Category: Politics

  • Fidel Castro resigns

    The corpse of Fidel Castro apparently resigned this morning (Fox News link);

    The end of Castro’s rule — the longest in the world for a head of government — frees his 76-year-old brother Raul to implement reforms he has hinted at since taking over as acting president when Fidel Castro fell ill in July 2006. U.S. President George W. Bush said he hopes the resignation signals the beginning of a democratic transition.

    From Ziva at Babalu Blog the quote from the announcement;

    To my dearest compatriots, who have recently honored me so much by electing me a member of the Parliament where so many agreements should be adopted of utmost importance to the destiny of our Revolution, I am saying that I will neither aspire to nor accept, I repeat, I will neither aspire to nor accept the positions of President of the State Council and Commander in Chief.

    Castrozombie
    Photo from Babalu Blog

    Hopes are high here in this household for the Cuban people, but expectations are low.

    From his resignation letter; My wishes have always been to discharge my duties to my last breath. That’s all I can offer.

    Cambio no esta completo todavia!

  • Drivel roundup

    There’s just too much absurdity going on in the world for you to have to surf looking for it, so I’ve rounded up much of it for you tonight;

    An Old Broad’s Ramblings and Bob’s Blog have the video of some guy who obviously knows something the rest of us should know – otherwise, why would he admit to it? But then again – who knows these days?

    Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs has links to the stories of the latest in eight nights of violence in Denmark in expressions of false outrage.

    Drew M. at Ace of Spades and Brennan at the American Pundit both think that maybe Michele Obama is a little too self-centered to be comparing what is happening in her life today to what the rest of us were doing before she and her suit model came along.

    Bloodthirsty Liberal writes that village elders are outraged when women voters start voting at the women-only voting station.

    At Big Dog’s Weblog, Bill Clinton gives a lesson on “telling the truth”.

    Robin at Chickenhawk Express writes that a documentary is due out from PBS and Frontline on the Haditha incident. Speaking of Haditha, Redstate and Michele Malkin are looking for pigsuit wearers to show up at a Murtha payoff dinner in Pentagon City (I’d go if I can get a timeframe).

    Crotchety Old Bastard points us to the American Thinker‘s Ari Kaufman’s indisputable worst presidents list.

    Somehow, Kosovo independence invokes “down with America” chants according to Gateway Pundit.

    Jammie Wearing Fool reports 66,000% inflation in Zimbabwe. What did they expect with a Friend of Carter for president?

    Liberty Pundit found all you loser Patriot fans championship hats and shirts.

    Little Green Footballs reports on the Muslim Flat Earth Society.

    VanHelsing at Moonbattery writes that Brits have discovered the key to a successful socialized healthcare system – more ambulances and bigger parking lots.

    Bob Parks at Outside the Wire writes about former conservative Charles Barkley’s swipe at Christians.

    Sister Toldjah has all the relevant links for Obama/Che flag controversy while DUmmie FUnnies chronicles the KosKids stroking each other over how this won’t affect Obama. Spree writes that McCain leads Clinton and Obama in Florida. This could get interesting.

  • Democrats’ “change” Part II

    In my earlier post today, I pointed out how the Democrats are so married to their failed campaign tactics, they’re dragging them all out to the 2008 campaign. Little did I know how right I was. At the time I was banging these keys, Obama was in North Carolina dragging out the most failed campaign tactic of them all – John Edwards (Breitbart link);

    Barack Obama sneaked down to North Carolina Sunday and met with former rival John Edwards, who has yet to make an endorsement in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

    Officials at North Carolina television station WTVD said they have video taken from a helicopter of Obama leaving Edwards’ home in Chapel Hill. A producer said the station was “tipped off” about the meeting, but said the source was confidential.

    The Obama campaign confirmed the meeting. Although reporters normally travel everywhere with Obama, he left them behind to fly down in secret from his hometown.

    “Senator Obama visited this morning with John and Elizabeth Edwards at their home in Chapel Hill to discuss the state of the campaign and the pressing issues facing American families,” said Obama spokesman Bill Burton. He wouldn’t comment on the possibility of an endorsement.

    I guess it’s because they think they have the right message to voters, just that they can’t find the right messenger that drives them back to their failed candidates. John Edwards, always the bridesmaid, is the new Al Gore, the new John Kerry, the new Walter Mondale – in fact you can point to more failures than successes in the political party that has elected only two Presidents in the last forty years.

    Remember that Hillary was conspiring against Obama with Edwards a scant few weeks ago (CNN Link). I guess it’s lucky that Edwards has the new isolated house that Fox affiliates can find easily enough to get paparazzi shots of the Edwards acolytes – the new generation of failed political ideologies.

