Category: Veterans’ Affairs Department

  • What to say to Oscar the Vet

    What to say to Oscar the Vet

    Oscar-the-vet

    I get tired of bashing the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, but they keep asking for it. From the Stars & Stripes comes the story of a slide presentation to train VA employees on how to deal with veterans seeking help. The slide presentation was entitled “What to Say to Oscar the Grouch – Dealing with Veterans During Town Hall Claims Clinics”.

    About a dozen slides include pictures of the misanthropic Muppet in the can he calls home. In one, a sign reading “CRANKY” hangs from the rim. In another, Oscar’s face is flanked by the words “100% GROUCHY, DEAL WITH IT.”

    The presentation includes tips on how to tell if a claimant is nearing an “outburst,” including being accusatory, agitated, demanding, or unfocused. One section on dealing with angry claimants is titled “Don’t Get in the Swamp With the Alligator.”

    If the stress of dealing with angry claimants is overwhelming, the employees are instructed to take a break.

    That’s a good way to stay out of the swamp, there VA. If I seem a little touchy, maybe we should hear what a veteran who watched the presentation says;

    Christian DeJohn, 45, a VA employee who attended the training, said the content stunned him. DeJohn, an Army veteran who served in Bosnia, said the message seemed to be that veterans are irritable and potentially dangerous.

    “For a long time, there was a stereotype of Vietnam veterans, that they’re mentally unstable and violent, bitter, angry, resentful,” he said. “I feel like this is perpetuating some of the worst stereotypes of veterans.”

    I’m thinking that is because too many VA employees in the upper echelon don’t understand their clientele. In case someone from the VA reads this and they’re planning on making their next slide show, I wouldn’t appreciate being portrayed as Bert, Ernie, The Count, Big Bird or any other Muppet character. How about using real people in your slide show? Hows that? Dingus.

  • Media: No vets died awaiting care, well except that they did

    Media: No vets died awaiting care, well except that they did

    Veterans-Affairs2

    Just in time for the President’s address to the American Legion, the Associated Press reported the news that the Veterans’ Affairs Department Office of the Inspector General couldn’t find any veterans who died while they were waiting for care from the VA hospital according to the ;

    Government investigators found no proof that delays in care caused veterans to die at a Phoenix VA hospital, but they found widespread problems that the Veterans Affairs Department is promising to fix.

    The AP changed their headline after the president’s speech to the American Legion from this;

    AP No vets died

    To this;

    AP No vets 2

    By the way, the president used that little Associated Press headline in his little talk yesterday – that they couldn’t find any dead vets – to prove that he’s getting an undeserved bad rep in the veteran community.

    At this point, if the VAOIG told me that water is wet, I wouldn’t believe them. They won’t rid their roles of phonies, like Joe Cryer, they won’t even bounce the list of DOD’s POW/MIA office off of their own lists. Every day, it seems, we read about a new phony who jumped in line ahead of legitimate veterans. Why should we start believing them now?

    Apparently, we shouldn’t believe them, or at least we shouldn’t believe the media filter that is protecting them. If you read the Washington Post today, after the President’s speech at the American Legion Convention it says;

    The Department of Veterans Affairs’ watchdog confirmed Tuesday that numerous veterans died after receiving poor care in a VA hospital in Phoenix, Ariz., but stopped short of substantiating widely reported allegations that at least 40 veterans died while awaiting care.

    The VA inspector general’s office said in a report that it reviewed the records of 3,409 veterans and found 45 cases where patients experienced “unacceptable and troubling lapses” in care. Of those, 28 experienced long delays in care, and six died, the report said. Seventeen other patients experienced care that “deviated from the expected standard independent of delays,” and 14 of them died, the IG found.

    On page ii of the executive summary of the report (pdf) it says;

    The patient experiences described in this report revealed that access barriers adversely affected the quality of primary and specialty care at the PVAHCS. In February 2014, a whistleblower alleged that 40 veterans died waiting for an appointment. We pursued this allegation, but the whistleblower did not provide us with a list of 40 patient names. From our review of PVAHCS electronic records, we were able to identify 40 patients who died while on the EWL during the period April 2013 through April 2014. However, we conducted a broader review of 3,409 patients identified from multiple sources, including the EWL, various paper wait lists, the OIG Hotline, the HVAC and other Congressional sources, and media reports.

