Category: Terror War

  • Monitoring Iran

    I haven’t written anything about this upcoming deal with Iran over their nuclear program mostly because I haven’t had an opportunity to read it yet. However, there is something I do know – politicians. The Associated Press reports that the Obama Administration is confident that they’ll be able to keep track of the Iranians’ nuclear program;

    The main reason, according to a classified joint intelligence assessment presented to Congress, is that the deal requires Iran to provide an unprecedented volume of information about nearly every aspect of its existing nuclear program, which Iran insists is peaceful. That data will make checking on compliance easier, officials say, because it will shrink Iran’s capacity to hide a covert weapons program.

    “We will have far better insight (into) the industrial aspects of the Iranian nuclear program with this deal than what we have today,” James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, told an audience last month at the Aspen Security Forum.

    I have no doubt that they’ll recognize when Iran is cheating, but my concern is will they be willing to do anything about it? I mean, they’ve known for more than a decade that Iran was supplying terrorists with stuff to kill our troops in Iraq during that war and they’ve done nothing about that. For years, we’ve been redrawing the line in the sand in regards to the Iranian nuclear program. Why would the Iranians take any threat seriously to restore the sanctions against them? Look how long it took to institute the sanctions in the first place.

    Part of the deal with North Vietnam was that we’d send troops back to South Vietnam in the event that the North invaded the South, well, we know how that turned out. Once politicians sign on to a deal, they forget all about it as if just signing it makes everything better. Like they actually accomplished something. Then it’s all for the next president to worry about.

  • Nader Saadeh; NJ man wanted to build an Army to support ISIS

    Nader Saadeh; NJ man wanted to build an Army to support ISIS

    Alaa Saadeh

    The Associated Press reports that Nader Saadeh, a 20-year-old New Jersey man along with his brother, Alaa (pictured above) and friend, Samuel Rahamin Topaz of Fort Lee, thought that they could build themselves an army to fight along ISIS in Syria and Iraq;

    Authorities say Nader Saadeh traveled to the Middle East in May to join the Islamic State but was arrested in Jordan and had been held there in custody. It was not immediately clear when or how he returned to the United States.

    He could face several decades in prison if convicted on all counts.

    Between 2012 and 2013, Saadeh allegedly expressed his hatred for the United States and his wish to form a small army via electronic messages.

    They had also communicated with Munther Omar Saleh another fellow with an Amish name who was arrested in June for the same thing.

    Personally, I’m all for these guys banding together and taking their jihad to Syria and Iraq where we have the means and the will to turn them all into gooey mush suitable for fertilizer and mulch. The FBI should let them go…unless these folks want to jihad here.

    Here’s a link to the DoJ press release.

  • Taliban kill 50 in wave of attacks

    On Friday, the Taliban launched large scale attacks in Kabul beginning with one in a heavily populated area of the city, followed by one on a police academy which killed or wounded 40 people, and then another on Camp Integrity, a base run by security contractors of Academi (formerly Blackwater) which wounded about 248 people and killed 15, including one American, according to reports. Reuters reports that more than 50 people were killed in the three attacks.

    The U.N. mission in Afghanistan said the incident was the worst since it began recording civilian casualties in 2009, with 355 civilians killed or injured. The U.N. Special Representative, Nicholas Haysom, called it “extreme, irreversible and unjustifiable in any terms”.

    On Saturday, NATO-led coalition forces confirmed that one international service member and eight Afghan contractors had been killed in the attack on Camp Integrity, a base used by U.S. special forces near the main airport.

    The blast outside the base was powerful enough to flatten offices inside, wounding occupants who were airlifted by helicopter to military hospitals during the night.

    The article says that US and Afghan military leaders had hoped that there would be a measure of disarray among the Taliban with the announcement of Mullah Omar’s death, but that was just wishful thinking, I guess. The dude has been dead for two years, they would have had time to adjust to the loss of the old useless fart by now, one would think.

