Category: Dumbass Bullshit

  • A Green “Fantasy” Come to Life

    Here, let me run a fantasy by you.

    . . .

    The story begins, and the hero is on the town council of a small New England town. The town’s electricity bills are killing them.

    The hero decides they’ll go solar. Notwithstanding the fact that New England isn’t exactly a primo location for solar because of its environment – no place that gets less than 200 sunny days annually is, exactly – solar is trendy and popular.  And hey:  the town might be able to get some help if they sell it just right.

    In fact, the town decides to ask for a $1.2+ million grant.  Who cares if it will only save $500,000 over the life of the project?  And who cares if the project will be owned by an overseas company – or if other citizens of the state will end up eating the cost?

    Later:  well, whaddaya know?  The hero’s plan worked!  They pulled it off!

    The town conned the Public Utility Commission into coughing up the grant, and found some foreign company willing to bite.  And they’ll save some money – by making everyone else in the state pay extra to subsidize their power!

    And they’re also saving the planet from global warming to boot.  Hooray!

    . . .

    That fantasy kinda sucks, doesn’t it? Yeah, I agree.

    Except is isn’t a fantasy. The above actually happened in Peterborough, NH – a town of less than 6,300 people.

    Watchdog.org has an article giving the details. It’s worth a read – unless you’re worried about your blood pressure.

  • Whitfield: Dallas gunman wasn’t “very courageous and brave”

    Whitfield: Dallas gunman wasn’t “very courageous and brave”

    james-boulware

    We didn’t talk about James Boulware this weekend. Boulware was that fellow in Dallas who built himself an armored van, made himself a scad of bombs and then attacked a Dallas police station with some firearms. This was a great opportunity for the cable news folks to run their mouths constantly without having to use their brains. Fredericka Whitfield on CNN did just that when she referred to the act as “very courageous and brave”;

    Now, of course, she’s backtracked on the ill-considered case of vocal diarrhea.

    “Yesterday, during a segment on the Dallas Police Department attack, I used the words ‘courageous’ and ‘brave’ when discussing the gunman. I misspoke,” Whitfield told viewers on Sunday. “I in no way believe the gunman was courageous nor brave.”

    Yeah, you did, you said it with no prompting. Way to encourage that behavior.

    Of course, the family blames society;

    Boulware’s father, Jim, told the Associated Press that his son was mentally unstable and angry with police after losing custody of his child, and that the family had tried to get him medical help but were unsuccessful.

    The suspect’s brother, Andrew Boulware, accused authorities of ignoring the family’s pleas for help.

    “They diagnosed him as ‘sane’ in 15 minutes,” he said, adding: “I didn’t honestly think that he would ever go this far, but it was always in the back of my mind that it was a possibility.”

    “We tried to get him mental help numerous times, but the system failed him,” Boulware’s mother, Jeanine Howard, said in the statement to local media. “He was very delusional. It was very obvious.”

    Yeah, he built an armored vehicle with firing ports in the side and back. He built bombs. I wouldn’t know how to build a bomb, but somehow this mentally deficient fellow figured it out, along with a firing mechanism that detonated the bombs when the robot started messing with the box full.

    And, I’m sure that the mugshot above wasn’t taken after this incident since a sniper took him out with a single shot. Apparently, he blamed police for losing custody of his child to his mother, the woman quoted above. If they thought that he was unstable, his family should have been monitoring him and he wouldn’t have been able to complete his little project.

    Has anyone else noticed that the usual suspects aren’t calling for more background checks because of this? Probably because he must have bought the scary black guns illegally. The jumpsuit in the picture above is testament to the fact that he was already forbidden to buy any firearms, yet he had them, and bomb components.

  • A Public Message to A One-Time TAH Commenter

    It has come to my attention that a recent commenter – using the screen name “Ralph Cinque” – apparently thinks I am someone I am not.

    Well, that’s happened before and is nothing new.  But this particular case seems to be a bit different.

    “Ralphie-boi” above appears to have a blog – which I’d never heard of until someone told me about it the other day.  Nothing new about that, either.

    From a single quick – and first-time – look at his blog after its existence was brought to my attention the other day, “Ralphie-boi” seems to be of the opinion that Oswald was framed for shooting JFK.  Hey, it’s still a free country; everyone is entitled to their opinion.

