Author: Hondo

  • The Senior Military Service Sends Its Regards . . . .

    . . . to a bunch of youngsters that ran away from home years ago.  (smile)

     

     

    Today is the 69th birthday of the United States Air Force.  The USAF was created by the passage of the National Security Act of 1947.  While the act itself was signed by the POTUS on 26 July 1947, many of its provisions did not come into effect until 18 September of that year.

    What is today the USAF had previously been a part of the US Army – in fact, several different parts.  Here they are, in chronological order, courtesy of Wikipedia:

    Aeronautical Division, Signal Corps – 1 August 1907 to 18 July 1914

    Aviation Section, Signal Corps – 18 July 1914 to 20 May 1918

    Division of Military Aeronautics – 20 May 1918 to 24 May 1918)

    U.S. Army Air Service – 24 May 1918 to 2 July 1926)

    U.S. Army Air Corps – 2 July 1926 to 20 June 1941) and

    U.S. Army Air Forces – 20 June 1941 to 18 September 1947

    Yes, you read that correctly:  what is today the USAF was once part of the US Army’s Signal Corps.  Go figure.

    The USAF was made an independent military service by one of the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947.  It became an independent service on 18 September 1947.   As a result, the USAF celebrates 18 September as its official birthday.

    So, since it’s official:  Happy Birthday, Zoomies.

    But we still need to talk about your service’s policy of giving priority to building on-base golf courses, clubs, and quarters – then asking Congress for more money so you can buy planes and finish building runways. (smile)

     

     

    (Historical note:  two other US Army organizations exist which could conceivably be viewed as USAF parent organizations.  However, neither of these is generally regarded as being a predecessor organization of the USAF.

    The Union Army created a Balloon Corps during the Civil War.  This organization existed from 1861 to 1863, and was generally used for observation of the enemy.  Many if not most of those in the organization were civilians accompanying the Union Army vice Union military personnel; the organization’s leadership was civilian.  Though of some military utility – particularly during the Peninsula Campaign’s Battle of Seven Pines – the organization was effectively disbanded in the summer of 1863.

    The US Army Signal Corps in 1893 also created a War Balloon Company.  This was a military organization, and over its lifetime appears to have had a total of two balloons (consecutively; the second was produced after the first was no longer serviceable).  The second was reputedly named the Santiago and saw some use during the Spanish-American War.  The unit appears to have been disbanded prior to the creation of the Signal Corps’ Aeronautical Division in 1907.)

  • Social Security’s Finances: Can You Say, “House of Cards?”

    There are a plethora of misconceptions out there regarding Social Security.  Some of the more common ones:

    1. I have a retirement account with Social Security.
    2. Social Security has plenty of money.
    3. I paid into the system, so I own something and am guaranteed payments.

    Plus many, many more other mistaken ideas.

    The truth is far different.  Regardless of how many people have claimed otherwise, Social Security is in effect the biggest Ponzi scheme ever run.  It has the false appearance of a retirement plan by design – indeed, that was only one of the lies told to get the US public to accept it.  But it’s not a retirement plan in any way.  If it were done by private industry, it would almost certainly be illegal.

    However, until recently I didn’t know that much about the details of Social Security financing.  Yes, I knew it had something called  “Trust Funds” (more on why the quotes are there later in this article).  But I realized I didn’t know much at all about how they worked.  So I decided to see what I could find.

    What follows is the result of that research.  This one’s rather long – so if you’re going to read it, keep that in mind.

    Overview.

    Here’s a brief overview of how Social Security operates.  It’s not complete, and is lacking some details.  But it hits the main points. It was also compiled from various documents on the Social Security Administration web site.

