Category: DC Government

  • 1400 armed robberies in gun-free DC last year

    Chief Tango sends us an article from the Washington Post which sheepishly reports that there were nearly 1400 armed robberies reported in the liberal utopia which is our nation’s capitol.

    The number of gun robberies in 2013 was 97 fewer than in the previous year, a drop of more than 6 percent. It was, however, about 11 percent more than the 1,261 gun robberies reported to police in 2011.

    Robberies, particularly those involving weapons, are often considered a key measure of crime and safety. More numerous and widespread than slayings, they have a strong effect on residents’ perceptions.

    The only thing that surprises me is the fact that the Post actually reported this crime rate. The Post and the Metro PD are proud of the fact that the murders were down to 104 last year, but if gun control was working, it should be “0”, shouldn’t it?

    The District banned guns from it’s streets in 1974, but their police still recover about 2,000 guns every year mostly from criminals, but also from gun buy back programs.

    And, oh, this week, the District’s legal gun owners are lining up at their local precincts to be fingerprinted like common criminals for reregistration of their firearms. From the Washington Times;

    In the District, firearm registration renewal will cost gun owners $48 regardless of the number of guns they own, according to police. The reregistration is completed when the gun owner is fingerprinted, pays the renewal fee, passes a criminal-background check and submits a renewal form that confirms the owner’s home address, the serial number and type of gun owned, and answers a series of questions about their fitness to own a gun.

    Meanwhile common criminals will likely avoid the process.

  • Death gratuity payments on hold while leftist groups are given exemptions from shutdown

    The selective manner in which budget items are prioritized and laws are enforced by the federal apparatus under the leadership of the Obama administration is getting sleazier by the day. We already know that death gratuity payments for service members killed in the line of duty have been suspended as “non-essential”.

    Are they, from the perspective of the legion of Washington bureaucrats enforcing federal governance, actually essential? Probably not. Yet, it’s part of the American ethic and, just maybe, a good idea too. It’s why Congress is already moving to reinstate the funding by law, one of the many ethical and simply good pieces of funding that the Congress has sent to Obama to be reinstated.

    The odd thing is while this “non-essential service” is falling victim to Obama’s “no negotiation” strategy it comes to light that at the same time leftist union backed immigration amnesty groups are managing to have a previously scheduled rally on the supposedly shutdown national mall today. How? Courtesy of an Obama administration exemption. Imagine that.

  • House: Military should be exempt from DC’s gun laws

    Emily Miller, our favorite 2d Amendment reporter at the Washington Times reports that this afternoon Congress voted unanimously to pass a resolution that expressed their opinion that folks in the military should be able to carry guns in the District of Columbia in spite of DC’s restrictive gun laws;

    “Our servicemen and women are highly-trained, highly-skilled, and the most professional fighting force in the world,” Gingrey said after the vote about those cases. “That this could happen to our veterans is a travesty. I will continue fighting to protect our Second Amendment rights.”

    The resolution says that the 40,000 active duty servicemen and women in Washington deserve a waiver from the city’s “onerous and highly restrictive laws on the possession of firearms.”

    Of course, their vote doesn’t mean anything, except that when there’s nothing on the line, Congress supports the troops gun rights. Somehow, I think, if it was actual legislation, the vote might have turned out quite differently.

    They had the same vote last year and Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton – a perfect example of the type of politician the district would send to Congress if they ever got an actual representative and Senators – kind of freaked at the first vote;

    “We will fight every attack on our rights as a local government, particularly when we are singled out for unique treatment.”

    Yeah, their rights as a government supersede those rights of the people who defend that government, I guess.

  • Emily Miller: the David Gregory saga continues

    Our favorite 2d Amendment journalist, Emily Miller, tells the tale of her journey through the jungle of getting a FOIA out of the DC government in regards to the David Gregory is better than the rest of us case. After she got the FOIA finally she found a couple of discrepancies between what Gregory’s lawyer told the prosecutor’s office and what really happened.

    It seems that Gregory’s lawyer told police that he had borrowed the magazine from a legal owner and it was returned immediately after the cute little TV show, however, police recovered the magazine from Gregory’s residence two days after he said he returned it the owner.

    Gregory’s attorney also told the prosecutor that they didn’t know that it was illegal to bring a 30-round magazine into the District if it wasn’t attached to a rifle. However the FOIA contains a conversation that proves otherwise;

    The police documents show there was no confusion. At 4 p.m. on Friday, Dec. 21, a NBC producer, whose name was redacted, emailed MPD this: “ ‘Meet the Press’ is interviewing a person on the show this Sunday in studio — Producers for the show would liek [sic] to have a clip (standard and high power), without ammunition in studio to use on the show. There will be no gun, no bullets, just clips. Is this legal?”

