Category: DC Government

  • Acting Secretary of Defense Starts January 1, 2019

    Patrick Shanahan from DOD website.

    Although Retired General Mattis designated February 28, 2019, as his intended step-down date, it’s looking like he’ll leave at the end of this year. President Trump designated the Deputy Secretary of Defense as the Acting Secretary of Defense effective January 1, 2019.

    From the Military Times:

    Mattis’ relationship with Trump had appeared to sour in recent months as the president pushed for more aggressive military policies.

    Pentagon officials appeared caught unaware by sudden decisions made in the Oval Office on forming a new Space Force, sending troops to the southern U.S. border, and banning transgender recruits from the ranks.

    Most recently, Trump’s decisions to begin massive troop withdrawals in the Middle East and Afghanistan seemed to go against military commanders’ advice.

    Shanahan, who is among the candidates to permanently replace Mattis, is now in a position to drive changes he’s championed as Mattis’ deputy.

    The former Boeing executive in his current role has pushed for systemic changes to the acquisition system that pushes the Pentagon’s focus away from annual budget cycles and more on making programs successful.

    Patrick Shanahan wants to focus on process and outputs, removing duplication of efforts, making programs successful, etc.

    You can read more here. Here’s President Trump’s announcement:

  • All Warfare Is Based on Deception

    If you can find the quote in the title, it was written up a very, very long time ago.

    I detest politicians. More than that, I detest what drives them into being the slumguzzling thieves that they become. Theft of money, theft of power – it’s all the same. They tell you what they think you want to hear, just to get elected. And the minute they get elected, they are off to the races to grab everything they can get their hands on.

    Even worse are the thugs and fellow travelers that surround them, and the hangers-on at the perimeter of the mess that has become our government.

    The recent TAH article on Julian “Wikileaks” Assange prompted me to dig further, and I found the article at the link from Vox. It hits both sides of the issue, but one item caught my eye: Jerome Corsi kept coming up in the text. I don’t know how reliable Vox is, but the article about this hits many, many points.

    And to think, all of this was going on before Thanksgiving.

    The Mueller investigations seem like a manufactured conspiracy to me, with the attention-grabber Jerome Corsi right in the thick of it.

    Then someone brings up Wikileaks, for no reason other than Assange lost his pussycat and wants attention again, but protests that he had nothing to do with any of this, and now we have this odd-ball connection with Wikileaks, Mueller’s investigation, Manafort’s dissembling, and our current loud-mouthed, attention-seeking conspiracy theorist, Jerome Corsi, who is right at the forefront of it – mired in the thick of it, as it were.

    So who is lying, and who is not?

    And why is Corsi sticking his oar into this? He’s addicted to creating conspiracy theories. He’s the one who started the rumor about bodaprez not being born in the USA. He likes to make stuff up, from what I read here, seems to be hellbent on causing trouble and stirring the pot everywhere he goes. He’s just published a new book. Is he really this desperate for attention?

    We all know about attention-whoring, don’t we?

    Why did Mueller hold off until after the President submitted his answers to Mueller to release the statement that Manafort lied? And where’s the concrete proof that Manafort lied? I mean hard, tactile, solid as a brick wall, physical evidence.

    As I said, I don’t know how reliable Vox is as a source, however, the reporter makes some very good points and touches conflicting bases throughout the text.

    Read the article at the link, and make up your own minds about this.

    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/11/27/18114355/manafort-assange-mueller-corsi-trump-russia

    ‘Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.’

    Perhaps that’s the reason Mueller hasn’t been fired just yet…?

    What a mess.

    Note: photo credit goes to Soviet.

  • In Regard to Ratifying the ERA

    When the Equal Rights Amendment was put into formal context of both language and legal status in 1972, it was in the form of a new amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In the original vote count, by 1977, the legislatures of 35 states had approved the amendment. Since then, two more states, Nevada in 2017 and Illinois in 2018, have voted to ratify the Amendment.

    Only one more state is needed to pass the US Equal Rights Amendment. This article from NYT tells us that since Illinois voted to approve the Equal Rights Amendment at the federal level in May this year, there is only one more state needed to complete the process of full ratification, making the ERA a federal law.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/us/equal-rights-amendment-illinois.html

    Phyllis Schlafly’s arguments included everyone using a common public restroom, and women being drafted. Well, okay, the unisex restroom thing has already been addressed and in regard to women being drafted, she forgot that the draft ended in 1973, which meant that men were only required to register with Selective Service to qualify for federal college loans.