    1.  Social Security is funded from multiple sources; those will be further identified below, but are generally identified in footnotes and/or explanatory text here and here. Those funding inputs are mingled and “laundered” through two so-called Social Security “trust funds” – which in reality are general purpose “slush funds” that receive every dollar that Social Security takes in, and from which all Social Security expenses get paid.  Thus, everything Social Security receives goes into one of two such “pots”:  one called “Old Age and Survivors,” and a second called “Disability”.  Everything Social Security must pay out is paid from one of those two common “pots”.   Anything left over at the end of the year “rolls over” and remains in the applicable “trust fund”.

    2.  Those Social Security   slush funds    “trust fundsbuy “special” Treasury securities not available to the public. These “special securities” are always redeemable at face value.  They also accrue interest annually.  (Being government debts, the interest of course comes out of other Federal tax revenues or from borrowing by Uncle Sam.)

    The Social Security      slush funds     “Trust Funds” buy these special securities on a daily basis. All Social Security expenses are paid by redeeming some of those “special” securities.

    Since the same fund is used to receive current income and pay current expenses, this means that the “trust funds” are not investment funds.  Rather, they’re merely temporary buffers – just like an interest-bearing checking account (if you can still find one of those these days).   Benefits are still primarily paid from incoming tax receipts, but because these “trust funds” have a nonzero balance there’s a time lag between receipt of taxes and outlay of those same dollars due to the “trust fund’s” providing a buffer.  The length of this time lag has varied over time and depends both on the fund’s balance and the average benefits dispersed monthly.  Currently the Old Age and Survivors     slush fund      Trust Fund has a “buffer length” of somewhat over 3 years.  The Disability      slush fund      “Trust Fund” has much less of a reserve on hand; it’s in serious trouble.

    3.  The Federal Government – not retirees – owns these “trust funds”. Technically, they are financial accounts belonging to the US Treasury.  All benefits are paid to qualifying individuals from these “trust funds”, as are other program expenses.  As noted above, it does this by redeeming those “special” Treasury securities you or I can’t buy.

    4.  Individuals receiving benefits actually own nothing. Since Social Security is a government benefit and not something you own, Congress can change qualification requirements, benefit amounts, or even cancel the program outright if it so desires.  Don’t believe me?  Well, then you might want to read the SCOTUS case Fleming v. Nestor (1960).  There’s a link to that case later in the article.

    5.  Social Security is primarily (at present, around 88% – and dropping) funded by payroll taxes on income below a certain level. These payments are not “retirement contributions”; they are taxes that are legally mandatory.  You do not have a “Social Security Account” with a calculable balance; all you have is an earning history.  That earning history is used – in a rather convoluted manner, which by design grossly favors career low-income wage earners at the expense of those earning a large income – to calculate the amount of the benefit the law deems you deserve.

    6.  Benefits are paid, as defined by law, to those who qualify to receive them. Federal law defines who qualifies and what must be done to qualify.  Qualification requires two things:  meeting an age or disability threshold, and having enough “qualifying quarters” of work under Social Security for which you’ve paid your Social Security taxes.  Currently, one calendar quarter of coverage credit is given for each $1,260 earned in a calendar year; earn $5,040 in a year, and you’ve got a year’s coverage.   That number was lower in the past.

    7.  Under current Federal law, 40 quarters of coverage over your entire working lifetime – in other words, 10 years – are all that is required to be “fully covered” and receive a benefit when you retire. Benefits based solely on age can be received as early as age 62 if not for disability, and earlier for disability.  Nonworking spouses receive benefits based on their spouse’s earning history.  These benefits continue should their spouse predecease them.

    8.  Those retiring for disability generally do not require as many quarters of “credit” under Social Security, but must have varying amount of Social Security employment “credit” based on their age.

    9.  Not all income is subject to Social Security taxes. Only the first $118,500 of earned income (the amount changes periodically) is subject to Social Security taxes; this is called the Social Security Wage Base.  This is because, regardless of income, there is a maximum possible benefit that can be paid to anyone receiving Social Security Benefits.  That maximum monthly benefit is currently $2,639 for someone retiring at their full retirement age of 66 (this will rise to 67 over the next few years).  Receiving this benefit requires earning at least the Social Security Wage Base for 35 or more years. In contrast, a person working full-time at a minimum wage job for 40 years at age 66 gets a monthly benefit of $924.

