Category: Politics

  • Democrats don’t want poor children insured

    I might as well say it outloud, because that’s what the debate over the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) all boils down to now. The Wall Street Journal reports that President Bush compromised with Congress on a key point of the legislation he vetoed a scant few weeks ago – like he said he was willing to do;

    Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt said the administration would be willing to let states cover health-care for children in families earning as much as 300% of the poverty level, or about $60,000 for a family of four, if certain conditions are met. That’s up from the White House’s previous threshold of 200%.

    But OMB said the new bill doesn’t cap income eligibility at 300% because it doesn’t close a loophole allowing states to enroll children in families with incomes higher than $62,000 a year by ignoring part of the family’s income.

    That’s the OMB talking – the same people whom Democrats line up behind when they point out failures of the Administration. So the administration is willing to compromise on a this most important point that Democrats whined the loudest about a few weeks ago. I don’t agree with the Adminstration’s caving on this, but the fact remains that they did.

    So why is the President threatening a veto again on this particular version of SCHIP – well, ask OMB;

    In a statement of administration policy, OMB complained that the bill would expand SCHIP coverage without assuring that poor children are already enrolled in the program, provide coverage for adults through 2012, move children away from private health insurance and cost more than the first SCHIP bill.

    So instead of providing the poorest children with health insurance first – the Democrats whole arguement for passing SCHIP in any form – they’re more interested in expanding coverage willy-nilly. In effect, beginning a national healthcare plan – and they’re willing to suffer another embarrassing veto to make an issue of it for the campaign.

    Seems to me, if Democrats were more interested in insuring children, they’d compromise – the President has comprised, why can’t Democrats? Well, because they want the issue more than they want actual results.

    Democrats say the revised legislation more clearly defines who is eligible for SCHIP and rules out illegal aliens from the program. It also would phase out adults receiving SCHIP benefits more quickly than the original bill.

    “Phase out adults more quickly”? What does the “C” stand for? If it was me writing this legislation, adults would be phased out tomorrow morning. Can you believe Democrats are whining “about the children” and they’ve got adults on the program now and poor children aren’t included?

    What planet is this?

  • University of Florida Cops Cleared In Tazing Him, Bro

    The Florida Department of Law Enforcement released a summary of its investigation of the John Kerry (did you know he was in Vietnam?) event at the University of Florida last month’s tazing of Andrew Meyer. Police stated he was disruptive, and resisted leaving when asked, and used foul language while resisting the officer’s attempts to remove him. The investigation found that the officers had followed state guidelines when they tazed Meyer.
    Orlando Sentinel story

  • Iran sanctions

    Pamela at Atlas Shrugs writes that the New York Times leaked news of the Bush Administration’s impending sanctions against the Iranian Quds Force this morning;

    The Bush administration will announce new sanctions against Iran on Thursday, accusing the elite Quds division of the Revolutionary Guard Corps of supporting terrorism, administration officials said Wednesday. The administration also plans to accuse the entire Revolutionary Guard Corps of proliferating weapons of mass destruction. Both designations will put into play unilateral sanctions intended to impede the Revolutionary Guard and those who do business with it.  

    The Wall Street Journal’s Glenn Simpson writes;

    The sanctions hit Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards Corps along with eight affiliated companies and five Guards officials and the elite Quds Force unit of the Guards, which was accused of backing the Taliban in Afghanistan and were designated proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic-missile technology. Also targeted are Iran’s defense ministry logistics unit, three officials in its ballistic-missile program, and two additional state-run banks.

    Of course, the reaction from the Left is predictable.

    At The Weekly Standard Blogs, Brian Faughnan writes that MoveOn hopes Iran can be trusted with nukes. It seems that MoveOn is trying to pre-empt a war with Iran because the president is “reckless” Brian reprints the whole solicitation letter. Yeah, it must be Bush’s fault if we go to war with Iran.

