Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden

  • That “illegal” war in Iraq

    That “illegal” war in Iraq

    pelosi-obama1

    Remember how we were told for years that the war in Iraq was “illegal”, somehow, when it was being fought by a Republican President. Well, apparently, now that the Republican is gone, it’s fine for the Democrat President to use the same authorization from Congress to fight another war in Iraq. From CNN;

    I’ll let you know what’s going on, but I don’t need new congressional authority to act, President Barack Obama told congressional leaders Wednesday about his upcoming decision on possible military intervention in Iraq.

    […]

    House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California agreed with McConnell’s assessment, adding she believed congressional authorization for military force in Iraq back in 2001 and 2003 still applied.

    What a difference party affiliation makes. Pelosi added;

    Obama “did not give us an array of actions he was planning to take,” Pelosi said. “He just talked about his perspective on what was happening there.”

    So, she’s not really worried about what the President will do in regards to Iraq, but when it was President Bush;

    “The burden is on the president to justify any additional resources for a mission,” said Pelosi, D-Calif. “Congress is ready to use its constitutional authority of oversight to question what is the justification for this spending, what are the results we are receiving.”

    “There’s not a carte blanche, a blank check for him to do whatever he wishes there,” she added in an interview taped Saturday and broadcast Sunday.

    I guess we can all relax when Democrats go to war.

  • Code Pink Finally Gets the War They Needed

    Code Pink Finally Gets the War They Needed

    Quite a conundrum, huh? Code Pink has to protest the Obama Administration’s march to war in Iraq, you know, after years of trying not to alienate liberals.

    Dear Jonn,

    Yesterday CODEPINK held a rally at the White House calling on President Obama to not intervene militarily in Iraq. We were joined by members from Veterans for Peace, the ANSWER Coalition, Iraq Veterans Against the War, and more. Check out pictures from the event here.

    Join us on Saturday, June 21, 1:00 p.m. in front of the White House for an even bigger rally to call for no U.S. military intervention in Iraq!

    President Obama stated on Friday that he will not send US troops to Iraq, however now he is sending 275 U.S. forces to Iraq for embassy security. He is also “exploring other options.” Those options clearly include air strikes, increased weapons shipments, and there are ominous reports that the US is moving an aircraft carrier into the Persian Gulf.

    Tell President Obama: No U.S. military intervention in Iraq!

    We have watched over the last 12 years how the citizens of Iraq have been terrorized, murdered and turned into refugees. Once again, we are seeing hundreds of thousands of innocent people fleeing for their lives. The people of Iraq need peace, reconciliation, development and a truly representative government free of US and other foreign interests.

    So, being careful not to be labeled racists, they have a caricature of John McCain instead of the President – you know, even though McCain has nothing to do with sending troops to Iraq;

    Code Pink3

    The Iraq Veterans Against the War, you know, those guys who have never been to Iraq, but they like to wear those cool T-shirts that say they have been to Iraq, came out of the shadows, too.

    Code Pink IVAW

    The usual huge crowd that Code Pink draws is present. I guess that since Bush left the White House some of them had to go out and find jobs.

    Code Pink

    Irony. You can’t see it.

    Code Pink2

    Nice to see all of the usual suspects back together again, huh?

    Code Pink 1

  • Obama: no combat troops to Iraq

    So, Obama and I finally agree on something – he says that he won’t send US troops to Iraq. Yep. they did their job and it’s up to the Iraqis to figure this stuff out for themselves, but, they do need some assistance. The Afgans’ Northern Alliance couldn’t defeat the Taliban by themselves in Afghanistan, but they got US air support and they rolled right over the Taliban, so that’s probably what the Iraqis need. A little moral support. But, really, it shouldn’t have got to this point.

    I’ll concede that it’s largely the Iraqis own fault. Maliki is a dumbass – no argument here. He needs to be reminded that he’s the leader of all Iraqis, not just Shi’ite Iraqis. But, as far as US involvement goes, the President told reporters yesterday that his national security staff is working on a range of options that he can take to help the Iraqis.

    Well, Fallujah fell to the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant or the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria whichever the group formerly known as al Qaeda in Iraq is now calling themselves, back in January. What has the President’s national security staff been doing since then? Why are they always surprised by world events? The fall of Fallujah might have been a hint that things were going wrong in Iraq – well, to me anyway. There should have been a plan in place, along with some military assets that could be applied at a moment’s notice.

    But the President and his staff only get their information from the news apparently. They’re consistently surprised by world events. It’s as if they don’t understand that their job is deal with these things before they happen based on the information that the rest of us don’t have. But, how many times has the President told us that he didn’t find out about problems until it was on MSNBC?

