Category: Society

  • Why we lost

    The American people trusted Republicans enough in 2002 to give us back Congress after the Leftists essentially undermined the will of the voters in the 2000 election with their double-dealing and convincing Vermont’s James Jeffords to jump across the aisle giving Democrats a majority in the Senate.

    Senate Republicans squandered that second chance by allowing their own political ambitions to get in the way of doing their jobs for the country. Acting like their Democrat predecessors, they feathered their political nests with political goodies for their constituents and wasted their opportunity to make a real mark in the four years they had control of Pennsylvania Avenue.

    Hagel, Lott, Frist, Chaffee, Voinivich, Snowe and Collins all let their personalities dominate the Senate rather than their duty. Instead of convincing Americans that we can do the job better than the government in our own lives, they bought our votes and stood against the party and the American people at every chance.

    When fighting the war, enforcing our laws and cutting government should have been the focus of the Senate, instead every day became a new battle between the White House the Senate.

    The Democrats turned it into a battle for the last two years between Congress and the White House – folks just gave up on it all. Congress did absolutely nothing except pass legislation they knew would fail – and, oh, they passed a minimum wage hike that immediately caused the unemployment rate to rise.

    With Obama, people hope they can forget about politics for a while. He’s promised to take over all of the annoying little things they worry about – the war, the economy, the poor, the health insurance, gas prices, their mortgages, the banks – all of the things that crowd their simple little lives with darkness and discomfort.

    They made the choice they didn’t have to think about. They only have to look at the visage of Obama and see a reason to vote for him without listening to a word he says. They’re so intellectually shallow that they think their stupid 52 to 48 websites will make us feel better about losing our country’s soul. They think we’re just as shallow as they are.

    The argument against Obama was too complex for them to understand, but when couched in terms like “historical”, it was easy to understand. When Obama made it clear that they’re absolved of further responsibility by simply pulling the lever for him, it all seemed so easy to do, too hard to not do.

  • Coming for the children

    Gateway Pundit writes this morning that Obama has outlined his plan to indoctinate the children into community service (so they, too, can be President someday) by requiring 50 hours every year for elementary and high school students and 100 hours every year for college students.  Again, more examples of what IS NOT charity – government-mandated work is not service to the community.

    The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America,

    JammieWearingFool also writes that Rahm Emanuel is on the same sheet of music with what Emanuel calls “The Real Patriot Act

    Here’s how it would work. Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service. They’ll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we’re hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities’ most pressing needs.

    What do I have against “community service”? Nothing. Anyone who volunteers their time is an exceptional person and commands my respect. But forced service? In the name of the community? It’s nothing short of collectivism – it assumes that we’re all the same, that we all just lay around watching TV and playing video games. That we all react the same way to the blessings of the Obama Messiah.

    And what happens when the shine wears off the new program – when people stop showing up for their mandatory charity? Fines? Jail time? Re-education camps? Another aspect of our lives regulated? Will we then have to form an enforcement agency and a network of tattletales to inform on shirkers?

    What have we created here?

  • I dispute this whole “historical” thing

    I have these thoughts zooming around in my head and find it hard to work without writing them down.

    I think it’s absolutely unAmerican to think of this as an historical moment in our nation’s long journey. It’s unConservative – and that’s been our whole problem with minorities, but it comes with the ideological territory.

    In our Declaration of Independence, it’s written that “…all Men are created equal….” It doesn’t make a racial distinction. Jumping ahead almost 183 years martin Luther King Junior said “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. ”

    Those two phrases taken together are incongruous to this assertion that Obama being elected is historical – and those are the two phrases that have governed my entire adult life and affected the way I treated people, even affected my choice of a wife and the subsequent children that resulted thereof.

    It would only seem to be significant to someone so shallow and steeped in their melanin level as to place some sort of significance on something so inconsequential.

    I’ve opposed Obama from the beginning, but not on any sort of racial level, because race is insignificant. I’ve opposed him on an ideological basis – and much more than “my club against his club” (the way Democrats seem to think of the R vs. D struggle).

    If we’re all supposed to be merely men and women, fashioned in the image of our Creator (whoever you think that is), I find it offensive for the media to keep pounding in my already-cluttered brain that this is somehow significant in our history.

    I’m sure some pointy-headed smart ass won’t hesitate to point out my failed reasoning by calling me a racist – or something equally vacuous.

  • Senator Government vs. Joe the Plumber

    Last night’s debate couldn’t have highlighted the differences between the two candidates more and it was best illustrated by John McCain’s freudian slip when he called Barack Obama “Senator Government” and the most talked about American in the debate, the fellow dubbed Joe the Plumber.

    Anyone listening closely would have heard Barack Obama pushing government programs from education to tax “cuts” as the solution to all of our problems…in other words, Senator Government saw himself as the answer to all of our problems. John McCain, on the other hand, told us that we were solution to our problems, that he saw his job as keeping government out of our way – the same thing that Joe the Plumber saw the solution to his problems.

    Obama finally stopped talking about McCain’s “special interest friends” and started admitting to having a few special interests of his own…teachers unions, community organizers and unrepentent terrorists. He stuck to the same tired explanations that have served him over the last 20 months…and since he’s the affirmative action candidate, that was good enough for many Americans. Since he played the Santa Claus to John McCain’s grumpy grandfather, he came out looking like a champ. Never mind that he relied on the same old tired broken and failed social programs of the last forty years…everyone heard how they were going to win the lottery of life when Obama ascended to his throne.

    John McCain, ever the straight talker, didn’t make promises he couldn’t keep. Unfortunately, he didn’t bother to tell America that there are no tax cuts for the real middle class coming from Obama, that health insurance premiums will sky-rocket under Obama’s plan, that Obama’s pandering to unions won’t save our education system. Obama called every factual disagreement with his proposals an “attack” and McCain shrank from his responsibility to point that out.

