Category: Politics

  • Port of Olympia emails and military cargo.

    PortZiegler
    It seems that the Port of Olympia might be used for the transpiration of military cargo via emails. This has apparently hit a nerve with a portion of the population in Olympia. Currently the city of Olympia is holding a public discussion on if the military cargo should be allowed to pass through the port. When I first heard this coming back from work I had to do a double take on why this is even up for discussion.

    Denis Langhans of Olympia, who was one of the first to speak Monday, said he was surprised by the “lack of candor and transparency on an issue of real community sensitivity.”

    Walt Jorgensen of Tumwater was one of two men who read The Olympian story to the commission. After he was done, he said the port’s credibility had plummeted to a new low.

    “There’s no other way to say it: Somebody’s been lying to me and I resent it,” he said.

    “Our faith and trust has been violated,” Chris Carson of Olympia added.

    Mike Pelly of Olympia questioned the honesty of how the military shipments discussion has been handled.

    “We want you to act like public servants and not do deals behind our backs,” he told the commission.

    Except that there has to be operational security in these matters. Public knowledge of a convoy route, cargo and delivery time would expose people to unneeded risks. Given the recent attacks on a Marine 10K, it is not far off to say that a another attempt would be realistic. Another reason would be the outcome of the last time military cargo was transported in Port of Olympia in 2007. It is also the current residence of the The Veterans For Peace Rachel Corrie Chapter 109 as well as Coffee Strong, after leaving Lakewood Washington. So it is not surprising to see statements like this.

    Mark Fleming of Olympia urged the commission not to accept military cargo.

    “It’s a visceral issue with me,” he said. “I convinced myself to participate in the Vietnam War, and I urge you not to make the same mistake in 2016.”

    There were supporters who voiced their opinion.

    “I want the port to continue to support the use of our port by the military,” Jon Cushman of Olympia said. “It’s the right thing to do.”

    “The port should be afforded an opportunity to exercise its role as an alternative port,” said Bill Adamson, program manager for the South Sound Military & Communities Partnership.

    Greg Bucove of Olympia also commented on The Olympian story, saying the emails show that Executive Director Galligan is just doing his job.

    But in the end it comes down to this simple fact. If the military needs to use a port to support the many different operations around the world then it is not for the local city to decide if it will happen or not.

    Galligan also said the port is bound by the Shipping Act of 1984, which prevents it from “unreasonably discriminating in the provision of marine terminal services.”

    “Our acceptance of military shipments in no way implies involvement in the making of foreign policy,” he said. “Rather, it demonstrates our commitment to operating a public marine terminal in compliance with all governing regulations.”

    He added: “I understand and appreciate the diverse perspectives our community holds on geopolitical strategies and the use of military force. (But) these are actions and policy decisions well outside the port’s jurisdictional authority.”

  • Larry the Lizard

    Currently in recovery from my news junkie and politics addiction… Secure in who I am. Are you?

    In July 99, Suzie-Q and I bought an old house. One of the first projects was converting the back porch into a sunroom. It was a concrete slab surrounded by a porch-rail height brick wall. Brick columns supported the roof. The prior owners left porch swing anchor bolts and roll-up shades hanging on the side facing the neighbors. They took the swing. The shades, I expect, were to hide from view of the neighbors otherwise it only blocked the afternoon sun. We threw them out. Not the neighbors, the shades. Although it remains debatable about which was easier on the eyes. These days, a nice lilac bush serves the same function as did the ugly shade.

    The neighbor’s dog, the one that would chase a cloud’s shadow across the yard barking like he was possessed, liked to steal our flip flops. The neighbor’s kid always returned them, each time having a few more chew marks. Squirrels also liked the porch. It was their favorite place to gnaw through mounds of acorns that fell from a giant oak that leaned dangerously over the house. The remnants of that potential house crusher produced aromatic smoke from the fire place chimney for a couple of winters. When the leaves began to fall from the small forest that was allowed to grow up too near the house, the porch turned into a catch basket filling to the top of bricked porch rail. Despite the charm of the little porch, it was not user friendly unless you were a no account flip flop chewing hound dog or a squirrel.

