This ain't Hell, but you can see it from here

Category: Liberals suck

  • Sam Adams, still kicking ass.

    Sam Adams, still kicking ass.

    In case you missed it, the owner of the Boston Brewing Company and makers of Sam Adams Boston Lager had some things to say about President Trump:

    Boston Beer Co.’s chairman, Jim Koch, is not one to shy away from speaking his mind.

    He proved it again Tuesday night. The founder of Boston’s best-known brewery told President Trump at a dinner in New Jersey that the corporate tax cut the administration successfully pushed last year has played a major role in making his company more competitive with foreign competitors (that he didn’t name). Going forward, Koch vowed, Boston Beer is “going to kick their ass.”

    You can watch his video and read the article from the Boston Globe HERE.  There used to be an American brewing company that had some horses but they were bought by snow flakes from who knows where.    Next time you are out and about try ordering a Sam Adams, because you’re American and not some Euro commie pinko.

     

  • Frederick Mendoza’s death sentence vacated because of PTSD.

    Frederick Mendoza’s death sentence vacated because of PTSD.

     

    From a 2008 article

    Rita Kremberg, originally from New York, lived in Las Vegas for about nine years with her husband, who died in 2002. They didn’t have any children but a friend testified that Kremberg and her husband had been active in raising money for medical centers for kids. Her friend, Gene Fogleman, said Kremberg was afraid of the crime in New York City and thought she’d be safer in Las Vegas.

    Kremberg was found dead at her apartment on March 3, 2007. She was naked from the waist down and had multiple stab wounds. Her attacker didn’t steal anything from her apartment.

    Las Vegas detectives found Mendoza’s fingerprints on a liquor bottle found inside Kremberg’s apartment. Mendoza denied knowing Kremberg or ever being in her apartment when homicide detectives asked him about it. He had lived at the Destination Senior Living facility about three months.  Mendoza’s DNA was found under Kremberg’s fingernails and on her genitals, said county prosecutor Robert Daskas.

    Daskas also told the jury that Mendoza had a prior conviction for a sexual crime in Las Vegas. In 1977, he met a woman at a hotel bar, followed her to her hotel room, choked her and raped her, Daskas said.  The victim in the case wanted to press charges against Mendoza because she believed he would kill the next time, Daskas said.

    Mendoza pleaded guilty to battery with the intent to commit rape in 1978 and was out of prison by 1979.

    Now a Judge has vacated his death sentence because he caught the PTSD in the NAM.

    A Las Vegas judge on Thursday vacated the death penalty for a Vietnam War veteran who raped and killed a 68-year-old woman more than 10 years ago.  Frederick Mendoza, now 71, pleaded guilty in 2008 in the slaying of Rita Kremberg. But he immediately appealed his sentence, which was handed down by a jury after a penalty hearing.  Under a deal with prosecutors made this month, Mendoza agreed that he would waive any challenge to his conviction and not appeal a sentence of life without parole.

    Mendoza had post-traumatic stress disorder after serving more than 18 months as a Marine in Vietnam, said his lawyer, Jamie Resch, who called the jury’s sentence “fundamentally unreliable.”

    If lawyers either wearing a robe or not decide these things, why waist the time of 12 citizens who are “fundamentally unreliable.”

    “This hard-fought and extremely rare agreement helps treat a combat veteran fairly and protects the state’s interest by ensuring Mr. Mendoza lives out his remaining days in prison,” said Resch, who had not spoken with Mendoza since District Judge Michael Villani signed off on the agreement. “I’m certain he’s very happy with this. He’s older and just wants to live out his days with the most freedom he can as an inmate.”

    Can I get a show of hands…how many people care about what Mendoza wants?  It’s because of lawyers in robes like Mikey Villani that this animal was let back on the streets after a year in the 70’s.   A jury of his peers said the man should have been executed years ago, he should have no say in anything at this point.  PTSD is no excuse for any crime.

    Kremberg was sexually assaulted and stabbed 18 times by Mendoza, and her throat was slit with a steak knife in March 2007, authorities said. The two were residents at Destinations Spring Valley, a senior-living facility near Jones Boulevard and Flamingo Road.

     

     

  • Defense Secretary Mattis sending personnel to North Korea

    Defense Secretary Mattis sending personnel to North Korea


    I have seen that look before…something is about to get done.

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. military is “absolutely” considering the possibility of sending personnel to North Korea for the first time in more than a decade to search for additional remains of U.S. troops from the Korean war, U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said on Friday.

    I ponder several things right off the bat:

    What kind of hysterical hyperbole will the Loony Left come up with to spin a dark side to this?  Is President Trump colluding with Rocket Man to build Time Shares?

    How much would we be  paying for the return of our fallen if  Whats her Name  was running things?  If  That Other Guy sent billions to Iran for…sorry it slips my mind what we paid for, how much would that crowd be willing to pay these days?  Maybe its just me, but it seems all of this winning is taking a toll on Certain People.

    Like him or hate him,  its becoming impossible to not acknowledge the man for accomplishing an awful lot in a short time.  Maybe his button really is bigger…I mean, look at those hands.

     

     

  • Gun-fag Dan Helmer compares Trump with bin Laden

    Gun-fag Dan Helmer compares Trump with bin Laden

    A few weeks ago we discussed Dan Helmer, Virginia Congressional Democrat candidate, when he bought an AR-style rifle at a gun show.