    But then, maybe the Clintons have a winning new strategy – Bill smacking around Obama’s black supporters. (MSNBC link h/t to Discarded Lies)

  • Democrats’ change

    The Democrat candidates try their level best to draw distinctions between themselves and any Republican candidate, according to the Wall Street Journal;

    The candidates have made broad attacks on corporate wealth and tax cuts they say tilt toward the rich, along with more specific attacks against health insurers and oil companies, among other industries. On Friday, Mrs. Clinton began airing a TV spot in Wisconsin in which she says, “The oil companies, the drug companies, have had seven years of a president who stands up for them…. It’s time we had a president who stands up for all of you.”

    Both candidates increasingly sound like former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards as they pursue his endorsement and the voters — particularly union members — who were drawn to the populist candidate before he dropped out last month. Illinois Sen. Obama got a boost toward that goal Friday with the backing of the Service Employees International Union, one of the most politically powerful labor organizations.

    Typical Democrat strategy, assume the mantle of the defeated. Since John Edwards’ candidacy failed, both Clinton and Obama want to act like him. That’s a real winning strategy. So the DNC, unable to formulate a winning strategy for their prospective candidates make sophomoric attacks against John McCain instead;

    Even as he acknowledged that our economy is headed towards a recession, McCain offered no answers about how to rebuild the economy, address concerns hard working Americans face or the mortgage crisis. Instead, McCain promised to make the President’s tax cuts for the wealthy permanent, pledged not to raise any new taxes and said he’d pay for it all with pork barrel spending reform. McCain’s approach just won’t work. As the Senate Budget Office recently reported, extending the Bush tax cuts and continuing the war is a recipe for a $6 trillion dollar deficit, something McCain can’t possibly pay for by reducing $35 billion in earmarks and pork spending.

    McCain also ducked the fact that he was more worried about alienating the right wing of his party than supporting the economic stimulus package when he failed to show up for critical votes on the measure.

    McCain also continued his pattern of marching in lockstep with President Bush on Iraq, a rallying point for the right wing of his party but not the rest of America. Five years ago this weekend, Vice President Cheney said Americans would be greeted as liberators in Iraq, a talking point McCain dutifully repeated. Now, when asked about establishing permanent bases in Iraq, McCain echoed the President’s talking points by pointing out that there are other status of forces agreements that “have never been approved by Congress.” From parroting the misleading case for war to President Bush’s rosy rhetoric and stay the course strategy, McCain has marched in lockstep with President Bush every step of the way and now wants to keep our troops there for 100 years.

    “John McCain showed today that he is about as far from a maverick as they come,” said DNC Communications Director Karen Finney. “How can the American people trust John McCain when time and time again he’s shown that he will compromise his principles to win the election and has no new ideas to address the challenges we face? Whether it’s promoting more fiscal irresponsibility or a 100 year war in Iraq, McCain offers nothing more than a third Bush term.”

    So basically, the Democrat strategy is to sell us the same old tired and failed Democrat social programs, wrapped in the new-style sexual/racial politics and to rerun the 2004 campaign against President Bush, with a smidgen of the 1992/1996 campaigns thrown in for good measure. So that’s change, huh?

  • Washington Post latest anti-Army tear

    First let me clarify that I certainly support our women in uniform – my close friendship with fellow author on this blog and 30-year Army combat veteran GI Jane demonstrates that. However, Washington Post’s latest attack on the military establishment is so petty it doesn’t belong on the front of today’s edition. In “Short Maternity Leaves, Long Deployments“, Ann Scott Tyson writes;

    Many female soldiers hoping to start families face the prospect of missing most of their child’s first year. The Army grants six weeks of maternity leave before a new mother must return to her job or training, and four months until she can be sent to a war zone. The Marine Corps and Navy allow from six months to a year before a new mother must deploy.

    The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have placed severe strains on the Army, including longer deployments in which soldiers serve 15 months in the war zone, followed by 12 months at home. Under that system, a woman who wishes to have a child and remain with her unit must conceive soon after returning home so she can give birth, recover and prepare for her next overseas tour.

    It seems to me that a responsible pair of parents wouldn’t want to bring their child into a situation which risks the absence of one or both parents for extended periods of time.

    The constraints on reproduction, child-rearing and family are a key factor leading many female soldiers to quit the Army, and have discouraged many civilian women from considering enlistment, according to Army officials. Surveys show that time away from families, because of long, frequent deployments, is the top reason for soldiers to leave the Army. The willingness of women to serve in the military has dropped faster than that of men in recent years, from a high of 10 percent among 16- to 21-year-olds in November 2003 to 4 percent last July, according to periodic youth surveys on “propensity to serve” conducted for the Army.

