Category: Terror War

  • Obama’s hidden war in Iraq

    Obama’s hidden war in Iraq

    Kerry stuck in Iraq

    Chief Tango sends us a link to the Wall Street Journal, where William McGurn reminds us that it was 45-years ago this month that John Kerry complained to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about the troops who were giving their lives up so that the Nixon Administration didn’t have to own up to their mistakes in Vietnam;

    Today, as secretary of state, Mr. Kerry travels about the world rationalizing an Iraq policy designed to keep President Obama from having to admit his mistake: that he has only made worse a war he claimed to have ended….In an interview aired Sunday on Fox News, President Obama declared that his “number one priority right now” is defeating Islamic State. But how does the man who sees himself as the guy who gets America out of its wars deal with the contradiction?

    Part of the answer seems to be fudging the troop numbers. Officially U.S. troop levels in Iraq and Afghanistan are capped at 3,870 and 9,800 respectively. But after a Marine in northern Iraq—Staff Sgt. Louis F. Cardin—was killed in an ISIS rocket attack, the Pentagon was forced to admit there are as many as 5,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. Only then did Americans learn that men such as Staff Sgt. Cardin are not included in the official troop count because they were rotated in on a temporary basis.

    Things won’t change with the next president, either. Obama has only changed the words we use;

    Mrs. Clinton has her own version of the charade. “I will not send American combat troops to Iraq or Syria,” she has declared in more than one primary debate. Instead, she says, “we will continue to use Special Forces.”

    I’m sure Special Forces soldiers in Syria and Iraq will be surprised to learn that they’re not combat troops. I’m sure it would surprise Staff Sergeant Cardin, too. It appears that Obama and Kerry aren’t the only people in the Democrat Party who are pretending that there’s no war in Iraq. Or contingency operations or whatever word they’re using these days to hide the fact that the Nobel Peace Prize-winning President only makes wars worse while he’s pretending to end them. And America’s best and brightest are shedding their blood for weasel words.

  • So, How Is Europe Handling “Refugees” These Days?

    Short answer:  in many locations they’re sending them back.  The days of “open doors to all” appear to have ended.

    While Germany still accepts large numbers of refugees, Denmark is taking a rather hard line – to the point of prosecuting their own citizens for “immigrant smuggling” if they assist illicit new arrivals.  Sweden, formerly world-renowned as a refugee haven, has substantially closed its doors as well.  Hungary has closed its borders; Macedonia has followed suit.  Greece is now sending new arrivals from Turkey back vice allowing them to stay.  And even Germany appears to be rethinking its “let-em-all-come” stance.

    The Washington Post recently had a longish article on the matter, focusing on Denmark.  Predictably, that article takes the hand-wringing, “Oh, the humanity!” point of view.

    But what the WaPo doesn’t address is why Europe’s practices and attitudes towards refugees have changed – IMO, probably intentionally.

    If you need to ask why, take a look at recent incidents in Europe.  Like Charlie Hebdo.  Like the e2015 Paris massacres.  The train attack.  The repeated assaults on women by “refugees”.  The demands for European nations to change longstanding cultural events and norms to “accommodate the sensitivities of refugee newcomers”.

    One has to be a moron not to realize why Europe made this change.

    Europe is closing its borders because many of those “refugees” . . . simply aren’t really refugees.  Rather, many are instead Da’esh operatives – or are otherwise Jihadis/Jihadi sympathizers intent on colonization.

    It appears Europeans’ eyes are finally opening.  And it also looks like they’ve decided they really don’t like the concept described by the term “dhimmi”.

    Maybe our government’s eyes will open one day soon as well.  But if San Bernardino didn’t already do that, forgive me if I don’t hold my breath while I’m waiting.

  • “Get On Board!”

    Well, it seems a couple of CENTCOM employees found out the hard way that telling the Emperor the truth as they saw it can be hazardous.

    Recently, a couple of CENTCOM intel analysists were shuttled aside. They may or may not have been forced out of their positions, but if not they definitely appear to have been marginalized.

    Their “crime”? Telling the CENTCOM CG that the US program supporting “moderate” Syrian rebels simply wasn’t working.

    One of the analysts alleging reprisals is the top analyst in charge of Syria issues at CENTCOM. He and a colleague doubted rebels’ capabilities and their commitment to U.S. objectives in the region. The analysts have been effectively sidelined from their positions and will no longer be working at CENTCOM, according to two individuals familiar with the dispute, and who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    Anyone who’s studied military history should find this unsurprising. USMAC-V famously ignored all but but rosiest intel analysis/reports concerning the situation in Vietnam prior to Tet 1968. And check out the scene described (in an account apparently based on the recollections of an eyewitness) on pages 3-5 of this document.

