Among those trying to make a buck by screwing over GIs, add . . . the freaking Girl Scouts???
Well, according to the Girl Scouts – no. Rather, it’s the company with whom they’ve contracted to ship Girl Scout Cookies.
As you might expect, Girl Scout Cookies can now be ordered online. However, if you have them shipped to a “military address”, there’s a slight surcharge – as in $20 per order.
The surcharge applies to military addresses overseas, including AK and HI. Well, I can understand that – to an extent. Shipping to those locations does often cost a bit more.
But the extra fee also applies to military addresses in CONUS.
I wish I was kidding – but I’m not. I’m dead serious.
Talk about an example of pure, outrageous bullsh!t. Think about it: USPS is available at every installation in CONUS. APO service is available overseas. And any reputable shipping company can access US military installations in CONUS, AK, and Hawaii to deliver packages.
Hey, I can see an extra fee for AK/HI/OCONUS. But hell: even in AK and HI, actual cost plus a fixed handling fee should be the norm – not some bogus $20 per order “surcharge”.
Not convinced? OK, then you tell me: why should a package delivered to, say, Fort Hood, TX, cost any more than one delivered to the adjacent community of Kileen?
The answer: it shouldn’t – because it freaking doesn’t. Shippers typically operate on a zone pricing basis. Whoever is adding that extra fee for CONUS military addresses is simply generating profit via screwing over the troops and their dependents.
As I said above: the Girl Scouts are blaming their “shipper” for this blatantly outrageous fee. Maybe that’s actually true.
However, given some of the other stuff I’ve seen lately about the Girl Scouts, their policies, and their political agenda . . . well, let’s just say I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that they’re getting a hefty chunk of that “surcharge”.