“Secret societies” have their rites and codes. And many have their own songs.
Well, lo and behold – I think finally found it. I believe I “broke their code”. This has GOT to be the Dutch Rudder Gang’s secret theme song!
(smile)
“Secret societies” have their rites and codes. And many have their own songs.
Well, lo and behold – I think finally found it. I believe I “broke their code”. This has GOT to be the Dutch Rudder Gang’s secret theme song!
(smile)
Yesterday, the Washington Post published some anti-gun propaganda an article. Its title tells you all you really need to know about it:
The “legal loophole” that allowed Dylann Roof to get a gun
I’ve put “legal loophole” there in quotes for a couple of reasons. The first reason is – it’s absolute bullsh!t, and it’s misleading as hell. IMO, that’s by intent.
The second reason is that it the whole article appears to be factually incorrect. No “legal loophole” – imaginary or otherwise – appears to have been involved at all.
Here are the facts of the case.
The apparently-racist bastard named Dylann Roof who murdered 9 innocents in Charleston was arrested for felony drug possession 28 February of this year. According to the WaPo propaganda article, he obtained the weapon used in his crime as a birthday present this April. (This now appears to have been proven false – I’ll cover that below).
The WaPo writer seizes on this, claiming that this is the result of the “gun show loophole”. He does so after acknowledging that it was already illegal under current Federal law for him to have been given a weapon as a gift while under indictment for a felony crime – see 18 USC 922(d)(1).
So, even if the original reports of Roof receiving the firearm he used in his murders as a gift had been true, the reporter’s article would still have been bullsh!t. Why? Because there was no freaking “legal loophole” here. Roof was facing felony charges – and his family had to know he’d been arrested. They thus had good reason to suspect he could be facing felony charges – and therefore giving him a weapon would have already been illegal under Federal law. There’s no “loophole” there, folks.
In fact, later news reports indicate that Roof in fact bought the gun himself at a local gun shop. My guess is that he probably falsified the purchase form (ATF Form 4473) and claimed he was not under “indictment or information” for any felony crime. (I’m pretty sure that being out on bail after arrest while awaiting further court action virtually guarantees the latter – e.g., that Roof was legally considered “under information” of a felony, even if he hadn’t been formally indicted by a grand jury.) Falsifying an ATF 4473 is also a Federal felony. I suppose it’s theoretically possible that the gun shop was “dirty” and ignored a truthful answer – but since that’s kinda easily discovered, I rather doubt it. Most business owners want to stay in business and stay out of jail.
I’ll spell it out for any logic-challenged “liberal brethren” who might be reading this. Roof was apparently willing to lie on the purchase form in order to purchase a firearm himself. That is itself a felony. So, how would requiring him to take a firearm received as a gift down to the same firearms shop to “complete the transfer” for a gift have made any difference?
Answer: it wouldn’t have. He’d have simply lied on the ATF 4473 then, too.
However . . . having him do that to “complete the transfer” would indeed assist in later compiling a database of who owns firearms, should anyone in the future want to do so.
Bottom line: that WaPo propaganda article yesterday wasn’t about gun safety at all. It was about misleading people. It was designed to convince people to support whatever is necessary to facilitate backdoor gun registration in the future – plain and simple.

UPDATE: Dan has demanded we take down his copyrighted picture. Now, of course it was used under Fair Use, but I found a better one to use anyway. Nonetheless, if you have pictures of Dan you’d like to use here, please send them along.
…and shockingly, it is for being a huge jackass. Who woulda thunk it?
For nearly two years, claims that Yelp Inc. should pay people who post on its site have dogged the company like a bad review…
This week, the entire mess landed in the Northern District of California after Yelp won a motion to move the case closer to the company’s San Francisco headquarters. Florida attorney Daniel Bernath claims Yelp cheated its legions of reviewers by refusing to pay them for content they post to the website. The reviewers were Yelp’s employees, Bernath argues, comparing the company’s practice of withholding wages to that of a “21st century galley slave ship.”
Florida Attorney? Yeah, not so much.
“Defendants could not exist, nor make its returns, without labors of and its control over unpaid writers,” Bernath wrote.