    The Daily Beast today has a longer article on the subject. IMO it’s worth reading – and it also says that CENTCOM is currently being investigated by the DoD IG for what appears to be a pattern of having deliberately skewed ISIS-related intel analysis and reports to present a rosier-than-real picture.

    “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.” Or, if you prefer Yogi Berra’s version: “It’s déjà vu all over again.”

  • US Navy intercepts another Iranian arms shipment to Yemen

    US Navy intercepts another Iranian arms shipment to Yemen

    Iranian arms shipment to Yemen

    Fox News reports that last week the US Navy intercepted another shipment of small arms probably to Yemen and orchestrated by the Iranians in their proxy war against the Sunni Saudis;

    The Navy said the shipment included 1,500 AK-47s, 200 rocket-propelled grenade launchers and 21 .50-caliber machine guns.

    After the U.S. seized the weapons stash from the dhow, a traditional sailing vessel, the Navy let the crew go. A U.S. official told Fox News current rules do not allow western naval forces to seize the crew in addition to illicit cargo. “You have to find a country willing to prosecute,” the official said.

    A defense official reached by Fox News would not reveal the nationality of the dhow’s crew.

    The Navy says that this is the third time an arms shipment to Yemen from Iran has been intercepted in the waters off of the Arabian peninsula in the last few weeks. It’s nice to see that they’re not squandering their billions of dollars in their recent windfall facilitated by John Kerry and the Obama Administration.

    ADDED: The Virginian-Pilot says that it was the Norfolk-based USS Gravely which responded to a call by the coastal patrol ship USS Sirocco.

    This is the third time in recent weeks that international forces have seized weapons the U.S. believes originated in Iran. On Feb. 27, the Royal Australian Navy’s HMAS Darwin intercepted a dhow with nearly 2,000 AK-47s, 100 rocket-propelled grenade launchers and 49 machine guns, among other weapons.

    On March 20, the French Navy destroyer FS Provence seized nearly 2,000 AK-47s, 64 Dragunov sniper rifles and nine anti-tank missiles.

  • Obama wouldn’t approve plan to beat ISIS in 2012

    Obama wouldn’t approve plan to beat ISIS in 2012

    last convoy out of Iraq

    That far-Right wing media organ, NBC News reports that CIA officer Doug Laux has written a book that tells the story of how he provided a plan that would have resulted in the ouster of Syrian President Bashar Assad to the Obama Administration back in 2012. A plan that Obama failed to approve;

    Laux, an Indiana native who joined the CIA in 2005 at age 23, says he wrote an “ops plan” that included all the elements he believed were necessary to remove Assad. He was not allowed to describe the plan, but he writes that his program “had gained traction” in Washington. His boss, the head of the Syria task force, regularly briefed members of the Congressional intelligence committees on what Laux was seeing, hearing and suggesting.

    A former senior intelligence official said Laux’s ideas—many of them shared by other members of the CIA’s Syrian task force–were heavily represented in the plan that was ultimately presented to Obama.

    But the president, who must approve all covert action, never gave the green light. The White House and the CIA declined to comment.

    That’s hardly surprising – this administration is the least pro-active presidency in recent history. They seem unwilling to display anything even resembling leadership either at home or in conducting our foreign policy. This administration has no problem using the troops and force to clean up that which has turned to shit, but they don’t want to fix problems before they are problems. From Libya to Syria. From sub-Saharan Africa to Yemen.

  • Obama: Iran is not business-friendly

    Obama: Iran is not business-friendly

    obama_kerry_biden

    President Obama seemed surprised yesterday when he noticed that, although they’re complying with the letter of the treaty, Iran isn’t following the spirit of the nuclear deal that John Kerry caved to last year. Iran complained that they haven’t reaped the economic benefits that were promised to them, according to The Hill;

    “Iran so far has followed the letter of the agreement, but the spirit of the agreement involves Iran also sending signals to the world community and businesses that it is not going to be engaging in a range of provocative actions that are going to scare businesses off,” Obama said at a press conference.

    “When they launch ballistic missiles with slogans calling for the destruction of Israel, that makes businesses nervous.”

    “Iran has to understand what every country in the world understands, which is businesses want to go where they feel safe, where they don’t see massive controversy, where they can be confident that transactions are going to operate normally,” he added. “And that’s an adjustment that Iran’s going to have to make as well.”

    Iran has squandered their windfall on continuing to be the main state supporter of terrorism in the world, and that seems to surprise this administration – as if they’ve been asleep for the last thirty years. Obama is referring to the news last month, from USAToday;

    Iran test-fired two ballistic missiles, one of them with the phrase “Israel should be wiped off the Earth” written on it in Hebrew, Iranian news media reported Wednesday.