    According to the Washington Times, John McCain is calling for the entire national security staff to be fired;

    Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, said Friday that every member of President Obama’s national security team should lose their jobs.

    “Everyone in the national security team, they have been a total failure,” he said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

    While the president said he is considering airstrikes to try to restabilize the conflict in Iraq, Mr. McCain said no one on the president’s current team should be making those decisions.

    Now, that’s always John McCain’s answer to problems in the Obama Administration – I think he just inserts the problem area into a boiler plate press release calling for people to be fired. However, in this case, the President should have arrived at that conclusion when he asked his staff what he should do and they told him that they’ll get to work on a range of options.

    I just finished reading Tom Clancy’s last novel “Command Authority” last night which was about a Russian invasion of the Ukraine. Clancy died on October 1st last year. The troubles in the Ukraine didn’t start until late November – Clancy had written a whole novel about a Russian annexation of the Crimea before he died, but the Obama Administration was taken by surprise. A novelist knew the warning signs better than the President and his advisers. So obviously the wrong people are in those jobs.

  • Washington Post blames US Troops and Bush for Iraq

    Pat and Chief Tango send us links to the Washington Post in which they do their best to deflect blame from the current administration for the failures of the Iraqi Army in Iraq this past week. Greg Jaffe, the WaPo journalist who told us at the last Milblog Conference that we have outlived our usefulness in the information business because he knows as much about the military now as we know, begins the blame game by blaming US troops for losing Iraq;

    The Iraqi army’s collapse this week marked a stark failure for the U.S. military that trained it and for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government, which has struggled to address leadership and morale problems that now threaten the force’s ability to defend the country.

    Although they far outnumbered the insurgents and had greater firepower, Maliki’s troops have fled by the thousands in the country’s north, allowing the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) to take the city of Mosul and start an ominous march toward Baghdad.

    Yeah, nice try, Jaffe. The troops did their jobs. They went above and beyond what they could do given what they had to work with. Fareed Zakaria, in another Post article, takes the more popular position of blaming Bush;

    But how did Maliki come to be prime minister of Iraq? He was the product of a series of momentous decisions made by the Bush administration. Having invaded Iraq with a small force — what the expert Tom Ricks called “the worst war plan in American history” — the administration needed to find local allies. It quickly decided to destroy Iraq’s Sunni ruling establishment and empower the hard-line Shiite religious parties that had opposed Saddam Hussein. This meant that a structure of Sunni power that had been in the area for centuries collapsed. These moves — to disband the army, dismantle the bureaucracy and purge Sunnis in general — might have been more consequential than the invasion itself.

    Um, Maliki has won popular elections in Iraq at least three times, the most recent was last month. That’s how he came to be Prime Minister. Leaning on Tom Ricks isn’t helping you. Ricks is taking the Obama position on Iraq, he’s decided that he’s ignoring it.

    The problem in Iraq isn’t a failure of the troops to do their job or Bush’s planning for the war. The failures came before the war began when liberals decided that a war against Iraq by a Republican Administration was unacceptable. It was fine during the Clinton Administration, but in 2003, not so much.

    That told the insurgents that all they needed to do was wait us out and we’d leave. Saddam Hussein gave his generals each copies of the “Black Hawk Down” DVD as an instructional manual to defeat American will.

    The insurgents in Iraq thought that the 2006 midterm election was a great victory, misunderstanding the US’ political process and the Iraq Surge surprised them. The 2008 election was their real victory – the Obama Administration wanted the US out of Iraq before the 2012 elections, regardless of the cost. Well, those chickens came home to roost this week.

    The Weekly Standard reminds us that Joe Biden once called Iraq one of President Obama’s “great achievements”. Withdrawal was their only strategy, much like it is in Afghanistan now.

  • Our “less violent world”

    Our “less violent world”

    The President told a Tumblr discussion group that they’re being too cynical, that the world is less violent now than it has ever been, according to the Washington Times;

    “If there’s one message I want to deliver to young people like a Tumblr audience is — don’t get cynical,” he said, Breitbart reported. “Guard against cynicism. I mean, the truth of the matter is that for all the challenges we face, all the problems that we have, if you had to be — if you had to choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this time. The world is less violent than it has ever been.”

    Well, as long as you ignore the fact that after Iraqi cities Falluja, Kirkuk and Tikrit fell, al Qaeda seized two more towns yesterday, according to Fox News;

    Police officials said militants driving in machinegun-mounted pickups entered two towns in Diyala province late Thursday — Jalula, 80 miles northeast of Baghdad, and Sadiyah, 60 miles north of the Iraqi capital.

    Iraqi soldiers abandoned their posts there without any resistance, the officials told The Associated Press.

    Well, maybe in the sense that the Iraqi Army isn’t resisting it’s more peaceful, I suppose.