    10.  Under some conditions, Social Security benefits are taxable income. When this happens, these income taxes are returned to the applicable Social Security “trust fund” which paid them the benefit, not kept by the Treasury to pay Uncle Sam’s bills.  Don’t ask me why.

    OK, that’s a rather long overview.  Though it hits the major points, it’s missing a fair number of details.  So I think you can see already why there are so many varied misconceptions regarding Social Security.  It’s complex as hell – and we’ve been lied to about it for years.

    What Social Security Is Not.

    1.  Social Security is not a retirement plan. This is the biggest and oldest lie about Social Security – right up there with “3% of your income” being “the most you will ever pay” (see the paragraph here titled “Your Part of the Tax”).  While it was sold as a retirement plan by FDR and his cronies, it is not.  You do not own anything.  Your payments are not “retirement contributions”; they are legally mandatory taxes you must pay to avoid going to jail.  You do not have any kind of “retirement account”, nor are your payroll taxes invested on your behalf.  Rather, they’re used to pay benefits to others – currently, with about a 3 year delay between the time you pay them and the time they’re paid out. (In late 1983, that lag was around 2 months.)

    What Social Security is is an income transfer program, funded by payroll taxes, that transfers income from those who are working to others eligible by law to receive benefits.  Period.

    2.  Social Security is not property; you own nothing. I mentioned this before, but it merits repeating.  Unlike an earned pension, you have no legal property right to receive Social Security benefits because you paid into the system.  The SCOTUS ruled that Social Security was a government benefit, not a pension in which you have ownership rights, in Flemming v. Nestor (1960). (You can read the full SCOTUS opinion here.)  If Congress wants to change the rules, lower benefits, or terminate the whole Social Security program tomorrow, it can – and you’re SOL.  All you did when you paid those FICA taxes was do what was necessary to stay out of jail:  obey current tax laws.

    3.  Your benefits are not guaranteed. Congress can change the rules at any time – and indeed has several times over the life of the program.  Just ask anyone affected by the 1970s “notch” – if you can find anyone still alive who was affected, that is.  Or you can anyone who’s had to delay retirement due to the rise in Social Security retirement age.

    4.  You didn’t “pay into the plan” or “earn it”. What you did was pay your taxes as required by law.  That’s it.  You earned nothing, and there was no “plan” to “pay into”.  You pay taxes because the law says you must.

    5.  Social Security is not “insurance. Insurance involves paying premiums in exchange for a defined payment in the event a certain event occurs.  Social security involves paying taxes required by law, along with – if you’re lucky – getting whatever benefit Congress deems you deserve when you retire or become disabled.  Big difference.

    6.  The “Trust Funds” contain investments that have real value.  Not really.  As explained above, they’re more like interest bearing checking accounts.  They earn little value – not nearly enough to pay annual benefits.

    Plus, those “trust funds” are “guaranteed” by Uncle Sam, not by real assets.  Uncle Sam is so broke these days that if it cost a quarter to take a dump he’d probably have to upchuck instead if he couldn’t find someone to loan him a nickle.

    7.  Finally, I’ll say it again: Social Security is not a retirement plan.  Bluntly, it’s an intergenerational income transfer program – or in plain language, a means of redistributing income from workers who earn it to others who in general no longer work.  In plain language, it’s a welfare program that by design provides an unearned income to elderly and disabled persons as recipients, and is funded by taxes levied on those currently employed.

    The Social Security “Trust Funds” – What They Are, and How They Work.

    OK, above there’s an overview, followed by a list of some things Social Security is not.  So, how does it work?  How does the money get from taxpayer to beneficiary?  Where does it all come from, and where does it all go?