    He says, “Last week, I went to a gun show to find out how easy it is to buy an assault rifle. What I found was terrifying – it took less time to buy a weapon of war than a cup of coffee.”

    This week he’s saying that President Trump is a threat to our national security, as bad as bin Laden;

    Of course, Gun-fag doesn’t clarify what he means by his charge that Trump is a threat to our Democracy – he’s just playing to the media, vacuous little prick that he is. His campaign manager, quoted by USA Today, doesn’t clarify his meaning at all;

    In response, Helmer campaign manager Bonnie Krenz said, “What is abhorrent is the way this president has failed to uphold his oath of office.” Krenze said the campaign stands by the ad and disputed the notion that there was anything about that warrants condemnation.

    […]

    “The ad shows that Helmer will have the courage to say what’s right, rather than what’s easy,” Krenz said. “He is the strongest candidate on the issues that matter most to the district, including healthcare and gun safety. And he’s ready to uphold his oath to defend the Constitution by serving as a check on President Trump.”

    No, what the ad shows is that Helmer is an empty suit. Comparing the president to a terrorist that masterminded the deaths of more than 3,000 Americans is just ignorant posturing. Boob bait for the Bubbas. Bill Clinton was a Rhodes scholar, too – that makes me wonder what they’re teaching.

    By the way, the term “gun-fag” is my label for veterans who want to trash the Second Amendment, ignoring their oath to protect and defend the Constitution. Helmer is their king. After my last post about him, he blocked me from commenting on his Facebook page.

  • We’re Extremists? What??? Seriously…?

    I knew that if I looked hard enough and far enough, I would find something interesting, and here it is.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/a-little-rebellion-now-an_b_253161.html

    Read the first paragraph:   “If you take part in protest rallies, voice your discontent through picket signs, or disrupt events with yelling or intermittent shouts, then you are likely a right-wing extremist or a member of an angry mob, and you must be silenced.”

    What have we been seeing since January 20, 2017? What would those obnoxious children do if they were told they are the right-wing extremists? The horror!!

    Almost nine years ago, in the face of the ACA, President Obama took this chilling message one step further, actually encouraging Americans to report on those who were spreading “disinformation about health insurance reform.”  Anything being done publicly that hinted at disagreement with that policy was labeled ‘mob action’. As the author, James Whitehead, says the Obama administration was trying to stop a resistance movement. We all knew the ACA was going to do more harm than good and we were right.

    And who was He, The One, to say we could not resist it? In 2013, because he allowed sequestration to go into effect instead of doing the job he was hired to do, he pissed off people all over the country in many, many ways, one of them being blocking access to national monuments by putting out crowd barriers, and national parks by blocking views from public highways, just because he could. Remember that?

    Well, here we are, not quite nine long years later and we’re facing the same thing, except that this time, the mob action is coming from the left side of the political fence, from that part of the Leftreds loaded with spoiled brat children who think that somehow they are entitled to “stuff” without earning any of it. As with bodaprez, the Leftreds leave no stone untouched (eeeww!) to try to put the blame on the Right, when in fact, we have little if anything to do with any of this. They lie, they cheat, they milk it for everything they can get, they fall all over themselves to grab the spotlight and almost pound the table with a shoe, like Krushchev once did at the UN, to emphasize that we, the peace-loving, patriotic, country bumpkins that we are, carry the entire load of blame for the behavior of crazy people who have nothing to do with us. False crocodile tears aside, it is slowly but surely becoming a sort of Theater of the Absurd.

    We, as a group, cannot afford to be complacent. We cannot expect peace and quiet unless we make it happen, and if we don’t keep a watchful eye on the horizon at 360°, something like this social “phenomenon” will show up again on our doorsteps and try to run over us roughshod, at the same time. Because, you see, in the view of these children who’ve been on this planet for less time than my aging Himmie, we don’t have any rights any more, or at least, we shouldn’t.

    The issue this time is not about resisting the government’s edicts, which we do all the time, anyway. It’s about facing another episode of disruption, this time by sloppy, obnoxious, ill-mannered, virtue-signaling, attention-whoring, nearly illiterate teens whose understanding of reality is tenuous, at best. It does not help that greedy, grasping, self-absorbed politicians egg them on by pandering to them while trying to scare law-abiding citizens like us. Most of them aren’t even old enough to vote, and my money says they won’t vote unless they get paid to do it.

    However, the Twigs who gathered here and there on Sunday in protest of GUN (violence) have no staying power. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Rien. They had a good point – that the violence is out of control – but just who is it that is committing the majority of these violent acts?

    Well, frankly, they are. And they know that they are the perps, especially in the Parkland case, but they have to try to hide it by doing that silly virtue signaling so that they’re separate from The Mob.

    The shooter in at a ball park in Alexandria, VA, last year was not a GOPer. He was a leftwing political activist, remember? The Parkland shooter was a mental case with frequent calls and complaints against him, remember? And what happened to Florida’s Baker Act there? And the Pulse nightclub shooter? His wife helped him in his effort to commit mass murder and is now on trial for that. His father admired the Taliban. I don’t see any right-wingers in there, do you?

    These tweenies howling for “safety” wanted our attention. They always want attention. All those street demonstrations last winter were attention-whoring, nothing else.