    We enclosed it with windows all around and a full glass storm door. We ripped out the natty indoor outdoor rug and replaced it with faux wood flooring, and added some wicker furniture. We turned it into our own little Shangri-la where we could sit and enjoy the view of the back yard without concern for the critters, dogs, acorns, leaves, mosquitoes or the neighbors. Or so we thought.

    One day a concerned Suzie-Q called me out to the porch and pointed toward what appeared to be a trail of critter poop. Now I am not an expert classifier of critter crap, but I do know that it did not resemble what deer leave in the yard nor did it look like a land mine from the neighbor’s dog. Concerning the neighbor’s dog I can tell you that using a technique I perfected during the cow chip wars of my youth I can scoop his leavings up with my spade and chuck them a good thirty yards effectively airmailing them back to their rightful owner. It is all in the wrist action and achieving the proper arch – according to my 6th grade basketball coach before the sport grew too tall for me.

    I was assigned the duty of depoopafying the porch. A couple of days later I was again summoned to the porch to view a new trail. A critter invited him or herself into Shangri-la and then decided it was okay to crap all over it. This newest poop trail was on the window ledge behind the wicker chairs. I moved a chair and there sat one of those little blue tailed lizards that hide around the yard in the rock piles and crevices. When you pursue one of them, he may jettison his wiggling blue tail to distract you while he bolts – if a lizard can indeed bolt.

    I made a grab for Larry the lizard or it may have been Laura, but since I am not up on my lizard anatomy I cannot be certain. Larry fled across the porch to the cover of the wicker couch. When I moved the couch, he bolted again. Before I could grab him (you see my intent was to capture Larry and return him to the back yard) he managed to get beneath the edge of the siding. I could not get my fingers under there and every time I touched him he would skitter away. Suzie-Q accused me of being afraid of him. I assured her I was not and that I always wanted to put my hands on a slithering miniature komodo dragon. I finally forced him to leave the safety of his hiding spot. By now, Larry was tired. He was not moving very fast so I knew I had him. As I was lying out like the great second baseman I once was, it turned into a slow motion replay. He was within my reach and destined for a return to the wild. Then faster than Bruce Lee could yell nunchucks, Hiyeaaah Whack! Suzie-Q ninjaed Larry with a flip-flop. His jettisoned blue tail was flip flopping around like it had a purpose, but Larry look stunned. I picked up him and his wiggling blue tail and chucked both into the yard. Either he would recover or become crow food.

    Since then, caulking has been squeezed into every crack and crevice that might permit lizard entry into Shangri-La. Later I may add motion sensors, but for now we believe we are secure. Larry and friends are free to roam and eat all the bugs they can find – on the other side of the wall.

    The moral of this story is that if you make it into Shangri-la, do not crap all over the place. Suzie-Q does not play.

    © 2016 J. D Pendry

  • Thank you, 60 Minutes…

    Ask health care providers to describe what constitutes a serious health event and you’re likely to get a bewildering assortment of medical definitions based on lengths and levels of experience of the opinionaters as well as the nature of their medical specializations. They’ve all seen such a variety of human health crises that it’s impossible to narrow all their experiences down to a common description, even of a single event.

    But I will wager almost every health care provider in the country, upon viewing the video of Hillary Clinton’s collapse at the 9/11 memorial last weekend, will agree that what we are witnessing is a serious medical episode. They will vary widely as to causation but considering the age of the subject and her past health history, virtually none will dismiss the events depicted in that brief video as anything less than a serious medical incident.

    Yet the Hillary campaign is doing its very best to dismiss possible thousands of professional opinions in its attempt to convince the American public that her serious medical occurrence was inconsequential pneumonia and indicative of nothing medically prohibitive regarding this almost 70-year-old woman’s ability to serve four years in one of the most stress-inducing jobs in the world.

