transfer” would indeed assist in later compiling a database of who owns firearms, should anyone in the future want to do so.
Bottom line: that WaPo propaganda article yesterday wasn’t about gun safety at all. It was about misleading people. It was designed to convince people to support whatever is necessary to facilitate backdoor gun registration in the future – plain and simple.