    McCain failed to point out that Obama was partially responsible for the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac problems because he wouldn’t act against his own special interest friends and rein them in even though McCain had several opportunities to do so. And that was his last chance.

    That leaves it up to us. As Ace of Spades wrote last night “If McCain Won’t Do It, We Will“.

  • The Palin false outrage continues

    Of course, all of the anti-Palin maniacal false outrage continues, despite Barack Obama’s call for it to cease yesterday. And of course, it’s to make Governor Palin withdraw using the model of the Harriet Meirs crucifixtion. The Wall Street Journal catalogues some of the “inside the beltway” criticism;

    – Eleanor Clift, the McLaughlin Group: “If the media reaction is anything, it’s been literally laughter in many places across newsrooms.”

    – Sally Quinn, Newsweek: “It is a political gimmick . . . I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country.”

    (more…)

  • On the periphery of the Convention

    There’s an awful lot of stuff on this convention that’s not showing up on the news, so I thought I’d troll around around a bit and bring back some of the news you might have missed.

    Here’s the IVAW misfits in their class photo (yes, I see you, AS);

    Ace of Spades has AliceH on the job getting video and still of the event. You can go to her YouTube channel (and see fake waterboarding demonstrations) or to her photo blog to see the latest. Photos like this (that make parents so proud);

    The Funk the War protest conducted by IVAW among the Code Pinks and assorted anarchists was videoed by a freelancer in Denver. You can watch this video about the horrible police state in which we’re living narrated by a bunch of spoiled brats who aren’t being arrested and tossed in jail.

    [youtube 6CLsVbD1ox4 nolink]

    The Weekly Standard‘s Jonathan V. Last tells us about the police state inside the Convention. From the American Prospect’s blog TAPPED, we find out not all of the delegates are pleased about Obama getting the nomination;

    You have a Hillary shirt and a John McCain button.

    Karen Brown: She was my first choice. Now I’m going to vote for McCain.

    Why?

    KB: I don’t like Senator Obama. His choices are all wrong. I feel secure with John McCain.

    Where do you feel McCain and Hillary have overlap that Obama doesn’t?

    KB: I feel that Hillary would make me also feel safe as far as terrorism goes while I think Obama would be thinking about it. As he said in an interview, I’ll “confront evil.” John McCain said I’ll “defeat” evil. I feel Hillary would’ve said the same thing. I want to feel safe here in America.

    And a photo to go along with the transcript;

    My mentor, Zombie, is still on the job, of course, sending out photos that will be the hallmarks of this cluster in Denver;

    UPDATED: Zombie got in too deep last night.

  • Obama and 4th Trimester abortions

    I don’t wade into the abortion issue often, because sometimes it’s just too murky. Simply put, I think all abortions are wrong, not on any religious grounds, but just because our natural instinct for survival just contradicts the practice. Killing people who’ve never done anything to anyone just doesn’t make sense and it’s immoral. Neither do I think governments should force me to pay for abortions. For the record, I oppose the death penalty, too, just because I don’t think the government should be killing people.

    Barack Obama has claimed that he will bring to us a new sort of politics, away from the politics of special interests, the old politics of pandering. Yet, in 2003, he voted in the Illinois legislature against the protection of babies who happened to survive an abortionists best efforts to kill them. Initially, he claimed that he did that just to protect Roe v. Wade. From Hot Air;

    Obama initially said he voted against the 2003 bill protecting born-alive aborted fetuses only because it would have threatened abortion rights due to its lack of a “neutrality” clause vis-a-vis Roe v. Wade. Minor problem: The bill did include that clause and State Sen. Obama was one of the committee members who made sure that it did — before he voted against it anyway.

    So, now that he has talked himself into a corner, and he’s been caught in yet another lie, Obama has pulled out the “offended” defense (CNS News);

    The suggestion that Obama – the proud father of two little girls – and others who opposed these bills supported infanticide is deeply offensive and insulting.  There is no room for these kinds of distortions and lies in this campaign.

    “Distortions and lies?” Give me a chance to defend an innocent life and see often I vote. So now Obama is trying to wriggle his way out of the “baby killer” label. From Ace of Spades;

    Read his new “fact check:” He’s claiming he supported the federal law (in theory; he didn’t have to vote on it) because federal law does not actually have any effect on state abortion law, and opposed the identical state version, because state laws can affect, um, state laws.

    So as far as the law is just a theoretical protection for children, he’ll vote for it. His daughters better thank their lucky stars they survived that sort of logic.  But, of course, the law is for us bitter people, not for the elite snobs with whom Obama associates. Their children are our eventual salvation, while our children are just dregs who are just a toss into the closet away from death anyway.

    Slublog wonders how this isn’t just politics as usual;

     Voting to allow the killing of living, breathing babies is voting in favor of infanticide. I do not believe Obama is evil, but with this vote he was willing to allow evil for the sake of political expediency. Is that what he means by judgment we can trust?

    Apparently, the only special interests we’re supposed to avoid are those special interests that have a conservative agenda. I guess the best way to get NARAL’s 100% rating is to vote for abortions in the 4th trimester.

  • It’s Obama’s fault

    As I’ve said a few times, this year just isn’t a good year for protests. It’s difficult for me get decent pictures anymore of Code Pink trolls on rolling beds or flocks of SEIU purple-clad socialists being herded by their handlers on the subway.

    All this time I thought the anti-war peace movement was petering out because of their intellectually invalid message. But from Don Surber, I learn that Tom Hayden is blaming Obama in The Nation.

    (more…)