Category: Big Pentagon

  • Sergeant La David Johnson; additional remains discovered

    Sergeant La David Johnson; additional remains discovered

    Apparently, there’s still a search on for the remains of Sergeant LaDavid Johnson. The Department of Defense made the following statement;

    On Nov. 12, 2017, a joint U.S Africa Command military investigation team discovered additional human remains at the site where Sgt. La David T. Johnson’s body was recovered following the Oct. 4 attack. Today, we can confirm that the Armed Forces Medical Examiner has positively identified these remains as those of Sgt. Johnson. The department continues to conduct a detailed and thorough investigation into the deaths of Staff Sgt. Bryan C. Black, Staff Sgt. Jeremiah W. Johnson, Staff Sgt. Dustin M. Wright, and Sgt. La David T. Johnson. We extend our deepest condolences to all of the families of the fallen.

  • Active duty transgender service member gets reassignment surgery

    Stars & Stripes reports that the Pentagon has announced that it has paid for gender reassignment surgery for an active duty servicemember.

    Defense Department spokeswoman Dana White said the surgery was done Tuesday in a private hospital and was paid for by the military’s health coverage because the doctor deemed it was medically necessary.

    ”Military hospitals do not have the surgical expertise to perform this type of surgery, therefore it was conducted in a private hospital,” White said, adding that because this servicemember “had already begun a sex-reassignment course of treatment, and the treating doctor deemed this surgery medically necessary, a waiver was approved by the director of the Defense Health Agency.”

    Army Maj. Dave Eastburn said that waivers are required and routinely approved for medical procedures that military facilities don’t have the expertise to perform.

    So we’ve begun that trip down the slippery slope.

    The President had told the Pentagon to cease paying for the treatments unless the servicemember’s health was in danger. Apparently, that was the case here. I’m not a doctor, but I can’t imagine how the presence of a male appendage can put someone’s health in danger. Especially if they were born with one.

    So there’s one troop who can’t be deployed for an extended period of time. Sure hope that our enemies take that into account before staging their next attack – the fact that we’re going to fill the ranks with folks who we know will be non-deployable for most of their time in uniform.

  • President Trump wants a military parade

    Chief Tango sends us a link to the Washington Post which reports that the president’s visit to France’s Bastille Day parade which showcased France’s military might has influenced Trump to inquire to his military chiefs to organize a military-style parade on Pennsylvania Avenue.

    On Monday, seated next to Macron, he boasted about the levels of U.S. military spending so far in his term. And he said his goal would be to “try to top” what France did.

    “I think we’re looking forward to doing that,” Trump said. “I’m speaking with General Kelly and with all of the people involved, and we’ll see if we can do it this year,” he added, referring to Chief of Staff John F. Kelly.

    The Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comment about plans to hold such a parade.

    There have been July 4th parades a block over from Pennsylvania Avenue every year. While they included some military aspects, there have been no tanks, artillery, fly-overs and things that Trump envisions in his parade.

    In my opinion, we don’t need a parade to showcase our military force – it’s on display around the world on any given day, in action and on nearly every continent. Military might on parade isn’t in the American character – we are not a tin-pot dictatorship like the Russians, the Chinese, North Korea and the others around the world which puts it’s force in the streets as tacit threat to control their own people under the guise of patriotism.

    I also sympathize with the common soldiers who will take time out of their training to scrub and paint vehicles in preparation for a martial pageant, the hours of practice they will have to engage in will only detract from their readiness for real world engagements.

    If anyone were bother to ask me about this, I’d have to vote an emphatic “No!”

  • Secretary of Defense statement on Presidential Memo

    Secretary of Defense statement on Presidential Memo

    The Secretary of Defense James Mattis issued a statement on the Presidential Memorandum signed last week in regards to “Military Service by Transgender Individuals.”

    Basically, he saluted and moved out smartly, continuing to allow transgender members of the uniformed service to serve until he completely investigates the issue;

    I will establish a panel of experts serving within the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security to provide advice and recommendations on the implementation of the president’s direction. Panel members will bring mature experience, most notably in combat and deployed operations, and seasoned judgment to this task. The panel will assemble and thoroughly analyze all pertinent data, quantifiable and non-quantifiable. Further information on the panel will be forthcoming.

    Once the panel reports its recommendations and following my consultation with the secretary of Homeland Security, I will provide my advice to the president concerning implementation of his policy direction. In the interim, current policy with respect to currently serving members will remain in place.

    Secretary Mattis emphasizes that the main mission of the Department of Defense remains the “military’s combat effectiveness leading to victory on the battlefield”.