    At 9 p.m., someone at MPD — again, the name was blacked out — replied: “No, possession of high capacity magazines is a misdemeanor under Title #7 of the D.C. Code. We would suggest utilizing photographs for their presentation.”

    But, obviously Gregory is better than the rest of us and a photo of a magazine isn’t quite dramatic enough, so lacking it drama that only the real thing brought into the District illegally would suffice. So dramatic that a lawyer can lie to the prosecutor without any repercussion.

    While I think that DC’s gun laws are draconian, I still think they should be applied equally to everyone. That’s not what happened in this case. If I lied to a prosecutor, I would expect to be punished for that, but I guess if I had a theatrical reason for breaking the law, the prosecutor would let me slide especially if I had stationary hair and a smarmy smile that invited the application of a blunt object.

  • About that IRS thing

    The TEA Party is pretty wary of the federal government, its a well known fact that they think the Federal Government has become corrosive towards individual liberty.  You could call the TEA Party a coalition of conservatives and libertarians.  You could call them paranoid.  You could call them funny.  You could call them idealistic.  You could call them wacky.  All of these tittles do have some element of truth to them.  It’s not like a guy walking around in a tri-corner hat with teabags hanging from it  is necessarily hard to make fun of.  But whatever else the TEA party is/was, it was and remains a legitimate political movement.  Our laws are created to protect any group of people that are passionate about any issue, and there are groups from both sides of the isle that are exempt from taxes because they are legitimate political groups.  Speech, it would seem is the one thing the Government isn’t trying to tax these days.

    Only, that doesn’t seem to be the case.  Apparently the IRS has been harassing groups with the words TEA party or Patriots in the title.  What it all boils down to is after the Citizen United ruling in 2010, the number of groups seeking 501(c)(4) status increased in order of magnitude.  Many of those groups were conservative, like the TEA party.  What appears to have happened is that following this sudden outgrowth of the TEA party, and the Citizens United ruling, some low level bureaucrats in the IRS specifically targeted the conservative groups.  They would target for auditing, demand donor information (which is illegal), name of who sat on the board (inappropriate), and in certain cases apparently asked question about the children of the leaders of these groups (HIGHLY inappropriate).  Keep in mind all of this is in the space of 2010-2012.  The run up to the 2012 election saw a lot of TEA party groups complaining about harassment, which most everyone dismissed as right wing wackos who were paranoid about the government.  Turns out they were right.

    Let’s step back for a second and look at that.  The IRS was using it’s almost God-like powers of paper to cause these people no end of grief.  If you haven’t been harassed by a government agency you have no idea what a nightmare it is.  Think bumbling psycho stalker that happens to have all the keys.  The term “harassment” doesn’t do it justice.  But there’s something else that should send a cold chill of fear down your spine.  a branch of the Federal Government used its power to assist a political ideology, or  more accurately to punish an opposing political ideology that could have potentially, affected the election.  That should stop everyone cold.  That should cause congress, and the American people in all areas of the political spectrum break out in a cold sweat.  The gears of government are choosing a winner.

    I know that Romney probably would have lost anyway, I know that Obama was still riding the “historic” wave, and the TEA party were just dismissed as loonies, but history has shown time and again that suppression of a political ideology by gears of the governing body is a very bad thing.  I’m not saying that the Sturmabteilung are going to be marching down the streets, or that the anarchists are going to finally “bring it all down.”  What I’m saying is that like Rome we have reached the apex of our power.  Our great philosopher leaders have come and gone.  We’ve had our Ceasars, we’ve had our Marcus Aurelius, and now the Praetorian Guard is auctioning off the crown.  This is a mark of corruption, perhaps of well meaning individuals, though that’s probably not the case.  We have devolved to the point were we are willing to intimidate and bully the very people our Constitution was designed to protect.

    It should not matter to you where you stand on the political spectrum.  You may personally despise the TEA party.  You may be diametrically opposed to everything they stand for, at the end of the day you should still defend them from government abuses, and protect their right to free speech.  It should not matter how despicable you find them, the principle is the same, if it can be done to them, it can be done to you.  If you are say a died in the wool Paulbot, or a die-hard Obamanut you should be on your phones to your senator or representative, calling them demanding an investigation.  Your party affiliation should never matter when the feds are harassing someone about their political beliefs.  What’s even worse is that this is being put out by pencil pushers.  Its a tyranny of bureaucracy.  There’s no congress critter to throw out of office.  Much like a “fire and forget” javelin anti tank missile once the mountain of paper avalanches on someone, there’s no way to recall it.  It should give you all a cold sweat that one stroke of a pen in the wrong place, one decimal point in the wrong spot, one “low level” clerk in an office in Ohio can make your life a living hell or send you to jail.

