Category: Military issues

  • Fort Lee shooter, another crazed vet

    The other day, we reported on the shooting incident which locked down Fort Lee, VA for about a half hour. We also told you that the shooter was a sergeant first class who shot herself. It turns out that, according to Reuters, her name was Paula Walker, assigned to the 266TH Quartermaster Battalion. For some reason, it’s a big deal that she spent 15 months in Iraq;

    Lee Shooter

    Walker, from Yonkers, New York, was a human resources specialist, the base said in a statement. She enlisted in September 2000 and had served at Fort Lee since December 2011.

    She served a 15-month combat tour in Iraq in 2007 and 2008. Her awards included three Army Commendation Medals, the statement said.

    The shooting at the base’s Combined Arms Support Command Headquarters is under investigation and no motive has been given. The incident led to a brief lockdown of the base, the Army’s third-largest training site.

    She was in the AG Corps, so I’m not sure how much of a “combat tour” it was. She has been at Fort Lee for nearly three years, so I’m really not sure how much a 15-month tour as an AG NCO six years ago has to do with this particular incident, but the Army needs to get in front of this and straighten this out. Quick. The last paragraph of that article;

    The shooting came about four months after a soldier with mental health problems killed three people and wounded 16 at Fort Hood in Texas. The Fort Hood incident was the third shooting rampage at a U.S. military base in six months.

    I’d remind Reuters and my readers that two of those “shooting rampages” were committed by civilians, not by military personnel. One of those “rampages” result in the death of one person who was in the military and he saved the life of another servicemember by sacrificing himself. Ivan Lopez, the shooter at Fort Hood, had been trying to convince doctors that he had head problems, but he wasn’t diagnosed as having “mental health problems” and he never experienced direct combat. So that’s pure speculation.

    I’m thinking that SFC Walker never experienced direct combat either, as a AG troop. They tried to push the PTS in the opening hours of the Hasan murders at Hood, too, despite the fact that Hasan had never deployed. Maybe they should be looking at what makes these POGs (People Other than Grunts) snap instead of trying to scare the country with the old crazy vet meme. It seems to me that folks who actually experience combat are the only ones not going on these “rampages”.

  • ISIS May Have MANPADS Now

    Remember that Syrian airbase that ISIS overran the other day?  Well, it looks like they might have obtained a few useful things when they took it.

    What kind of useful items?  Try advanced MANPADS, for starters.  The Washington Post is reporting that a cache of MANPADS were among the items ISIS obtained when they took that Syrian base.  The MANPADS obtained were reportedly SA-16s, although at least one photo released may be that of an SA-18.

    Along with MANPADS, ISIS reputedly obtained MIG-21s and AIM-9 Sidewinders as well when it captured the base.

    They’ll need qualified pilots, facilities, and maintenance personnel to use the latter two items of course.  But MANPADS aren’t that difficult to use – and if they captured the systems, presumably ISIS also captured a number of Arabic-language manuals as well.  And they’re, well, man-portable.

    If true, this is not good news.

  • Can’t Bomb Them into Submission?

    Can’t Bomb Them into Submission?

    Operation ArcLight

    Says who? In 1965-66 I huddled at night inside my dug-in defensive perimeter and watched the flickering lightning of the explosions of Operation Arc Light, an aggressive use of American heavy bombing capabilities against the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese enemies we faced. The sky-lighting flashes accompanied seconds later by muted rumbles gave only the barest hint of the unbelievable violence being unleashed upon our enemy a few kilometers distant.

    Days later, our ground patrolling into the bombed areas gave us an awed appreciation of the power of America’s Air Forces. The former jungle terrain was a scorched and scarred moonscape with the only visible life being the green shoots pressing an inch or two upward to the tropical sunlight, testament to the eternal renewability of life.

    But those green sprigs were it. Every other thing in that landscape was dead. Irregularly spaced craters, several yards across and several feet deep depending on what the original topography had been, covered the area where the bombs had impacted. There was the occasional indication that humans had once been there, small bits and pieces of weaponry and the various metal accouterments of any infantry force, helmets, canteens, and so forth. Of human remains my patrols found none, at least none that were recognizable as such, nor did we find the remains of the indigenous animals like monkeys and water buffalo that we knew had lived there, possibly even tigers.

