Category: Veterans’ Affairs Department

  • Helman canned

    Helman canned

    Sharon Helman

    After 207 days on administrative leave, Sharon Helman, the former director of the Phoenix VA hospital has finally been kicked to the curb. Helman presided over a corrupt system that the Office of the Inspector General found that neglected veterans waiting for their treatment, yet taxpayers continued all of this time to pay for her comfortable lifestyle for a few more months. from our friends at Concerned Veterans for America;

    Pete Hegseth, CEO of Concerned Veterans for America, issued the following statement in reaction to Helman’s termination:

    “Good riddance.

    “Through our VA Accountability Project, Concerned Veterans for America has fought to hold failing bureaucrats who have endangered the lives of America’s veterans like Sharon Helman accountable for their actions. While we are pleased that Ms. Helman has finally been fired, we are frustrated that it took 207 days to happen. The fact that it took so long to fire someone responsible for such grave wrongdoings speaks volumes about the culture at the Department of Veterans Affairs—an agency infected by corruption and void of transparency and accountability.

    “Under her direction, employees at the Phoenix VA hospital were instructed to systematically falsify patient records and wait time data, and anyone who did not comply with these practices was punished. As a result of this manipulation and deceit, veterans—men and women who fought to protect our country so people like Sharon Helman can live free—died while Ms. Helman collected tens of thousands of dollars in bonuses and a six-figure salary.

    “Sharon Helman is the poster child for VA dysfunction. Had she done the same thing in the private healthcare sector, she’d be fired immediately and probably face criminal charges. We hope that Ms. Helman’s termination is a signal that the Department of Veterans Affairs will begin to return to its mission of serving veterans, rather than protecting selfish bureaucrats only interested in serving themselves.”

    Firing Helman doesn’t fix the problems at the VA, but it’s a good first tiny little step.

  • Obama: ‘We can’t ever quit’ on veterans

    Obama: ‘We can’t ever quit’ on veterans

    The Washington Times reports that President Obama’s weekly message focused on veterans appropriately leading up to Veterans’ Day, but his message is just words and doesn’t match his actions;

    “The end of a war is just the beginning of our obligations to those who serve in our name. These men and women will be proud veterans for decades to come, and our service to them has only just begun,” Mr. Obama said. “Let’s honor our veterans by making sure they get the care and benefits they’ve earned. That means health care that’s there for them when they need it. It means continuing to reduce the disability claims backlog. And it means giving our wounded warriors all the care and support they need to heal, including mental health care for those with post-traumatic stress or traumatic brain injury.”

    The Obama Administration threw billions of dollars at the Department of Veterans’ Affairs for the treatment of veterans, but those billions were apparently squandered because nothing improved in regards to getting treatment to veterans who earned it. The money went to coddling the VA employees instead with high-priced conferences and new furnishings for their offices while thousands of veterans languished on secret and not-so-secret lists. President Obama threatens to veto the defense bill this year if Congress doesn’t shift health care costs to veterans. And just last year, Obama’s Defense Department raided the $770 million Tricare surplus that veterans paid for their own health care. That surplus was spent on pet projects in the DoD.

    The president has also threatened to veto the defense bill if Congress gives the troops a pay raise that keeps pace with inflation.

    Six years into the mismanagement of the Veterans Affairs Department, the Associated Press reports that a thousand employees of the VA are being scrutinized and looking at losing their jobs;

    [VA Secretary Robert] McDonald’s comments represent a departure from his previous public remarks. At a news conference Thursday, he said the VA has proposed disciplinary action — up to an including firing — against more than 40 employees nationwide since June. Those cases are all related to a scandal over long patient wait times and manipulation of records to hide the delays.

    At an appearance Friday at the National Press Club, McDonald said the VA has taken or is considering disciplinary action against 5,600 employees during the past year, although aides later clarified that most of those actions were not related to the health-care scandal.

    Just as with everything else that this administration faces, they wait until the last minute to deal with problems – and then they have to “focus group” their reaction. If these employees are so terrible that they must be terminated, why is it only happening now when it could have been done last year or the year before?

    The troops have never failed the President, not once, whenever he’s called on them. It’s unfortunate that veterans can’t say the same about the President.