    “Ralphie-boi” also apparently has been having a running argument on his blog with some individual using the screen name or nom de plume “Hondo”.  The argument relates to the JFK assassination in some way; I didn’t bother to read enough of Ralphie-boi’s “scholarly work” to determine the precise details of that argument.

    Regardless: “Ralphie-boi” has apparently published a number of rebuttal articles directed at this individual he calls “Hondo” on his blog.  And he also seems to think this other individual is either named or using the screen name “Bpete” as well.

    And of course – according to “Ralphie-boi’s” immense intellect and amazing powers of analysis, it’s not possible that TWO DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS might possibly use the same screen name or nom-de-plume. Apparently “Ralphie-boi” has determined that that simply can’t happen.

    So there you go: per “Ralphie-boi”, since I use the nom-de-plume “Hondo” here at TAH I must be the same guy with whom he’s been having his running argument regarding the JFK Assassination.

    Well, “Ralphie-boi” – I got some bad news for you.   Here’s a news flash fer ya, “Einstein”.

    I hate to “burst yer bubble” . . . but it is indeed possible for different individuals to use the same screen name on the Internet.  That’s precisely what has happened here.

    I am not the guy you’ve been arguing with on your blog.  Before yesterday, I had no idea you even had a blog.  I’ve never commented there, nor have I ever argued with you about the JFK Assassination.  The sole exchange I’ve ever had with you was my single reply to you that occurred on this blog, regarding the comment I linked above.

    Before that, I didn’t know you even existed.

    Oh, and your blog articles and use of logic kinda . . . well, IMO they rather suck. I wasted a bit of time looking at a couple of them. For starters, not responding to an argument is decidedly not the same thing, logically, as agreeing your opponent is correct – either tacitly or explicitly.   One has to see the article in question in the first place to respond; secondly, they have to feel the argument even merits a reply.

    Your blog articles IMO go rapidly downhill from there.

    I will say that at least you’re somewhat more literate than a few of the tools who have been featured here at TAH – you can string a readable sentence or two together, even if the use of logic therein leaves much to be desired.  And you don’t seem to TyPe LiKe An AdOlEsCeNt TeEnAgE GiRl HaViNg A hIsSy FiT after drinking an entire 2-liter Mountain Dew and finding out her boyfriend wants to dump her, either.

    Now, how about you take your half-baked ideas and comments back to your insular little JFK-conspiracy-theory-world and leave discussions here relating to military and government matters to rational adults.  And while you’re at it, how about you quit accusing me of being someone I’m not?

    Sheesh. I’d expect stuff like this from SoMeOnE eLsE wE kNoW aNd “LoVe”.   Wonder if they know each other, or are possibly related?

  • OPM breach news (UPDATED)

    We talked the other day about the data breach at the Office of Personnel Management that probably affected the PII of everyone who has ever been employed or contracted by the federal government. Apparently the breach happened months ago and went undetected for months, and like the President, we don’t find out about important stuff until it’s news. From Fox News;

    “The recent OPM breach was identified, noted and the credentials and identities have been discovered online and are being traded actively,” said Roberts, who has been a consultant to a number of government agencies, but is currently at odds with the FBI over his reports, first published in Fox News, detailing the vulnerabilities of commercial airlines to cyber hacking. The FBI accused Roberts of hacking a commercial airplane, while Roberts claims he was simply trying to warn the government and industry of vulnerabilities.

    “When these accounts are posted on the darker side of the net, they are usually ‘live’ and are part of a larger breach,” Roberts added. “They are typically parsed out and sold and distributed to interested parties, something OWL tracks.”

    So the crooks find out about it before we do – we find out after our information is sold to criminals. But, not to worry, the government is on the job. According to a memo they sent out today, you’re in good hands;

    Beginning June 8 and continuing through June 19, OPM will be sending notifications to individuals whose PII was potentially compromised in this incident. OPM has retained a private vendor, CSID, to transmit the notifications on behalf of OPM. Consequently, the email will come from opmcio@csid.com and will not come from a .gov email address. The notification will feature a CSID logo and will contain information regarding credit monitoring and identity theft protection services being provided to those federal employees impacted by the data breach. In the event OPM does not have an email address for the individual on file, a standard letter will be sent via the U.S. Postal Service.