    So to help illustrate what a peaceful friend Iran is to us, I lifted this photo from my friend Kamangir; it’s a picture of a miltary academy graduation ceremony in Iran;

    306238_orig.jpg

    It’s a formation of soldiers – one group is marching in the form of the US flag (which has a swastika on it for some reason) and the other group is in the form of a scimitar piercing the US flag. That’s a peaceful image, isn’t it?

    Then Solomonia has posted one of Ahmadinjad’s speeches from October 6th;

    …An incident occurred on September 11, and look what they did afterwards. They used this pretext to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, they killed dozens of thousands of peoples, and they want to continue to kill. They are creating another incident like the Holocaust. We advise them not to create something sacred, not to fabricate another sacred lie, and to allow a group of truth-seekers to get to the bottom of things, to identify and expose those behind it, and get it over with.

    Got that? An incident on 9-11. And we used it as an excuse to occupy Iraq and Afghanistan. For what? Their abundance of sand and goats?

    Lew Rockwell says the Qods Force is just like US Navy Seals – so why are we pickin’ on ’em? Yeah, just like SEALS, Lew – except the folks that our SEALs kill have all contributed or plan on contributing to the deaths of innocent people.

    And Maureen Dowd is wondering will crazy Cheney get his war with Iran;

    He may have lost his buddy in belligerence, Rummy. He may have tapped out the military in Iraq. He may not be able to persuade Congress so easily anymore — except for Hillary — to issue warlike resolutions. He can’t cow Condi into supporting his bullying as he once did, and Bob Gates is doing his best to instill some common sense.

    Besides, Cheney is running out of time to wreak global havoc; he’s working for a president who is spending his waning days on the job trying to prevent children from getting health insurance.

    I’m wondering if Crazy Maureen will ever win her fight with reality or common sense. “Wreak global havoc” – that’s a level of paranoia right out of a James Bond movie…or Get Smart.

    I guess the Left is still in denial that we’ve been at war with Iran for thirty years now – and we’re the only ones acting like we don’t know it.

  • Obama Promises Gore Will Have Position

    Barrack Obama, in a town hall meeting in Dover New Hampshire, stated that Former Vice President, and failed politician Al Gore will be involved in the Obama Presidential Administration in a “very senior capacity” ABC News reports
    Gee, Barry, do you NOT want to be president? Because, that is fine for me, but, damn. You couldn’t pick a simpler way to kill your campaign?

  • More “Reasoned Discourse” from the Left

    Taking a page from the Anti-fur kooks a Code Pink(O) member accosted Secretary of State Dr Condoleezza Rice in a House committee hearing room.
    Breitbart/AFP Photo
    Gee, how do these nutjobs keep getting into the House’s chambers? It is almost as if someone wants them there…
    Secretary Rice again has impressed me with her cool demeanor. Had someone started playing the childish “I’m not touching you” game with me in that manner, they would have gotten laid out.
    Breitbart and the AFP have the story.

  • Six “immigrants” Arrested At Qualcomm

    Six illegals were arrested for “stealing” food and water at Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego. The stadium is being used as a refuge for victims of the wildfires. Apparently, the six were targeted because they don’t speak English. This is outrageous! They shouldn’t have been arrested for stealing food and water! They should have been arrested FOR BEING IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY!

    Border Patrol agents are not looking for illegal immigrants at the center but will continue responding to police calls for assistance.
    “We are not in any means at Qualcomm for enforcement capacity,” he said. “We are not there to take advantage of a situation.”

    What the hell? The argument has been that it would be too hard to round up illegals to deport them, yet, when they willingly gather the Border Patrol won’t take advantage of the “situation” and nab the CRIMINALS? So much for enforcing the law…
    The LA Times has the story

  • Carter: Me-too-ism; Roz could’ve been Prez

    Jimmy Carter is making that last turn to get his musty ass all the way around the bend. According to the Washington Examiner, he claims Rosalynn, his wife, could’ve run for President and won;

    Speaking at Washington’s Motion Picture Association of America before a screening of Jonathan Demme’s new Carter documentary entitled, “Jimmy Carter: Man from Plains,” Carter said that, if Rosalynn had “gone home from Georgia and run for Senate” (a la Hillary), she would have been a formidable candidate.