Need I explain how ridiculous that statement is? They aren’t “unpaid writers,” they are people who write reviews for dinner. Yelp doesn’t have “control” over them, and there’s no compulsory labor. Here’s the thing about uncompensated writers “working” for Yelp, at any given moment they could do the almost unthinkable, shut off the computer, and walk away. No one would notice. Yelp, and civilized society would continue. Bernath is basically the Obama of Yelp shouting “You didn’t make this!”
Actual lawyers, the kind that Yelp hires to get migraines dealing with this mental midget pegged it succinctly:
“Under plaintiffs’ theory, popular websites like Amazon, eBay, Facebook, Google and Twitter would suddenly gain hundreds of millions of employees,” the lawyers wrote, “all entitled to billions of dollars in payment by the mere fact that they have used these online forums to express themselves through content contributions.”
Now here’s the Dan we’ve come to know and adore, the man who won the Stolen Valor tournament on the strength of having gone full retard like the Hulk…
In a phone call Wednesday, Bernath said the bar complaint was an intimidation tactic.
“Yelp’s whole strategy is just to be petty and attack you by nipping at your heels and tripping you,” he said. “But in the end, the law says that they owe my clients money.”
Bernath’s bizarre sanctions motion, which includes a photograph of a shingles sore on his skin and a blister on his big toe, also accuses Yelp of abusing the mediation process. The company did everything it could to delay mediation, Bernath said, which is what caused the judge to postpone ruling on Yelp’s motions. When the two sides finally met, Bernath claims Yelp did not negotiate in good faith, adding the stress Yelp’s counsel inflicted caused him to suffer a shingles outbreak.
Bernath also claims the walk between the mediation conference rooms and the Orange County airport gave him a blister. He accuses Yelp’s counsel of refusing to offer him a ride.
Who in the Holy Name of SpongeBob’s Dick would let Bernath get in their car with them? The silly son of a bitch bought my car and I wouldn’t let him in either.
But wait, I thought we caused his shingles and blisters? Yelp did it?
In an email to me the other day Dan claimed victory over all of us, and ticked off a list of things he’d accomplished. It was awesome, because not a one of them was accurate. Not even a little. He claims he ran a whole host of you off, and that everyone is afraid to comment. Here’s some brain nuggets he dropped in that email:
TAH-used to get a few thousands per issue. Now you get 20 or 30.If anyone dares post to TAH every friend they know get informed that they are participating in a child pornography websiteThe wreckage of that website and its participants-someday we’ll give you an accounting but you have been hollowed out and destroyed.your jeep, your student loans. I didn’t pay for them.You don’t fit the norm of a rational person. No gain but you have been scared for the rest of your professional life and have a fat wife and fat kid to support for the next 18 to 21 years.
Yes, perfectly rational to get upset that the lawyer opposing you in court should give you a ride in his car. I bet he smells like horseshit and hasn’t showered in weeks. If you do offer Dan a ride, for the love of all that is holy, lay down a sheet of plastic first.
Apologies if Jonn already wrote about this, but this kind of pissed me off. I wrote this for the paying home, but wanted to share here too.
Seth Moulton is a former marine with combat experience in Iraq over four tours there. He got a hernia lifting weights, and so he went to the VA. That might not seem out of the orginary, but Seth doesn’t have to go, because his day job provides health care coverage. In fact, he’s a Freshman Member of Congress from Massachusetts. So he went to the VA in DC. To phrase it charitably, it did not go well:
“I went to the VA, showed up and checked in at the front desk, and about 30 minutes later, they told me that they had no record of me. They couldn’t prove that I was a veteran. But they would consider taking me as a humanitarian case,” he said.
Well, the seemless transition isn’t going well, but let’s see how he did after that….
He said he did not identify himself as a member of Congress, since he was just going there as a veteran. Moulton said he didn’t have his VA card on him, but had his license and social security number.
“More than enough things to put into their computer system, supposedly the world-renowned VA computerized medical records system,” he said.
Moulton suggested that the front desk employees call the VA hospital in Boston, where he had previously received care. After eventually getting through, the Boston VA said it would fax something down.