    No, all mammalian life had been obliterated, reduced to particles of flesh and bone no longer visible to the human eye, blown into oblivion by a storm of fire and concussion that can never be fully described because no scribe who might be in the center of such events could ever survive to record them. Descriptions are left to the few of us who went in on the ground to survey the results of a B-52 carpet bombing campaign. I will wager that every trooper from the 327th Airborne Infantry who took part in those patrols will, to this day, tell you how he thanked his Maker that our enemies possessed no weapon equal to our Buffalos.

    That’s a long preface to get to the premise of my piece about the issues challenging America and other Western democracies today. We are facing Muslim insurgencies throughout the areas where the teachings of Mohammed have poisoned millions of minds into believing that the only way they can survive is to dominate the world. Because America represents the biggest challenge to such a conquest, we are naturally their primary target, probably not a problem as long as we have the courage and the fortitude to deal with it over there rather than over here.

    In order to become a fully functional cohesive military threat, capable of seizing territory and holding it, these ragtag jihadi revolutionaries must assemble their military assets into a cohesive force capable of effective offensive operations that result in the seizure and occupation of the sovereign territories needed to make up their Islamic caliphate. As every marauding tyrant in history has known, it requires concentrations of forces in key positions to attack, overrun, and then hold that portion of the world you intend to make part of your empire. That rule is indelible; it doesn’t change, as America, with her mighty air and naval armadas, has so recently learned; you cannot hold geography without sufficient forces in place on the ground.

    But, America is not interested in seizing and holding any Middle Eastern geography; our goal is to deny that capability to others by not allowing them to build and assemble forces sufficient to be dominant. To the naysayers, military and civilian, who claim on television and in op-ed pieces that a determined and unrelenting, heavy bombing campaign can’t reduce any assembled forces of ISIS to rubble, I say, talk to infantry veterans of Vietnam who surveyed the results of B-52 strikes in that battleground.

    With the intelligence capabilities we have today we most assuredly can monitor ISIS activities to determine when and where they are marshaling their forces for a major assault. When our intel indicates they are engaged in that process, we allow them sufficient time to gather as many of their forces as possible before their planned assault and then we send in the BUFFs at that critical moment to turn their marshaling areas and massed forces into nothing more than many, many large, smoking holes in the sand filled with nothing but memories of the atomized, wannabee soldiers of Allah. I guarantee you that any ISIS members who come in post-raid to assess the damages will gain a fresh understanding of what the term terror must truly mean, like my fellow troopers and I did fifty years ago.

    Sadly, like so many other unused capabilities this great nation possesses, our heavy bombing assets will probably be kept on a tight leash by this dithering, incompetent loser in the White House that the Democrat party foisted on this nation and the world, an act of political treachery for which they should never be forgiven.

    Crossposted on American Thinker

  • Cold War Overflights of Russia – the Peripheral Missions

    My article the other day provided a pointer to information concerning US deep penetration overflights of the Soviet Union between 1950 and 1956 – before the U2 was flying.  Needless to day, these weren’t the only overflights of Soviet territory conducted by US aircraft during the “Cold War”.  Nor were they the only ones during which shots were exchanged.

    Far more numerous were peripheral missions – those that flew along the Soviet Union’s land or maritime borders.  I also found an article that gives a fairly good (if perhaps not fully comprehensive) rundown of this far more numerous type of Cold War Soviet overflight mission.

    You can find that article here.  It also seems to be of good quality, and I’d assess it as being reliable as well.  Also highly recommended.

  • USAF Overflights of Russia

    I ran across a fascinating article this morning.  I thought I’d share it.

    The article deals with USAF involvement in overflights of the Soviet Union between 1950 and 1956.  And no, not just quick in-and-out “border dashes”.  Some of the missions were indeed deep penetration overflights.

    The article is not sourced, and the author appears to desire anonymity.  I thus can’t give a good assessment of how credible the article is based on sources or author’s reputation.

    However, the article does generally square with other accounts generally accorded to be of high-reliability. It also provides details that lead me to believe the author had access to some . . . very good documentation.  My assessment is that very likely quite accurate.

    The CIA and the U2 generally get the bulk of the credit for overflying the Soviet Union. But the CIA weren’t the only “players” in that deadly Cold War game – which was at times neither “cold” nor played for low stakes.

    Fascinating reading.  Highly recommended.

    . . .