    OIG examined the electronic health records (EHRs) and other information for the 3,409 veteran patients, including the 40 patients reflected above in PVAHCS’s records, and identified 28 instances of clinically significant delays in care associated with access to care or patient scheduling. Of these 28 patients, 6 were deceased. In addition, we identified 17 care deficiencies that were unrelated to access or scheduling. Of these 17 patients, 14 were deceased. We also found problems with access to care for patients requiring Urology Services. As a result, Urology Services at PVAHCS will be the subject of a subsequent report. The 45 cases discussed in this report reflect unacceptable and troubling lapses in follow-up, coordination, quality, and continuity of care.

    Basically, they found less than forty, but they found more than the zero that the Associated Press (and the President) reported yesterday. By the way, the Army Times says the same thing as the AP said yesterday;

    Army Times - no vets

    From our buddy, Pete Hegseth, at Concerned Veterans For America;

    “Concerned Veterans for America is disappointed, but not surprised, to see the Office of the Inspector General’s report confirm what we already knew about the systemic problems and manipulation of records in the Phoenix VA Health System. Following this scathing report, we hope that VA leadership, including former Phoenix VA Health Care System Director Sharon Helman, will finally be held accountable and fired for the gross mismanagement and falsification of records that the IG’s report confirmed occurred on her watch.

    “It is now solely up to President Obama and Secretary McDonald to use the firing authorities recently granted in the VA reform law to make sure that those responsible are held to account and that the VA’s systemic culture of corruption comes to an end. Without that sense of accountability, veterans will continue to be denied the care they have earned. Concerned Veterans for America will continue to monitor the situation long after it has faded from the headlines to make sure that the administration follows through on its promise to our nation’s heroes.”

  • So, What Does the POTUS Really Think of Vets?

    Yesterday, the POTUS signed that “landmark” VA bill – throwing more money at a problem that isn’t financial.  That means he really cares about vets and their problems, right?

    Yeah, right.  Remember the VA scandal that caused that bill to be drafted and fast-tracked?  You know, the one that finally got former VA Secretary Shinseki    kicked to the curb    to resign?

    Wanna guess how many times the POTUS met one-on-one with Shinseki to discuss the scandal this year while it was ongoing?  Remember, the POTUS made it clear when speaking publicly that he regarded the crisis as “urgent”.

    Try once – on the day Shinseki resigned, May 30.   (He also saw Shinseki at two cabinet meetings Shinseki attended in January – but that’s hardly the same.)

    That’s it.

    Words, actions. One’s for show; the other is reality.

    You do the math.

  • “Landmark” VA bill signed

    “Landmark” VA bill signed

    VA Bill Belvoir

    The President signed what is being called a “landmark” bill to overhaul the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, according to Stars & Stripes;

    “This will not and cannot be the end of our effort,” Obama said. “Implementing this bill will take time. It will take focus from all of us.”

    The massive reform package has been a rare instance of bipartisanship in Washington and won overwhelming support in both chambers of Congress in late July, just three months after delays in veteran health care exploded into a national scandal. It dramatically expands veteran access to private care, adds medical staff and facilities, and streamlines the firing of VA executives found to be incompetent or guilty of manipulating patient data.

    “It’s a good deal,” Obama said. “This bill covers a lot of ground.”

    Everything this President does is somehow “landmark” and I’m not sure why they signed it at Fort Belvoir, an Army base which has nothing to do with the VA. Of course, it’s really not going to change much about the way the VA is run. From another S&S link;

    The bill includes a compromise by House and Senate lawmakers allowing the Department of Veterans Affairs to continue handing out up to $360 million in employee performance awards each year as it attempts to overhaul its health care system and ease chronically long patient wait times.

    So, basically, the bill rewards VA employees by pushing their workload off on civilian hospitals and continuing their bonuses.