    I see nothing wrong with requiring the same thing of women, because from World War I  (and the Civil War) right up to the present, millions of women have been putting in their time voluntarily because they thought it was the right thing to do, and they still think that way.

    So what is the issue again? Just what is wrong with being asked to put in some of your precious time serving your country? There are thousands of us girls doing it right now, some on the front lines, and many who went before, so get over whatever that nonsense is about ‘it’s a man’s world’ thing. Grow up.

    There are 13 states left to make up a 38th state to ratify the ERA. Yes, it is well past the deadline, but there was one Amendment to the US Constitution that took 200 years to be ratified.  Something unexpected happened with a different amendment in 1992.

    First, some history: Six months after the Constitution went into effect, James Madison offered 17 amendments to the founding document. Congress ultimately approved 12. By 1791, the states had ratified the first 10, which became known as the Bill of Rights.

    One of Madison’s amendments continued to slowly work its way through the states more than 200 years after congressional approval. In May 1992, Michigan became the 38th state to ratify, making it the 27th Amendment, which says that salary increases for members of Congress do not go into effect until the term after they were approved.  – Article.

    If it took 200 years for that salary increase amendment to become an Amendment to the US Constitution, then why shouldn’t this one have that approbation, as well? After all, it simply confirms what has already happened, mostly at the state levels, and requires only one more state to pass the ERA. There are 13 states from which to choose: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia.

    Once a 38th state has passed the Amendment, perhaps, per a 2013 report by Congressional Research Service, Congress could simply change the deadline. Congress could also replace the old ERA with a new, updated version and ask the states to ratify the newer version.

    Whatever happens, it’s kind of a lame duck thing anyway, because so many moves forward have taken place since 1972. It would be symbolic that we do support the Law of the Land, the language of the U.S. Constitution, and we don’t just give lip service to it.

  • 14th Amendment, Pt. IIa Sec. (B1015zillow)

    GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham announced on Twitter Tuesday morning that he will introduce legislation similar to any executive order President Trump might issue ending birthright citizenship in the United States. He tried to do that in 2010.

    “Finally, a president willing to take on this absurd policy of birthright citizenship,” Graham tweeted Tuesday. “In addition, I plan to introduce legislation along the same lines as the proposed executive order from President Trump.”

    Oh, and now, the Democrats are experts on the Constitution, as noted [below – my bad!]  before.

    On Tuesday morning, Rep. Justin Amash, a Michigan Republican who frequently vocalizes his differences with the president, emphasized that ending birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment.

    “A president cannot amend Constitution or laws via executive order,” Amash tweeted. “Concept of natural-born citizen in 14th Amendment derives from natural-born subjects in Britain. Phrase ‘and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ excludes mainly foreign diplomats, who are not subject to U.S. laws.”

    Apparently, Amash has forgotten that statute on the books that gives American citizenship to people who were born overseas to American parents, e.g., military and diplomat families stationed in France or Japan or the UK.

    So they want to trash the Constitution because of the Electoral College, but they want to keep it, too, because of “citizenship” stuff. Well, you wouldn‘t want to lose all those votes, would you?

    Okay. Whatever.  Pres. Trump certainly does know how to poke the bear when he needs to.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-the-past-republicans-have-suggested-ending-birthright-citizenship-requires-amending-constitution/

    Thanks for reading.

  • Doxing Boy Update

    cosko doxer

    Former Democratic aide Jackson Cosko was arrested on charges of allegedly posting GOP senators’ private information online, known as “doxing,” made his first court appearance on Thursday.

    Cosko, 27, appeared in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia a day after being arrested for “doxxing” GOP senators on Wikipedia.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia announced that Cosko has been charged with five federal offenses, including making public restricted personal information; making threats in interstate commerce; unauthorized access of a government computer; identity theft; and witness tampering.

    He is also charged with two D.C. offenses: Second-degree burglary, which carries up to 15 years in prison, and unlawful entry, which carries up to 6 months in prison.

    Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson ordered that Cosko be held in detention pending a hearing set for Oct. 9.

    Its all fun and games until that bitch “Accountability” shows up in the form of a District of Columbia Magistrate with zero sense of humor. The entire article can be viewed at The Hill

    But wait there’s more-

    Fox News has uncovered two social media accounts that supposedly belong to Cosko. One account, @TrundleDaGreat, which has not been active since October 2, is linked to Cosko’s personal email account. Cosko was arrested on October 3.

