Category: Military issues

  • More US troops, aircraft to Africa

    Joseph-Kony

    So, while the Obama Administration is busy dismantling the US military, they’ve also decided that they need more troops and aircraft in the hunt for African warlord Joseph Kony, says Fox News;

    Early Monday, the White House confirmed a Washington Post report that the U.S. was sending “associated support personnel,” and a “limited number” of CV-22 Osprey aircraft to assist local forces in their long-running battle against Kony’s Lord’s Resistance Army, or LRA. Obama sent about 100 U.S. troops to help the African forces in 2011.

    The administration did not specify how many troops and aircraft would be sent to Africa, but the Post reported that the president had ordered four Osprey aircraft and 150 Air Force special operations members and airmen to Uganda.

    National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden told the Associated Press that the aircraft would be based in Uganda but will be used in LRA-affected areas of the Central African Republic, Congo and South Sudan to support the African Union’s regional task force.

    There’s that lyin’ ass Caitlan Hayden again. When she was minister of disinformation in the Eikenberry Embassy in Afghanistan, she posted on this blog, in the comments, that the US wasn’t engaged in talks with the Taliban. But, it seems that we were, so if she told me that it’s raining, I’d have to look outside.

  • 20th anniversary of Green Ramp disaster

    Green-Ramp-Wreckage

    20 years ago on this date, at Pope Air Force base an F16 fighter collided with a C-130 while they were trying to land. As the F16 hit the runway, the two pilots ejected while the F16 continued on his path into another parked C141 which waiting on Green Ramp for loading of paratroopers of the 82d Airborne Division. The two aircraft exploded into flames and the resulting fireball and debris washed over the waiting paratroopers loaded down with their parachutes and equipment.

    24 were killed and 80 more were injured. Some of the survivors remember that day at Military.com and more at army.mil. One survivor and his wife remember the struggle afterwards.

  • Stolen Valor: What it Should be Teaching America about its Veterans

    I am going to open up with this link to a young man explaining why he donned an Army Combat Uniform and wore it around campus, until several young veterans called him out and asked him to remove the garment. (This is the link to the original video) The Veterans were arrested for Disturbing the Peace and making threats. The young man who was wearing that uniform has now become the victim in the eyes of his local news organization–in this act of bullying–as they portrayed it.

    Here are some simple facts to warm this conversation up:

    • The young man is well within his rights to wear that uniform as he pleases. It is a first amendment right.

    • The news organization can say whatever they want as long as it does not endanger the public. It is a first amendment right.

    • Disturbing the Peace is defined as: “a crime generally defined as the unsettling of proper order in a public space through one’s actions. This can include creating loud noise by fighting or challenging to fight, disturbing others by loud and unreasonable noise (including loud music), or using offensive words.” These young veterans legally violated this law.

    I’m not disputing any of this. That is the country we live in. What this case does do is highlight the differences between the veteran class and the non-veteran class.

    I am going to focus on two key points. The first being, why Stolen Valor means so much to us as Veterans, and why civilians don’t understand. The second being, a highlight of the behavior differences between Veterans and civilian personalities as highlighted in this case.

    Why Stolen Valor matters.

    Lawyers, doctors, and accountants are all professional fields in which you have to meet a series of minimum requirements to be able to participate. And all of those careers carry felony charges for impersonating and practicing the profession without proper licensure. There are no laws supporting the impersonation of a service member. Why? Because it poses no risk to the public for the impersonation. It isn’t fair, but it is the truth.

    All of those jobs carry with them a high amount of effort to enter into those fields. They also carry high financial rewards compared to the Military, which has high costs and fewer rewards, which is why Stolen Valor has become such a hotly contested issue for us. The civilian population doesn’t understand that we don’t put any piece of our uniform on without earning it, not the stripe down my Dress Blue pants, the bars on my sleeve, or the ribbons and badges on my chest. Every one of those items is a representation of a cost paid, either by myself, those beside me, or those that came before me, individuals who I am now able to call my brothers and sisters. All of that said, those ribbons, badges, bars and stripes when added together don’t amount for anything of marketable value.

    They represent something.

    The licensure attained by doctors, lawyers and accountants has a marketable value. They will attain a higher wage. That licensure, which they worked so hard for, does have value after they earned it.