    I don’t think they can outdo what they did this time, because it is not really about guns. It’s about throwing tantrums and “crying” on camera to get attention. If this is supposed to be some sort of resistance movement, its legs are stumpy and weak. It has no staying power. In fact, I have no idea what they’re resisting. There is no verifiable message there. They just tack themselves onto the most recent “thing” and go with that. And some of them can cry on cue. What actresses they are!

    Well, now they’ve got our attention. All eyes are on them, and it is not in a positive way. Their façade of virtue-signaling is cracking and peeling and falling apart. The facts about their fabrications and excuses keep coming to light in what one can only term a completely embarrassing way. When the lights are out, the microphones are shut off and the TV cameras are gone, no one is paying attention to anything they say or do.

    So what are they going to do next?

    Just keep your eyes peeled and ears open. I would not put anything past them.

  • Read It and Weep, Gungrabbers

    I don’t know if it’s a good title or not, but maybe it will get the attention of the dumber people on the planet.

    The most recent attempts by the Leftred media to distort something into hysterics failed them again. I see the same idiocy being exposed at websites devoted to exposing the fraud in so-called climate science, which has deteriorated and declined into a pseudo-religion aimed at manipulating the minds of the uninformed into following false paths. There is a strange thing going on there, having to do with controlling what people “believe” in the most Medieval sense. The propaganda rhetoric wears thin when you can’t keep the home fires burning.

    In our most recent episode of Strange Violence in February, the quarreling and phony virtue signaling were rampant. The false narratives being pushed by major media networks and newspapers in what appeared to be an effort to create a theater of blood and gore was an over-the-top attempt to stir the fears and angst of the viewing public. But when there is no blood and gore, as in the more recent Maryland event, when the bad guy turned out to be a teen who stole his father’s gun to go after a girl who broke up with him, or when a serial bomber blows himself to bits before he gets caught, then they have nothing to turn into a bloody spectacle that suits their need to push a political agenda, i.e., take away what are rightfully and legally your possessions and civil rights with no due process.

    Would these same fearful people like it if they were muzzled by the same methods they seek to inflict on others? Perhaps we should give that a try. After all, the Reich in Hitler’s Germany controlled what the press was allowed to print, which is why news about the death camps never reached the average German.

    It was the same in the Soviet Union. Izvestia was the daily broadsheet newspaper in Russia. It was the newspaper of record in the Soviet Union from 1917 until the dissolution of the USSR in 1991. The word “izvestiya“in Russian means “delivered messages”. It also means “disambiguation”. It was the Soviets’ major propaganda rag, along with Pravda, the other official news rag of the Soviets, starting in 1912. Pravda (“Truth”) was a Russian broadsheet newspaper, formerly the official newspaper of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, when it was one of the most influential papers in the country with a circulation of 11 million. Since these were the only news resources available and were controlled by the Soviet government, only state-approved info was published in them. The counterpoint to all of that was Radio Free Europe, which broadcast news about the world outside the Iron Curtain to all those countries behind it, including East Germany.

    If you see a pattern of deceit in the stories presented by many media outlets, you are correct. Distort the real stories, make stuff up to scare the uninformed and naive, stifle civil rights, violate Constitutional laws, pretentiously parade children and/or victims of some terrible event in front of a camera to promote this obviously falsehood-laden objective, all to suit your own agenda – well, it’s all there, but it isn’t working quite so well these days.

    I have seldom been as disgusted with so-called reporters as I have been since mid-February, when the Leftred media’s hastily-concocted Theater of Blood fell apart within a 32-hour period as the verifiable facts came to light, more and more quickly. The result was that the Leftred media looked exactly like what they are: a bunch of amateurs barely out of junior high school pretending to be important.

    The Leftreds in news media have been counting on having control of it all for some time now. Unfortunately for them, it is not working quite as well as they had hoped. They have engaged in continuing efforts to act as master manipulators of the news and of opinions, and yet, for every exaggeration and false statement that they have concocted out of whole cloth, their opposition has filed a full story with all the facts available and shot down their tales of Jack the Fake Giant Killer and his Fake Exploding Beans. Every damned time!!

    Why are they failing? Their own vanity that sends them dashing to the internet and instant media outlets with angst-ridden horror stories of death and destruction has blinded them to the mere fact that the same media outlets are available to anyone who has more facts and better information and takes the time to present it correctly, without the speculation, the hysterics and the hyperbole, without the fabricated stories, and without the desperate need to be in control of the minds of public viewers.

    Yesterday (3/24/2018), a quickly-planned protest took place, addressing everything about gun violence except for the fact that many of the items howled about (e.g., universal background checks) are already in place, and the real problem is caused by people, not by inanimate objects.  800,000++ people, most of them reportedly under the age of 18, went to Washington, DC for this protest.. In Chicago, about 85,000 people (mostly under 18) held their own protest. (It did not look like that many, frankly. I’ve seen the crowds at Lollapalooza.)