    The other one, named “Radical Ed” is linked to an email account – livefreeorpwn@gmail.com – that sent a threatening email to another staffer who confronted Cosko after catching him in the office of Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., using an unauthorized login, according to Capitol Police.

    “If you tell anyone I will leak it all. Emails signal conversations gmails. Senators children’s health information and socials,” read the threatening email allegedly sent by Cosko.

    The social media account tweeted Graham’s personal information, though without the address, in reply to Move On, a progressive advocacy group that also tweeted Graham’s office phone number.

    This explains the witness tampering charge, a Federal offense. As I understand it, a Federal beef has no parole, but may take time off for “exemplary behavior,” whatever that entails. Read the article in its entirety Here.

  • All Hands!! Attention On Deck!!! Listen Up!!!!

    You should all be aware that the “Me Too” movement by women regarding sexual harassment and misconduct started about one year ago. Furthermore, this next week, there will be an investigation by the FBI as ordered by dTrump, as well as a one week delay on the confirmation vote.

    .https://www.wsj.com/articles/senate-judiciary-committee-prepares-to-vote-on-kavanaugh-this-morning-1538134779

    The drama is not over yet, but may be reaching a peak shortly.

    Why? An astrologer would said it has to do with Venus (women) retrograde in Scorpio and square to Saturn in Capricorn, no longer retrograde but moving forward. Capricorn is the control freak sign in the zodiac. Saturn symbolizes structure and authority, which applies to control freaks. I should know. My sister is a Capricorn.

    So we can go with the astrological explanation, or we can take a different and more prosaic viewpoint.  They seem pretty much the same.

    Whether or not you believe in karmic influence is immaterial. Per karmic law, the energy from whatever you do goes out into the Universe and comes back to you nine times over. It ‘s another way of saying ‘What goes around, comes around.’

    Bearing in mind that the Democrat side of the Senate is dead set on controlling everything, the reality is that their control is slipping, and they may know it but refuse to recognize it. However, their behavior is clearly saying ‘we know we are losing control here’. Why else would Pelosi put out a begging letter already?

    Sen. Flake has asked for an investigation and a one-week delay on the vote. Pres. Trump has asked the FBI, as I said, to pursue an investigation.  What will happen next?

    In one week, the SJC will be required to vote ‘Yes” or “No”, like it or not. Nothing will be found impugning Kavanaugh. The “guilty until proven innocent” is as Medieval as you can get, and I once said ‘Do NOT go Medieval on my ass!’  I meant every word of it.

    Therefore, should Mr. Kavanaugh not receive the vote to seat him on the SCOTUS bench, the next candidate is Amy Barrett. 

    Barrett is, as we all know, a Catholic, which means that her view of things like abortion may be even less acceptable than Kavanaugh’s history. The fact that Roe v. Wade, passed in 1967 and tested several times since then, has not yet been overturned is immaterial to them. The first thing they will pounce on, like the fools they are, will be that issue, which in my view is, and for 50+ years has been, a non-issue. To say that it will be automatically overturned is utter nonsense boiling out of pure ignorance.

    By delaying the vote instead of holding it, and letting everyone know that they are the most obnoxious control freaks on the planet, the Democrats are setting themselves up for what can only be termed the most laughable and obnoxious public decision they have ever inflicted on themselves.

    They had a good choice with Kavanaugh, but trumped-up fantasies from “this one time in high school…” have had them chasing themselves and their stubby, wrinkled, little tails in entirely the wrong direction. And now, unless I’m informed otherwise, they will have to vote for someone, whether or not they like it, or leave SCOTUS in an unbalanced and untenable position.  While I realize that there are other candidates waiting in the wings, they and Barrett all have the advantage of witnessing the biggest, and possibly most egregious clown show since Bozo left the circus.

    And frankly, the leftreds and Democraps brought it on themselves.

    “Lord, what fools these mortals be!” : Puck to Oberon, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Act 3, Sc. 2.

    Chin up! It is not over yet.

  • No, Trump is Not Going Away

    Any of that talk of impeachment still wandering through the hallowed halls of the Congress?