    In what follows, I won’t be addressing Medicare; that also has a trust fund, but though there are some similarities it’s a different beast and appears to be run somewhat differently.  I also haven’t researched that one in enough detail to be able to write anything about it that would be reasonably accurate.

    The “Trust Funds”.  Social Security has two so-called “trust funds”.  The quotes are there because in reality, these are merely two temporary holding accounts – or, if you prefer, “laundry bins” or “slush funds” – that allow income to be held temporarily (and earn a bit of interest) before it is spent within a relatively short period of time.  These funds are called the “Social Security Old Age and Survivors Trust Fund” and the “Social Security Disability Trust Fund”.  (Though it’s technically in the name, I refuse to include the term “Insurance” in the name of either trust fund – because Social Security IS NOT FREAKING INSURANCE, no matter how many times people have lied through their teeth claiming that it is.  It’s a damned tax-funded government income transfer program mandated by law; neither payments nor participation are voluntary, and taxes are not insurance premiums.)

    While the two funds (Old Age and Survivors, Disability) are distinct, they both operate virtually identically.  So a single discussion of how they operate suffices for both.

    Income.  All income for Social Security is glommed together in the applicable    slush funds    “trust funds”.  It’s held there until it’s needed to pay expenses, at which point it’s spent.

    On receipt, this income is used to buy interest bearing “special” Treasury securities.  These are different Treasury securities than those available to the public.  They generally earn some interest between purchase and redemption.

    These sources of income for Social Security’s “trust funds” come in 3 basic “flavors”.  The first, and largest, income “flavor” is payroll taxes.  This is the 12.4% of all earned income below the Social Security Wage Base (for 2016, that’s $118,500; a history of the Social Security wage base can be found here) that is required to be paid as the OASD portion of the total 15.3% FICA or SECA taxes.  Since 2000, of that 12.4% of payroll income roughly 1.8% has gone to the Social Security Disability fund; the rest  has gone to the Old Age and Survivors fund.

    Yes, I did say 12.4% and 15.3%.  That’s not a mistake.  If you’re working as a payroll employee, you don’t see that much deducted from each paycheck.  However, that’s because payroll employees only pay half of that tax; their employers pay the other half.  Self-employed individuals pay SECA taxes vice FICA taxes; these “lucky” folks get boned royally, because they’re responsible for paying that full 15.3% total out of their earned income.  (The “extra” 2.90% is Medicare taxes – which are not limited to the first $118,500 of annual earned income.  Payroll employees generally only pay half of those as well, with the other half paid by their employer.  Self-employed individuals pay the full amount.)  In 2015, those OASD payroll taxes totaled nearly $795 billion in income for Social Security, divided between the two “trust funds”.

    The Social Security “trust funds” also receive interest from the US Treasury; that’s the second “flavor” of income received by these slush funds.  This is the interest earned by those “special” Treasury securities the “trust funds” buy between the time they’re bought with payroll taxes/other income and the time they’re redeemed to pay benefits or expenses.  In 2015 that amount was also significant, totaling over $93 billion – again, divided between the two “trust funds”.

    The third “flavor” of income for Social Security “trust funds” is payments Social Security receives from the US Treasury’s general fund.  Most years, this consists mainly of the return of income taxes paid on the taxable portion of Social Security benefits; those are transferred by the Treasury to the appropriate Social Security “trust fund” vice retained by the Treasury.  (As I said previously:  do not ask me why this occurs.)  There are a few other reasons why the Treasury would transfer money to Social Security (or, even more rarely, where money would flow in the opposite direction).  However, with the exception of special reimbursements that occurred in 2011 and 2012, these other reimbursements are generally dwarfed by the other types of Social Security “trust fund” income.  (In 2011 and 2012, the Treasury “made up” the 2% temporary reduction in Social Security OASD withholdings by paying the Social Security “trust funds” the difference – which was a huge amount both years.)  For 2015, these Treasury payments were around $32 billion – with returned taxes accounting for nearly 99% of that total.