  • VA secretary interceded in IG report

    VA secretary interceded in IG report

    We called BS on the media’s reportage in regards to the Veterans’ Affairs Office of the Inspector General’s investigation into the charge that veterans had died awaiting care in Phoenix. It turns out that the interim secretary of the Department, Sloan Gibson, asked the VAOIG to “soften” their report according to the Army Times;

    According to newly released documents, the report was amended to add a finding that there was no conclusive evidence that delays in care resulted in veteran deaths.

    In recent congressional testimony, acting VA Inspector General Richard Griffin adamantly denied that changes in the final report, which downplayed links between delayed care and up to 40 veteran deaths, had been “dictated” by VA headquarters.

    But e-mails released Friday by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs show that Sloan Gibson, who had been acting VA secretary, personally corresponded with Griffin in early August, asking him to amend the report.

    You might remember that the day the report was released to the media, the President was speaking to the American Legion and making more bullshit promises about caring for veterans. But, I suppose that had nothing to do with the urgency to mislead the media.

    Thanks to Chief Tango for the link.

  • VA takes precautions against “crazed vets”

    VA takes precautions against “crazed vets”

    Oscar-the-vet

    Remember a few weeks ago when we were Oscar the Grouchy Vet according to the VA? Of course, the VA apologized for that slight, but the National Journal reports that the VA still has that perception of the people they’re sworn to service;

    Veterans Affairs officials want to change when veterans can view some of their medical records online, fearing that some could become violent if they see negative comments and think their disability claims will be denied.

    […]

    A group of department officials said Monday that they fear some veterans could see the notes from the exam, assume from this partial picture that their claim is being denied, and take out their anger on local VA officials. They voiced their safety concerns Monday to members of the department’s Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation at their meeting this week in Washington.

    “He walks past the [compensation-and-pension] clinic, and he’s very angry. Goes into the C-and-P clinic, and we have an incident of some kind,” said Gerald Cross, the chief officer in the Veterans Health Administration’s office of disability and medical assessment. “Some of our C-and-P clinics are quite small, … and it doesn’t have much in the way of reasonable defense. We’re very concerned about that.”

    […]

    “I hate to say this, but what is the ethical justification of removing the C-and-P exams from the Blue Button?” asked Michael Simberkoff, executive chief of staff at the VA’s NY Harbor Healthcare System.

    But department officials tied the move to one factor: Potential risk to VA staffers. In addition to changing when a veteran can see part of his or her file online, they are also considering adding extra security to the clinics, such as requiring a code to unlock doors.

    So, we’ve graduated from Oscar the Grouchy Vet to the Tasmanian Devil Vet.

    The reasonable solution, of course, would be to give veterans the amount of respect that we deserve instead of being treated like vicious animals. Maybe they could be more trustworthy to veterans. They could stop giving benefits to those phonies with wild-ass tales of derring-do and start serving the rest of us who are only trying to get enough to get by.

    Instead they bow to the corrupted popular culture and perpetuate the myth of the crazed vet.

    Thanks to SSG E for the link.

  • Update on the Washington Times’ poorly written piece

    Update on the Washington Times’ poorly written piece

    We talked yesterday about the piece in the Washington Times written by Jacqueline Klimas, in regards to how younger veterans are avoiding the traditional VSOs for younger, hipper versions. Our buddy, Mothax at The Burn Pit noticed a few funny things about some of the people that Ms. Klimas interviewed.

    Like I said yesterday, Kate Hoit and I have been pals since we met at the Milblog Conference a few years back. Before that, she wrote at VoteVets, then she worked with the VA’s New Media directorate or whatever, she went over there with the crowd from VoteVets who followed Tammy Duckworth, including many of our traditional enemies, Brandon Friedman, Dicksmith, et al. Now she works for “Got Your 6” – everyone knows what I think of “Got Your Six”.

    Also there was Lieutenant Commander Sean Foertsch, a Navy Reservist, quoted in the article who recently decided not to renew his membership in the American Legion. He doesn’t mention it, nor does Ms. Klimas, but the good Lieutenant Commander also works for the VA.