    As I said when this administration decided to leave 10,000 US troops in Afghanistan, their main problem would stem from the fact that US forces would need to rely on Afghans for security. The Afghans have trouble providing security for themselves let alone our troops. The fellow who bombed the Afghan police academy was wearing a police uniform.

    Mike sends us the news that the Department of Defense has just released the name of the American soldier killed in these attacks;

    The Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was supporting Operation Freedom’s Sentinel.

    Master Sgt. Peter A. McKenna Jr., 35, of Bristol, Rhode Island, died Aug. 8, in Kabul, Afghanistan, of wounds when he was attacked by enemy small arms fire.

    McKenna was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 7th Special Forces Group, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida.

  • Saddam’s ghost in ISIS

    Saddam’s ghost in ISIS

    The Associated Press reports that the ghost of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq is alive and well in the upper echelons of ISIS’ leadership. Of course, it’s Bush’s fault;

    How officers from Saddam’s mainly secular regime came to infuse one of the most radical Islamic extremist groups in the world is explained by a confluence of events over the past 20 years — including a Saddam-era program that tolerated Islamic hard-liners in the military in the 1990s, anger among Sunni officers when the U.S. disbanded Saddam’s military in 2003, and the evolution of the Sunni insurgency that ensued.

    It looks like the Bush Administration did the right thing by disbanding the Iraqi Army in 2003. In fact, the article opens with the story of how one of Hussein’s generals, Taha Taher al-Ani, now a commander for ISIS, was loading up weapons and ammunition for an insurgency before the Americans even got to Baghdad in 2003. So, disbanding the Army had nothing to do with his decision, did it?

    The Associated Press also blames the US-run prison, Bucca, for introducing these ISIS people to each other;

    The prison was a significant incubator for the Islamic State group, bringing militants like al-Baghdadi [the leader of ISIS] into contact with former Saddam officers, including members of special forces, the elite Republican Guard and the paramilitary force called Fedayeen.

    In Bucca’s Ward 6, al-Baghdadi gave sermons and [al-Baghdadi’s current deputy and a former Saddam-era army major, Saud Mohsen] Hassan emerged as an effective organizer, leading strikes by the prisoners to gain concessions from their American jailers, the intelligence chief said.

    Former Bucca prisoners are now throughout the IS leadership.

    Yeah, well, it appears as though we had all of the right people in prison, then. It begs the question “Why are they out now?”

    Saddam-era veterans also serve as “governors” for seven of the 12 “provinces” set up by the Islamic State group in the territory it holds in Iraq, the intelligence chief said.

    The article claims that these former officers of Saddam’s bring a measure of tactical expertise to ISIS. I wonder how they figure there is any military expertise to gain from forcing their soldiers into murderous waves against the Iranians, or forcing them to sit like ducks for the air campaign that the US waged against them in 1991 or their full-flight from Baghdad in 2003. Yeah, that’s some kind of expertise they have going there. It doesn’t take expertise to wrest control of towns and villages from unarmed civilians and cowing them into submission by beheading their neighbors in public.

    “IS’s military performance has far exceeded what we expected. The running of battles by the veterans of the Saddam military came as a shock,” a brigadier general in military intelligence told the AP….

    The only experience the Saddam-era leaders have is being shot at…by the Iranians and by the US. ISIS military successes are a result of the terror they inflict on folks, not some magical expertise they learned from Saddam Hussein. ISIS gained prominence in the region because the US left Iraq and refused to take the lead to end the civil war in Syria. ISIS took advantage of that void. Period.

  • Lawyers’ motion: ISIS is not a terrorist organization

    There are seven people facing a trial in Minneapolis later this year and their defense attorneys have filed scads of motions trying to frame the case against their clients, according to the Star Tribune. One motion disputes the charges that they were supporting a terrorist organization.

    “While the group has adopted partly violent and repressive tactics, and engages in military and insurgency attacks against the Syrian and Iraqi armies, it has also embarked on a systematic process of civilian governance over the eight to 10 million people with the territory it controls,” attorneys said.