    OK, that’s where the money comes from.  These “trust funds” thus have their hands in the American taxpayer’s pockets 3 different ways:  direct seizure of income (payroll taxes); interest from the Treasury (which taxpayers pay for as well, through other taxes); and diversion of income taxes paid on taxable Social Security benefits that are returned to the fund vice being kept by the Treasury (which taxpayers again must make up through paying other offsetting taxes).

    So, that’s where the Social Security “trust funds” get their coin.  Where does that money go?  Glad you asked.

    Expenses.  Like income, Social Security has three “flavors” of expenses.  The first is Social Security’s own administrative expenses.  These currently total somewhere around $6 billion annually, and come out of the “trust funds” vice the Treasury’s general fund.  When you’re talking an enterprise that takes in and spends close to $900 billion annually, that’s not really too much in the way of overhead.  It’s around 0.67% or so of income.

    The second “flavor” is reimbursements to the Federal Railroad Retirement program.  By law, Social Security and Part I Railroad Retirement are coordinated, with railroad retirees guaranteed the equivalent of Social Security as their Part I Railroad Retirement benefit. (Part II railroad retirement is funded differently, is optional – and to my understanding is actually backed with some real assets besides Treasury IOUs – just like Social Security should have been funded from day 1.)  What that means is that whenever the Railroad Retirement Old Age and Survivor and/or Disability “trust funds” have insufficient income to pay Part I railroad retirement benefits . . . the Social Security “trust funds” transfers them funds to bail them out.  That has happened every year but two since 1960 for both railroad retirement Old Age and Survivors and Disability benefits (for railroad retirment Old Age and Survivors benefits, it’s happened every year since 1958).  However, this is also a relatively small item; in 2015, that total was less than for admin expenses, coming in at a bit less than $4.7 billion – maybe a bit over 0.5% of income.

    The last “flavor” of expense for the Social Security “trust funds” is the “biggie”:  benefits payments.  In 2015, the combined benefits paid by Social Security for Old Age and Survivors benefits and Disability benefits totaled over $886 billion – exceeding payroll tax receipts by over $91 billion.  Only the other two sources of “trust fund” income (interest payments, returned taxes/other Treasury payments) kept the “trust funds” from collectively losing money for the year.  Indeed, the Disability fund DID lose money last year – bigtime.  In contrast, last year the Old Age and Survivors fund showed a net surplus.

    After all is said and done, anything not spent at the end of the year is retained in the “trust funds”.  The balance rolls over to the next year.  Last year there was a net increase in the OAS fund of around $51 billion.  In contrast, the Social Security Disability fund decreased by nearly $28 billion.

    Unfortunately, the gap I referenced above between payroll tax receipts and benefits paid is getting larger every year.  In the relatively near future, both funds will have more outgo in terms of benefits paid/other expenses than income received from all sources – hell, the Disability fund is already in that state, and has been for several years.  When that happens, the “trust fund” concerned spends down its assets to pay those legally-mandated benefits.  When the fund balance drops to zero, payments then get dramatically reduced – when that happens, then by law payments will be limited to available income  (though it’s unclear if that applies by fund or overall).

    Observations Based on the Data – and the “So What”.

    1.  Many readers may remember the late 1970s/early 1980s “Social Security Crisis”. Yeah, that crisis was real. The Old Age and Survivor’s portion of Social Security damn near went broke.

    In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Social Security Old Age and Survivor’s “Trust Fund” went into a downward spiral.  At the end of 1983, the Social Security Old Age and Survivor’s “trust fund” was low enough that it was in real terms less than  2% of today’s balance; it had lost almost half its nominal value (and far more in real terms) from a decade before.  It had just over 1 1/2 months of average monthly benefits on hand as a reserve.  Since monthly benefits are paid by redeeming securities (and replacing them by immediately repurchasing new Treasury securities with payroll taxes received), this means that the fund was at risk of being unable to pay full benefits if the economy experienced anything but a trivial slowdown.  Absent those early 1980s reforms, Social Security would have almost certainly gone Tango Uniform (in terms of paying full benefits due) within a few years.  In contrast, at the end of 2015 the Old Age and Survivors “trust fund” had somewhere around 3 years of benefits on balance.  (And no – that does NOT mean everything is “Hunky Dory”.  Read on.)