    This notification is different from other notifications you may have already received. The Department is also in the process of notifying some DHS employees in CBP, ICE, TSA, and in a small number of other components that one of the companies that DHS contracts with to conduct background investigations and credit checks may have had a compromise of its network. That notification, which was made via U.S. Postal Service, is separate from this OPM notification.

    Fing brilliant – send out a notification by email from a commercial email address. I’m sure no one will send out phishing emails, the crooks aren’t that smart, huh? F*** you, federal government. I’ll take care of my-damn-self you buncha incompetent boobs. If you send me an email, you won’t get a response…ever.

    The rest of their stupid email, if you still think that they care about your PII;

    As a note of caution, confirm that the email you receive is, in fact, the official notification. It’s possible that malicious groups may leverage this event to launch phishing attacks. To protect yourself, we encourage you to do the following:

    1. Make sure the sender email address is “opmcio@csid.com.”

    2. The email should not contain any attachments. If it does, do not open them, and forward the email to dhsspam@hq.dhs.gov.

    3. The email is sent exclusively to your email address. No other individuals should be in the TO, CC, or BCC fields.

    4. The email subject should be exactly “Important Message from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management CIO.”

    5. The email will feature an embedded “Enroll Now” button. Do not click on the included link. Instead, record the provided PIN code, open a web browser then manually type the URL – http://www.csid.com/opm – into the address bar and press enter. You can then use the provided instructions to enroll using the OPM/CSID website.

    6. The email should not contain any attachments. However, once you visit the OPM/CSID website (http://www.csid.com/opm) to enter your PIN code, you will be asked to provide personal information to verify your identity.

    7. The official email should look like this sample screenshot.

    8. If you would prefer not to enter your personal information on the OPM/CSID website (http://www.csid.com/opm), you may call the CSID call center toll-free at 844-777-2743 or 844-222-2743. (International callers: call collect 512-327-0705).

    9. OPM will not proactively call you about the breach. If you receive a phone call about the breach claiming to be OPM, then it is a scam. Do not provide any personal information. CSID, not OPM, is making all notifications about this breach, and the notifications are by email or through the U.S. Postal Service.

    Additional information is also available on CSID’s website, http://www.csid.com/opm (external link), or you can call them toll-free at 1-844-777-2743 (International callers: call collect at 1-512-327-0705).

    Regardless of whether or not you receive this notification, you should take extra care to ensure that they are following recommended cyber and personal security procedures. If you suspect that you have received a phishing attack, contact your component’s security office.

    In general, government employees are often frequent targets of “phishing” attacks, which are surreptitious approaches to stealing your identity, accessing official computer systems, running up bills in your name, or even committing crimes using your identity. Phishing schemes use email or websites to trick you into disclosing personal and sensitive information.

    We will continue to keep you advised of new developments regarding this cybersecurity incident as we learn more from OPM. The following includes helpful information for monitoring your identity and financial information and precautions to help you avoid being a victim.

    Steps for Monitoring Your Identity and Financial Information

    Monitor financial account statements and immediately report any suspicious or unusual activity to financial institutions.
    Request a free credit report at www.AnnualCreditReport.com or by calling 1-877-322-8228. Consumers are entitled by law to one free credit report per year from each of the three major credit bureaus – Equifax®, Experian®, and TransUnion® – for a total of three reports every year. You can find contact information for the credit bureaus on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) website, www.ftc.gov.
    Review resources provided on the FTC identity theft website, www.Identitytheft.gov. The FTC maintains a variety of consumer publications providing comprehensive information on computer intrusions and identity theft.
    You may place a fraud alert on your credit file to let creditors know to contact you before opening a new account in your name. Simply call TransUnion® at 1-800-680-7289 to place this alert. TransUnion® will then notify the other two credit bureaus on your behalf.

    Precautions to Help You Avoid Becoming a Victim

    · Be suspicious of unsolicited phone calls, visits, or email messages from individuals asking about you, your employees, your colleagues or any other internal information. If an unknown individual claims to be from a legitimate organization, try to verify his or her identity directly with the company.

    · Do not provide personal information or information about your organization, including its structure or networks, unless you are certain of a person’s authority to have the information.