    All of which brings me to CBS and “60 Minutes”, which just ran a segment on the continuing nuclear threat to America, presumably from the Russians, in some new Cold War the media keeps insisting we are now entering. The “60 Minutes” piece, which will air a second segment next week, was obviously contrived to insert doubt in the minds of American voters as to whether Donald Trump is up to the mental and emotional challenges of handling a nuclear confrontation. The timing is simply too convenient to be otherwise. And consider the source.

    As I watched all the ominous details unfurling on CBS, an image kept replaying in my mind, that of a seriously debilitated senior citizen first being held rigidly erect, then collapsing towards the pavement, being grabbed up, thrown into a van, and then hustled away out of public view. My reaction: How could any person in that condition be capable of responding effectively to an alarm of incoming missiles should the two events occur concurrently? Moreover, wouldn’t the circumstances of such a physical collapse by the commander-in-chief throw the entire National Command Authority into question? Who present would qualify to determine the c-in-c incapable of performing her duties? Long, confused minutes would tick by while incoming missiles continued to fly at near-orbital speeds to their American targets. Until such a medical determination occurred, who in the command structure could or would assume the enormous responsibility of ordering our defense forces to respond?

    As the “60 Minutes” piece made clear, intricate codes and confirmation processes are all part of the fail-safe protections built into our National Command Authority to prevent a mistaken release of our own nuclear arsenal. Watching that CBS presentation, I had to wonder how any person in the condition of that woman who stumbled from that curb and collapsed towards the pavement beside that van could possibly comprehend such complexities as those codes and processes demand. And if she could not, but her authority couldn’t be quickly transferred, what might be the fate of our nation?

    Thank you, “60 Minutes”, for opening my old, weak eyes to Hillary’s inability to serve.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Ongoing Pattern of Fraud? Sure Looks Like It to Me.

    What would you think of an organization that did the following:

    apparently sought out lower-income individuals;

    solicited funds from them via small credit-card donations, purportedly on a “one-time basis”;

    on a recurring basis, processed multiple such “one-time” donations against donors vice the single donation that was authorized;

    did all of the above to a number of individuals every month;

    gave these individuals the “run-around” regarding returning unauthorized donations when they complained; and

    appeared to take great pains to keep the unauthorized total received through such shady actions from any single individual below the known thresholds ($100 on a given account) at which credit card companies begin to investigate fraud?

    Oh, and did I mention that this is reputedly precisely the method used by some shady pr0n companies to scam extra money from their customers?

    Don’t know about you, but it certainly looks to me like “an apparent pattern of ongoing and repetitive small-scale fraud.”  And I might call the folks doing it sleazy bastards who were running a scam targeting those who can least afford the financial hit.

    Now, what would you think about a national political campaign that did that? Hypothetically speaking, of course?

    Well, maybe you don’t have to think hypothetically. According to this article from Observer.com, apparently the Clintoon Campaign appears to have been doing exactly this during the current election cycle.  (FWIW:  the publisher of Observer Media, which owns Observer.com, is related to Donald Trump by marriage.  That fact is fully disclosed in the linked article.  That fact is also completely irrelevant if what’s reported is true.)

    It’s not the first time the Clintoon Campaign has done something along these lines, either. As reported by that charter member of the “vast right-wing conspiracy” the New York Times back in 2007, there’s some indication that Clintoon’s campaign might possibly have been doing something similar back then, too.  Hell, even the       Useful Idiots       “Progressives” over at Daily KOS were raising a stink concerning the issue back then.

    In contrast, the Trump campaign doesn’t appear to be doing anything similar.   Per the article, Wells Fargo – whose customers have reported extensive problems along these lines from the Clintoon Campaign – has reportedly received no such complaints from Trump supporters.

    Sheesh. You or I would have been in jail by now.

  • We Deplorables may have an Anthem…

    We Deplorables may have an Anthem…

    Deplorables

    A theme that is repeated every day here and all across the conservative Web is that we ordinary Americans, the folks whom Hillary Clinton characterizes as irredeemables and deplorables, are fed up with her and everything she represents, the constant lying and misrepresentation that pervades every aspect of her, her husband and the criminally dishonest political party they head. Over and over we find ourselves saying that we are sick and tired of the Clinton’s themselves as well as their usual corrupt way of doing business and that we need to stand up and say so, which is exactly what all those deplorable Americans are trying to do at those Trump rallies.