    Now, why would the VA employees be mad at the Legion and the VFW? Well, mainly because the VSOs had a hand in getting former VA Secretary Shinseki fired for being an incompetent boob, because being a member of their club is more important than taking care of vets – something that the Shinseki VA couldn’t do properly – even though the Obama Administration threw sacks of cash at them, the VA pissed it all away on silly videos and parties while the sick and injured piled up outside their doors (figuratively speaking). The Shinseki VA was more about taking care of VA employees than taking care of veterans.

    So, yeah, the VA is still working to screw vets by confounding the discussion over VSOs with their bullshit blather. I’m really disappointed with the Washington Times and I think it’s off my rotation for the time being. I’m sure Reverend Moon will survive without me, though.

    But, I do know how those VA employees turn on their former friends to protect Shinseki from criticism. Buy me a beer sometime and I’ll tell you about it. But you should read The Burn Pit post, first.

  • Yet More VA Waste and Abuse?

    Watchdog.org has a new article up today about the VA.  This time, they’re questioning some activities at the 111-bed VA Overton Brooks Medical Center in Shreveport, LA.  At first glance, it certainly seems that the activities in question need questioning.

    Seems the VA Medical Center there has some problems.  The article lists several.  But the one that got my attention most was the fact that it has been running out of things lately.

    What kind of things, you ask?  Well, things like toiletries – toothbrushes, toothpaste, stuff like that – for patients.

    Well, that’s not so bad, you say?  True.  But they’ve been running out of other stuff, too.  Like clean sheets.  And serviceable blankets.  And clean pajamas.

    However, it also seems like the facility has plenty of money.  They recently spent just under $74,500 on flat screen TVs.  No, not new TVs for each of the 115 patient rooms.  New 42″ (and one 50″) flat-screen TVs to be placed in hallways at elevators.  The VA issued a statement saying that these TVs were

    . . . procured to serve as an electronic bulletin board that “offers an easy way to spread information to a wide audience in a short amount of time. It also provides a way to inform … (about) Medical Center activities, future events and specific health-related topics,” . . .

    Hmm.  Yeah, that’s a great way to use our tax money instead using it to support basic facility operations.  I can’t see why anybody would complain.

    They also bought new furniture – at least some of which was made in Canada, not the US – to the tune of just over $134,000.  And they spent $3M on solar cells for the facility.

    Hey, sometimes you need to replace furniture, and the facility was built in 1950.  So maybe the furniture buy was legit – though given employee accounts that much of the furniture previously on hand was in “great shape”, I kinda doubt it.

    I also don’t have any data on the payback period for the solar cells, so I won’t dispute that purchase either.  Based on previous idiocy we’ve seen from this Administration regarding other so-called “green energy” products (like that $24/gallon biodiesel the Navy purchased), I have my doubts.  I’d guess it’s likely a waste, and will never pay for itself.  But maybe not.

    Further:  this hospital is currently sending their soiled items over 100miles to another VA facility to be laundered so that job can be performed by VA employees.  (And no, I’m not joking; that’s really their stated reason for periodically running out of bedding and pajamas.)  So I think I can recommend an easier and simpler way to save even more energy than spending $3M on solar cells – and one that has a real short payback period.

    But the hallway TV procurement for use as an “electronic bulletin board” really bothers the sh!t out of me.

    Why?  Well, for starters:  $74,000 for 24 TVs works out to over $3,080 each.  That probably includes the broadcast source, cabling, and installation.  But still:  close to $3,100 a screen?  Damn, that seems pretty excessive for something used to display the weather, inspirational sayings, quotations from modern poets, and healthy lifestyle exhortations  at the facility’s elevators – which is what one employee says is all that is routinely displayed on them.

    But that’s not what torques me the worst.  What galls me most is that I took a few minutes, looked up a few prices for hospital bedding (here) and blankets (here), and did a little math.  And the results (and implications of same) were, well, disgusting.

    Per those price sources, purchased in case lots (60 each) a set of sheets plus a pillowcase runs somewhere about $20.  A decent cover/blanket runs about the same.  So a set of hospital bedding runs about $40.

    That’s commercial pricing.  I’m guessing the government could negotiate a substantially better price – but let’s use those numbers anyway.

    $74,000 / $40 = 1,850.  That means the money spent on those flat-screen TVs could have bought 1,850 complete sets of bedding for the facility (set of sheets, pillowcase, blanket).