He said employees in D.C. then questioned aloud whether their fax machine even worked. In addition, he said veterans in the waiting room next to him had been waiting there for “hours.”
After a surgery, he was prescribed the powerful painkiller Percocet, as well as Advil. However, after he was sent home with medication, he discovered he had just been given Advil.
“And so I opened up the bottle and took a pill. And sometime later, it was still hurting an awful lot, and so I went back for a second one and realized that I didn’t have Percocet. I just had ordinary Advil. Of course, the pharmacy was closed at that point, so I was out of luck,” he said.
He added, “If that’s the care they’re giving to a United States congressman, you can imagine what the average veteran is getting at many of the VA facilities across the country.”
I’ve also been to the VA in DC. It was horrible. I could barely walk, so I went there for an MRI for herniated discs, which I already knew I had. This wasn’t years after service, it was literally 3 days after coming off terminal leave. I still remember the date, September 2. After an interminable wait the lady finally said that yes, I needed an “emergency MRI” and that she could schedule that for me……on October 23. Literally 7 weeks. Again, I could not walk. Later they pulled the secret waiting list game on me, where she said I would have to call back in a week to try to schedule, because the next 30 days were booked solid, and they had to see OEF people in 30 days or they got in trouble. Exasperated I told her that was fine, that I had the VA Secretaries phone number in my cell from when I met him overseas, and I would call him and see what he thought. Miraculously a spot opened up.
After that I never went back to that VA again.
Then I moved to Indiana. I’ve gone to the VA probably 10 times here. The longest wait I have had for a visit to be scheduled was 72 hours. Either this is the best VA in the country, or the VA just isn’t allocating resources properly to match where the need is.
So today I find this letter essentially blaming Moulton:
While I have no reason to doubt Representative Seth Moulton’s story (“In effort to fix woes in VA care, Moulton taps own experience,” Page A1, June 5), his comments would hold more weight if he also addressed the performance of Congress. It is, after all, Congress that authorized two wars and then expanded eligibility for VA health care without providing the corresponding funds. Perhaps the new congressman could offer his critique of the do-nothing Congress in as public a forum as he offers his critique of the Veterans Affairs health system.
Only when Moulton mentions the failures of Congress to provide funding for increased veteran services can he be seen as an objective observer. Until then he is a part of the problem.
Devote time to improving the VA, but acknowledge that it will happen only as Congress cleans up its act.
William F. O’Brien, Eastham
The writer is a retired chief of VA mental health services in Dayton, Ohio.
Seth Moulton has been in office just over 6 months. VA budgets are done a year in advance. Just how exactly should he be held accountable? Second of all, how exactly would increased funding fix someone putting Advil in a Percoset bottle?
I’ve been to VA funding hearings. Hell, I’ve even testified in VA funding hearings (both appropriations and authorizations.) The VA comes in with a budget request, and then Congress tweaks it. But I VIVIDLY remember hearings in like 2004 or 2005 when then-House Chairman Steve Buyer (not my favorite person) absolutely laid into the VA people because they had used numbers from 2000 to figure out how many patients would enter the VA that year. They used figures from before the war, to determine how many people would show up. The VA got every dime they asked for, and then came back and had supplemental requests when they realized their budget was off by monumental amounts.
Blaming Congress is easy, almost as easy as blaming the VA. And I’m no huge defender of the Congress. But if someone comes to you and says I need $100 for a hotel room, and then comes back 2 days later to say it cost $456, do you blame the person who gave you what you asked for? Or the person who didn’t bother to figure out the actual cost? Look at the Denver VA. The Congress didn’t solicit the bids for building the facllity, the VA did that. And we’re at almost 3x the projected cost. How can you blame Congress for actually showing deference to the budget request of the people who are supposed to be the subject matter experts?
A friend of mine who is a subject matter expert adds this:
VA Budgets:
FY 2001 – year the war start $48.6 million (https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22897.pdf )
FY 2015 – $158 million
The budget has more than tripled in the last decade and a half. Yes the load on the system has increased, but especially since 2006 (the year under Buyer they had to go back and ask for a supplemental because they almost ran out of money) VA has gotten generous budget increases every year, even as the rest of the government faced sequestration cuts and reductions to operations.