    Well, it looks like American women have found a solution to their dilemma – they get out or they don’t join. SO why is this a front page story? I’m so sure that aren’t millions of women waiting to join the military if only they’d extend the maternity leave to, say, five years like the Post seems to suggest is reasonable.

    …said Maj. Gen. Gale Pollock, deputy Army surgeon general for force management.

    “We need to look at the fact that many women want to serve but they also want to be mothers,” Pollock said. “It’s a medical issue, it’s a mental health issue. Your ability to bond with your children is . . . very important.”

    Pollock said last summer that she had proposed that the Army double the time women are exempt from deployment from four to eight months, noting that she would prefer 12 months. “That addresses the need for breast-feeding that is important for health, and also allows for optimal bonding time,” she said.

    So far, Army policy remains unchanged, spokeswoman Cynthia Vaughan said this month. Senior Army officials declined requests to explain the reasoning behind the current policy.

    Other services grant longer exemptions, and all have generally shorter deployments: The Navy exemption is 12 months, and the Marine Corps’s is six months, and deployments average seven months for both. The Air Force has a four-month exemption, but its deployments average only four to six months.

    Well, since all of the services have different policies according to their force needs in theater, the Army arrived at their policy logically. But, if a woman wants to serve in the military she has an array of choices, doesn’t she? She certainly doesn’t need the Washington Post reporter with her a the recruiting station to help her.

  • Sandinista cutthroat endorses Obama

    Just wonderful:

    President Daniel Ortega, who led the 1979 revolution in Nicaragua, says Barack Obama’s presidential bid is a “revolutionary” phenomenon in the United States.

    “It’s not to say that there is already a revolution under way in the U.S. … but yes, they are laying the foundations for a revolutionary change,” the Sandinista leader said Wednesday night as he accepted an honorary doctorate from an engineering university.

    Ortega led a Soviet-backed government that battled U.S.-supported Contra rebels before he lost power in a 1990 election. He returned to office last year via the ballot box.

    In statements broadcast on Sandinista Radio La Primerisima, Ortega said he has “faith in God and in the North American people, and above all in the youth, that the moment of great change in the U.S. will come and it will act differently, with justice and equality toward all nations.”

    Ortega returned to power with the same communist agenda as before, along with a state-owned media to propagate his message. Seems like old times.

    Naturally, he pushes illegal immigration:

    Ortega also called Obama a spokesman for the millions of Central American and Mexican citizens who migrate to the U.S. in search of work, though polls indicate most Latino voters so far have favored Clinton over Obama.

    And echoes the left’s harangue over the former “School of the America”:

    Also Wednesday, Ortega gave approval to various army officials to receive training at the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, operated by the U.S. Defense Department in Fort Benning, Georgia ” even as he said he would continue to lobby for the school’s closure.

    Pot, meet kettle:

    The president claims that members of the now-defunct National Guard who were trained at the school, formerly known as the School of the Americas, were involved in torture. Human rights groups say graduates went on to commit abuses throughout Latin America.
    …Ortega did not explain why he approved the training, but said he would try to ensure officials did not turn into”torturers and killers.”

    Link: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/14/america/LA-POL-Nicaragua-Ortega-Obama.php

    For Americans with short memories, Ortega was the leader of the communist Sandinistas who flourished as an extention of Soviet influence in Central America in the 80’s. He and his merry band of revolutionary thugs were responsible for slaughtering dissidents and Miskito Indians, who wouldn’t knuckle under the Marxist-Leninist theory of indoctrination.

    Ortega subjugated the Catholic Church, suppressed the media, and imprisoned and executed “counter-revolutionaries” by the thousands.

    While leftist asshats like columnist William Greider chirped praise for Ortega and railed against the Contras, members of La Prensa, an outspoken newspaper in Nicaragua, were repeatedly harassed, jailed, censored, and forced into exile.

    The Sandinistas continued their bloodbath until they were were ousted during the 1990 elections.

    Since then, Ortega has been a political chameleon, changing with whatever opportunity presents, and was re-elected in 2006.

    Ortega is in a tight spot. The Soviet safety net is gone, and he has to rely on the capitalist system for handouts; U.S. foreign aid and the International Monetary Fund. Nicaraguan youth, too young to remember the Sandinista rule, enthusiastically greeted his election.

    Unstable regions of the world like Central America have always been a playground for socialism and communist regimes. The Left adopts leaders of these movements as darlings; without being subjected to the consequences. It’s no wonder despots like Ortega endorse Democrat candidates.

    Obama should be proud.