    This is your government doing this.  You, sitting there reading this, have a roughly 1/308,745,538 +/- ownership stake in the federal government.  Every bit of good it does on your behalf, every piece of property it owns, and every misstep it takes belong in some portion to YOU.  Abraham Lincoln called this a government “Of the People, By the People, and For the People.”  If the Government is picking winners, if the People don’t give a damn.  If the People are so apathetic that they do not act when their rights are clearly threatened, that they do not take ownership of their government, then this will no longer be the case.  It will be a government “Of the Government, By the Government, and For the Government,” and the people can go screw themselves.

  • DC residents want to “crack down on ski masks”

    Old Trooper sends a link to an article in the Washington Times wherein some locals are blaming high capacity ski masks which are apparently being sold with no background checks in DC stores, and then the masks are free to wreak havoc on the otherwise peaceful community. So they figure they need to “crack down” on the purchase of the item.

    On a Metropolitan Police Department-run listserv, Ms.[Faith Wheeler, an Advisory Neighborhood Commission member] was one of several people who broached the subject of trying to discourage the sale of ski masks in the neighborhood, or asked legislators whether there are other ways to ban their sale.

    The City already forbids people over the age of 16 from wearing the ski masks in public in some circumstances like while committing a crime or threatening someone else, but apparently the law doesn’t go far enough for some of the residents of DC…sound familiar? The DC cops say they don’t keep statistics on how often they enforce that law…which in the language of the DC government means that they don’t enforce it at all. Again, sound familiar?

    “And the next thing you know, the irrational thinkers will be talking about getting rid of scarves. A long scarf can make a good mask. Hmm. What’s next after that?” one woman wrote on the police listserv in response to the ski mask discussion.

    Yikes, it’s almost as if there’s a pattern here. It’s as if people who think that government can solve every little problem in their lives expect more and more government. But that can’t be right. Can it?

    So, those balaclavas that Ranger Joe’s sells – are those assault ski masks? And those ski masks made by that company UnderArmor – are they really armor – who cares, we should ban them because they sound scary? The DC government should have a database of people who can legally purchase ski masks and there should be a three-day cooling off/waiting period. And purchase should be limited to one ski mask every month. The black ones scare me. The opportunities for the “do something” crowd are virtually endless in the unregulated ski mask market.

  • DC Prosecutor: No arrest for NBC’s Gregory

    The other day we wrote about Emily Miller’s article about the DC Metropolitan Police passing on their investigation of David Gregory’s heinous disregard of the District’s large capacity magazine ban, in contradiction of an advisory from the MPD to the City prosecutor. Of course it will surprise no one that the prosecutor isn’t prosecuting, according to the Washington Post;

    D.C. attorney general Irvin B. Nathan announced his decision Friday afternoon by releasing a letter to an attorney for NBC. Nathan wrote that though the device Gregory held up “meets the definition” of the criminal statute, he wrote that prosecution “would not promote public safety in the District of Columbia nor serve the best interests of the people of the District to whom this office owes its trust.”

    I guess the only interest served in the arrest and prosecution of David Gregory would be a measure of credibility of the justice system in DC, since 105 people were arrested in the District for possessing large capacity magazines last year. Including James Brinkley, an Army Veteran, who was just passing through DC when he was arrested. But then, he wasn’t a rich white guy, and he wasn’t toeing the party line while he was in possession of the illegal item. And, his defense wouldn’t make banning the harmless object look ridiculous.

    Thanks to Chief Tango for the link.

  • DC’s homicide rate exceeds Afghanistan US casualty rates

    The Washington Post doesn’t say this, but they wrote an article today which mentioned that there have been 2294 homicides in that city since 2000. So to determine about how many homicide victims there have been since 2001, I subtracted out the 204 homicides in 2000, and since the Metro Cops stopped posting current year homicide numbers on their website (because, apparently, if they post the numbers, there’s no problem), I added in the 2012 unsolved homicide victims (50) that makes the number 2102 from 2001 – 2012 (or more).

    This is not to trivialize the deaths in Afghanistan, or to magnify the situation in DC. It’s just something that I thought you should know.