Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden

  • Falklands redux

    Cowardice and betrayal are again brewing in the Falkland Islands. The Falklands are a group of sparsely inhabited British islands a couple hundred miles off the coast of Argentina, most famous for the brief British-Argentinian conflict over them in 1982. In that conflict an increasingly unpopular military junta, facing growing economic problems, looked to invade the islands and subjugate its British citizens as a way of distracting from their domestic inadequacies. Margret Thatcher responded by deploying the British military and crushing the Argentine invasion. As some of you may have heard, over the past couple of years they’ve discovered a substantial amount of economically viable oil around these same islands. With the depletion of the reserves in the North Sea some figures estimate that these new discoveries could be as much as triple the UK’s existing reserves.

    Lo and behold, this discovery has given the economically floundering, left wing Kirchner government in Argentina all the reason it needs to stir up trouble by again attempting to colonize the Falklands and its British population. In addition to some saber rattling, economic sanctions and not so subtle threats the Kirchner administration has enlisted the aid of left wing thug Hugo Chavez and his counter-U.S. Community of Latin American and Caribbean States.

    Now if you thought to yourself, “Well the British are the United States’ oldest and most steadfast ally; the Obama administration will denounce this cynical aggression and help protect both their ally’s sovereignty and the Falkland people’s right to self determination” then you’d be absolutely, 100% wrong. Back in the summer of 2011, while British troops were fighting, bleeding and dying shoulder to shoulder with American troops in Afghanistan, the Obama administration was signing off on an Organization of American States statement calling for the British to enter into negotiations with Argentina over the status of the Malvinas Islands, the Argentinian name for the Falklands. All this at the behest of the leftist and increasingly anti-American government of Argentina.

    Then, on the 20th of January, the Obama administration twisted the knife it drove into the back of the British by issuing a statement through the State Department saying, “This is a bilateral issue that needs to be worked out directly between the governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom,” the official said. “We encourage both parties to resolve their differences through dialogue in normal diplomatic channels. We recognize de facto United Kingdom administration of the islands but take no position regarding sovereignty.” Needless to say this left many people floored.

    Not only is the Obama administration falling on the wrong side of the geopolitical arena by backing political aggression pursued by organizations dominated by left wing autocrats and anti-American populists but they’re betraying our oldest ally and undercutting the basic principals of liberty and self determination for the 90%+ of the Falkland Islanders who are fully enfranchised British citizens wanting to remain so. All morality, character and faithfulness aside these caustic positions undercut security in the Western Hemisphere by appeasing aggression and placating governments which have no intent to ally themselves with us in the future. This sort of diplomatic timidity serves only to undercut peace and degrade the value of the friendship of the United States. How can we ask our allies, especially those as dear as the British, to send their men and women onto the battlefield to fight and die for our collective security if we won’t even stand up in a council meeting for it?

  • Who wrote this smoldering turd?

    Usually at Associated Press, they put their names on their articles, but this smelly turd is unsigned, and whoever regurgitated this bullshit is obviously embarrassed by it.

    The Navy SEAL operation that freed two Western hostages in Somalia is representative of the Obama administration’s pledge to build a smaller, more agile military force that can carry out surgical counterterrorist strikes to cripple an enemy.

    That’s a strategy much preferred to the land invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan that have cost so much American blood and treasure over the past decade. The contrast to a full-bore invasion is stark: A small, daring team storms a pirate encampment on a near-moonless night, kills nine kidnappers and whisks the hostages to safety.

    Yeah, that’s how you win a war…by surgical strikes at point targets. It worked so well when the French and Dutch Resistance movements employed it as their singular strategy and they beat the Germans and drove them from their countries with pin pricks…oh, wait…no, they didn’t.

    Not to be discounted is the feel-good moment such missions give the American public, a counterbalance to the continued casualties in Afghanistan.

    Yeah, that’s how you win a war…make people feel good in an election year. Swell.

    So if we can arrange to have an enemy that just kidnaps our citizens, wars will be all gravy.

    Notice how the article uses Panetta’s term “agile” to describe the new military, implying that today’s military is unreasonably bloated and cumbersome. I’d like them to point to one successful military endeavor in history which was won because the force was merely “agile”. I suspect that this will is only the first of many articles supporting the Obama military by being completely void of substance and facts to support their wishes and dreams.

  • So why are you telling ME?

    So I get this email from the Obama 2012 campaign telling me about a tax deduction that corporations get for outsourcing jobs overseas.

    Jonn —

    Here’s something that President Obama laid out in his State of the Union that I think deserves special attention:

    Under current law, American companies can actually get a tax deduction for outsourcing jobs.

    That’s the opposite of how it should work. President Obama is proposing to end tax deductions for outsourcing, create a new tax credit for bringing jobs home, and lower tax rates for companies that manufacture and create jobs in the United States.

    If you think this should be a priority during this campaign, it’s up to you to speak out. Support the President and spread the word:

    This could be a defining issue of 2012.

    So why the f^ck are you telling me about it, douche nozzle? First of all, I don’t even know if there is such a thing, but assuming that there is, hasn’t Obama been president for more than three years already? Why hasn’t he done something about it? My guess is that if he had actually fixed it, he’d be short one more bloody shirt to wave at Democrat voters to get them to send him money so he can get four more years to make shit up about what he can’t do because of Bush.

    One of our prospective opponents built his career in part on outsourcing jobs in the private sector — and then continued outsourcing jobs as a governor. Is that the kind of economic experience and mindset people want in a President?

    Again, f^ckstick, if the president had fixed this like he said he was going to fix in the 2008 campaign, your “prospective opponent” wouldn’t have been able to outsource jobs. So who is really at fault here?