    Per the news reports, other protests took place in other cities. There were protests held in Houston, NYC, Boston, etc., but 800++ cities around the world? Berlin, Paris, Hong Kong and London only count as four. Where’s the list? Some of those protest had 10 or 15 people attending. Wow. I’ve had more people at a spontaneous Friday PM dinner after work. And frankly, only one resource noted that a pro-gun protest took place in Salt Lake City.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/03/24/aerial-images-around-world-shows-scope-march-our-lives/455891002/

    Sorry, but if these protests take place outside the USA borders, I don’t give a crap about them. They are not involved in either our legal processes or our laws, nor should they be. If the media cannot produce an accurate tally of people, even by square yard count, or a true list of those 800++ cities, then it’s just more of their idiot scare tactics, which are repeatedly failing. I can quickly get a list of the 10 largest cities in the world, and a count of cities worldwide (4,416) , so where’s that list of 800 cities with protests?

    I want to be clear on this issue.

    It is absolutely appropriate to protest the violence.

    That is the real issue, not some inanimate object that seems targeted by the brainwashed who believe that guns are somehow responsible for these things, but fail to acknowledge that it is people who abuse them. There is no doubt in my mind that there is a problem with people who misuse these inanimate objects. Need I remind anyone that in that hostage event at a French grocery store yesterday, the French policeman was stabbed, as well as shot? Why is no one blaming the knife used to stab the policeman? Must I add that in the Austin violence last week, homemade explosives were used to kill people, and the bomber was killed by his own instrument?

    The real message – that it is violence, not guns, which is the problem – is not being heard at all. Violence is caused by people who are out of control, with no one stopping them before it starts. They can and do use anything available to cause destruction.

    When does that sink in? WHEN????

    The people who are promoting the wrong attitude want this narrative of fear of an inanimate object to be the issue, first and foremost.

    We who know better and disagree with that narrative must ensure that this disinformation campaign to cloud the truth becomes weaker and weaker and finally, fizzles to nothing by speaking the truth: – that is it people who are the cause of violence.

    Accordingly, I’m providing links to three articles by different authors, in separate publications, including a 1994 article in The Atlantic when the Brady Bill was signed, providing various viewpoints on why gun control laws do not work.

    Brazilians are leaning toward increasing access to guns to combat increasing gun violence.  https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/03/28/472157969/brazil-has-nearly-60-000-murders-and-it-may-relax-gun-laws

    Brazil is the murder capital of the world, with 60,000 people dying per year, per Bloomberg News article 2018-3-20. Brazilians are now supporting access to guns for self-defense. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-20/in-world-s-murder-capital-brazilians-are-ready-to-buy-some-guns

    The false promise of gun control, from The Atlantic in 1994: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/03/the-false-promise-of-gun-control/306744/

    “Gun-control laws don’t work. What is worse, they act perversely. While legitimate users of firearms encounter intense regulation, scrutiny, and bureaucratic control, illicit markets easily adapt to whatever difficulties a free society throws in their way.” – article.

    It’s not the guns that are the problem, you incredible morons.

    It’s not the means of destruction that bear the blame, you despicable cretins.

    It’s the people using them.

    Now what are YOU going to do about that?

  • The Liberal Zombie Manifesto

    President Trump accurately identified the parties, on both sides, that were involved with violence. This was in the aftermath of the Charlottesville, VA, incident. The media, ignoring violent leftists, vilified the president for not carrying their narrative. In their eyes, only one side deserved this type of label and condemnation.

    Violent leftists were also guilty for the violence. Many in the media; however, deliberately disregarded them or deemphasized their involvement and impact.

    Shift to reporting on actual or assumed scandals and you’ll see a similar script. Liberal talking heads, and reporters, run fool’s errands regarding President Trump’s “scandals”. Yet, calls for pursuing actual scandals, by Democrats, are dismissed, swept under the rug, ignored, half baked, not seriously done, etc.

    Enter the Liberal Zombie manifesto. I also got this from the old Protest Warrior forums. As with the previous article, I did some major editing and adjustments. I also updated this as the years went by.

    The above photo is one of the protest signs that Protest Warrior used. One way they’d use this sign is to “blend in” with a group of people who were demanding gun control.

    Without further ado…

    I don’t pay for my mistakes or misfortunes.

    1. If I…

    a. Never went to college…

    b. Was born into a poor family…

    c. Am lazy…

    d. Am unmotivated…

    e. Wish to portray myself as a victim of any situation or series of events…

    It’s other people’s responsibility to extricate me from my own mess.

    2. Receiving more Social Security than I deserve is great because it rewards me for failing to put money away when I was younger.

    3. Abortion is great because I should never have to deal with the consequences of my failure to use the following:

    a. Birth control.
    b. Common sense.
    c. Keep the gates closed to irresponsible partners.

    4. Government subsidized paid abortion is a right that I have for not being responsible in the first place.

    NOTE: Please see Manifesto rules concerning my not having to pay for my mistakes. And society’s responsibility to get me out of the mess that I get myself into.

    Affirmative Action is great.

    1. If I’m a minority, I can get a job with substandard qualifications over someone that’s more qualified than me for the job. It’s not about who is qualified or not, it’s about giving me the job because I want it.

    2. If I’m white, I’ll support affirmative action to the hilt if it doesn’t affect me.

    The best thing about affirmative action is that it allows us to make protected groups think we’re helping them. Instead, we’re keeping them down by allowing them to take the path of least resistance. “Gain with no pain” is the rule. It’s easier to sway them with fake news this way.