    Essentially, the lawyers claim that because ISIS builds roads and schools, it is a government, not a terrorist organization;

    “Mere travel to Syria, or willingness to ‘join’ ISIL, cannot constitutionally be equated with material support. Accordingly, the material support statute is void,” the attorneys argued.

    Also in dispute is the amount of security at the courthouse where the trial will be held. The lawyers claim that a large number of police officers, Homeland Security officers and a bomb sniffing dog will prejudice the jury against their clients.

    “ … The security appears not to be designed to protect against potential danger posed by the accused but, rather, perceived danger from members of the Somali community who are not accused of any crime.”

    Not as much as a terrorist attack on the courthouse will prejudice the jury, though, I’m guessing.

  • About That Iran Nuke Deal . . .

    I’m reasonably sure that most TAH readers think the current       group of fools and tools in DC helping the POTUS screw things up by-the-numbers       Administration’s proposed nuclear deal with Iran is a serious mistake, and should be rejected.

    One would expect the Administration’s political foes to oppose the deal.  But it’s not only the Administration;s political opponents who have issues.  For starters, Alan Dershowitz – one of the few liberals out there who IMO actually seems to have his head screwed on straight when it comes to terrorism – has come out strongly against the deal. (He has some pretty harsh criticism of the POTUS’s efforts; the linked article is IMO definitely worth a read.)

    It also seems that two senior Members of Congress from his own party – Sen. Schumer of New York, and Rep. Eliot, also of New York and ranking Minority Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee – have now publicly stated their opposition to the deal.

    I just don’t understand that stance.  I mean, really: what’s not to like about a deal that gives away the farm to a nation that has declared you an enemy; which the Administration itself acknowledges will provide financial support to international terrorism; and which the Administration refuses to allow to be read by the public?

    Further, a lady named “Clinton” has reportedly “cautiously embraced the deal”.  And we all know that her judgement – particularly regarding foreign policy – is always “dead on target” and above reproach.  I mean:  just look at Benghazi, her use of email, and her hiring practices.  So what’s not to like?

    (For the record: yes, the previous two paragraph are indeed satire and/or sardonicism.)

    Schumer’s argument for opposing the deal appears quite well-reasoned.  If you’re interested; you can read it here.

    I’m thinking this deal is now in serious trouble. And I’m also thinking . . . that’s just too bad. (smile)

  • Al-Nusra Front kidnaps 5 more US-trained Syrians

    Al-Nusra Front kidnaps 5 more US-trained Syrians

    AFP reports that the Al-Nusra Front, an al Qaeda-affiliated group in Syria battling the Syrian government has captured five more US-trained rebels;

    According to Abdel Rahman, late on Monday, Al-Nusra stormed a camp for internally displaced people in Qah, where the rebel fighters had taken refuge.

    “Five fighters were seen captured but there may be more.”

    The Observatory chief said Al-Nusra was “hunting down” US-backed rebels in both Idlib province, where Qah is located, and neighbouring Aleppo province.

    Last week, eight of the US-trained rebels were captured in a raid, too. There are only 60 of them, so I’m not seeing the value of 3000 US troops training 60 rebels and, so far, thirteen of them have been hauled off by al Qaeda.

  • “Middle Eastern males” approach troops’ family members

    “Middle Eastern males” approach troops’ family members

    According to CBS News the FBI is warning law enforcement that “middle eastern men” have approached family of servicemembers in Colorado and Wyoming seeking to obtain personal information through intimidation;

    Family

    In one case last May the wife of a military member was approached in front of her home by two Middle Eastern males. The men stated that she was the wife of a U.S. interrogator. When she denied their claims the men laughed. The two men left the area in a dark-colored, four-door sedan with two other Middle Eastern males in the vehicle.

    Yeah, well, we didn’t want to fight them over there, so….