    I have only placed my awards onto one resume (by request of a military provided resume coach), and I was offered an entry level position.

    I understand, it is capitalism. But when we remember the blood, sweat, and tears that go into everything that makes up our uniforms, and all that we got from it was a strip of cloth or a shiny badge . . . that is why we get so emotional about them. That is why you can hear that Ranger’s voice cracking when he fended off the passive-aggressive assaults from the crowd, while he defended something he earned, which was being portrayed by someone as cheap trinkets that the young man wanted to earn.

    The difference between veterans and civilians.

    75% of Americans do not meet the minimum requirements for military service according to a report titled: “Ready, Willing, and Unable to Serve,” published by Mission Readiness (You can find more information about them at www.missionreadiness.org). According to this article in the NY Times (which also addresses the divide between the military and civilian class) less than .5% of Americans are presently serving. That means that only 2% of those eligible to enter military service do so currently. There was a time, WWII, when 12% of the US population served in the military, which was in a time of the draft. This is important, because in an all-volunteer military we need to consider the types of people that it will attract, especially in a time of war. Whereas, during draft time, those able were obligated to serve, capturing a more diverse (not demographically, but value-wise) segment of the population as opposed to today. That, is actively serving, including guard and reserves.

    The total population of Americans who are veterans is about 10% now. I want to throw this number out there, although it is less important for my argument.

    Today, when America is still technically at war, there is no hiding the potential consequences of military service. This is a spectacular filtering process. By virtue of the War on Terror, we only recruit those who understand that going to war is a distinct possibility. Those people are more devoted toward personal and national values, hard working, and risk averse, which is also an important consideration.

    We don’t see the world the same way, and we are quite willing to step outside of our comfort zones, which is important when we consider how insulated America is from the reality of the struggle to survive. We pay lip-service to daily struggles, but in the developed world, if we completely quit trying, there is a government sponsored safety net to help us meet our daily needs. Only by stepping outside of that net, which is a substantial effort, can we find within our nation the daily struggle to survive.

    The consequence of this insulation is our transition up Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. We no longer need to concern ourselves with the physiological or the safety levels, and have moved into a mixture of the love/belonging and esteem levels. If you want proof of this, go onto your Facebook page. You will find it all over, watching how friends and family interact and what they talk about. Or, for that matter, look back to the News 10’s representation of the interaction between the young man and the veterans who called him out. Their focus wasn’t on the safety afforded the country by those veterans who have put themselves into harms way, it was on the young man’s need to belong to an organization he is unable to join–because he is unfit.

    Unfit.

    In a nation where everyone wants to belong, there are organizations in which we are unfit to join. You simply don’t meet the minimum requirements. These requirements aren’t set forth by any small measure. The consequence of us loosening the standard on the physical and mental capabilities of an applicant has a far greater consequence compared to that of most civilian sector jobs. In the most extreme of positions–which makes up approximately 12% of the military population, the remainder being in support roles–the consequence of being unfit may potentially have deadly consequences. Now, this isn’t having to come in on Saturday to finish a report, or receiving a lower tip from an unsatisfied table. In the combat arms community, being unfit is a gross liability to one’s self and those around them. Even our support elements, which are less in the direct line of fire by the nature of their duties, understand that their failure to act isn’t a late shipment and an unhappy customer. It is a nineteen-year-old who doesn’t have ammo or chow.

    These types of extreme circumstances, paired with having a military raised in a time of war, create a culture of doers. Within the ranks, we don’t have a culture that promotes conversation. I promotes action. We need to get things done now, or this will be the consequence. That isn’t true for the better part of our country, which has a heavy focus on conversation, which was why in this video we heard several people asking those Rangers why they were going after the civilian impersonator. They asked the question, confused at the veracity in which these Rangers addressed the problem in front of them, and when they got an answer they walked away or called the police (Because public safety is not the responsibility of every citizen, it is the duty of the police officer).

    The sad part is our voices are being drowned out, because the indifferent, unaffected class of civilian Americans who are untouched by war are a growing population, while the population of veterans is dwindling.