    (Note:  it’s been my experience that sites such as the one to which this article is posted are often ephemeral.  I’ve captured the article to PDF in the case it disappears.) 

  • Continuation Boards – Coming Again to a Navy Near You!

    It appears as if the US Navy – like the Army – is about to engage in some “force shaping” efforts.  The Navy has announced that almost 8000 Chiefs (E7/8/9) will have their records screened for continuation in service, starting on 27 October 2014.

    The board will consider both active duty and reserve personnel.  Acitve duty personnel who had 19 years of service as of 28 February 2014, and who had 3 years time in grade as of 30 June, will be considered.  On the reserve side, only those with 20 “good” (qualifying) years for reserve retirement will be considered.

    The Navy held similar boards in FY2010-FY2013.  There was no board this year (FY2014).  But unlike previous years, no career fields will be exempted from consideration.

    No quota for eliminations was set.  Rather, based on the recommendations of Navy senior enlisted advisers the board will operate on a “pure quality cut” basis instead – whatever that means.

    Hey, at least they’re not forcing folks to retire earlier than 20.  Still – for some, it looks like it will soon be, “Bless Our Home It’s Christmas Almost”.

     

  • Ukrainians strike Russian column

    Ukrainians strike Russian column

    Russians in the Ukraine

    See, I take off for a little while to get my wife a truck load of crushed white stone and the world falls apart – now I know how the President feels. Pinto Nag and COB6 send word that a Russian column was struck inside the Ukraine, according to MSN;

    Ukraine said its artillery partly destroyed a Russian armoured column that entered its territory overnight and said its forces came under shellfire from Russia on Friday in what appeared to be a major military escalation between the ex-Soviet states.

    Russia’s government denied its forces had crossed into Ukraine and accused Kiev of trying to sabotage deliveries of aid. NATO said there had been a Russian incursion into Ukraine, while avoiding the term invasion, and European capitals accused the Kremlin of escalating the fighting.

    Either way, it’s doubtful that Russians will sit still for being in an impact area, and retribution probably won’t be in the form of some sanctions.

    A spokesman for Russia’s border guard service was quoted by Russian news agencies as denying that any Russian military units had entered Ukraine.

    In a statement issued by the Russian foreign ministry, Moscow accused Ukrainian forces of intensifying the fighting against pro-Moscow separatists in eastern Ukraine in an attempt to sabotage Russian efforts to get aid into rebel-held areas.

    After Ukraine reported the clash, Russia’s rouble currency weakened against both the dollar and the euro. Russian shares were also dragged lower.

    Someone tell Hagel to tell the President that the world is exploding.

  • Bergdahl’s mates can’t publish book for political reasons

    This story has been bouncing around for a few days, but it seems that Simon & Schuster has refused to publish a book written by platoon mates of recently-returned guest of the Haqqani Bowe Bergdahl. The reason they’ve given is fairly ridiculous;

    Here is an excerpt of Simon and Schuster’s reasons for refusal of the Bergdahl book, as reported via The Washington Free Beacon:

    “I’m not sure we can publish this book without the Right using it to their ends,” Sarah Durand, a senior editor at Atria Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, wrote in an email to one of the soldiers’ agents.

    “[T]he Conservatives are all over Bergdahl and using it against Obama,” Durand wrote, “and my concern is that this book will have to become a kind of ‘Swift Boat Veterans for Truth’”

    If that’s the reason, I can’t imagine S&S using the same excuse for rejecting a potential money-making book about the president during the Bush years. Just because the book may reflect badly on the president, that doesn’t make it less truthful or less valuable for the public debate.

    Besides, S&S passed on an opportunity to make a lot of money – conservatives who would buy the book, unlike the hippies who like books which support President Obama, have money.

    Ms. Durand also accidentally used the term “Swift Boat” correctly in a sentence – it means to tell the truth about a veterans’ career when that veteran won’t tell the truth about his career – as in John Kerry’s case. The book seems to be out of Ms. Durand’s area of expertise – the books that she has worked with in the past are boring fluff – clearly not books that made any significant money for the company. I’m sure the crew will find a publisher and Ms. Durand will have egg on her face, along with other gooey stuff she has on her face now.

    Bergdahl and his lawyer had a nice little talk last week with investigators about the circumstances surrounding his vacation with the Haqqani. I’m curious why we haven’t heard from General Dahl yet.