    But “she didn’t want to do that,” he added, without a trace of regret.

    I guess he doesn’t remember that America was just worn out from the first and only term we suffered through his spotty leadership. His Vice president, Walter Mondale, lost in a landslide to Ronald Reagan in 1984 after Carter had lost in a landslide in 1980. We were tired of being a laughingstock cowered in the corner from every tin pot dictator who shook their fists and took our citizens hostage.

    I suppose Rosalynn was a nice woman, but Presidential material? Not on your life – she’d have been no leader, just like her husband was no leader.

    And as for the “documentary” of The Man from Plains – what human being has so much time on their hands they’ll take time out to sleep through the story of his life – again. I had the misfortune to use his memoirs “Keeping Faith” for a paper in college on the Carter-Torrijos Treaty. Not only was it the most factually inaccurate drivel I’d ever read, it was a giant snooze fest. I’m sure this documentary will be no better.

  • CA BDS; Prez is wrong either way

    Yesterday I wrote about Barbara Boxer’s terminal bout of Bush Derangement Syndrome, apparently coupled with Tourette Syndrome, when she blurted out that they only had half of the National Guard troops they needed to fight the fire in California. The National Guard was quick to respond that they’d only drawn 1700 troops from their available 17,000 and there was no shortage of equipment – and Boxer’s staff scrubbed her statement on her official website to remove any traces of BDS.

    Well, Bill Sammon tells of another bout of BDS which struck another California politician in the Washington Examiner;

    President Bush is pushing ahead with a visit to fire-ravaged California Thursday, despite complaints from the state’s top Democrat that the trip is a “public relations” stunt that will distract firefighters.

    “I got some doubt about the value of President Bush coming out here,” said California Lt. Gov. John Garamendi on MSNBC. “How many times did he go to New Orleans and still made promises, but hasn’t delivered?”

    It was a pointed reference to Hurricane Katrina, which ravaged New Orleans in 2005 and exposed weaknesses in the emergency preparedness of local, state and federal authorities. Although Bush was criticized by liberals for not visiting New Orleans soon enough, Garamendi accused the president of visiting California too soon.

    “It’s public relations,” Garamendi said. “OK, President Bush comes out, we’ll be polite. But frankly, that’s not the solution. How about sending our National Guard back from Iraq so that we have those people available here to help us?”

    [Emphasis mine]

    Can you imagine the uproar Garamendi would have made if the President hadn’t gone to see the fires? There would have been comments similar to the comments they made after 9-11 when he continued reading to children and then flew to Nebraska to his bunker. Did any Republicans disparage Bill Clinton for visiting disaster areas? Does anyone remember any Republicans complaining about the lack of equipment or funds to deal with the various natural disasters in the 90s? Nope.

    The Democrats used Hurricane Andrew against the first President Bush – there was no FEMA before Hurricane Andrew, that President Bush created it as a clearing house for emergency response coordination. And they continue to use Katrina against this President Bush, even though this President Bush and FEMA urged local government to EVACUATE THREE DAYS before the levees broke. What kind of “jackbooted thug” comments would we be listening to today if Bush had forcibly evacuated New Orleans with Federal troops?

    So I guess Garamendi will be running against President Bush for the governor of California this next year.

    Bloodthirsty Liberal asks “How much do these people suck”? My answer would be “Immeasurably”. Gaius at Blue Crab Boulevard writes that Schwartzenegger is getting praised, though. Pam Meister at Blogmeister wants to know why it’s OK to talk smack about California residents after we had to be so careful not to disparage New Orleans’. Actually, I’d like to know, too (although I suspect we both know the answer).