    US Population 317,736,457 (Taken on Mar 22, 2014 at 2127 UTC US Census Bureau)

    Post 9/11 Vets 1,761,446  (Taken from US Census Bureau)

    It is only a matter of time before the .5% of veterans is all that remains of our veteran population. And this nation’s perspective only further alienates their veterans, a class of people who have dropped down a level on the Hierarchy of Needs on behalf of others, those who are currently portraying us as bullies and impersonating us to gain recognition for acts that were not their own. We have foregone the safety level, and sometimes physiological level, and have stepped down the pyramid. It wasn’t for our own sakes, the economic return wasn’t there, especially compared with the opportunities that exist in the civilian sector–at a much lower cost. We did this because we believe in something, that it was worth it for others for us to do these things.

    The hard part is awareness. There is only one way to educate a person about the differences in perspectives to truly make them understand. But that was why we did it, so that those who we left behind wouldn’t have to endure what we did. The consequence of our own actions is the ignorance of the civilian population. As a result of these differences, the insurmountable divide that is ever growing between a population of ignorant individuals and a dwindling population of the aware will only get worse. They will segregate themselves from us and us from them.

  • Post-op tranny blames former-self for murder

    Breitbart reports that a fellow who doesn’t look like he used to look has been charged with a series of prostitute murders in the 1990s. He claims that it wasn’t him, but the him that he was before he looks like he does now;

    In interviews, Perry told police that Douglas [Perry] never stopped killing, but “Donna [Perry] stopped it.”

    Donna further told authorities that she would not confess to murder because she didn’t do it. Donna also claimed not to know if Douglas killed the prostitutes in 1993. “I don’t know if Doug did or not, it was 20 years ago and I have no idea whether he did or did not,” she said.

    Police cite testimony from Donna’s cellmate who said that the transgendered woman made all sorts of admissions in prison, even once saying she was a “sociopath.”

    I figured that this was important because of the stories we’ve been reading lately about transgendered soldiers (15,000 of them, according one article), not that all trannies are serial murderers, but rather how this is just another excuse for past bad behavior. That Manning fellow, whatever his name is today, for example. It certainly supports the American Psychological Association’s continued listing of this condition as a disorder.

  • The next DADT

    Leah Eleazer

    This is a confusing article. Hondo sent it to me early this morning and I couldn’t make heads nor tails of it on just one cup of coffee. It wasn’t until Country Singer sent it to me this afternoon that I could figure it out. When you’re reading the story, the fellow above is really Leah Eleazer who now goes by the name of Jacob Eleazer, but the Army still calls her Leah and she’s a Captain in the Kentucky National Guard’s 238th Regimental Training Institute. No, she’s not in the Army, like the article says. In order to understand the article, you have to remember that when they write “Jacob Eleazer”, “him”, “his” or “he” they’re talking about this Leah Eleazer person.

    Jacob Eleazer, a 28-year-old Army drill instructor, learned he was up for promotion this December. For seven years, he’d been an exemplary soldier, rising to the rank of first lieutenant, and now on his way to captain. But there was a problem. Within the confines of his military training center, in western Kentucky, Eleazer still went by his birth name, which was female.

    Outside his Army base, Eleazer lived as a man, one of 15,450 military personnel who consider themselves transgender but don’t dare come out to their fellow soldiers and risk jeopardizing their careers.

    “My colleagues just assumed I was a really butch lesbian,” says Eleazer, who has the broad shoulders, close-cropped hair and a jutting chin one would expect of a drill instructor.

    Yeah, that’s her or him in the photo. The article is basically about her struggle to be a man, of sorts, you’ll be happy to know that when she told her commander about her impending “transition” to a man, her commander was totally fine with it.

    For decades, transgender men and women have been barred from serving in the military. The rule is rooted in an archaic theory that equated being transgender with having a mental disorder. Four years after Congress repealed the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law, activists have been agitating for change, and point to other nations, like Israel and England, which allow transgender military personnel.

    Yeah, you can call it “archaic” and a “theory”, but gender identity disorders is still listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders under the category of Sexual Disorders and Dysfunctions. So I guess, in this instance, the military should ignore the science and welcome these folks with whichever gender of open arms they prefer. And if these folks are so anonymous and fearful for their careers, where do they get that 15,450 number who they say are currently serving?

    Like the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, this is not about service, it’s about acceptance of a lifestyle choice. But they should be talking to the American Psychological Association, not the Pentagon.