    2.  The Social Security Old Age and Survivors “trust fund” turns over every 3 years or so. It is, in effect, nothing more than a Ponzi scheme that presently has a largish (3 years or so worth of benefits) “slush fund” acting as a 3-year buffer through which to “launder” incoming payments.  The fund has nowhere near enough interest and other income annually to pay annual benefits; those incoming payments are thus used, after being held for about a 3 year or so period, to pay benefits.  Only what ever is left over after current benefits are paid – today, only a tiny fraction of overall fund income – is retained annually to increase the “trust fund” balance.  That ended years ago for the Disability fund.  For the Old Age and Survivors fund, that necessary condition (fund increasing annually) for continued operations will be coming to an end pronto.

    3.  Today’s Social Security “trust funds” are not in any way, shape, form, or fashion funded by tax payments made decades ago. (Remember:  the Old Age and Survivors fund was nearly gone at the end of 1983 – and the Disability fund is damn near gone today.) Those payroll taxes from long ago were spent decades ago to provide bennies.  Rather, today’s “trust funds” were funded by payroll taxes paid during the past 5 years, give or take – as has historically been the case.  Take away income from payroll taxes and the whole thing comes to a screeching halt in about 3 to 4 years, maybe less.  And benefits payments keep increasing each year.

    4.  The Social Security Disability Fund is a “dead man walking”. It will run out of money (e.g., hit zero balance) within 2 years.  I’m not sure precisely what happens then; my guess is that either the Old Age and Survivors fund gets tapped to make up the difference, or perhaps disability benefits get temporarily limited to funds received – with the shortage “to be made up later” (yeah, right).  Or maybe the Treasury makes up the difference – if it can find anyone to lend it the additional money.  Dunno.

    However, any of those options is seriously “bad juju”.  The Treasury “making up the difference” increases the Federal deficit substantially.  The second option cuts bennies substantially for those receiving SSDI benefits.  The first accelerates dramatically the coming crash of the OAS fund, which is already projected to occur within 20 years (2035) as it is.

    5.  Finally: the “so what”.  Why do we care about these “trust funds” and how they’re run?  How does it affect us?

    Here’s why we should care.  When Social Security’s “trust funds” are depleted Social Security then reverts to “pay as you go” status, or PAYGO.  That means Social Security benefits payments will be limited to that which can be supported by payroll taxes alone.  Barring a change, it’s estimated that when that happens in around 20 years, income will at the time support maybe 75% of the benefits that otherwise would be paid.  That means everyone receiving Social Security benefits gets a very sudden and (for most) extremely painful 25% financial “haircut”.

    “Bad juju,” indeed.  We should have listened to folks trying to privatize the system back in the early 1980s.

    Unfortunately, we did not. And as a result, to paraphrase the words of Apu Nahasapeemapetilon:  “Oh – now (we) are truly screwed!”

  • Ongoing Pattern of Fraud? Sure Looks Like It to Me.

    What would you think of an organization that did the following:

    apparently sought out lower-income individuals;

    solicited funds from them via small credit-card donations, purportedly on a “one-time basis”;

    on a recurring basis, processed multiple such “one-time” donations against donors vice the single donation that was authorized;

    did all of the above to a number of individuals every month;

    gave these individuals the “run-around” regarding returning unauthorized donations when they complained; and

    appeared to take great pains to keep the unauthorized total received through such shady actions from any single individual below the known thresholds ($100 on a given account) at which credit card companies begin to investigate fraud?

    Oh, and did I mention that this is reputedly precisely the method used by some shady pr0n companies to scam extra money from their customers?