    · Do not reveal personal or financial information in email, and do not respond to email solicitations for this information. This includes following links sent in email.

    · Do not send sensitive information over the Internet before checking a website’s security (for more information, see Protecting Your Privacy, http://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/tips/ST04-013).

    · Pay attention to the URL of a website. Malicious websites may look identical to a legitimate site, but the URL may use a variation in spelling or a different domain (e.g., .com vs. .net).

    · If you are unsure whether an email request is legitimate, try to verify it by contacting the company directly. Do not use contact information provided on a website connected to the request; instead, check previous statements for contact information. Information about known phishing attacks is also available online from groups such as the Anti-Phishing Working Group (http://www.antiphishing.org).

    · You should take steps to monitor your personally identifiable information and report any suspected instances of identity theft to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at www.ic3.gov.

    · Additional information about preventative steps by consulting the Federal Trade Commission’s website, www.consumer.gov/idtheft. The FTC also encourages those who discover that their information has been misused to file a complaint with the commission using the contact information below.

    Identity Theft Clearinghouse
    Federal Trade Commission
    600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20580
    https://www.identitytheft.gov/
    1-877-IDTHEFT (438-4338)
    TDD: 1-202-326-2502

    UPDATE: There seems to have been a second hack that exposed the records of military personnel.

    The Office of Personnel Management, which was the target of the hack, has not officially notified military or intelligence personnel whose security clearance data was breached, but news of the second hack was starting to circulate in both the Pentagon and the CIA.

  • Rachel Dolezal; Phony African-American

    Rachel Dolezal; Phony African-American

    Rachel Dolezal

    I’m not sure what this is all about, but I’ve always said that white liberals talk as if they’re not white – as if the white people in this country are conservatives. But this woman, Rachel Dolezal, is the head of the Spokane chapter of the NAACP, she’s identified herself as African-American on applications for employment, but her parents (who might have some measure of insight into her heritage) say that she is Caucasian. According to News4Jax, a reporter in Spokane confronted her;

    This is how the conversation went:

    “Is that your dad?”

    “Yeah, that’s…that’s my dad.”

    “This man right here’s your father? Right there?”

    “You have a question about that?”

    “Yes ma’am, I was wondering if your dad really is an African-American man.”

    “That’s a very — I mean, I don’t know what you’re implying.”

    “Are you African-American?”

    “I don’t understand the question of — I did tell you that, yes, that’s my dad. And he was unable to come in January.”

    “Are your parents…are they white?”

    Dolezal walked away from the microphone, leaving her purse and keys, and took refuge in a nearby clothing boutique.

    Here’s another picture of her in earlier days;

    Rachel-Dolezal

    She teaches African-American studies. I had a Native-American History teacher who was just like that. He had a long pony tail, wore buckskin clothing to class and tried to indoctrinate history students into some culture that he really wasn’t clear on. If I remember correctly, he had an Italian name. As Indian as he acted, the University didn’t think he was Indian enough and let him go after that semester and hired a real Indian.

    Liberals. They so funny.

  • Daily Beast: Wounded Warrior Project sells your name

    I’ve pretty much stayed out of this fight mostly because I don’t understand charities and the regulations that restrain them form doing certain things. I think we’ve had one campaign here wherein I asked for donations to help a youngster whose own charity was flim-flammed by a phony. Other than that, when you guys give donations to TAH, you know it’s going into my liquor cabinet or my humidor. However, according to Tim Mak at the Daily Beast, the money you give to Wounded Warrior Project that you think is going to help, well, wounded warriors, is probably going into someone’s pocket at the upper echelons of management. Now, Mak also says that WWP will rent your personal information to other charities for a profit;

    [I]n another twist, [Wounded Warrior Project] is repackaging givers’ personal information and selling it off to third parties, making more than $1 million in the process.

    The renting of private information is a betrayal of donors, argues Sandra Miniutti, the vice president of Charity Navigator, a group that rates nonprofits. “When a donor gives to you there’s a level of trust, that you’re going to repay that with respect, that together you’re working to make the world a better place, and that [the charity is] not going to flip and sell my personal information,” she said.

    A top official for a another large veterans nonprofit was aghast when informed about the practice. “We have never rented out, sold, or shared our donor list,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “Our donors would kill us if we did that…I can’t believe their big, midsize, and small donors would be too happy with that.”