    3. Racism against whites is OK. Racism against minorities is horrible.

    a. If whites kill a member of a protected group, that’s a hate crime. If a member of a protected group kills a white person, it’s simply a misunderstanding of the races.

    b. If you fail to hire a member of a protected group, you’re a racist. If you fail to hire a white person, you’re doing your job in “hiring the most qualified person” for the task.

    c. If you call a white person a thief, chances are he’s actually a thief. If you call an illegal immigrant a thief, you’re a racist, even if he’s a thief.

    d. If a black kid is kidnapped and drugs are involved, only report the kidnapping. If a white kid is kidnapped and drugs are involved, report everything.

    Gender discrimination only occurs when applied against a woman.

    1. If a man hits his woman, it’s domestic violence. If a man didn’t hit his woman, but she claimed that he did, it’s still domestic violence.

    2. If a woman hits her man, it’s domestic disturbance. Don’t worry, her hitting her man is her man’s fault. Scientific data proving that domestic violence is equally perpetrated by both genders is pure baloney. Numbers based on battered women’s shelters should be taken as gospel.

    Cherry picked “evidence” is better than data obtained via the scientific method.

    3. If a husband murders his wife in the heat of rage, prosecute him to the maximum extent of the law. If a wife murders her husband in the heat of rage, it’s due to self-defense. Even if he’d been long asleep when she had to “defend” herself…

    4. If the father kills the kids in the heat of rage, prosecute him to the full extent of the law, he should have controlled his anger in the first place.

    5. If the mother kills the kids because of post-partum depression, it’s because her husband subjected her to too much stress and she cracked. She wasn’t herself.

    NOTE: If this starts to get confusing, remember… If a man does something wrong, he failed to exercise responsibility over his behavior. If a woman does something wrong, it’s because of some external extenuating circumstance “out of her control”. If a man is involved, it’s the man’s fault.

    You can’t say I’m wrong here.

    1. If you think I’m wrong, you’re just exposing your own hatred, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness.

    2. There should be no restrictions on behavior or restriction against consumption of certain substances. There should be no restrictions on censorship in free media.

    3. Accepting a lifestyle only applies to lifestyles my friends and I accept. It’s okay to be intolerant of lifestyles that embrace conservatism, moderation, class, and modesty. I refuse to acknowledge the inherent hypocrisy in this.

    4. If our views of what’s “right” and what’s “wrong” came from different upbringing… Then what’s “right” and “wrong” for me is different from what’s “right” and “wrong” for you.

    5. There’s no universal rights or wrongs… There’s no absolute evil… My sense of what’s “right” and “wrong” always trumps yours.

    Drugs are good. Smoking is bad. I’ll defend that to the death!

    Censorship applies only when I want it to.

    1. Say you give me a forum and an outlet. I subsequently make a donkey out of myself.

    a. If you call attention to that fact, you’re infringing on my freedom of speech.

    2. If you refuse to buy my albums or watch my movies because of my political rants, you’re infringing my freedom of speech.

    3. If we deny you of a forum and an outlet, we’re not denying you your freedom of speech. We’re just silencing bigotry and hatred.

    Abortion is good. The death penalty is bad. I’ll defend that to the death to!

    I don’t like facts because they go against most of what I believe in.

    1. If you destroy my drivel and tripe with the facts, you’re just expressing your opinion.

    a. For the sake of not hurting anybody’s feelings, there’s no right or wrong when we debate. Facts are what my emotions say they are.

    b. The empirical evidence you present against my drivel is just your opinion.

    c. Facts are what my emotions say they are.

    d. Being right is in the eye of the beholder.

    e. If you refuse to see my emotions as fact, you’re narrow minded and stuck in a “black and white” mindset.

    Changes in society should fit my tastes.

    1. I’ve suffered a traumatic experience in my life and I have not gotten over it. Instead of changing myself and moving on, I’m going to change the world to fit my perception. It’s easier for me if the world did the hard work of changing to accommodate my habits and beliefs.

    2. Change is good if it fits my perceptions. Evidence that this change is harmful should be dismissed as…

    a. Conservatives’ refusal to be inclusive…

    b. Right wing religious extremism…

    c. Denying a group their rights…

    d. Discrimination…

    e. Refusing to share…

    Corruption by liberals, whether moral or political, will be ignored.

    1. If you call me out on my corruption, you’re a bigot consumed with hatred.

    2. If I’m minority and you call me out on my corruption, you’re a racist.

    3. If I’m a woman and you call me out on my corruption, I’ll accuse you of being misogynist.

    4. If I’m Muslim and you call me out on my corruption, I’ll accuse you of Islamophobia.

    5. If I’m gay, and you call me on me out on my corruption, I’ll accuse you of homophobia.

    I hate guns… There shouldn’t be guns.

    1. If nobody had guns, they’d be unable to stop me from stealing their property and rights. That’s my ultimate goal.

    2. We need to think of the safety of the person that’s going to rob your house or rape your loved one. Robbers and rapists are people too.

    Exception: Only the government, representatives of the government, and my security, shall have guns.

    I attended some liberal arts school in a left-wing university and got a degree in Postmodern Feminist Studies or some such horse poop.

    1. As a result of this useless degree, I consider myself a foreign policy, political, historical, economic, and crime expert. I know better than military veterans, policemen, and other residents of the real world.

    a. I also know how to raise and educate your kids better than you do.

    b. Let’s make this simple so that you’ll know what I am talking about.