  • Back to the future

    Leon Panetta unfurled his plan for slashing defense spending yesterday. I got the feeling that we are now in the post-Korean War era, with Eisenhower touting the “bigger bang for the buck” strategy of relying on our nuclear dominance for our defense. Except now Panetta thinks that relying on our technological dominance is the cure-all for our national security concerns.

    Panetta cloaked the smaller force in terms like “agile” to make it seem as if he’s improving the force.

    Although some have been predicting slashes to manpower up to 100k troops, the Washington Post says 57,000 slots will be cut;

    Aside from the cuts to the Army, which will eventually reduce the number of active-duty soldiers to 490,000 from 547,000, most of the reductions revealed Thursday had been previously announced or involved less costly items. Panetta noted that the Army and the Marine Corps will still be slightly larger than they were in 2001, before the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent war in Iraq.

    The plan for Europe is to leave just two brigades behind says Stars & Stripes;

    The move will send the 172nd Separate Infantry Brigade, based out of Grafenwöhr and Schweinfurt, and the Baumholder-based 170th Infantry Brigade, back to the States.

    The 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Vilseck, Germany, and the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team in Vicenza, Italy, will remain as the only Army brigades permanently based in Europe.

    Ya know, all of that is fine, if the Europeans are willing to pick up their end of the rope and pull for a change instead of relying on the US to rush to their aid, And while Eisenhower was planning on the nuclear edge for our defense, history had other plans and we were later embroiled in a close-up, hand-to-hand primitive sort of warfare that negated any impact our nuclear arsenal. In other words, our enemies will make plans to exploit our weaknesses, not our strengths.

    So while Panetta and Obama plan to fight the next next war with drones and ninjas, our enemies are planning a manpower-intensive war.

  • Their fair share

    Yeah, you rich Americans are expected to pay your fair share, well, unless you rich Americans work for the Obama White House (Investors’ Business Daily link fixed);

    A new report just out from the Internal Revenue Service reveals that 36 of President Obama’s executive office staff owe the country $833,970 in back taxes. These people working for Mr. Fair Share apparently haven’t paid any share, let alone their fair share.

    Previous reports have shown how well-paid Obama’s White House staff is, with 457 aides pulling down more than $37 million last year. That’s up seven workers and nearly $4 million from the Bush administration’s last year.

    Nearly one-third of Obama’s aides make more than $100,000 with 21 being paid the top White House salary of $172,200, each.

    Raise taxes on the richer Americans, raise healthcare costs on veterans, end COLAs for retirees, so our betters can skip out on paying what they owe.

    Thanks to ROS for the link.

  • US plunges in “Press Freedom Index”

    I guess you probably won’t read this in too many places, which is why I’m writing about it. In George Bush’s last year, 2008, Reporters Without Borders ranked the US in 36th place in terms of the freedom of our media in relation to the other nations. Somehow, RWB credited the fact that we were at war in two countries with that lack of freedom – without really explaining how the wars affected our First Amendment right.

    Them in 2009 and 2010 we shot up to 20th place. RWB explains that was because of the “Obama Effect” whatever the f^ck that is. So they report today that we’ve fallen to 47th place. RWB says;

    The United States (47th) also owed its fall of 27 places to the many arrests of journalist covering Occupy Wall Street protests.

    Many? How many? And why didn’t they factor in the “Obama Effect”? Or has it become the “Obama Reverse Effect”, now? So we’re tied with Argentina and Romania, another way we’ve squeezed our way into the 3rd world rankings in the past few years. All this despite the fact that we’re only in one war compared to the two wars we were in 2008.

  • SEALs free aid workers in Somalia

    Two aid workers were rescued by Navy SEALs from Somali pirates in the early morning raid that came on two helicopters according to Fox News;

    The Danish Refugee Council confirmed the two aid workers, American Jessica Buchanan and Dane Poul Hagan Thisted, were freed “during an operation in Somalia.” Buchanan, 32, and Thisted, 60, had been working with a de-mining unit of the Danish Refugee Council when they were kidnapped.

    President Barack Obama appeared to refer to the mission before his State of the Union address in Washington Tuesday night. As he entered the House chamber in the U.S. Capitol, he pointed at Defense Secretary Leon Panetta in the crowd and said, “Good job tonight.”

    According to reports, nine pirates were killed in the rescue operation, but there were no American casualties.

    ON EDIT: Oh, so I’m supposed to read my own blog? I guess Zero posted on this last night, but I missed it. Oh, well.

  • Iran claims right to close the Persian Gulf

    Yes, the whacky nutjobs in Tehran are threatening to close the Straits of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf as retaliation for economic sanctosn which have taken Iran’s oil off of the global market says Associated Press;

    The remarks by Heshmatollah Falahapisheh came as EU nations on Monday agreed in Brussels on an oil embargo against Iran as part of sanctions over the country’s controversial nuclear program.

    I’d remind the crackpots in Tehran, as well as our own crackpots in Washington that Jimmy Carter threatened military force to keep the persian Gulf open in his State of the Union Address on January 23, 1980 in what is now referred to as the Carter Doctrine;

    Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.

    The original “war for oil” doctrine was aimed at the Soviet Union after their invasion of Afghanistan, but we’ve used as justification to station carrier groups in the Gulf as well, as the Persian Gulf War when Saddam Hussein threatened the Gulf States.

    And how much sense does it make to close the Gulf when Iran deends on the Gulf for it’s on oil shipments. What a bunch of babies. I guess they’re just spoiling for a fight with this weak Administration, like they did with Carter Administration.