    Pete Hegseth, CEO of Concerned Veterans for America, issued the following statement in reaction:

    “Today is a victory for veterans. The VA reform bill President Obama signed into law today brings the first major civil service reform since the 1980’s. But while the key provisions in this legislation that hold VA executives accoundailytable and grant veterans’ choice for private sector care are long overdue, they are only the first step. CVA fought long and hard for these reforms, and it’s important to remember that this historic legislative compromise happened in spite of this administration’s efforts rather than because of them.

    “The fact is that there was little appetite from those on the stage today for the reforms that are the core of this legislation. It is telling that rather than pausing for victory laps, House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller—who deserves the lion’s share of the credit for his leadership on this legislation—and CVA, were in the field today making sure that the calcified bureaucracy at the center of this scandal as well as the politicians who failed to prevent it, are held to account.

    “The President has no more room to shirk responsibilities or shift blame. How effective these reforms will be now rests squarely on the shoulders of this administration. CVA will be keeping a close eye on how these reforms are implemented and enforced to ensure that Congress’ intent is met and that President Obama and VA Secretary McDonald use these significant tools of reform so that the betrayal we have seen is never repeated.”

  • House passes compromise Vet bill

    The House voted 420-5 to pass a compromise bill on veterans’ care. I don’t know how much good it will do since all it does is throw $17 billion at the problem and make it easier for the new VA Secretary to fire department executives, according to the Washington Times;

    Lawmakers approved the plan to cut down on wait times 420-5, signaling that the eagerness to care for veterans outweighed the almost $17 billion price tag — $10 billion of which would be tacked onto the deficit, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate.

    “There’s no doubt that the Department of Veterans Affairs as we know it today is in crisis and our veterans are suffering,” said Rep. Jeff Miller, Florida Republican and co-author of the bill, on the House floor. “The conference committee report we’re considering today is the first step.”

    The bipartisan deal would let veterans who have been waiting more than 30 days for an appointment or who live more than 40 miles from a facility seek care outside the VA. It would also give newly-confirmed Secretary Robert McDonald more power to fire poor-performing senior executives.

    I don’t know how Congress can actually vote to lessen wait times. But, at least they feel like they “did something” and they can feel good about themselves – and isn’t that really all that matters. The good news is that some veterans can now take advantage of care outside the system if they meet the geographic preconditions. That should reduce wait times somewhat. the problem at the VA is a cultural problem, though and can’t be legislated away, you know, like most problems in this country.

    The problems go deeper than a few executives, though. The Senate (Bernie Sanders, specifically) protected their union base and the real problem employees are still safe, irrespective of how they do their jobs. I wish Mr. McDonald all of the luck in the world, and I wish those veterans who have been left out of the system all of the luck in the world, but I don’t have much hope.

  • Vet locked inside VA hospital

    I saw this early this morning on Fox about Jeff Duck, a veteran who had gone to the VA hospital to get his prescriptions filled. He was kept waiting for three hours, and then he noticed that everyone in the hospital was gone and he was locked in with an alarm going off;

    When he tried to leave, he triggered an alarm so he called 911. Duck took some video of the strange situation with his cell phone before authorities arrived to let him out.

    Duck had been at the clinic for three hours trying to see his doctor for a refill of his pain medication.

    Duck later questioned how the VA is going to handle its much broader problems if it can’t get things like this in order.

    The VA has since apologized to Duck and vowed to change its procedures “to ensure that this does not happen again.”

  • Hegseth: Sen. Sanders’ socialist agenda holding up help for America’s veterans

    Our buddy, Pete Hegseth, the director of Concerned Veterans for America sends us a link to his opinion piece in Fox News. Here are some excerpts;

    They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. The definition of insanity in Washington is when, despite painfully obvious facts and experiences, ideologically-slavish legislators insist the “solutions” (read: more money) that they’ve tried for years will finally solve persistent problems.

    The latest personification of such insanity is Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the self-proclaimed socialist who also happens to be the chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs (VA) committee.

