Category: Terror War

  • About That Recent “Return of Assets” to Iran . . .

    Remember that $400 million      ransom payment      return of assets we recently sent to Iran?  You know, the one made in cash, using foreign currency obtained in Europe, by a cargo plane immediately before 4 US citizens      held hostage by Iran       detained by Iran were released?  The cash payment I wrote about previously here – and again here – and mentioned yet again here?

    Well, it appears that the       gang of idiots screwing up US foreign policy “by the numbers”      current Administration has recently acknowledged that cash payments in foreign currency made to Iran didn’t stop after the first payment.  The total paid in cash to Iran amounted to far more than the original $400M.  Rather, the entire $1.7 billion in “returned assets” was apparently paid in foreign currency – e.g., in cash.

    The first installment of $400M was sent to Iran on the day Iran agreed to release those       US hostages      detained US citizens:  17 January 2016.  The Administration has now confirmed that the second and third payments of those “returned assets”, totaling another $1.3 billion, were made a few days after their release – on 22 January 2016 and 5 February 2016, respectively.  They were also made in foreign currency.

    Hmm.  So, we made cash payments to an adversary that was at the time detaining a number of US citizens, and in return those US citizens were promptly released.  To me that certainly sounds an awful lot like the textbook definition of something called a “ransom” – and a big honking ransom at that.  And it was paid in cash.

    But maybe that’s just me.

    Oh, and if anyone’s wondering if this is a “big freaking deal”, it is – for two reasons.  First, we have now established the principle that we will indeed pay ransom for US citizens held hostage by adversaries, at least sometimes.  This is idiocy that even Jimmy “the Clueless” Carter did not commit.

    And, second:  cash generally cannot be traced.  And $1.7 billion can fund a helluva lot of terrorist activity.

    I really did not think I’d live long enough to see a US Administration more inept, foreign-policy wise, than Carter’s Clueless Crew.  I was wrong.  This gang of naive fools in DC today takes the cake.

  • No Worries. Just A Local Delivery.

    The BBC reports that a car was found parked on the Quai de Montebello, near the Cathedral Notre Dame de Paris. It was found with its hazard flashers activated.

    The vehicle had an empty gas cylinder on the front passenger seat. Six other gas cylinders, apparently not empty, were found in the trunk.

    No detonating device was present. However, materials written in Arabic were found in the vehicle.

    The vehicle’s owner is on France’s watch list of “suspected religious radicalization.” He’s now in custody, along with a second individual.

    French authorities believe this was a “dry run” for a possible terrorist attack. The Cathedral Notre Dame de Paris is one of Paris’ most popular tourist destinations, visited by about 13 million people annually. Per the linked articles, the auto was found parked “meters” from the cathedral.

    The vehicle was reported by a nearby bar owner, who noticed it and notified local authorities. Looks like Paris’ has the functional equivalent of a “see something, say something” program that works pretty well.

    In case anyone was wondering: yes, the title of this article was sarcasm. If you believe this was a “gas delivery”, well . . . I’ve got this bridge for sale really cheap.

  • Khalimov becomes ISIS’ Minister of War

    Khalimov becomes ISIS’ Minister of War

    Gulmurod Khalimov

    Last year we mentioned Colonel Gulmurod Khalimov, the commander of Tajikistan’s special forces who defected to ISIS. According to him, he was trained by US Special Forces to be a sniper before his defection. According to the Australian News, Khalimov has been named as the Minister of War for the Islamic State;

    “The Tajik has been appointed as the successor to the dead terrorist Tarhan Batirashvili who (was) also known as Abu Omar al-Shishani (Omar the Chechen)”, the Iraqi News reported, citing an unnamed Iraqi security source.

    “The Tajik Golmurud Khalimov was elected as the first military commander in ISIS. The organisation did not announce it officially because it fears that once mentioned, there might be a series of air strikes against them.”

    According to the article, Khalimov was trained by the State Department;

    In a chilling 10-minute address, Khalimov revealed the extent of his experience, which included participating in five counter-terrorism training courses in the US and Tajikstan between 2003 and 2014.

    The courses were organised by the US State Department’s Diplomatic Security/Anti-Terrorism Assistance program. Part of the training, according to the Tajik commander, was conducted by the private American military consultancy previously known as Blackwater.

    Khalimov also revealed in the video that he had taken part in numerous secret training sessions in Russia during his reign as police chief.

    Well, that was money well-spent.

  • Chlorine gas attacks in Aleppo

    Chlorine gas attacks in Aleppo

    The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and medical folks have told Associated Press reporters that Syrian government and Russian jets have dropped chlorine gas on civilians in Aleppo, Syria earlier this week. They say that ten people were killed and 70 have been treated for breathing difficulties.

    Accusations involving the use of chlorine and other poisonous gases are not uncommon in Syria’s civil war. The report could not be independently verified and it was not clear how it was determined that chlorine gas was released.

    It seems to me that, if these attacks were real, it crosses over some sort of “red line” or something.

    [W]hen the administration suspected that the Assad regime was contemplating the use of chemical weapons, Obama had declared: “We have been very clear to the Assad regime…that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.”

    That was three years ago and not an election year, though. But, hey, these reports are common, too common to check out every one – despite any goofy red line.

  • Gitmo grad Abu Wa’el Dhiab is not happy in Uruguay

    Gitmo grad Abu Wa’el Dhiab is not happy in Uruguay

    Former Guantanamo detainee, Jihad Ahmed Mustafa Diyab AKA Abu Wa’el Dhiab staged a hunger strike when he was in the detainee camp. Medical officials were concerned that he would die of starvation, so he was sent to Uruguay two years ago with a couple of other fellow detainees. He absconded from Uruguay earlier this year and before he was found in Venezuela this month, international police were worried he’d turn up at the Olympics with bomber’s vest.

