Here’s a thread for you guys to post random thoughts to start your work week. I’ll get things started…
“They will take their lies to the grave!” We consistently see evidence of this here and elsewhere. Let’s start with a recent example.
Colt Bulot, phony Army Ranger, showed us last week that he never learns from his mistakes. After being called out, again, on his continued embellishment, he doubled down. Never mind that his documentation doesn’t support his claims.
So, Colt Bulot rapidly flipped through the pages of the phony/embellisher playbook. Driven by control and desperation, he ripped a page out and ran with it. The result? His phony medical screening form:
Colt Bulot says:
November 16, 2018 at 1:58 pm
Screw you idiots you want proof? you couldn’t handle the proof but here is my medical graduation from signed by the doc that cleared me after graduating Ranger school. Now suck on it and back the hell off before I have to contact my lawyer again. SSG Colt Bulot, REAL HERO, signing off.
http://files.constantcontact.com/1ba25797701/8ea2a55c-7e1b-49ce-8303-2586568554ef.png.
Where else have we seen manufactured proof before?
Well, after downloading his PDF documentation, I did a “split documents” operation. I pulled the top page into a separate document, then rotated it. His so-called “evidence” actually damaged his claims further.
As many in the community pointed out last week, inconsistencies torpedoed his “proof”.
For example, he dated the form “November 7, 1982”. The medical history form he used; However, was revised effective October, 2018.
Colt Bulot signed the form with a date that existed outside of his military service dates.
Additionally, those in the know pointed out that there were no “medical graduation medical screenings” for Ranger training. If anything, the screening would’ve been done prior to training.
Now, a look at the form itself shows additional discrepancies.
Blocks 1 through 4 show blacked out information. However, the way the blackout is done appears random. Colt Bulot more than likely left most of those blocks blank, and then did the blackout. With no words to guide his actions, they show a “drift”. This should’ve exposed a part of the words being blocked out.
The examination “took place” at the Army Ranger School’s location. As was noted, the screening would’ve taken place at the previous unit. If they required this form, it would’ve been a part of a packet taken to the school, for review by a local surgeon.
Perhaps those that have been through this course could shed more light on this part.
In 1982, the “Xs” would’ve looked different. Although he lists “apply for Ranger school” as the purpose of the examination, it shows his “usual occupation” as “Ranger”.
Onto the “screening” portion.
He chose “yes” for some of the questions. Collectively, they’d have a high chance of disqualifying him from consideration for any “secret squirrel” operations. His screening would’ve risked his being declared “nondeployable”.
The comments section would’ve focused on medical issues. This includes answers to the doctor’s questions not addressed above.
Fitness for a specific duty would’ve been coached in terms of medical readiness. If someone has issues that could potentially impact their performance, and the doctor gives a positive recommendation, he’s potentially putting his/her neck on the chopping block.
If something happened to the person being screened, while at the recommended unit, and it could be traced to one of the “yes” answers, then fingers would be pointing to the doctor. So, the statement about “risks of severe harm” being accepted, is very suspect.
Cult Bulot lists “Apply for Ranger’s school” for the purpose. Yet, the healthcare coordinator states that Colt Bulot completed Army Ranger School at Fort Benning. Which is it?
In reality, if they accepted a previously filled form, the comments would’ve been left blank. Then, after he went through all of the screening, and the doctor was looking at the results of his labs and examination, the doctor would hand write the commentary.
Then, if a recommendation was required, the doctor would provide a recommendation based on the results.
It’s unlikely that he’d recommend “promotion to clandestine operations”. He may not necessarily state whether someone completed a school or not. There’s a good chance that the doctor wouldn’t say that “risks are accepted” given the “yes” responses on this form.