    […]

    First, Sen. Sanders introduced an expansive $30 billion veterans omnibus bill in February that foisted substantially more responsibilities onto the VA, flooding a system that was already overloaded. But, for the first time in decades — thanks to the efforts of reform-minded Senators and outside groups — the bill was defeated on the Senate floor. A clear message was sent: bigger doesn’t mean better.

    Second came the public VA scandal in late April, when brave whistleblowers in Phoenix came forward and started the ongoing cascade of revelations that became the national disgrace known as the VA scandal.

    A department that had been lavished with substantially more resources under this administration — roughly 60 percent more funding since 2009 — was unable to see patients promptly, and worse, was caught falsifying records to protect executive bonuses and hide the truth that veterans were dying as a result.

    The reaction was strong and swift on Capitol Hill, with a common refrain: VA does not have a resource problem, it has a culture problem.

    Even President Obama echoed this sentiment last month, saying, “before we start spending more money [at VA], our first job is to take care of some basic management issues that can be fixed.”

    Shortly thereafter, accountability and veterans choice legislation overwhelmingly passed the House and the Senate.

    Which brings us back to our favorite socialist, Bernie Sanders. Those House and Senate bills are now before a conference committee, in which — as the Senate VA chairman — Bernie Sanders has a large role. But, rather than negotiate in good faith to hammer out strong VA reform legislation that would finally hold VA executives accountable and finally give veterans the choice to see private doctors if they wait too long, Sanders is doing the only thing he knows how to do: throwing money at the problem. It’s insane, but he’s doing it.

    In the face of overwhelming evidence, and an urgent crisis for our nation’s veterans, Bernie Sanders is insisting on $17.6 billion in additional VA funding—to hire more staff, build more facilities, and upgrade IT infrastructure.

    Worse, the billions in spending he’s requesting is currently justified by three pages—three!—of information provided by the VA itself.

    […]

    Even if the additional spending Sanders is requesting is valid, it does not address immediate crisis of care and should be managed through the regular budgeting cycle. Moreover, why should we build more capacity in a system that is failing, instead of finding immediate ways for veterans to get the care they need?

    Simple solutions need to come first: like longer hours at VA clinics, asking certain doctors to see more than a handful of patients per day, and giving veterans private choice could address urgent needs. …

    […]

    A clean reform bill, one that addresses accountability and choice—is within reach. Groups like mine will be fighting for that reform, and still believe the right deal can still be struck. …

    I’ve disliked Bernie Sanders since the late eighties when he was a carpetbagger, flatlander mayor of Burlington, Vermont where I taught ROTC. Now, he’s faced with a dilemma – the only real solution to reforming the VA is cleaning house and tossing out the deadwood, but in order to do that, Sanders would have to turn his back on the union, a socialist’s base. So, veterans are going to lose, because veterans count less than union members. And America is looking at a crashed airliner this week, instead of veterans.

    Go kick some commie ass, Pete.

  • Obama Team warned about VA wait times 5 years ago

    Obama Team warned about VA wait times 5 years ago

    The Washington Times reports that they got their hands on a Freedom Of Information Act report that the Obama transition team received when they took the reins of government five years ago which warned that the Department of Veterans’ Affairs had trouble with wait times for patients. That the data which was being used to pay executive bonuses was easily manipulated.

    “VA has been trying — and failing — to replace its outpatient scheduling system since 2000, wasting nearly $130 million in the process,” Rep. Jeff Miller, Florida Republican and chairman of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, told The Times when asked about the delays.

    “Because VA acquisition officials have proven time and again they are simply too inept to guide the development of a new proprietary appointment-scheduling system in an expedient and cost-effective manner, department leaders need to look at adopting commercial technologies that are being used in the private sector,” Mr. Miller said.

    Which is really no surprise. The VA and the Department of Defense can’t figure out a way to transfer medical records between them electronically. How many billions have been wasted on that program? And that’s just transferring data – you know, something that we all do everyday.

    The problem at the VA is the culture and the culture won’t change until they start throwing out the incompetent boobs at the lowest levels.