    The Venezuelans sent him back to Uruguay and since it worked the first time for him, he’s threatening another hunger strike if we don’t let him leave Uruguay, according to the Washington Post;

    [Christian] Mirza has acted as the Uruguayan government’s liaison with Dhiab and five other former Guantanamo detainees who were resettled here and said Dhiab told him of his plans to launch a hunger strike.

    […]

    The Uruguayan government has provided social services and financial support. But the men have struggled to adjust, and complained about not getting enough help from Uruguayan officials.

    Dhiab, who suffers health problems related to his hunger strikes and forced feedings while in captivity, has been the most vocal about his unhappiness. Shortly after arriving in Uruguay, he called a press conference to complain that the government needed a better resettlement plan.

    Yeah, well, we can always put him back in Guantanamo if he doesn’t like Uruguay. He claims that he wants to go home – his home is Syria where he’s been tried in absentia and sentenced to death, so I’m guessing that he’s referring to somewhere else besides his actual home. Somewhere else he can pick up being an international thug where he left off.

  • Abu Sayyaf bombs Filipino market place

    Ex-PH2 sends us a link to Reuters which reports that the terrorist group Abu Sayyaf took credit for the bombing of a marketplace in Davao, the hometown of the new president, Rodrigo Duterte. 14 innocent people died in the bombing. I guess the ISIS-linked terrorists haven’t heard about the president’s war against drugs;

    The bombing came as the abrasive former prosecutor wages war on narcotics kingpins and street dealers, Islamist rebels and corrupt bureaucrats, scoring big points in opinion polls but at a risk of making powerful enemies.

    Rumors have swirled of a plot to assassinate Duterte, 71, which he has shrugged off as part of his job. The talk has been fueled by his controversial crackdown on drugs that saw him elected by a huge margin, but condemned by human rights groups and the United Nations.

    More than 2,000 alleged drug pushers and users have been killed since Duterte’s June 30 inauguration. Critics are alarmed at the sheer number whose deaths have been attributed to vigilantes, and the president and police chief’s apparent support for it.

    Here are a couple quotes that won Duterte the popular election this year;

    Forget the laws on human rights. If I make it to the presidential palace, I will do just what I did as mayor. You drug pushers, hold-up men and do-nothings, you better go out. Because I’d kill you. […] I’ll dump all of you into Manila Bay, and fatten all the fish there.

    None of my children are into illegal drugs. But my order is, even if it is a member of my family, ‘kill him.’

    The plain spoken President has a warning for our own President Obama;

    Duterte warned President Obama on Monday not to question him about extrajudicial killings, or “son of a [expletive], I will swear at you” when they meet in Laos during a regional summit.

    Duterte has also had strong words for the Pope and for the UN in regards to his war against drugs.

  • Turk tanks in Syria

    The Associated Press reports that Turkey has sent 20 tanks and five armored personnel carriers into northern Syria. They are accompanying anti-Assad Syrian rebels as they sweep aside ISIS fighters along the Turkey-Syria frontier. Since the operation began on Saturday, seven towns have been liberated.

    IS, which once controlled hundreds of miles of territory along the Turkish border and used it to bring in foreign fighters and supplies, now only rules a 21-kilometer (13-mile) stretch of the frontier. The group has suffered a string of defeats in recent months in both Syria and Iraq.

    Some 5,000 U.S. and Turkish-backed Syrian rebels have crossed into northern Syria from Turkey to participate in the so-called Euphrates Shield operation, according to local journalist Adnan al-Hussein, who is embedded with the groups.

    Meanwhile, the US and Russia are in talks about cooperating to end the conflict in Syria, but they can’t seem to get there from here, according to AFP. Of course, John Kerry has the lead in negotiations with the Russians and we all know what a stellar negotiator Kerry is. Coupled with the Nobel-prize winning President, what could go wrong?

    The White House has been reluctant to tether Obama personally to a deal that could well fail.

    Earlier truces in Syria have rapidly deteriorated, and Obama warned Sunday that the US was approaching the talks “with some scepticism”.

    […]

    The White House is also highly reluctant to offer Putin a high-profile stage to gain international legitimacy after his backing for a regime that has used chemical weapons on civilians.

    Obama has steadfastly refused to meet Putin for official talks, instead talking with him in “pull-asides” at closed multilateral meetings.

  • Zinni and Mattis on the war against ISIS

    Zinni and Mattis on the war against ISIS

    last convoy out of Iraq

    The Washington Times reports that Generals James “Mad Dog” Mattis and Anthony Zinni were asked by Time Magazine for their opinions on the President’s war against the Islamic State. They were characteristically blunt;

    Mr. Mattis, who led U.S. Central Command from 2010 to 2013, told the publication that Mr. Obama’s efforts are “unguided by a sustained policy or sound strategy [and] replete with half-measures.”

    Mr. Zinni, who held the position from 1997 to 2000, was even more blunt.

    “It’s a bad strategy, it’s the wrong strategy, and maybe I would tell the president that he would be better served to find somebody who believes in it, whoever that idiot may be,” the former four-star general told the magazine.

    The whole Time article is here. The article, also characteristically for Time Magazine, makes excuses for the president by blaming the Syrian Civil War, the Iraqis and anything else they can find to distract us from the fact that this administration, while admitting that our involvement in Iraq and Syria are inevitable, are avoiding to take a lead or make any real commitment to winning the war.

    All this, rightly or wrongly, has tied U.S. hands. “There is no political will in the White House to even listen to serious recommendations from military commands,” says Derek Harvey, a retired Army military-intelligence colonel who spent much of his career in Iraq. “The original strategy explained by the President was barely adequate and even that was not resourced or executed well.”