Claymore sent us a link from Alex Jones and his Infowars nutbaggery in which Jones advocates for the arrest of Angelina Jolie for war crimes.
Drunk on the blood of Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and scores of other nations Jolie is now pushing military invasion to “help” Africa. She and her masters know full well that they are carrying out destabilization operations in the 3rd world so population can be reduced and resources stolen.
We need to call a spade a spade, this is part of a new branding rollout to launch a AFRICOM take over of Africa. This constitutes a crime against humanity and Jolie is a party to it and needs to be arrested along with other globalist that are using left cover to widen globalist empire.
Yeah, there is someone drunk on something in this discussion. Jolie has expressed opinions, much like the opinions expressed across the internet every minute of the day. Since Jolie doesn’t command any armed forces, other than her security detail, that I know of, I’m not sure how Jones can think anything she does rises to the level of a war crime. Unless, of course, Jones’ preferred presidential candidate, Ron Paul, has plans to name her to his cabinet.
I’m pretty sure that Africa is pretty low on our list of priorities, what with a real enemy to our own security. And if Jolie can be accused of crimes, I think Jones should be imprisoned for crimes against common sense and giving the human race a bad name. And this warrior for our civil liberties mimics the government of France with his assbaggery which prosecuted Bridgette Bardot for her opinions
An anonymous lurker left a press release in our inbox about Kokesh choking the last drop out of the Ron Paul campaign with a veterans’ march on the Republican Convention;
Adam Kokesh, Zakery Carter and Nathan Cox, all veterans of the Iraq war, released a statement today claiming that the mission of their newly formed Veterans for Liberty Super PAC is to ensure that Ron Paul is elected president. They are calling for veterans and active duty troops to join them at “FOB Domestic Defense” and to be present as a lobbying force for the duration of the convention.
Yeah, “Domestic Defense” like that’s even an issue with the Paul campaign.
Their goal is to convince delegates to the convention to ignore their constituencies and vote for Ron Paul – that makes complete sense. Someone who can’t even get the votes from his own party forced onto the ballot.
Following a successful march on the White House on President’s Day under the banner “Veterans for Ron Paul,” three Iraq War veterans have announced the formation of Veterans for Liberty Super PAC. This week, the committee announced the organization of a march on the Republican National Convention in August to lobby delegates to support Paul in the all-important second round of voting at what many are now certain will be a brokered forum.
Their “successful march on the White House“. Thousands pledged to come on Facebook, less than a thousand showed up and then after they weeded out the strap hangers, they had less than 500 actual veterans to march on the White House. That’s the definition of success, huh? Well, if their goal was to walk to the White House from the Washington Monument without falling down, I guess it was successful. But if their goal was to show overwhelming support for Ron Paul by veterans, I think it was successful not so much.
But, they’re just as relentless in their defeat as their candidate. The Washington Times points out that, despite the fact that Paul has failed to win a single state in the primary race even though the race is almost halfway to the finish, Paul is still optimistic;
On Tuesday, Mr. Paul put his effort into caucuses in North Dakota, Idaho and Alaska but managed just a second-place showing in the first and third-place showings in the other two.
In Fargo, N.D., Mr. Paul said Tuesday that his campaign has succeeded in placing his issues before voters.
“The momentum is building,” he said at his victory party.
Yeah, that momentum has been building since I started watching the Paulians four years ago and it’s resulted in one second place win in a two-man race in those four years. Maybe in another four years he can actually come in second in a three-man race.
I know that during this election season, you’ve wondered to yourself “how would MSG Nick Androski aka Soup Sandwich vote?”. Well, thanks to one of our alert readers, Joe, you don’t have to wonder anymore;
Yes, he’s still out there pretending that he’s not the most famous poser on the internet behind Jesse MacBeth. By the follow-on comments, it looks like he ain’t getting away with it anymore, either. Those Ron Paul claims that he has the support of military veterans are sounding a little hollow about now, aren’t they?
Claymore sends a link from Big Peace which reports what we already know; Code Pink and Veterans For Peace are coming our for Ron Paul. It was almost a year ago that we first reported Code Pink support for Ron Paul.
But, as we’ve said before, Ron Paul’s foreign policy isn’t that far from the anti-war Left, which is why he has attracted people like IVAW’s Adam Kokesh and Rethink Afghanistan’s Jake Diliberto. Of course, Kokesh and Code Pink have been tied to each other for ages, like when Adam hosted their Karaoke fundraiser over three years ago, and their recent adventures in dancing at the Jefferson Memorial. It’s a foreign policy that is naive and will intentionally make the US weaker. That Maoists and racists like Medea Benjamin are attracted to him isn’t that surprising;
It’s CODEPINK founder Medea Benjamin, who’s now on record saying: “I think Ron Paul has a remarkable position when it comes to U.S. foreign policy, and his call for no war on Iran is something that many of us support.”
