Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden

  • Bergdahl the Wanderer

    Bergdahl the Wanderer

    According to the Washington Times, quoting from a “classified” report, Bowe Bergdahl has wandered off from his unit twice before the last and most famous “walk”;

    A classified Pentagon report on Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s dissappearance in Afghanistan outlined how the soldier had wandered away from his unit on two occasions — once during training in California and once from an outpost in Afghanistan — prior to going missing in June 2009.

    […]

    “We have no indication that he intended to leave permanently,” one government official familiar with the probe told Military Times. Several soldiers in Bergdahl’s unit told investigators that Bergdahl had previously talked about a desire to leave the base unaccompanied and may have done so and returned unharmed at least once before the night he disappeared, the official said.

    It really doesn’t matter that he didn’t intend to leave permanently, I’m pretty sure there were rules against leaving the wire and wandering around at night to smell the flowers, or to have congress with goats or whatever excuse he’ll use. It’s not his intentions that counts, it’s the result.

    Henry Mark Holzer writes a little history of past deserters and how they were punished and he concludes that given the lessons of the past, Bergdahl has little to worry about.

    As the credulous are joyous over the safe return of Sgt. Bowe Berghdal after nearly five years of Haqqani captivity, and as every hour the Internet traffic swells with questions about whether Bergdahl was a deserter, sadly, if it’s the latter he probably won’t have too much to worry about.

    Not only because Obama, Hagel, and others occupying dark corners of the administration now have a vested interest in Bergdahl and the POW narrative that they’ve wrapped him in, and not only because of the parades and keys to the city that will be proffered, but because the Pentagon’s track record of severely punishing desertion leaves much to be desired.

    As far as the release of the five Guantanamo alumni, the Pentagon had successfully fended off White House attempts to release them before, but this time they were told to “suck it up and salute” according to Time Magazine as quoted in the Washington Times;

    “This [sudden release] was out of the norm,” [an anonymous Pentagon official] continued. “There was never [a] conversation.”

    “Obama’s move was an ultimate victory for those at the White House and the State Department who had previously argued the military should ‘suck it up and salute,’ says the official familiar with the debate,” reported Time.

    National Security Counsel Deputy for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes told the magazine that “there was not a dissent on moving forward with this plan,” from representatives at the Pentagon, State Department, intelligence community and Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    Officials who spoke with Time contradict that claim, saying of the released terror suspects: “These five are clearly bad dudes.”

    But, like I’ve said before, it’s easier to ask forgiveness than it is to ask for permission.

    And then there’s this from Fox News;

    U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl at one point during his captivity converted to Islam, fraternized openly with his captors and declared himself a “mujahid,” or warrior for Islam, according to secret documents prepared on the basis of a purported eyewitness account and obtained by Fox News.

    The reports indicate that Bergdahl’s relations with his Haqqani captors morphed over time, from periods of hostility, where he was treated very much like a hostage, to periods where, as one source told Fox News, “he became much more of an accepted fellow” than is popularly understood. He even reportedly was allowed to carry a gun at times.

    I could mitigate some of that. I would say crazy stuff to keep my head attached to my neck, too, so I’m between not believing it and not caring about it. But, it may affect you differently.

  • Beeker on Bergdahl

    Beeker on Bergdahl

    beeker brandon

    So, Brandon Friedman, affectionately known here on these pages as “Beeker”, an infantry platoon leader in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Vice Chairman of VoteVets as well as the administrator of their blog VetsVoice which TAH effectively killed. Friedman followed Tammy Duckworth to the Department of Veterans Affairs as their chief of new media propaganda, the Director of Online Communications. He left the VA when things started getting too hot at that department and now he is Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, you know to cover for the failures at that agency.

    Friedman is cutthroat. He’ll throw anyone under the bus who doesn’t toe the party line. I have intimate knowledge of that. He’s even stooped to using TAH for some of his attempts to cut the wings off of his political opponents. But, I’m saving the specifics of that particular story for a time when I need it. Brandon knows what I’m talking about.

    But now, he’s casting aspersions on Bergdahl’s leaders and his unit to salvage the White House’s image in that discussion. Throwing an entire unit under the bus to make the President and this administration, along with Bowe Bergdahl look good.

    Of course Friedman says that he’s “not a fan of speculation” just before he begins to speculate. There’s no evidence that there were failures of leadership in Bergdahl’s unit, so Friedman makes them up out of whole cloth. I guess, in a courtroom they’d call that “sowing seeds for reasonable doubt” – the last refuge of a defense attorney who is in over his head. But, you know, a commissioned officer in the United States Army shouldn’t be screwing over his brother officers in that manner.

    And even if there was a leadership problem in the unit, that doesn’t mitigate deserting your unit and being the subject of millions of dollars spent on finding you and trading five high value prisoners for you.