    The Wire reports that Iraq is getting military help from Iran, which seems like a real good idea;

    Iran, of all places, has reportedly dispatched two units of its elite Revolutionary Guards to Iraq to help stem the tide of terrorist gains and defend Baghdad from assault.

    The two nations were bitter rivals for decades when Saddam Hussein’s Sunni dominated regime was at war with Tehran’s Shiite-led government. After the U.S. invasion, the Iraqi government came to be dominated by Shiite leaders, who now finds themselves under assault from the Sunni militants of ISIS. Now Iran sees Baghdad as a strategic partner, and the ISIS militias as unacceptable neighbors.

    The President is weighing options on the Iraq morass according to the Associated Press;

    Less than three years after pulling American forces out of Iraq, President Barack Obama is weighing a range of short-term military options, including airstrikes, to quell an al-Qaida inspired insurgency that has captured two Iraqi cities and threatened to press toward Baghdad.

    “We do have a stake in making sure that these jihadists are not getting a permanent foothold,” Obama said Thursday in the Oval Office.

    How many thousands have died in Syria thus far? Estimates vary between 110,470 and 162,400. Maybe they were tickled to death. Thousands of Africans have been murdered in Africa as a result of al Qaeda insurgencies there.

    CNN reports that Russian tanks have rolled in the Ukraine;

    Three Russian tanks and other military vehicles crossed the border into Ukraine on Thursday, prompting a skirmish between Ukrainian and Russian forces, acting Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said.

    The Russian Foreign Ministry told the BBC that the claim was “another fake piece of information.”

    According to Avakov, tanks crossed the border at a checkpoint controlled by pro-Russian separatists in the Luhansk region of eastern Ukraine. Armored vehicles and artillery were part of the columns, Avakov said, citing Ukrainian intelligence.

    The Obama Administration has released a dozen more terrorists that the US held in Afghan prisons back into the wild;

    A U.S. defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that a Frenchman, a Kuwaiti and 10 Pakistani prisoners were sent back to their respective home countries at the end of May.

    So, I’m sure that adds to our peaceful world, especially in the long run.

  • Bergdahl, the special snowflake & Chuck Hagel, the dupe

    The Washington Post is setting up the scenario that Bowe Bergdahl was some sort of Bohemian deep thinker who was operating on an entirely different plane of existence that the rest of us wouldn’t understand. Well, that and he got booted from the Coast Guard after 28 days of basic training, or whatever it is that they call the initial training phase;

    Before he became a Taliban prisoner, before he wrote in his journal “I am the lone wolf of deadly nothingness,” before he ever joined the Army, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was discharged from the U.S. Coast Guard for psychological reasons, said close friends who were worried about his emotional health at the time.

    Of course, he was allowed to join the Army because “Bush!”

    With two wars raging in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008, the Army was meeting recruitment goals by issuing waivers that allowed people with criminal records, health conditions and other problems to enlist. According to a 2008 Army War College study on the subject, the Army was issuing waivers at a rate of one for every five recruits at the time.

    […]

    “Bullet sponges,” [Bergdahl] wrote at one point. “This is what some of the SEALs call regular Army and other mass ground troops. Its right, the job of a soldier is to basically die.”

    At another: “Lightning, there is nothing as truly beautiful as lightning .?.?.”

    And then: “Puddle of mud, skitsafrentic phyco.”

    He was a hippie, spawn of hippies, who accidentally joined the Army. The job of a soldier is to live, actually. A dead soldier is more of a burden to the Army than a live soldier. Of course, it’d be nice of us to die the day after we leave the service, but not while we’re in. But hippies like to read that shit. They also like to read that the Army was taking the Coast Guard’s mental rejects.

    I guess the nature of his new chosen profession hadn’t dawned on him during marksmanship training (you know, shooting at people-shaped targets) or bayonet training (you know, stabbing people-shaped dummies and reciting the “Spirit of the Bayonet”).

    Bergdahl wrote all of this hippie shit to a young lady by the name of Kim Harrison. I don’t know anything about her, but I assume that she’s nice, but in my opinion, Bowe was setting her up for a booty call for when he came home. I was a teenager in uniform and I recognize the theme of his writing style.

    But the big news today is how Chuck Hagel testified to Congress that “time was not on our side” in regards to the negotiations for Bergdahl’s release. Funny, but the same deal was rejected in 2011 and 2012, according to the Washington Times so basically the Obama Administration is admitting that they suck at negotiating – they had four years to negotiate a better deal, but instead they just took the first thing that had come along. Like that kid in your neighborhood who always got suckered into bad trading card and comic book swaps.

    From Associated Press;

    “We could have done a better job of keeping you informed,” Hagel acknowledged to the panel.