Benjamin has latched onto Paul’s incessant criticism of the wars we’ve fought in Afghanistan and Iraq, and she claims that the Texas Congressman “has tremendous support among many young people who see that their futures are being frittered away by spending trillions of dollars on unjust wars.”
The article goes on to mention that Veterans For Peace, that POS stepchild of the old Vietnam Veterans Against the War which is chock full of phonies and pretenders like Ward Reilly and Doug Zachary. So I guess that’s more proof that most veterans support Ron Paul. As long as they don’t mind getting in bed with Medea Benjamin.
Yes, everything is a conspiracy to Gordon Duff, the guy who spent an entire 18 months of his life in the military forty years ago, yet understands the troops serving today well enough to tell Iranian State TV, PressTV, that our troops are “poorly disciplined” and ruled over by Christianists who have “taken over” the US military. His evidence, of course, is the Koran burning incident in Bagram Air Base. Odd philosophy for the Senior editor of a place called “Veterans Today” to subscribe his publication to, eh?
He claims that the military still slavishly clings to Bush-era Islamophobia, you know the same Islamophobia that led that President to call Islam a “religion of peace” and to be mocked for that phrase at every turn by his own party.
I don’t know how Duff or anyone else can find value in his mindless yammering if the only venue he can find is Iranian state TV, especially when it’s clear to anyone with two brain cells they can rub together that Iran is using this incident to camouflage it’s own nuclear program.
And if that’s not enough Duff crackpottery for you, go read how the 1973 War was a plot hatched by Henry Kissinger, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Sharon of Israel to take over Syria. If you can take the beating on your braincells long enough, you’ll discover that Rupert Murdoch and Newt Gingrich figure in the plot, too.
OK, show of hands, how many of you have this idiotic facebook disclaimer up on your page:
Warning–any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photo’s or any other “picture” art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law. Without reservation U.C.C. § 1-308.
Look, I don’t mean to be a dick (except to you Paulians, Oathkeepers and assorted other cranial rectal inversion enthusiasts) but the above stated disclaimer, (hereinafter “horseshit”) has as much legal bearing as reading the peanut and corn splatters in a port-a-john like a Rorschach test.
There is so much going on here, I am not sure where to even start. It’s like I once heard Rush Limbaugh wonder in his book, where he was trying to figure out who the first dude that licked a toad and got high. Like, how did that dude brag to his buddies that he found a way to get high by tonguing an amphibian? “Oh, I slipped and fell and my tongue went into this swamp creature?” Likewise, who was the keen legal mind that first thought up the concept that a social networking site, wherein you detail the mundane minutia of your day for the hundreds of folks that are your friends is somehow “private and legally privileged and confidential information”? I’d sooner lick the toad than claim birthright to that one.
Anyway, let’s start with the legal authority referenced, U.C.C. § 1-308. Must be legit, it has that squiggly line shit and some numbers…well, no, not really. You see, the U.C.C. is the “Uniform Commercial Code.” It’s not a law, it’s a bunch of drafts on what the law should look like from the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) and the American Law Institute (ALI). (Your standard wiki link.) The second obvious problem is that it deals with the commercial code, which has jack shit to do with keeping the Feds from snooping in your shit. The specific language of that section of not-law, states:
§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.
(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice,” “under protest,” or the like are sufficient.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.
So let’s review….the legal authority they cite is not a law, it deals with commercial transactions not criminal or 4th Amendment type stuff, and has to do with the performance in a contract. Which parts of all that horseshit apply to Facebook?
So yesterday a wackadoodle shot up a school in Ohio, as you all know. And the pictures they used were all from dickhead’s Facebook. Now, how many of you out there think that had he had this disclaimer up, then no one would be allowed to use it? Not CBS News, not the evil Feds, no one….For all of you, here’s your sign:
I don’t want to get all legal on you, but “private and legally privileged and confidential information” actually has a meaning in the law, and it doesn’t apply to shit you toss up on your Facebook. For instance, my discussion this morning about how my wife noted that Jabba the Hutt looks like a poop….yeah, not privileged. Now, there is the spousal communications privilege and the spousal/marital testimonial privilege, but when you disclose that stuff to someone else, it is no longer privileged. So, my wife’s thoughts on Hutt/Fecal similarities conveyed to me in the car might be confidential to us, but when I put them up on my Facebook for Blackfive to call me a Ghey, they lose their inherent privileged status.