    Don’t know about you, but it certainly looks to me like “an apparent pattern of ongoing and repetitive small-scale fraud.”  And I might call the folks doing it sleazy bastards who were running a scam targeting those who can least afford the financial hit.

    Now, what would you think about a national political campaign that did that? Hypothetically speaking, of course?

    Well, maybe you don’t have to think hypothetically. According to this article from Observer.com, apparently the Clintoon Campaign appears to have been doing exactly this during the current election cycle.  (FWIW:  the publisher of Observer Media, which owns Observer.com, is related to Donald Trump by marriage.  That fact is fully disclosed in the linked article.  That fact is also completely irrelevant if what’s reported is true.)

    It’s not the first time the Clintoon Campaign has done something along these lines, either. As reported by that charter member of the “vast right-wing conspiracy” the New York Times back in 2007, there’s some indication that Clintoon’s campaign might possibly have been doing something similar back then, too.  Hell, even the       Useful Idiots       “Progressives” over at Daily KOS were raising a stink concerning the issue back then.

    In contrast, the Trump campaign doesn’t appear to be doing anything similar.   Per the article, Wells Fargo – whose customers have reported extensive problems along these lines from the Clintoon Campaign – has reportedly received no such complaints from Trump supporters.

    Sheesh. You or I would have been in jail by now.

  • Hiding the Truth? Sure Looks Like It to Me.

    The DHS claimed earlier this year that they prevent roughly 81% of adults trying to sneak into the US across the southwestern border from doing that.  Specifically, they claimed an interdiction rate (defined as apprehension or forcing the individual to turn back) of 81.01%.

    Now, having lived in that part of the country for a while myself . . . IMO that claim doesn’t pass the “smell test”.  But regardless, that was their claim.

    If that number seems suspiciously low to you too, well, there may be a good reason.

    It seems in last year’s Fiscal 2016 Omnibus Bill required DHS to provide Congress a report on the matter.  The report still hasn’t been provided to Congress.  DHS says the report “isn’t finished”.

    Sources familiar with the situation say that is bull.

    Instead, those familiar with the subject say such a report was completed last November by a contractor for DHS – specifically, the Institute for Defense Analyses.  Apparently DHS already had such a study underway when Congress demanded one from them.

    Those knowledgeable  further indicate that the report is unclassified and is not marked to preclude public release.  They further say it’s also reportedly the “most extensive survey” of US illegal immigration and enforcement along our southwestern border conducted to date.

    Contrary to DHS claims, the report apparently shows that the actual interdiction rate (apprehension or turned back while attempting to cross) for adults attempting to cross the US border illegally is about 50% – not the 81% DHS claims.   The DHS figure was produced by “padding the numbers”.  It was calculated after including unaccompanied children and those who voluntarily surrendered (likely because they were either lost or in severe distress) vice being apprehended.

    In short, that “81%” number simply isn’t accurate.  DHS did not apprehend or force back 81% of adults attempting to cross the US southwestern border illegally; the actual fraction is far lower.  They’re engaging in intentional spin and dissembling.  Again.

    Gee, you don’t think maybe that’s why they’re “stonewalling” release of the report that exposes the truth – do you?  Why, this Administration would never do something like that!  (I trust the sarcasm in the preceding two sentences was obvious.)

    Fox News has an article giving more details.  It’s worth a read.

    “Most transparent Administration in history.”  Yeah. Right.

     

  • Pay for Play? Sure Looks Like It – Part . . . Uh, I Lost Count

    It seems as if the hacker “Guccifer 2.0” released a bunch of new DNC-related documents the other day.  A “bunch”, as in “600+MB worth”.

    There was at least one interesting bit of info in the info.  Wanna guess how many of the DNC’s 53 top fundraisers during the 2008 campaign cycle received high-level (e.g., Ambassador-level or similar) appointments with the Federal government?  Well, here ya go:

     

     

    By my count, that’s 23 of 53 individuals – or roughly 43.4%.  Since two individuals were appointed to two different high Federal offices, that actually underplays the situation somewhat.