    Say I have a degree in basket weaving. Say you’re a fire fighter and we’re arguing about disaster operations dealing with fire. Say, in this argument, you’re wiping my rear end all over the floor. Even under those conditions, I’m right and you’re wrong.

    My watching fire fighters (military, police, or other profession) in action on the news, or in the movies, has more weight over what those professionals experience firsthand. Even though I may never have access to the information they have access to.

    Diversity is great only when we’re talking about having both genders, almost all races, most religions, and almost all ethnic groups being represented.

    1. Diversity does not apply to those with conservative views, to Christians, and to white males.

    a. Don’t ask why, because my explanations of this concept always tend to be circular in nature. So we’ll just skip to the end and I’ll call you a bigot, racist, narrow minded, xenophobe, misogynist, NAZI, etc., right now, to save time.

    Or, I could be nice about it and just tell you that you’re wrong.

    b. The absence of Christians, Republicans, white males, conservatives, etc. does not constitute a lack of diversity. Don’t ask about this, either you narrow-minded racist.

    All religions-especially Christianity and Judaism-are bad.

    1. Crazy Muslim radicals are the only exception to this rule.

    2. “Separation of church and state” means “A churchless state.”

    3. “Freedom of religion” means “Freedom from having to acknowledge the right to practice religion. It also means the freedom from having religious morals and values.”

    4. Atheists that follow a moral code are lumped in with the religious people.

    5. We don’t care for atheists that support religious rights for others, who are conservative, who are white, etc.

    6. All mention of religion should be kept out of schools, even if it means revising the Declaration of Independence, fudging the facts about the first Thanksgiving, or suing the school if winter break is called Christmas Break.

    I will not accept any historical-primary source evidence-that the Founding Fathers were Christians and embraced Christianity.

    I’ll quote Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, John Adams, etc. completely out of context to make my case against religion and against war.

    Aggression is never good… It’s never okay to use force.

    1. Instead of using force to defend yourself, concede immediately. I’ve no concept of honor or national pride.

    2. I’d rather jeopardize my own family, economy, and security, in lieu of using force. It’s never okay to use force! Now, when my security is present, that’s a different story.

    The military should be eliminated.

    1. They’re all a bunch of brainwashed savages anyway who parrot what their bosses say.

    2. They just joined for education benefits and for the money (after we severely cut their budget).

    3. We totally support the troops, but not the military, its mission success, or its Commander in Chief-unless he is a Democrat.

    What’s that? Pointing out indefensible contradictions in my ideology? Why you fascist narrow minded racist, misogynist, xenophobe, Islamophob! Did you have to point that out to me with one or more big, long, multi paragraphed posts when you could’ve said it with less?

    I’ll never accept the fact that sometimes, people just get offended.

    That’s life in my world. In my perfect world, nobody-except conservatives-would ever be offended.

    I refuse to follow the rules of logic or rhetoric.

    Proper debate rules do not apply to me. I can argue however I want; please see my rules on what constitutes fact.

    I must win every argument even if I have to pull things out of my arse to do it!

    1. You must cooperate with me by not pointing out the errors of my argument.

    2. You must cooperate with me by using less words. Remember, less is more when you argue, more is more when it’s my turn.

    3. You must cooperate with me by conceding to me without requiring me to do the same.

    4. If I can’t win, I’ll resort to insults such as calling you a racist, anti-gay, right wing… By giving you a name that matches “Fantasy land” or any other false and derogatory descriptions.

    I refuse to acknowledge the validity of an analogy or metaphor.

    When you use them, I’ll make sarcastic remarks and/or give myself some omnipotent powers in dealing with the analogy.

    Say we’re arguing about gun control. Then you use an analogy. You point out the fact that gun free zones, and other gun laws didn’t stop mass shooting. Then you ask me if criminals, who didn’t follow the current laws in the books, would all of a sudden follow these new laws. I’ll tell you that we’re not talking about psychology. I might talk about some cartoon character. I’ll get emotional with you. Or I’ll simply conduct the verbal equivalent of evasive maneuvers.

    The best way to react when my statement has been disproved is for me to repeat myself.

    1. You’ll eventually get tired and give up, which is my actual goal. If you don’t, I’ll simply call you names.

    2. If you don’t fall for my ploy, I’ll accuse you of repeating yourself and ignore the fact that you’re doing so because I’m repeating myself.

    a. You see, only I can repeat myself. You can’t.

    Censoring conservative dialog is not censorship but preventing hate speech.

    1. If you’re minority, and you’re debating as a conservative, you’ll be labeled as a sell out to your race, ethnic group, etc… Even if you use proper debate etiquette and follow the rules.

    2. If you’re a woman that’s arguing as a conservative, you’ve sold out your gender.

    3. If you’re a democrat that’s arguing as a conservative, you’ve sold out the Democratic Party.

    4. If you’re a Republican arguing as a liberal, you’re arguing your conscience. You’re also a part of the center and the mainstream.

    It’s OK to criticize the the United States, but not OK to criticize the UN or any other country that hates the US.