By overusing [disclaimers], lawyers may be undermining the effectiveness of disclaimers in protecting the confidential or privileged nature of the information in the e-mail in the (hopefully) rare event that an e-mail is misdirected (or inadvertently produced in discovery). In a recent case, Scott v. Beth Israel Medical Center Inc., 847 N.Y.S.2d 436, 444 (2007), the court refused to find that a series of e-mails were privileged just because they contained a disclaimer that was found in every e-mail sent by the plaintiff. Lawyers are also training the world to ignore disclaimers and privilege warnings, which is precisely what we don’t want people to do.
The takeaway: if the disclaimer makes you feel warm and fuzzy, by all means keep it on your Facebook page. But, if you think that it will actually serve the purpose that it seems to be intended for, you have bigger problems that the Gov’t monitoring your Facebook page.
Yeah, so I told Adam Weinstein that I hated his lying ass when he “friended” me on Facebook, and that it would blow up in his face someday. It only took a few weeks for him to get his eyebrows singed. He posted this shit that he wrote as Mother Jones’ “national security writer” this morning;
Weinstein perpetuates the lie that we’ve talked about several times that the proof that the military supports Ron Paul because more people who identify themselves as members of the military give money to Paul than any other candidate. That’s complete horseshit, because any goober off of the street can give money to the Paul campaign can identify themselves as members of the military on the form. Given the history of Paulians and their internet tomfoolery, I wouldn’t put it past them to have an organized effort to do just that in this case.
Weinstein goes on to “report” that the reason most members of the military support Paul is because they’re anti-war…and who does he interview to prove that point? Adam Kokesh of IVAW and Jake Diliberto of Rethink Afghanistan – both of them are anti-war, always have been since they found a political niche for themselves.
And Weinstein’s proof for military support of Paul was the “Veterans for Ron Paul” rally from this past weekend that I attended. As I reported, there were less than a thousand people at the rally, then the group weeded out veterans from non-veterans for their march on the White House and had barely 500. I didn’t see Weinstein write about the actual numbers. So out of millions of veterans in this country, because 500 showed up, we’re all Ron Paul supporters. Fuck you, Adam.
Then Weinstein makes the most egregious statement of all;
Soldiers tend to see Paul as understanding the pressures they face better than the other candidates because he’s the only one in the group who served in uniform, as a flight surgeon in the Air Force and Air National Guard during the Vietnam era. The libertarian’s service gives him “street cred,” Kwiatkowski noted.
Yeah, with my two decades of service in the infantry, the person who knows me best is the Air Force OB/GYN. I don’t even think Adam, a Navy veteran, can identify with me. But mostly because he’s a lying, talentless hack.
Yeah, we all know that the media wants Ron Paul to be the Republican candidate because he can never win against Obama, but Paul is a racist crackpot and his followers are even more crackpottish. To throw members of the military involuntarily into that clown car ride is beyond the pale.
UPDATE: By the way , be sure to read the comments at the article. Supposedly because you all support Ron Paul it’s proof that you’re all racists. Did I say “Fuck you, Adam” already?
This isn’t the best source. I never link to World Net Daily, but in this case, I think it warrants a link. They report that Ron Paul is considering the anti-SVA, Kokesh-hugger, “Judge” Andrew Napolitano for his VP;
Paul was asked the question about whom he would like on a White House ticket with him at a recent public meeting, and he said, “One time somebody asked me who I’d have to consider and the name Judge Napolitano jumps right out at me.”
When Napolitano had Kokesh on his show a couple of times, I wrote to him and told him the background on Kokesh, but I’m sure he knew. Either way, I got no response (Fox News people always answer my emails, so I’m spoiled) and Kokesh kept showing up on Napolitano’s show. That’s when I quit watching. Now his show has been cancelled.
Even Oathkeepers disavowed Kokesh and IVAW when we raised a stink a few years back, but not Napolitano. Arrogant POS.
Then yesterday he was on Fox and Friends talking about Stolen Valor and the Supreme Court. Firstly, he was wrong on the day that they would be discussing the issue – it’s today not yesterday. And secondly, he kept defending Alvarez’ uniform calling it a “costume” as if Alvarez never meant it to be a uniform, but some colorful clown clothes.
So, yeah, Paul, go ahead and name Napolitano as your VP and see how nasty I can get.