    The country’s semiofficial Fars news agency said the missiles were fired at a target 870 miles away.

    It came the day after Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said it test-fired several ballistic missiles as part of a military exercise.

    Good use of their billions of dollars, you know, instead of making life better in Iran. And, oh, yeah, Iran’s agent in Iraq, Muqtada al Sadr is back in business in the Green Zone reforming the Iraqi government in Iran’s favor;

    Muqtada al-Sadr, the cleric whose militia repeatedly battled US troops more than a decade ago, is back in action in Iraq – this time as a battler against corruption who seeks to change the face of government.

    On Thursday, after spending five days holed up in a tent inside Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone to press his demands, he was handed a victory, in the form of a proposed new government presented to parliament by Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

    CNN reports that that the Pentagon is contemplating even more US troops in Iraq;

    A U.S. defense official told CNN earlier this week that the U.S. currently has between 4,500 and 5,000 troops in Iraq on a regular basis, about 1,000 over the stated limit of 3,800. This includes 200 Special Operations Forces whose presence is not publicly acknowledged, the official said.
    The coalition has made a decision not to publicly reveal the exact number of U.S. troops currently in Iraq, coalition spokesperson Army Col. Steve Warren told reporters earlier this week.

    So, basically, it’s 2005 all over again.

  • Dependents ordered to leave Turkey during Erdogan visit

    The Stars & Stripes reports that hundreds of military and diplomatic dependents have been ordered out of Turkey because of concerns about deteriorating security in the Middle Eastern country;

    The mandatory departure order, announced by the State Department, affects nearly all Defense Department dependents assigned to Incirlik, as well as those at smaller bases in Izmir and Mugla. The families of U.S. diplomats in the same areas also are ordered to depart.

    On Monday Israel issued a new travel advisory for Turkey, warning Israeli citizens to leave the country as soon as possible and avoid any traveling there.

    About 670 dependents are expected to be evacuated, along with 287 pets.

    I guess that the attack in Belgium was the impetus for the decision, according to USAToday;

    Michael Desch, co-director of the University of Notre Dame’s International Security Program, said the Pentagon’s decision to evacuate families is unsurprising given the region’s perilous terror climate.

    “The decision was obvious given the series of attacks in Turkey, but I think the final straw was Brussels,” Desch said of the terror attacks in Belgium last week that killed more than 30 people. “The risk-management people must have determined that Turkey was low-hanging fruit in terms of vulnerabilities.”

    This comes to pass while Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an is visiting Washington;

    But analysts detect a snub reflecting U.S. discomfort with Erdogan’s crackdown on free expression in Turkish news media and political opponents.

    On security matters, however, Erdogan and Obama are closer. Turkey supports a U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State and backs Obama’s call for new leadership in Syria to end the five-year civil war.

    Erdogan arrives Tuesday evening and hopes to meet with Obama at some point during his visit, said Fatih Oke, spokesman for the Turkish Embassy in Washington.

    Earnest said Monday Obama and Erdogan met several times in recent months, including at the Paris climate summit in November, and both leaders will attend a nuclear security summit Thursday and Friday.

  • The war against Christianity

    The war against Christianity

    I’m sure you heard about the Taliban’s attack on a peaceful gathering of folks celebrating Easter in Lahore, Pakistan yesterday. Fox News says that there were more than 70 killed and hundreds injured. Most of the casualties were women and children;

    Ahsanullah Ahsan, a spokesman for the breakaway Taliban faction Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, which has sworn allegiance to ISIS, told The Associated Press late Sunday that the suicide bomber deliberately targeted Christians celebrating Easter in the park. The mostly-Muslim country has a small Christian community, accounting for less than two percent of Pakistan’s total population.

    The same militant group also took responsibility for the twin bombings of a Christian church in Lahore last year.

    The article continues that only 14 of the murdered people were Christians – most were Muslims. But that doesn’t seem to matter to the Islamist thugs. From Yemen, we get reports that ISIS crucified a Christian priest, Father Tom Uzhunnalil, according to the UK’s Daily Mail. He was captured from an old folks’ home where he ministered. 16 folks were murdered in the raid, including four nuns.

    While the case can be made that there is no war against Islam in the middle east, no new Crusade, there is evidence that Christians are being targeted by the Islamists. Christians have been targeted in Syria and Iraq, The Sudan and Pakistan, Tunisia and Libya. Yet, the Catholic Pope, in his Easter message to the masses, urges us to accept more of the refugees from the region – some of whom intend to cause mayhem.