Category: Big Pentagon

  • Pentagon Force Protection Agency warns military members of ISIS

    Chief Tango sends us a link to the Washington Times which reports that the Pentagon Force Protection Agency has issued a warning to service members about their public behavior in light of the attack on a guard at the Canadian War Memorial last week;

    “Recent threats, revealed through various intelligence and law enforcement sources, indicate that terrorists, directed or inspired by the Islamic States of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), view members of U.S. military members and law enforcement officers as legitimate targets for attacks,” the agency warns in memo that The Washington Times has obtained.

    So, I guess we can admit now that the war has followed the troops home because this administration has decided it’s better to fight them at home.

    The alert lists 11 protective steps that require employees to alter their way of life.

    *Remove decals and other identifiers from clothing and vehicles.

    *Vary travel routes.

    *Avoid large gatherings and places where people congregate.

    *Guard what you post on Facebook and Twitter.

    *Do not post anything that links you to the Defense Department.

    *Do not post any opposition to terrorists groups.

    Um, I’d add a #12 – carry a weapon. But, then, a few years back, their commanders wouldn’t let the troops carry a loaded weapon while they were in Afghanistan, so it’s no surprise that they’d leave out that particular bullet recommendation.

  • Chuck Hagel’s big idea

    Chuck Hagel’s big idea

    Wayne sends us a link to Defense News in which they report that Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, had a big idea the other day – he could save the Army if they started a program for coastal defenses.

    In a speech to a military and industry audience that mostly shied away from program specifics, the secretary suggested the Army should try and “broaden its role by leveraging its current suite of long-range precision-guided missiles, rockets, artillery and air defense systems.”

    Hagel said these capabilities “would provide multiple benefits, such as hardening the defenses of US installations; enabling greater mobility of Navy Aegis destroyers and other joint force assets; and helping ensure the free flow of commerce.”

    He also insisted that “this concept is worthy of consideration going forward” and that “such a mission is not as foreign to the Army as it might seem — after the War of 1812, the Army was tasked with America’s coastal defense for over 100 years.”

    That makes complete sense since we’ve been invaded by sea so many times in our history. The Iranians almost sailed a warship to our shores recently, and who knows how soon ISIS will sail it’s Navy in our direction and cut off our commerce. And then there’s the Taliban which has made great strides in it’s swimming donkey bombs program recently.

    I guess they’ll be reopening Fort Monroe and it’s Coast Artillery School that the Army foolishly closed in 1946.

    With the Middle East in flames and the troubles in Africa, it only makes sense that we return to a 19th century strategy. Maybe they should dig a trench-works along the entire East Coast and put infantrymen with fixed bayonets every 5 meters or so.

    I know that this administration wants the wars to end in the Middle East and Africa, but why are they acting like the wars have already ended?

  • Thanks for your service

    So here we are in the midst of several deployments to the various shit holes around the world. The Afghan War isn’t ending this year, thousands are supporting the newest Iraq War, 3000 are headed to Liberia to battle Ebola and at home, the folks in the Pentagon are hard at work to support them. Says Military.com;

    Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work said Tuesday that the Pentagon will continue pressing to trim military pay, pensions, and housing allowances despite rejections by Congress.

    The Pentagon will also try again to reform the Tricare health care system and kill the A-10 attack aircraft despite nearly universal opposition from veterans service organizations, Work said at a Council on Foreign Relations forum.

    “This whole idea of compensation is absolutely critical. Compensation (reform) is a really big deal” in DoD’s efforts to maintain readiness, fight wars in Afghanistan and the Mideast and rebalance forces to the Pacific while working under the budgetary restrictions of the Congressional sequester process, Work said.

    Yeah, they cut pay raises, but that’s not enough, apparently, I’m sure we can find a senior NCO somewhere who can spur the general officers and the civilian employees onward in their quest to make military service even shittier, so shitty, in fact, that they’ll be in command of nothing after a while.

    Thanks to Chief Tango for the link.

  • Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission survey

    Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission survey

    MCRMC banner

    I just finished the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission‘s survey that they sent out to some of us, and it was a real POS, I can still smell it on my fingers. I was limited in my responses to support lowered retirement pay and guided towards a Thrift Savings Plan-type retirement. No matter how carefully I answered the questions, it didn’t stop the summary from arriving at the conclusion that I supported lower compensation for 20 years of service and increased premiums and co-pays for Tricare.

    I feel so dirty to have participated in that piece of Soviet-style propaganda that will be used against the troops. The only reason I took it is because I thought maybe it would send a message – instead I was the one getting a message. These peckerwoods at the MCRMC are bound and determined to change the retirement system and their dishonest survey questions and limited responses available is just ammunition for them to plow ahead.

    So before they publish the results of the survey, you already know how it’s going to turn out.