    The White House has even stooped to calling what Bergdahl’s former platoon mates have done in the media as “Swiftboating” him, according to an NBC White House correspondent, says Breitbart. Of course, it’s misuse of the term – swiftboating means to call out a member of the military on his lies, like the Swiftboat Vets for Truth did to John Kerry. So, in that sense, yes they did swiftboat Bergdahl, but, of course, the White House means to disparage a number of veterans of the Afghanistan War to save the fairy tale that they’re trying to shove down our throats.

    So, see, we’re all heroes and worthy of praise unless we turn on the party line – then we’re all shit. Well, Brandon Friedman, you’re shit for turning your back on your brother officers for your thirty pieces of silver.

    Thanks to our countless friends who sent us links to Friedman’s Twitter account.

    This is from Patrick;

    bergdahl video

  • Kerry: $5b in terrorism fund

    Kerry: $5b in terrorism fund

    John Kerry

    ROS sends us a link to the Washington Times with an Associated Press article and I really don’t know what to make of it.

    Secretary of State John Kerry said Wednesday the United States is setting up a $5 billion “terrorism partnership fund” to help other countries push back against radical extremists.

    The headline tells that story, too, but that’s all there is. No indication as to what they plan to do with the fund. For all we know, it’s to buy bubble gum for when our allies aren’t kicking ass.

    From Wiki;

    The most recent major report on these costs come from Brown University in the form of the Costs of War project, which said the total for wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan is at least $3.2-4 trillion.

    So what do they expect $5 billion will do? I’m thinking that they announced this the day after they settled on keeping 9800 troops in Afghanistan to give the impression that they’re not giving up on the war on terror, that the Nobel Prize president is still a wartime president.

    The only way this would be news to me is if Kerry was starting the fund out of his own pocket, and I guess we know that will never happen.

  • Troops worry about hashtag war

    Troops worry about hashtag war

    navyseals_s640x411

    I don’t know how much stock I put in this story, but NBC reports that “some commanders” of special forces troops are concerned that the #bringbackourgirls hashtag thing is going to get them bogged down in Nigeria;

    According to two well-placed defense department sources, senior Special Operations commanders — those in charge of the Navy SEALs, Delta Force and the Ranger Regiment — have told their men to be ready, assuming that eventually “the hashtag will bring us out.”

    “We’re being tweeted into combat,” said a military official who spoke to NBC News but asked not to be identified.

    Like I said, I don’t think this is a real worry. As little regard as I have for the current administration, I don’t think they’re as susceptible to the calls from the slacktivists as the skinnyjeans crowd would like to think. I’m pretty sure that they’re well aware of how the historians would judge them…after all, that’s what they’re most worried about – their legacy.

    Thanks to Pinto Nag for the link.

  • The President at Bagram

    The President at Bagram

    Obama in Bagram

    Stars & Stripes reports that President Obama made a surprise trip to visit the troops in Afghanistan today. Good on him;

    Air Force One landed at Bagram Air Field, the main U.S. base in Afghanistan, after an overnight flight from Washington. Obama was scheduled to spend just a few hours on the base and had no plans to travel to Kabul, the capital, to meet with Hamid Karzai, the mercurial president who has had a tumultuous relationship with the White House.

    Obama’s surprise trip came as the U.S. and NATO withdraw most of their forces ahead of a year-end deadline.

    If I’m not mistaken, it’s the first time he’s been there since he was running for president in 2008. I’m sure if I missed a trip, y’all will tell me about it.

    Now fire Shinseki.

  • More on MoveOn

    More on MoveOn

    MoveOn loves Boko Haram

    From our friends at Weasel Zippers; I guess this fell down memory holes, but, according to their own petitions pages, MoveOn.org petitioned Hillary Clinton, then the Secretary of State, to prevent her from naming that Boko Haram al-Qeada-linked terrorist organization in Nigeria to the Foreign Terrorist Organization list, because “Such a move would be a counterproductive mistake with far-reaching negative consequences for both Americans and Nigerians.”

    It would give the group additional visibility and credibility among international terrorist networks. It would increase the chances that the group would direct its attacks against U.S. targets.

    Most significantly, it would reinforce militarization of Nigerian government actions against the group. Repressive actions by Nigerian security forces in the past have already contributed to increasing support for Boko Haram among those affected. What is needed instead is a multifaceted strategy. Such a strategy must include not only security measures to protect civilians but also flexible diplomacy and serious attention to development issues, particularly in the disadvantaged North of Nigeria where Boko Haram finds support.

    Whew, thanks MoveOn, we really dodged that bullet, didn’t we? Those nearly 300 teenage girls called and they wanted me to thank you for them. Now we can engage in hashtag warfare, which is much safer and makes stank-ass hippies feel good about themselves;

    hashtag warfare

    FTO designation would also cause enormous collateral damage, making it difficult for both the U.S. government and non-profit groups to address humanitarian and development issues, particularly in the North. It would hamper any efforts by third parties to encourage dialogue and it would introduce new tensions into U.S.-Nigerian relations. It would also pose serious bureaucratic obstacles to travel and family remittances for Nigerian Americans and other Nigerians resident in the United States.