    The facility has 111 beds.  Assuming a daily change of sheets for each bed, that’s over 2 weeks worth of linen for every hospital room in the facility.  Even if each bed needs a 2nd change once a week (due to sickness, accidents, spills, etc . . . ), that’s still nearly 2 weeks worth of linen.  Cut back the furniture buy by about 33% and you’re talking about purchasing around 3 weeks worth.

    Seems to me that 2 weeks is more than enough time to get the laundry done and returned.  And it seems that having a 3-week supply of new bedding on-hand would fix the current problem of periodically running out.  But apparently having those damned TVs and that new furniture was more important than making sure patients had clean linen when needed.

    The basic article goes on to discuss a number of other problems at that VA Medical Center.  Disgusting – there’s really no other word.

    . . .

    I’ve said it before, but I’ll repeat myself here.  IMO, the VA doesn’t have a resource problem.  The VA has a leadership, culture, and priorities problem.

    The new VA Secretary there needs to f**king clean house among his agency’s management.

     

     

     

  • VAOIG “softened” report of vets’ deaths

    VAOIG “softened” report of vets’ deaths

    Veterans-Affairs2

    Last month, I wrote about the Veterans’ Affairs Department Office of the Inspector General’s report after I actually read the thing, and not the media’s translation which benefited the President’s speech to the American Legion Convention on the day of the report’s release. The media told us that the report said that no veternas’ deaths were caused by the delay of their care in Phoenix, but the report stated otherwise. Now, CBS has noticed it, too;

    Two of the doctors who first blew the whistle on the veterans’ deaths in Phoenix say the inspector general botched the investigation and went too easy on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

    One says the IG engaged in a whitewash of what happened there, bowing to pressure from inside the agency, reports CBS News correspondent Wyatt Andrews.

    The issue surrounds the investigation into whether more than 40 veterans at the Phoenix VA died while waiting to see the doctor. The IG’s final report in August concluded that it “[could not] conclusively assert” that long wait times “caused the deaths of these veterans.”

    Yeah, that number looks like it’s actually 293 veterans who died, not necessarily from waiting for treatment, but it proves that the IG report was flawed in the research.

    Our source, who works at VA headquarters and who spoke exclusively to CBS News, said officials inside the agency asked for a revision of the first draft. That’s standard practice, but in this case the source said it amounted to pressure on Inspector General Richard Griffin to add a line to water down the report.

    “The organization was worried that the report was going to damn the organization,” the whistle-blower said. “And therefore it was important for them to introduce language that softened that blow.”

    Of course, we knew it was flawed and watered down because we actually read the report, instead of just taking the media’s word for it.

    Thanks to one of our ninjas for the link.

  • Venita Godfrey-Scott; renovations at VA’s expense

    Venita Godfrey-Scott; renovations at VA’s expense

    Venita Godfrey-Scott

    AW1 Tim sends us a link to the Department of Justice press release about Venita Godfrey-Scott of New Haven, Connecticut who was a supervisor in the Facilities Management Service of the VA hospital in New West Haven. Here, let them tell you the story;

    From approximately 2010 until 2013, GODFREY-SCOTT directed VA employees that she supervised to perform home improvement projects at her private residence, including a deck in her backyard, carpet installation, and various kitchen, bathroom and basement improvements. GODFREY-SCOTT directed the employees to use materials, supplies, tools, and vehicles belonging to the VA, and also had the employees purchase necessary materials at local stores using her government-issued credit card. She sometimes directed the employees to work on her home improvement projects during their regular work hours while they were being paid by the VA. The total loss to the government as a result of GODFREY-SCOTT’s criminal conduct is estimated to be between $15,000 and $20,000.

    Yeah, I’m trying to get my home altered to be more adaptive to my condition and I can’t find a contractor who wants to jump through the VA’s hoops to get paid, you know, even though I’ve been approved for the grant. Maybe I should just get a job at the VA and force VA employees to do it for me. After all, when this Godfrey-Scott chick was sentenced, all she got was 4 years of parole (the first six months of her parole she will be confined to her newly remodeled home), 120 hours of community service and she has to pay back $15,000 of the money she stole. Seems like a fairly good trade-off.