    I guess it’s bad enough that the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, the Department of Defense, the Office of Personnel Management are losing control of my PII, now WWP is selling my PII to other entities? That’s a little much.

    [Steven Nardizzi—CEO of the Wounded Warrior Project] also argues that refusing to sell information limits charitable sector efficiency: “Donor lists, which tend to include those individuals more interested in philanthropy than the average American, are both cost and mission efficient,” he wrote. “The misdirected privacy protections will limit the effectiveness of important charitable organizations.”

    Yeah, well, see that’s the beauty of a free market economy – it’s our choice which people get our donations and most of us want to remain anonymous. I give directly to people in need, not through a charity, and when I do give, it’s on the condition that they don’t tell anyone that I helped precisely because of this – I don’t want folks lined up outside my door with their tin cups rattling for every little thing that they want or need. in effect, that’s what happening with Wounded Warrior Project, if Mak is correct in his investigation.

  • Joe Teti is crazy-pants, and we told you here first

    Joe Teti is crazy-pants, and we told you here first

    Over two years ago, we brought you Joe Teti’s records. I spent hours that weekend on the phone with him to get the record straight. He sent me all kinds of stuff that I promised that I wouldn’t publish, nothing earthshaking, but still it demonstrates how hard I wanted to get the story right, and I still haven’t published the stuff he told me not to publish.

    He immediately went into his psycho act with his Facebook fans because no one here thought that he could call himself a combat veteran because he didn’t serve in the military while engaged in the war against terror.

    The day that I published the first post about his records, he called me demanding that I take your comments down. He made a point of telling me that we were on speakerphone with his lawyers. You know that went over big with me – I love to be threatened with lawyers. I refused to comply and told him how his problem was with the hundreds of people who commented, not me.

    Teti’s tantrum went on for days and got to the point where he was challenging us to a fistfight. So I guess we were just the canary in the coalmine.

    Now he’s suing the whole world (except us, for some reason) and the news is that Discovery Channel had decided not to pick up his Dual Survival reality show again. So he helps to reinforce that decision by injuring or killing a dog (folks aren’t clear about which happened) on the set of his last show;

    Teti TMZ Screenshot  circle highlight

    The word on the street is that the studio where he worked has been locked tight because of threats that he has made to the Hollywood people involved in his show. I’ve also heard that his guns are gone because of a restraining order. Most of our friends are facing a law suit and strangely enough, the day after we finished our Peace Order hearing, Teti filed restraining orders against his foes.

    So, like I said in the title, we told you he was unbalanced, and you heard it here first.

  • Draw Muhammad in Arizona

    Draw Muhammad in Arizona

    Arizona2

    Arizona

    I guess things were pretty tense in Phoenix yesterday where two equally sized groups of dumbasses faced off at the Islamic Community Center mosque. It attracted loudmouths from both sides of the discussion, according to AFP;

    About 200 demonstrators from each group stood outside the mosque in Phoenix, Arizona, where a biker crew had said they would hold a Mohammed cartoon contest.

    Dozens of officers lined up between the two sets of protesters, using yellow police tape to separate them near the gates of the Islamic Community Center mosque in north Phoenix.

    “Stop Islam” was among the slogans on placards held by bearded bikers, one of whom wore a T-shirt reading “Support Your Local White Boy” and had a shouting match with rival demonstrators across the police lines.

    Arizona3

    I don’t know what they intend to “stop Islam” from doing, or what being a “white boy” has to do with the whole thing. Yeah, I get the whole “free expression” thing and it’s distasteful to me that there are those in the Muslim community who want to dictate to Americans what we can do or say, but by the same token to wag your finger in someone’s face only encourages them to bite it off.

    Why are the fat, slovenly, dorky fellows the only ones who want to stand up for my rights by openly carrying their camouflaged AK-47s to protests. That was meant to intimidate, not to offer protection. Protection could have been accomplished by discreetly carrying a handgun with several extra magazines. And, me, I was intimated by the Captain bars – he must’ve been Captain of all the s’mores. That’s why he had the earbud on – so he didn’t miss the call for the campfire cookout later.

    Thanks, fellas, I feel like all of my rights are more secure now.