    The Nigerian government is well aware of the counterproductive effects of a FTO designation for Boko Haram and has expressed its opposition. So have more than 20 of the top U.S. scholars on Nigeria. We urge you to heed their informed advice.

    Thanks, MoveOn. Of course, it hardly got any signatures, but looking at the most current dates of the signatories, I see that they’re still signing it. And using the hastag meme. #illiterateassholes #stankasshippies

  • Jane Mayer; Reagan’s Benghazi

    Jane Mayer; Reagan’s Benghazi

    Jane_mayer

    ChockBlock sends us a link to New Yorker in which journalist/Yale grad, Jane Mayer strains to make a comparison between the Obama Administration’s tribulations in comparison to President Reagan and the Beirut bombing;

    There were more than enough opportunities to lay blame for the horrific losses at high U.S. officials’ feet. But unlike today’s Congress, congressmen did not talk of impeaching Ronald Reagan, who was then President, nor were any subpoenas sent to cabinet members. This was true even though then, as now, the opposition party controlled the majority in the House. Tip O’Neill, the Democratic Speaker of the House, was no pushover. He, like today’s opposition leaders in the House, demanded an investigation—but a real one, and only one. Instead of playing it for political points, a House committee undertook a serious investigation into what went wrong at the barracks in Beirut. Two months later, it issued a report finding “very serious errors in judgment” by officers on the ground, as well as responsibility up through the military chain of command, and called for better security measures against terrorism in U.S. government installations throughout the world.

    In other words, Congress actually undertook a useful investigation and made helpful recommendations. The report’s findings, by the way, were bipartisan. (The Pentagon, too, launched an investigation, issuing a report that was widely accepted by both parties.)

    In March of 1984, three months after Congress issued its report, militants struck American officials in Beirut again, this time kidnapping the C.I.A.’s station chief, Bill Buckley. Buckley was tortured and, eventually, murdered. Reagan, who was tormented by a tape of Buckley being tortured, blamed himself. Congress held no public hearings, and pointed fingers at the perpetrators, not at political rivals.

    If you compare the costs of the Reagan Administration’s serial security lapses in Beirut to the costs of Benghazi, it’s clear what has really deteriorated in the intervening three decades. It’s not the security of American government personnel working abroad. It’s the behavior of American congressmen at home.

    Yeah, well, there are vast differences between the two incidences which resulted in the murders of Americans by jihadists. In Benghazi, warnings were made to people in Washington to reinforce security personnel. In Beirut, there were already hundreds of troops, but they weren’t deployed properly with sufficient security measures employed to protect the facility. Although some of that was the fault of Washington, and ultimately the president, the culpability was also shared by commanders on the ground who didn’t foresee a truck bomb attack, although that method of attack had been employed in the recent past.

    Mayers claims that Hillary Clinton took responsibility for Benghazi, and something about the “dismissal of four employees”. If I remember correctly those four employees were just moved to other jobs, and Hillary Clinton told us that the deaths of those Americans at Benghazi don’t matter.

    The Reagan Administration were forthcoming with information to Congress in regards to Beirut, the Obama Administration has not – they let it out in drips and drabs to drag out the investigation, ala Bill Clinton so that America tires of hearing about it. All of the surviving victims of Beirut were allowed to have their say abut the investigation. There are 30 surviving victims of the Benghazi whose names we don’t even know yet.

    She claims that there are Republicans calling for the impeachment of the President. Yeah, no one rational is doing that, but there are impeachable offenses in regards to the lack of candor in the executive branch. Not to mention that the Reagan Administration took their portion of the blame immediately, they didn’t blame some virtually unknown movie or video.

    But you can bet that the low-information voters are going to eat this vacuous shit up like applesauce. Mayer just wanted us to know that she was at Beirut back when she considered an unbiased reporter, but years of drinking the koolaid has made her an apologist for the naked emperor.

  • The douche constituency weighs in on Benghazi

    Vietor

    Yeah, I’m sorry but I would have slapped the snot out of this hipster douche, Tommy Vietor, a former NSC spokesman when he was asked by Brett Baier on Fox News if he participated in the editing of talking points, Vietor said that he didn’t remember because “Dude…that was like two years ago”. SMACK!!! Here’s the video of that moment;

    From Business Insider;

    The exchange between Vietor and Baier mirrored a heated debate at a White House press briefing on Wednesday, where ABC News’ Jon Karl grilled spokesman Jay Carney over newly released emails concerning talking points given to Ambassador Susan Rice after the attack.

    So, because the White House has stalled the investigations of the attack on the consulate in Benghazi for two years, I guess enough time has passed that they can all feign memory loss, because, as we’ve been told “what does it matter?”