  • John McCain, Vietnam veteran

    Remember the 2004 election? Remember how the words “John Kerry, who served in Vietnam,…” were tied together so often that we began to believe he’d changed his name to include the brief biography. He saluted the Democrat convention to wild cheers (a recruit-style salute that would have been corrected by a drill sergeant with memorable adjectives the first day of basic training). We were treated to endless broadcasts of his carefully-scripted recreation of his heroics for which he had carried a movie camera to Vietnam specifically to film.

    Well, we all know that was to contrast Kerry’s service to National Guard pilot George W. Bush – to make it seem as if John Kerry had some special gift for defending our country. It turns out that he only had a gift for gaming the military’s system and got out of a 12-month tour in three months so he could rush into his political career. So his three months in Vietnam were worthy of mentioning every time his name was mentioned. In fact, his ultimate downfall came around because he depended so heavily on his three-month stint. And he refused to sign his Form 180.
    John McCain, according to his website lists his awards;

    His naval honors include the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart, and the Distinguished Flying Cross..

    He also has a world-famous career as a POW for nearly six years, which gets mentioned very little. A Yahoo search turned up more anti-McCain links discrediting his service than honoring it. The only news stories mentioning the link of McCain to the Vietnam war are in relation to his argument with Castro’s corpse.

    So why isn’t the media harping on McCain’s service, which certainly trumps Kerry’s three months Barack Obama’s lack of service and Hillary’s attempt to join the Marines (in a totally fictional account) when she was rejected for being a girl.

    And then on top of it, Cuffy Meigs (h/t American Pundit) finds that McCain’s sons are currently serving in the war against terror, his youngest a grunt Lance Corporal just returned from Iraq. And that John McCain makes unpublicized visits to the homes of military families. Neptunus Lex gives up updates on another McCain progeny racking up demerits at Annapolis. If John Kerry had sired similar siblings, we’d have been treated to “film at 11” every night.

    So how can the media continue to inflict this facade of neutrality in politics on the American public without violent retribution?

  • Why is Arkin still at the WaPo?

    Of course we all remember William Arkin‘s “These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President’s handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect”. And his follow up “I can see, in the military blogs and in the comments of those who have written about my posts last week, that those who refer to themselves as Vietnam veterans still yearn for the recognition and thanks that they believe they haven’t received. There is no question that Vietnam is still an open wound for them, and that they therefore only recognize the worth of fellow veterans, of those who have been through exactly the same experience.” As well as his lamentation at not being invited to the MilBlog convention last year.

    Well, catching up on stuff, I made my daily trip over The Weekly Standard blog and found this jewel by John Noonan on William Arkin’s latest attempt at being a national security expert at the Washington Post “Getting the Military Out of The Nuclear Business

    Now my favorite part. After incorrectly interpreting the report, and drawing a false conclusion based on what seems to be little or no research, Arkin decides that nukes either need to be handed over to the Department of Energy (which retains non-military control of nuclear weapons) or outsourced:

    Last August’s incident demonstrated that all the systems of security and control can break down because the nuclear weapons themselves are routinely mated with military equipment–particularly in the case of bombers and nuclear fighters–that is otherwise and regularly used to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is a system made for ultimate failure and one that will always challenge operators to maintain expertise on two very different “planes.” Perhaps it is time to give the missile force and the nuclear weapons back to the Department of Energy (the successor to the old AEC) or, God forbid, “contract” out the day-to-day maintenance to corporate experts.

    I was unaware that the DoE had nuclear delivery capabilities. And I’d love to know which contractor would receive the fat nuclear weapons contract. Blackwater perhaps?

    The true problem, the one the Air Force can’t address, is that the nation doesn’t really want to invest in a cadre of dedicated nuclear weapons experts in uniform anymore. Some see that as a crisis; I see it as an opportunity to get the military even more out of the nuclear business.

    I’m not sure what polling data Arkin is referencing when he decided to speak for the entire country, but I do know that I’d rather have military nuclear professionals (who have a spotless, 60+ year record of accident-free nuclear handling) responsible for these weapons than some corporation or government agency that has no idea how to actually employ them.

    Can you imagine Department of Energy civilians being in charge of our nuclear weapons? The same kind of civilians that can’t find that package you shipped through the post office last year. The same Department of Energy that just a dozen years ago thought that having different levels of security access affected their employees’ self-esteem.

    So why does the Washington Post continue to employ this goober? Other than the fact that he sticks to the WaPo’s line that the military is bad and government bureaucrats have all of the correct answers all of the time, he’s completely useless. His military background is limited to driving up to the Berlin Wall a few times (probably under heavy supervision), and he doesn’t bother to check his facts (as Noonan demonstrates with a few phone calls).

    Well, this post guarantees me another year’s worth of hits from Vermont as Arkin googles his name.