A better question to ask VA is why their Central Office numbers of executives in Washington, DC have grown exponentially while actual caregivers in the field have seen a more deliberate and slow increase. VA is spending their large budgets on a team of people to argue for why they need more money, not on people to treat the ones who have been injured in service.


Fox News reports that retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn who used to run the Defense Intelligence Agency said this about the administration’s pursuit of a nuclear deal with Iran in a written statement to a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee;
“It is clear that the nuclear deal is not a permanent fix but merely a placeholder,” he said in the testimony, obtained by Fox News in advance of a hearing where he’s set to testify.
He said the 10-year timeframe on parts of the deal “only make sense” if the U.S. thinks a “wider reconciliation” with Iran is possible. He called this “wishful thinking,” adding that “regime change” is the best way to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
In lengthy written remarks, Flynn asserted that Iran has “every intention” of building a nuclear weapon, and their desire to destroy Israel is “very real.”
Well, it’s not like we already didn’t think that, but it’s nice to have General Flynn validate our suspicions. Who better to negotiate policy based on wishful thinking than John Kerry?
Flynn went on to condemn Iraq for their participation in the killing of US troops and continued that there is no real strategy against ISIS, but, you know, the President admitted as much just two days to the world.


In 2004, Sergeant Rafael Peralta shielded his mates from a grenade blast with his own body. The Navy tried to award posthumously his family a Navy Cross for his actions that day, but his mother refused the honor because she thought that her son deserved the Medal of Honor, the only award higher than the Navy Cross in the Navy. We’ve discussed the controversy here several times as recently as February, we were quoted in the Washington Post.
Although witnesses swear that Peralta made a conscious decision to save his fellow Marines with his own shattered body, forensic professionals claim that it wasn’t possible. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates says that he was ready to award the medal to Peralta, but the science stood in the way. You know, the same old pogues vs. witnesses argument.
Well today, Peralta’s mother finally accepted the Navy Cross for her son at Camp Pendleton. According to the Associated Press, the citation reads;
While attempting to maneuver out of the line of fire, Sgt. Peralta was shot and fell mortally wounded. After the initial exchange of gunfire, the insurgents broke contact, throwing a fragmentation grenade as they fled the building. The grenade came to rest near Sgt. Peralta’s head. Without hesitation and with complete disregard for his own personal safety, Sgt. Peralta reached out and pulled the grenade to his body, absorbing the brunt of the blast and shielding fellow Marines only feet away.
The award is for the same thing that the forensic boobs said the Marine sergeant couldn’t have done. And there’s always the USS Rafael Peralta coming down the chute.


Several people have sent us links to the story about General Hawk Carlisle (cool name, btw), commander of Air Combat Command, who bragged in a speech sponsored by the Air Force Association how airmen targeted one ISIS fellow using social media;
“The [airmen are] combing through social media and they see some moron standing at this command,” Carlisle said at the speech, which was sponsored by the Air Force Association. “And in some social media, open forum, bragging about command and control capabilities for Da’esh, ISIL, And these guys go ‘ah, we got an in.’
“So they do some work, long story short, about 22 hours later through that very building, three JDAMS take that entire building out. Through social media. It was a post on social media. Bombs on target in 22 hours.
“It was incredible work, and incredible airmen doing this sort of thing.”
Yeah, it was incredible work, so why are we telegraphing to the terrorist group how we’re finding them and destroying them? Yeah, it makes for a really nice story about how airmen are doing their jobs, but, do you think that will work from now on?
In the early days of the war against terror, intelligence agencies told the media how they looked at things in the background of videos to locate where terrorists were making their little broadcast messages to the world. Immediately, the terrorists learned to hang a sheet behind them to hide the background, so that didn’t work. Do these people think that our country’s enemies don’t have TVs and access to the media?
General Carlisle, if you find something that works, write about it in your book after the war. We would much rather that you kill these guys in droves than to tell us how you did it. We know that you’re doing everything that you can do, but stop giving away the farm.
The Air Force Times article that I linked to above begins “OPSEC isn’t the Islamic State group’s strong suit.” Apparently, it’s not ours, either.