    1. If you’re a foreigner and you bash your own country, you’re ashamed when you shouldn’t be.

    2. If you’re American and you bash your own country, you’re giving good and honest criticism.

    3. If you point other nation’s shortcomings out, you’re preaching hate.

    4. If these nations bash the United States, they’re giving “legitimate” criticism.

  • Are You a Liberal Zombie? Liberal Zombie Q & A

    These day’s Gun control arguments and activism is a taste of the Liberal Zombie Apocalypse. They’re all over the place, on your news-feeds, on your browser, on your social media, on message boards, on the streets, etc. They don’t want your brain or flesh… Just a piece of your gun rights. They want the government to take more of your money, and make it harder for organizations to earn it.

    On top of that, they want to turn you into one of them via their version of “discussion and compromise”. This involves you being in listen mode, while they try to convert you.

    The following is a breakdown of their “line of reasoning”. I saw the original version of this on the old Protest Warrior forms. It was funny, but needed adjustments for easier reading. I improved, adjusted, and expanded on it over the years. This is a humorous take on the profiles of the liberals, embellishers, and phonies that we’ve came across.

    Without further ado:

    Q: First of all, what is a liberal zombie?

    A liberal zombie is a former human that used to have a brain and was once capable of carrying out a debate. Today; however, said individual no longer has a brain and can only parrot leftist/Anti American tripe and drivel; facts are completely useless to him/her. This is also a person that doesn’t believe in personal responsibility and accountability. They choose to blame some outside factor for their demise instead. They’ll utilize the, “But they do it to,” argument in response to your pointing out their errant arguments and actions.

    Q: What kind of defenses do these zombies utilize when shocked into reality by the facts?

    Typical responses to the facts include rebuttals consisting solely of insults but no substance, name-calling, comments such as, “This thread is stupid”, and comments pulled from ones behind — or out of thin air. Other defenses include accusing you of being in denial, of being a phony, of arguing from assumptions, and of arguing from perception.

    One defense used by these zombies is a severe emotional reaction to an analogy that forces them to question their flawed reasoning.

    They’ll also tap dance around straightforward questions that you ask them. Or, they would simply ignore these questions.

    If you want to get an idea of what they will tell you in advance, go watch and read some liberal news sources. Touch up on some conspiracy theories while you are at it. Don’t forget to watch and read foreign news sources as well, like those immediately to the right of Vladimir Lenin. Their reply will certainly be a refresher of these sources.

    There’s a typical defense used by a borderline zombie whose perception of things come crumbling down like a house of cards… Whose misconceptions have been shattered as a result of being exposed to facts and/or logical arguments. This defense comes in the form of accusing you of having no debating skills, of accusing you of being brainwashed, or an accusation that your response had no substance when the facts dictate otherwise.

    Treat these borderline zombies with care, any more exposure to the facts could send them hurtling down the path to becoming full blown zombies. Flaming them with the facts could accelerate this change.

    Q: Where do these liberal zombies come from?

    Most, if not all, liberal zombies begin as thinking human beings. But mainstream media propaganda likes to brainwash their audiences. Brainwashing includes thinking that the USA, its rich people, and its conservatives, are the causes of all of the world’s problems. It also includes making these liberals think that they are only presenting one of many “right” answers. Other people, unfortunately, do a Castro “face dive” into news sources that are based on emotion and not on fact.

    But once facts and logic are applied to their dishonest tomes, leftist propaganda quickly falls apart as their ideology cannot stand up to intellectual scrutiny. Thinking people, on the other hand, are quick to see the facts and are very quick to connect the dots. They’re not suckered into confusing emotions as facts.

    SOME humans; however, cling tenaciously to this leftist line of reasoning in spite of the facts. This causes their brain to literally begin to decay in their skulls. They have the appearance of humans, but – upon closer inspection – their glassy eyed stupefied stare and pungent aroma quickly identify them to be liberal zombies!

    Q: Should I shoot them?

    Heavens NO! You’ll only re-enforce the propaganda that they’ve been forced fed, about veterans, law-abiding citizen gun owners, and conservatives. You’ll end up going to jail.

    Q: Should I debate them?

    NO! This is about one of the most dangerous things a human being can do when confronted by this type of zombie. They’re IMMUNE to facts, to rational thought, and to logical reasoning. Debating them encourages them to repeat their liberal vitriol and drivels and may in fact attract MORE zombies. It’s best to ignore them, or hurl insults at them.

    Q: Do liberal zombies KNOW they are zombies?

    In most cases no, they still think they’re rational human beings. They’re usually completely devoid of a sense of humor.

    There are issues and areas that make perfect sense to them, though facts — current and historical — do not support what they think makes sense. They believe that their drivel makes perfect sense to other people, even when common sense dictates otherwise. They see anyone, that dares to use the facts to discredit their tripe, as brainwashed sheep incapable of coming up with their position… Without rational thought and without instruction by some “right-wing” higher source.

    If someone claims that the liberal media — such as the New York Times, BBC, CNN, MSNBC, and their ilk — are “centrist” or reliable news sources, for example, there’s a 99.99% chance that they’re a liberal zombie.

    A liberal zombie, upon seeing this post, will demonstrate denial by claiming that they could take each of the criteria here and apply them to conservatives.

    This is consistent with their “blame the other guy” mentality.

    The ones that are truly in denial will try to go through this list and explain why they are not liberal zombies, or why others are zombies.

    Q: Are all liberals zombies?

