It seems that PFC Bradley Manning’s lawyers are whining again. But this time, it’s not over his treatment.
No, this time they are objecting to the fact that Army officials seemed more concerned about potential bad publicity than Manning’s comfort and “feelings”. At least, that’s what I get from this paragraph:
David Coombs, a lawyer for Pfc. Bradley Manning, argued at a pretrial hearing that prosecutors have yet to turn over about 700 emails in their possession. But he said the emails he’s already aware of paint a portrait of a military more concerned with combating negative publicity than with Manning’s welfare and reveal that high-level officials, including a three-star general, were briefed about the conditions of his confinement.
Gee, a 3-star General was concerned that the Army might get bad publicity. I’m shocked, I say – shocked!
Frankly, I’m not surprised that senior Army leadership is concerned about avoiding bad publicity for the Army. That’s part of their job. And I couldn’t personally give a hoot in hell if they were more concerned about protecting the Army than about how Manning was inconvenienced, provided they ensured he was treated humanely – which they did.
Let me recap a few pesky things called “facts” that Manning’s lawyers don’t seem to want to discuss. Manning was confined to his cell for 23 hours daily. So? Many prisoners who might be at-risk from other inmates (or who are dangerous) are similarly kept isolated.
Manning was also evaluated as a suicide risk. Therefore, for a period of time at Quantico his clothing was temporarily taken away. This was done as a protective measure to ensure he didn’t attempt to harm himself with same. He was later provided with a suicide-prevention smock.
But for a while, he had to make do with skivvies – and even sleep in them, without his jammies. Oh, the horror! The horror!
Were Manning’s “feelings hurt” by such “terrible” treatment? Whoop-te-doo. Personally, I couldn’t give the proverbial flying . . . flip if they were. Perhaps he should have thought about the possibility that he’d go to prison – and be treated harshly but humanely as a prisoner – before disclosing several hundred thousand classified documents to persons not authorized to receive them.
Humane treatment doesn’t necessarily equate to pleasant conditions. “Three hots and a cot”, adequate shelter, and protection from physical harm or abuse qualifies. And having to sleep in your skivvies (or naked) because you’re thought to be suicidal and your normal clothing has been taken away to ensure you don’t harm yourself with it does not qualify as abuse.
Manning didn’t give a damn about how his actions affected the Army or his brothers/sisters in arms – or his country. So as long as he’s treated humanely, why should anyone in the Army give a rat’s ass whether he’s comfortable or his feelings get hurt?