  • USMC to train a coed mini-MEU

    In an effort to study the effects of the intermingling of males and females in a combat unit, the Marine Corps is planning to create an experimental expeditionary unit that is about 25% female, according to Stars & Stripes;

    The task force will be made up of about 460 Marines, and about one quarter will be women, said Capt. Maureen Krebs, a Marine spokeswoman. The task force will look like a small battalion landing team with attachments such as artillery, tanks and amphibious assault vehicles — similar to the ground combat portion of a Marine Expeditionary Unit, but about half the size.

    The Camp Lejeune, N.C.-based unit will replicate the predeployment training cycle that other ground combat units go through, and will help the Marine Corps evaluate whether women are capable of doing the jobs and physically demanding tasks inherent in the training, Krebs said.

    The unit will be made up of volunteers….

    I guess that, since they have to follow the ridiculous guidance of their political masters, this is probably the smartest way to do it. I just find it odd that this experiment is taking place while there’s still a war going on and those 300+ male trigger pullers are engaged in an experiment when they’re needed to fight the Taliban a half a world away.

    Of course, it’s not the Marine Corps’ fault, it the fault of those social engineers in the Pentagon who are trying to ram this down the throats of the services while they still have the unfocused vision from the White House and while there are no grownups to stop them.

  • Playing for Keeps

    TSO wrote a short article the other day that got me to thinking.  And when that happens, regular readers know I sometimes tend to wander off the beaten path a bit.

    Yeah, you’re right – your luck ran out.  I’m about to go on another walkabout.  (smile)

    But this time, it’s not about music.

    (more…)

  • Opening the flood gates

    trans SEAL

    The photo is a verified phony SEAL

    Too many of you folks to name each of you have sent us a link to an article from CBS in San Francisco which reports that some unnamed commission led by masturbation queen and pediatrics doctor who was fired as the Surgeon general by the Clinton Administration, Minnie Jocelyn Elders recommends that the Pentagon can admit transsexuals to the military with no discernible damage to the welfare and good order of the military establishment;

    The report said Department of Defense regulations designed to keep transgender people from joining or remaining in the military on the grounds of psychological and physical unfitness are based on outdated beliefs that require thousands of current service members either to leave the service or to forego the medical procedures and other changes that could align their bodies and gender identities.

    “We determined not only that there is no compelling medical reason for the ban, but also that the ban itself is an expensive, damaging and unfair barrier to health care access for the approximately 15,450 transgender personnel who serve currently in the active, Guard and reserve components,” said the commission led by Dr. Joycelyn Elders, who served as surgeon general during Bill Clinton’s first term as president, and Rear Adm. Alan Steinman, a former chief health and safety director for the Coast Guard.

    Yeah, well, the problem I see right at the front of the whole line of problems is folks signing up for the military to get their treatment, have their “reassignment” surgery and then beating feet for the exits. You know, they do that now with their signing bonuses, so what’s to stop folks from doing the same for their turn at the scalpel?

    The commission argued that facilitating gender transitions “would place almost no burden on the military,” adding that a relatively small number of active and reserve service members would elect to undergo transition-related surgeries and that only a fraction might suffer complications that would prevent them from serving. It estimated that 230 transgender people a year would seek such surgery at an average cost of about $30,000.

    Yeah, well, I see a bigger cost because the military would pay for their training which would be money down a dark hole after they go AWOL, or claim they were mistreated, or whatever excuse of the day they used to get out of the remainder of their service. Yeah, I know this unnamed Commission says that it’s all about service, but that’s what they said about repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, but then it became all about what people could get out of their service without actually serving.

    “When you closet someone, you create a security risk, and we don’t need another Chelsea Manning,” [Retired Brigadier General Thomas Kolditz, a former Army commander and West Point professor] said, referring to the soldier formerly known as Bradley Manning who came out as transgender after being sentenced for leaking classified documents to the website WikiLeaks.

    Yeah, well, [insert current first name here] Manning wasn’t treasonous because he was gay or transgendered, it was because he was a scummy piece of shit, but nice try, Gen-gen, screwing the Army now that you’re out. I hope the Pentagon isn’t so stupid in this day and age that they’d attach their little red policy wagon to this band of morons led by Minnie Elders.