    No, although liberals do have zombie like tendencies, there are many liberals that retain some higher brain functions and can hold an open debate. Then there are liberals that are borderline zombies, as mentioned earlier.

    Warning: too many facts at once can overload a borderline liberal zombie, and fling them into full-blown brain melt down, handle these people gently!

    Note: If you come across a classical liberal, don’t panic, they’re perfectly human and are very capable of analytical thinking. Their liberal like appearance is just a defense mechanism. This also applies to the fair and balanced modern liberals, who have maintained their brain functions. The latter is just being well intentioned and don’t mean any harm, their consistently being wrong should not be mistaken for zombie behavior.

    Q: Are there other ways to spot this type of zombie?

    My word yes!

    Merely mentioning the following will often send any liberal zombie within earshot into a frothy frenzy of spewing utter nonsense:

    * President Trump (or Republican politician),

    * President Trump’s policies and accomplishments,

    * Our right to defend ourselves and to act in our best security interests,

    * Why gun control won’t work,

    * Tax cuts given back in the percentages that they were paid,

    * Responsibility and accountability,

    * Why tax cuts are not income redistribution,

    * Evidence that the liberals are wrong… Or a strong logical argument against liberal tripe,

    Or support for the candidate that believes in these things.

    If you want to quickly spot some liberal zombies, simply talk about liberal zombies. This will cause liberal zombies to come out of the woodworks and go straight for you. Use this trick with care.

    It’s best just to walk away and ignore these zombies when this happens; or hurl insults at them. This may cause them to call you an oil hungry imperialist, fascist, sheep, (well versed in the army doctrine if you are in the military, no matter which branch), brown shirt, brainwashed, NAZI, racist, xenophobic, misogynist, sexist, homophobic, etc., before going away.

    Q: Can liberal zombies ever say anything intelligent? Can we communicate with them?

    The classical liberal and the fair and balanced modern liberals are the types that could hold an intelligent conversation on a regular basis.

    The liberal zombies also can and do say something intelligent once in a while that is NOT 100% retarded. But they usually follow that with name-calling or insults.

    Q: But thebesig, there are conservatives on This Aint Hell that utilize name-calling and insults, does that make them zombies as well?

    If this happens, there’s a very good chance that the recipient of this label is actually an idiot, or what they are described as. This is not an insult on the account that this poster is calling it like it is.

    This is different from someone calling you an idiot because they do not have a factual or logical reply or because they simply don’t like what you said.

    Q: Do these zombies have a sense of humor?

    No.

    Q: If someone doesn’t have a sense of humor does that mean that they’re a liberal zombie?

    They either don’t find you funny or they just simply lack a sense of humor. More criteria will have to be utilized before determining whether someone is a liberal zombie or not. If it’s the former, it’s possible that they take things to seriously. In this case they might become candidates for being real liberal zombies in the future.

    Q: What should I do if I accidentally try to be rational with one of these zombies?

    Quickly realize your mistake, ignore them, and then walk away – OR hurl insults at them until they call you an imperialist, fascist, brown shirt, brainwashed, in denial, xenophobic, misogynist, racist, homophobic, etc. and walk away.

    Q: Hey thebesig, what do you do when the liberal zombie just won’t go away?

    One common zombie fighting tactic is to instantly reply to their post with a cut and paste from a site that has nothing to do with the original thread, let me give you an example:

    Thread title: Man-made global warming is real!

    Your initial reaction is to debunk this with facts, but remember; this is NOT a rational human that we’re dealing with here, but a liberal zombie. Respond to the thread with cut/pastes from sites that have nothing to do with the original post. For example, an article on someone going full bore “trigglypuff”, a copy and paste of a sports event, or growing garden plants. Remember, Google is your friend!

    Using President Donald Trump’s tweets greatly offends these zombies hint hint!

    Q: Dear thebesig,

    What should we do if we are accidentally bitten by one of these zombies? Their soulless behavior isn’t contagious, is it?

    Please… I need answers quickly… I’m starting to feel like… like… like…. I…Am… Feeling… triggered!

    Liberal zombie conversion is not spread by bites. It’s self-inflicted when a rational thinking human being clings tenaciously to leftist mantras in spit of facts and logic proving otherwise. Their brain suffers a massive meltdown and begins to rot in their skulls.

    If you “feel” like you are becoming a liberal zombie, put the iPhone, iPad, games, etc., down and get a job… The feeling will soon pass.

    Q: Hey thebesig, are there other types of zombies that I should be aware of?

    There are these anti-western zombies that despise anything western and do not restrict their hatred to the US. These zombies honestly think that without western civilization, the world would be a utopia paradise with ever lasting peace. The criteria used on liberal zombies applies to these zombies as well.

    Also, there’s the “Stolen Valor” zombie. These guys will do things like tell you about the nature of their service. Then, when you ask them questions about their service, they’ll tell you that “it’s secret” or “classified” or something like that.

    Q: Thebesig, what do I do when name-calling does not work?

    If this liberal zombie is immune to name calling (a rare and extra annoying type of zombie) then simply say, “Oh be quiet!” Then walk away. Don’t waste your time with these zombies, you’ll get better reception arguing with the walls.

    Q: What’s the best way to recognize one of these zombies on websites like this?

    Watch for the “clever” – you got under my skin – responses to this post.