  • Mattis to the troops: Hold the line

    Mattis to the troops: Hold the line

    The Hill quotes Secretary of Defense James Mattis speaking to the troops in an unknown location;

    “Our country right now, it’s got problems we don’t have in the military,” Mattis said. “You just hold the line until our country gets back to understanding and respecting each other and showing it.”

    Mattis said the U.S. has “two powers” – “inspiration” and “intimidation.”

    “We’ve got the power of intimidation, and that’s you, if someone wants to screw with our families, our country and our allies,” Mattis said. “The power of inspiration – [and] we’ll get the power of inspiration back.”

    He also thanked the troops for their service and said he came out of retirement to “serve alongside young people like you who are so selfless and, frankly, so rambunctious.”

    “Problems we don’t have in the military”.

  • Defense Logistics Agency to fix loophole

    Chief Tango sends us a link to Federal News Radio which reports that the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) promised congress that they’re working on plugging holes in their Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) which supplies law enforcement with surplus from Defense Department stocks. Apparently there is big hole in the system;

    GAO showed that it was able to pose as a federal agency that does not exist to get hold of $1.2 million in military gear that’s not available to the general public.

    In an audit released last week, the office said its investigators, posing as employees of the fake federal agency, sought and gained approval to participate in the program by corresponding with DLA solely via email. Later, the undercover GAO employees were able to pick up more than 100 pieces of controlled property from DLA warehouses — and in two of the three cases, did so without being asked to show any form of identification.

    I know you probably think there might be an easy fix to the whole problem, but you’re not in the government;

    But Zina Merritt, GAO’s director of defense capabilities and management, said the equipment the office procured from DoD could have been turned into lethal weaponry with commercial items that are easily obtainable off-the-shelf.

    “While DLA has taken some steps to address identified deficiencies in the program, it lacks a comprehensive framework for instituting fraud prevention and mitigation measures at all stages of the process,” she said. “DLA officials acknowledge that they have not conducted a fraud risk assessment.”

    The National Archives publishes a manual every year that lists every single government agency, it’s called the US Government Manual. You’d think the folks at DLA would have a copy of the manual, or they could bookmark the link I helpfully posted, so they could check if an agency exists, but I guess not.

  • Reaching

    Reaching

    The whole world has gone crazy because the President announced yesterday that he wouldn’t allow transgender people to serve in uniform. Of course, they cling to that Manning fellow who was a traitor to his country and claims to be transgender because it got him released from prison by the social justice warrior in the White House.

    A number of people who did serve honorably in the military and then came out are pissed off. Folks like Junea Childers, Kristin Beck, Logan Ireland .

    Yeah, well, they didn’t serve openly as transgenders, they didn’t expect to have their transition paid for by the American taxpayers, and their units didn’t have to make accommodations in order for them to serve, so there’s a difference.

    The Washington Post couldn’t help themselves pointing out that “The military spends five times as much on Viagra as it would on transgender troops’ medical care” as if those two things are related. They also published some stupid crap about “A history lesson for Trump: Transgender soldiers served in the Civil War” which isn’t about transgender people at all – it’s about women who wore pants on the battlefield. Not a single instance of a transgender person was mentioned in the story. We’re constantly being told that cross-dressing is different from transgender, but no one told the Washington Post, I guess.

    That angry old queen, George Takei piled on Trump, along with a bunch of other Hollywood has-beens (never-weres). Folk who spent the last two decades demeaning military service now act as if not allowing transgender people to serve is some egregious violation of their rights. There is no right to serve in the military.

    Military.com provides a list of medical conditions that would preclude military service, should we find a way for everyone to serve despite the costs to the taxpayers and the costs to military order and discipline?

    Allowing a bunch of people to put on uniforms knowing that they would never be deployed is bad business for the Defense Department. Everyone who has no military experience seems to have an opinion that is completely devoid of common sense and they’re all reaching for straws.

  • Trump bans transgender troops

    According to Fox News, the President Tweeted that he won’t allow the military to be distracted by the costs associated with allowing transgendered people to serve in the military;

    “After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow…Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming..victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you.”

    The president’s tweets came only a few weeks after Defense Secretary James Mattis said he would give military chiefs another six months to conduct a review to determine if allowing transgender individuals to enlist in the armed services will affect the “readiness or lethality” of the force. The deadline for that review was Dec. 1, 2017.

    I’m expecting my inbox to fill up with emails from the Palm Center and human rights groups who will point out that transgendered troops have been serving for the past year without disruptions, however, they won’t take into account the folks who will join just to get free alterations and the cost to readiness that would be caused by those folks riding medical profiles, unable to deploy, not to mention the costs of life-long medical attention they’d require for elective treatment. Ignoring the social costs to order and discipline in the ranks.

    In the spirit of the Secretary of Defense’s focus on warfighting, this is probably the correct decision at this time.