    Translation: It’s easier to ask forgiveness than it is to ask for permission.

    They couldn’t negotiate to keep troops in Iraq, they can’t negotiate to keep troops in Afghanistan and they can’t negotiate so that dangerous, treacherous criminals aren’t wandering around loose in the world. I’ll betcha that I could get Hagel to trade that Mickey Mantle rookie year card for my A-Rod Yankee card.

  • 68% of vets: Bergdahl swap was wrong choice

    The USAToday published the results of their USA TODAY/Pew Research Center poll and it looks like veterans aren’t in the president’s corner on this one;

    Thirty percent of those surveyed have a strong opinion of Bergdahl, whose decision to leave his post in 2009 and subsequent capture by the Taliban is under investigation by the Army. Half of respondents say they were sympathetic, and half say they are angry with Bergdahl.

    The 128 veterans included in the poll are much more harsh in their assessment of the 28-year-old sergeant. Only 6% of veterans who responded say they sympathized with him, while 33% say they were angry. By 68%-16%, veterans say Obama made the wrong decision.

    “If he was a captured prisoner of war, we wouldn’t be having this discussion,” says Joe Davis, the director of public affairs for the Veterans of Foreign Wars. “He put his teammates in jeopardy, and you absolutely don’t do that in a combat zone.”

    Well, there were only 128 veterans included in the sampling, so it’s probably not scientific enough for the wonks in the White House, but, I know from conversations that I’ve had in recent days that 68% is probably a little low. 100% of people I’ve talked to disagree with the decision to swap Bergdahl for five high value Taliban commanders and leaders. I’ll add the caveat that none of the people I talked to had a better idea to recover the young buck, including myself, but we all agree that the way it happened was the wrong way.

    Apparently, some Democrats are abandoning the President for the same reason, if you can believe the National Journal;

    The email hit my in-box at 9:41 p.m. last Wednesday. From one of the most powerful Democrats in Washington, a close adviser to the White House, the missive amounted to an electronic eye roll. “Even I have had enough.”

    Another Democrat had quit on President Obama.

    The tipping point for this person was the Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl case—not the soldier-for-Taliban swap itself as much as how the White House mishandled its obligation to communicate effectively and honestly to Congress and the public. More than that, Obama’s team had failed once again to acknowledge its mistakes, preferring to cast blame and seek cover behind talking points.

    Don’t get me wrong, this is not me calling for impeachment or anything. Impeachment is boob bait for the bubbas, to borrow from Daniel Patrick Moynihan. It will never happen. But given that this is a long list of failures from this administration – especially in the realm of foreign policy and national security – stuff that’s important to veterans, it should get veterans back into the Conservative fold.

  • Wrong Family in the Rose Garden

    America was recently treated to a heart-warming display of presidential warmth, sympathy and concern when our commander in chief lent his magisterial presence in a particularly personal way to a Rose Garden photo opportunity. Barack Obama personally led the nation in welcoming the return from behind enemy lines of PFC Bowe Bergdahl in the presence of Bergdahl’s parents in a highly scripted event on the White House grounds. After Bergdahl senior stepped to the lectern and demonstrated in Arabic or Pashto where his true loyalties lie, our ever so solicitous chief executive escorted the happy family away from the ceremony with a comforting presidential hand on the centers of both their backs.

    Even before this ceremony, Internet buzz, especially among those in the military and veterans, was that the guy the president was honoring before the entire world was in fact an undeserving deserter, possibly a defector and most likely a collaborator with the enemy. Coming out of all that buzz was the heretofore unknown information that there were at least a half-dozen or more young soldiers killed in the efforts expended by the American military forces in Afghanistan to recover the rogue soldier who’d gone through the wire.

    At minimum, six Gold Star Mothers lost their sons in a futile effort to recover a possible traitor. While Bergdahl’s family is treated to a celebratory Rose Garden event by a super solicitous president, not a one of those grieving mothers of the dead searchers is given the time of day by the most agenda driven and politically motivated commander-in-chief of our armed forces this nation has ever seen. A Rose Garden stroll? Sure, but what’s in it for Barry, hmmm?

    Military deaths must be sorted and categorized, you see, by this most transparent of administrations, for their relative political value. Deaths that can advance their politically correct, socialist agenda become high value opportunities. Should that political value be lacking, then meh…not so much. But in the case of Bergdahl, this tender flower child with ballet skills and inclined to ethereal walk-abouts is obviously poster material for liberal causes, so we will level the full force and presence of the United States government to enshrine him as a hero.

    Oh, the families of those killed in the search for our precious little flower?

    Tough…they’ll just have to work through it on their own.

    Hey, this is the office of the commander of the chiefs; we’re busy, ya know?

    Crossposted at American Thinker