    What we, and those folks at those rallies need is a political anthem that captures that fed-up, sick and tired feeling as well as a defiant refusal to put up with it anymore. Well, guess what? There is just such a tune and it has been done toe-tappingly well by the Gatlin Brothers for Dinesh D’Souza’s movie, Hillary’s America. Titled “Stand Up and Say So,” it contains clever, spot-on lyrics set to a lively, country-rock beat that is damned near infectious. Click on that link and see if you don’t agree it is a fitting anthem for us poor ol’ Deplorables.

    It would be a great tune to fire up a Trump rally crowd if it’s not already being used for that purpose. Having the Donald do a few boot-scootin’ steps to that tune across the stage while lip-synching those catchy lyrics would likely bring the roof down in any venue.

    Kellyanne, you hear I’m sayin’ Darlin’?

    Crossposted at American Thinker.

  • Pay for Play? Sure Looks Like It – Part . . . Uh, I Lost Count

    It seems as if the hacker “Guccifer 2.0” released a bunch of new DNC-related documents the other day.  A “bunch”, as in “600+MB worth”.

    There was at least one interesting bit of info in the info.  Wanna guess how many of the DNC’s 53 top fundraisers during the 2008 campaign cycle received high-level (e.g., Ambassador-level or similar) appointments with the Federal government?  Well, here ya go:

     

     

    By my count, that’s 23 of 53 individuals – or roughly 43.4%.  Since two individuals were appointed to two different high Federal offices, that actually underplays the situation somewhat.

    Oh, and it doesn’t include one individual who apparently received a very high level political appointment with the state of California.

    “Nothing to see here, people.  Move along now.  Let’s go.”

  • Vote Fraud is “Insignificant”, Eh?

    “Vote fraud is insignificant.”  We hear that all the time from certain circles.

    Well, Norm Coleman would be virtually certain to disagree – and if he’s willing to be honest, so would Al “Felon’s Choice” Franken.  But I digress.  (smile)

    Back on topic:  I guess it’s at least theoretically possible that vote fraud is indeed “insignificant” today.  But IMO that also depends on what you consider “insignificant”.

    How about having 2.7+ million people being registered to vote in more than one state? If that were the case, would you call that “insignificant”?

    I certainly wouldn’t consider 2.7+ million potential multiple-voters to be an “insignificant” issue.  But that – along with numerous other problems – is precisely what Pew Center found when they studied US voter registration back in 2012

    Pew Center found over 2.688 million US voters to be registered to vote in 2 different states.  Over 68,700 were registered in 3 states.  And over 1,800 were registered in more than 3 states.

    Yeah, it’s unlikely that all of those folks voted in more than one state.  Some of them were doubtless dual-registered due to the individuals concerned having moved in the year or two prior to the election and their former state not removing their name from the list of registered voters.

    But I’ll guarantee you that some of those with multiple registrations did vote more than once.  As this Fox News article documents, there have indeed been a number of prosecutions for exactly that during recent years .

    My guess is that merely the blatantly stupid or a handful of unlucky few got caught.  I’m thinking the cases prosecuted are barely the tip of the iceberg.

    Short of requiring voting “in person only” and using indelible ink on a finger afterwards as proof of voting, requiring a prospective voter to produce a valid photo ID to allow reasonable verification of identity in order to vote is the logical first step in fighting vote fraud.  And even that’s not sufficient in and of itself when it comes to multiple registrations; some way to detect and flag duplicate registrations in multiple states would also be required to stop people from voting in multiple states.

    But for whatever reason some just won’t support requiring a prospective voter to prove he or she is who they claim before they vote.  Apparently they’re fine with leaving open a loophole that enables this kind of fraud.

    Kinda makes you wonder why.

  • Point of personal privilege: NFL Smack Talk

    Suck it everyone in the NFL. The kill everybody tour rolls on.

    kill everybody

    Pats

    H/t to someone I don’t want to “out”.