Jonn posted a brief story the other day on the guilty plea entered by Robert Bales – the guy who claims he “snapped” after a night of unauthorized drinking, then went out and murdered 17 Afghan civilians in their homes. Even now there appear to be those who would excuse Bales’ actions, either partially or completely.
I’d like to offer a short counterexample.
What Bales did was nothing but thuggery. What the following three Soldiers did, on the other hand, was IMO the epitome of correct, professional conduct.
During the first Gulf War a small US Special Forces team of 3 persons was conducting strategic reconnaissance. They were well behind enemy lines. Indeed, they were north of the Euphrates river and were less than 100 miles from Baghdad. Their mission was to observe one of the major roadways between Baghdad and Iraq for signs of enemy activity in order to screen the western flank of the planned allied “left hook” through southern Iraq.
They had secreted themselves in a dug-in, “spider-hole” hide site. (We’d studied the Viet Cong’s use of such during the Vietnam war, and had learned much.) The site was well camouflaged; observation was by a small periscope-like device raised through a small opening in the camouflaged door to the hide site, described as a “slit”.
Unfortunately, no camouflage is absolutely perfect; children are both inquisitive and observant. Early one morning a small Iraqi girl – a child no more than 7, per later estimates – was out and about and saw something she though unusual. She went over to investigate.
She found the slit in the hide site’s trap door – then lifted it open. In short order, she was staring down the muzzle of three silencer-equipped pistols.
The three US soldiers had a choice. They could kill the little girl, hide the body, and continue their mission. Or they could let the child go, attempt an extraction with their cover blown – and maybe not get home.
They chose the latter option. The child ran and got her father. Her father informed nearby Iraqi forces of what his daughter had found.
The site was soon surrounded by around 100 Iraqi troops. Amazingly, the team was successfully extracted – although it turned out to be a truly harrowing and narrow escape under fire.
The most junior member of the team was later asked why they didn’t kill the child to preserve their mission, and perhaps their own lives. The title of this article gives his response.
Like Bales, he was a US Army Staff Sergeant.
The story above is not apocryphal. Details may be found at pages 4 and 5 of this article. It’s a short but incredible read.
Those three soldiers knew the difference between cold-blooded murder and collateral damage. They chose to be military professionals instead of murderers, even though they knew it might cost them their freedom – or their lives.
In contrast, Bales chose cold-blooded murder. For that, there’s no justification.