    Oh, and it doesn’t include one individual who apparently received a very high level political appointment with the state of California.

    “Nothing to see here, people.  Move along now.  Let’s go.”

  • Vote Fraud is “Insignificant”, Eh?

    “Vote fraud is insignificant.”  We hear that all the time from certain circles.

    Well, Norm Coleman would be virtually certain to disagree – and if he’s willing to be honest, so would Al “Felon’s Choice” Franken.  But I digress.  (smile)

    Back on topic:  I guess it’s at least theoretically possible that vote fraud is indeed “insignificant” today.  But IMO that also depends on what you consider “insignificant”.

    How about having 2.7+ million people being registered to vote in more than one state? If that were the case, would you call that “insignificant”?

    I certainly wouldn’t consider 2.7+ million potential multiple-voters to be an “insignificant” issue.  But that – along with numerous other problems – is precisely what Pew Center found when they studied US voter registration back in 2012

    Pew Center found over 2.688 million US voters to be registered to vote in 2 different states.  Over 68,700 were registered in 3 states.  And over 1,800 were registered in more than 3 states.

    Yeah, it’s unlikely that all of those folks voted in more than one state.  Some of them were doubtless dual-registered due to the individuals concerned having moved in the year or two prior to the election and their former state not removing their name from the list of registered voters.

    But I’ll guarantee you that some of those with multiple registrations did vote more than once.  As this Fox News article documents, there have indeed been a number of prosecutions for exactly that during recent years .

    My guess is that merely the blatantly stupid or a handful of unlucky few got caught.  I’m thinking the cases prosecuted are barely the tip of the iceberg.

    Short of requiring voting “in person only” and using indelible ink on a finger afterwards as proof of voting, requiring a prospective voter to produce a valid photo ID to allow reasonable verification of identity in order to vote is the logical first step in fighting vote fraud.  And even that’s not sufficient in and of itself when it comes to multiple registrations; some way to detect and flag duplicate registrations in multiple states would also be required to stop people from voting in multiple states.

    But for whatever reason some just won’t support requiring a prospective voter to prove he or she is who they claim before they vote.  Apparently they’re fine with leaving open a loophole that enables this kind of fraud.

    Kinda makes you wonder why.

  • Nice Shot

    Anyone who’s been following events in the Middle East during the past few years knows Daesh has some sadistic and evil bastards in its ranks.  But some really stand out.

    Like the Daesh executioner who liked to execute people with fire.  Using a flamethrower.

    Well, it appears that particular evil bastard is no longer stealing oxygen.  He and three of his “friends” are now receiving the “tender personal attention” that comes with an afterlife in the company of Shaitan.

    It seems that earlier this month, the Daesh executioner was preparing to burn to death a group of twelve prisoners using his favorite flamethrower.  But before doing so, the evil bastard first harangued his prospective victims-to-be with a rambling speech.

    Bad move.

    You see, there was an SAS sniper team in the area – located approximately 1,500 meters away.  When the Daesh tool finished his speech, the sniper took his shot.

    The shot nailed the fuel tank on the evil bastard’s back.  The resulting explosion and fire took out the executioner – and his three accomplices.  I’d like to think it also gave them a preview of what they’d experience for the rest of eternity.

    US and British Special Forces in the area soon afterwards rescued the prisoners.

    The NY Post and UK Daily Mail each have decent articles on the incident.  IMO, they’re truly “feel good” stories.

     

    (Hat tip to TAH commenter Greybeard for bringing this incident to my attention via comments elsewhere,)

  • Yer Monday Funny: Where’s the Beef?

    That’s precisely what one Chick-Fil-A restaurant wants to know.  Seems theirs is missing.

    Arizona Chick-Fil-A searching for stolen 24-foot inflatable cow

    The Hamburgler, Burger King, and Wendy could not be reached for comment.  (smile)