    The author of the National Review article gives us good, hard, solid reasons for the unlikely possibility that Trump will face impeachment charges, despite the howling in the outer darkness, and why such a move would be distinctly unwise. I think he spares no one, including Trump, for faults that are public knowledge,

    For example, this paragraph makes Trump’s popularity clear:  “Had Trump misled his base and not fulfilled his campaign promises, he would have little popular support. Had he tanked the economy and started a war, he would be polling in the 20s rather than the mid to lower 40s.“

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/donald-trump-impeachment-unlikely-unwise/

    I’ve said this before, as have others, including the author of the article:  “The startling fact is that a so-called buffoonish real-estate developer hit upon a calculus to restore robust economic growth in a way that all the degreed experts of the prior (Obama) administration had not.”

    Yesterday, I referred to the sluggish return of the markets under Obama’s administration as an anemic 1404.84 average per year over a period of eight years. I also said that once the 2016 election results were announced and confirmed, the markets rose rapidly from a DJIA 18,847.63 on 11/7/2016, to an all-time high of 26,616,71 on 1/22/2018, a difference of 7,769.11 points in about 14 months. That is not a fluke. The markets reflect the economy and both continue to stabilize and improve under Trump. The so-called blue collar sector views Trump as a positive response to what had become an economy that was, at best, sluggish and weak under bodaprez.

    The DJIA reached another high 26,124.57 on 8/29/18 and maintains a steady growth rate. There may be a ceiling to the markets, but it has not been speculated on thus far.

    Politifact tried to claim that Obama had the better record by comparing those eight years of his slacker, self-involved governance to Trump’s 22 months. This is a false comparison and does not work. You cannot legitimately compare 22 months in office with 8 years, and expect any reaction other than laughter at this attitude. And furthermore, employment opportunities during Obama’s administration were sluggish at best, nearly nonexistent at their worst. Under Trump, employment has picked up graphically, as the author indicates. Unemployment is at an anemic low now of 3.9% since April and may go lower. During the Obama administration, it was as high as 10% in 2009, a level that stirred mutterings of another Great Depression.  The chart to refer to is at this link: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

    I have to add here that Franklin Roosevelt started the government sponsored work programs CCC, WPA, and PWA, as a response to the demands of the War Bond veterans who were desperate for money. He put them to work at a time when people needed jobs more than anything else. The CCC workers at the people who put the national parks into place. You can thank them for Yellowstone, Yosemite, and various other national parks that might be housing developments now.

    The National Review article is worth your time and full attention. The author includes the Never Trumpers, who were ostensibly conservatives who didn’t like Trump, although I view them not as conservatives but as Mugwumps (look that up) who would approve of Gerrymandering if it suited their needs.

  • Confirmed!

    Gina

    National Politics News reports today Gina Haspel will become the first female director of the CIA, after a Senate confirmation vote that overrode concerns about her role in the spy agency’s harsh interrogation program after 9/11.

    Thursday’s count of 54-45 votes was the closest for a CIA nominee in the nearly seven decades that confirmation from the Senate has been required. Haspel, who has spent nearly her entire CIA career in undercover positions, is the first operations officer to be confirmed since William Colby in 1973.

    Haspel, 61, is a native of Kentucky but grew up around the world as the daughter of an Air Force serviceman. She worked in Africa, Europe and classified locations around the globe and was tapped as deputy director of the CIA last year. She worked under former CIA director Mike Pompeo until President Donald Trump moved him to secretary of state.

    Haspel was backed by many in the CIA rank-and-file and was robustly supported by senior intelligence officials, including six former CIA directors and three former national intelligence directors, who said she earned the chance to take the helm of the nation’s premier spy agency. National Intelligence Director Dan Coats said Haspel has integrity and both frontline and executive intelligence expertise. “We salute Director Haspel, a trailblazer who today becomes the first woman to lead the CIA,” he said.

    Her opponents argued that it wasn’t right to promote someone who supervised a covert detention site in Thailand where terror suspects were waterboarded, an interrogation technique that simulates drowning. They said the U.S. needed to slam closed what was one of the CIA’s darkest chapters that tainted America’s image with allies abroad.

    Haspel is taking over from Mike Pompeo, whom Trump recently made his secretary of state. Her boss, John Brennan, CIA director during the Obama administration, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 8, 2013, by a vote of 63-34. He was also deeply involved in “enhanced” interrogation techniques, discussed here: https://www.azuse.cloud/?p=79403 but was not a Trump nominee.