Category: Military issues

  • Last “Kill Team” member exhonerated

    We awake this morning to the news that the last member of the Fort Lewis “Kill Team” is released from custody because the Army has dropped charges against Spc. Michael Wagnon, 31.

    The Army did not say why it dropped the charges. Lewis-McChord senior commander Maj. Gen. Lloyd Miles chose to dismiss the case “in the interest of justice,” Army spokesman Lt. Col. Gary Dangerfield said in a written statement.

    Four members of the team are serving in prison for their participation in the grisly murders of Afghanistan civilians, so the Army has dealt justice to the criminals and cleared the names of the innocent.

    Wagnon’s friends supported him with a Facebook page. According to the S&S article, the case against him was the weakest;

    Wagnon was one of the most experienced soldiers to face charges in connection with the “kill team.” He had served on two deployments to Iraq and was well-regarded by soldiers from his previous units.

  • Big Army silences Big Catholicism

    Over at the National Review, they report that last weekend the Army instructed catholic chaplains to not read from the pulpit the letter that Archbishop for the US Military Services Timothy Broglio wrote to instruct Catholics to resist the mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services requiring Catholics as well as everyone else to ignore their religious beliefs and their conscience on insurance coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortifacient drugs.

    The Army’s Office of the Chief of Chaplains subsequently sent an email to senior chaplains advising them that the Archbishop’s letter was not coordinated with that office and asked that it not be read from the pulpit. The Chief’s office directed that the letter was to be mentioned in the Mass announcements and distributed in printed form in the back of the chapel.

    Following a discussion between Archbishop Broglio and the Secretary of the Army, The Honorable John McHugh, it was agreed that it was a mistake to stop the reading of the Archbishop’s letter. Additionally, the line: “We cannot — we will not — comply with this unjust law” was removed by Archbishop Broglio at the suggestion of Secretary McHugh over the concern that it could potentially be misunderstood as a call to civil disobedience.

    I’m pretty sure that God [whatever name your God uses] doesn’t want us to have abortions (what with Him being known as The Creator and everything), but I object to government sponsorship of abortions on completely secular Constitutional grounds, specifically, the fifth amendment which says “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” and there’s no due process involved in abortions. So the religion thing aside, it’s unconstitutional for the government to sponsor the killing of the unborn.

    I think it’s also unconstitutional for Big Army to interfere with the free exercise of religion. And if they’re so concerned about “civil disobedience” why didn’t Big Army prosecute Dan Choi when he chained himself to the White House fence while in uniform? Is some civil disobedience OK, while some is not? Can we get a list of Army-approved civil disobedience actions?

  • Tebowing Marines

    I’m only posting this picture because it’ll send Joe running for the exits screaming “The Christianists are coming!!!”

  • Never forget; MIAs still in Iraq

    Bingham Jamison, a former Marine Corps officer with two combat tours in Iraq writes today in Time magazine to remind us that we have troops left behind in Iraq;

    To me, [Staff Sergeant Ahmed Kousay Altaie, kidnapped by Shiite militia in Baghdad on October 23, 2006] service to our country represents the best of America – an immigrant, from Iraq no less, that was willing to trade his comfortable life in Michigan for the dangers of the battlefield. Fighting to protect the country that he adopted, and that adopted him, is the epitome of the very courage that keeps our country free and strong. This dual love for America and Iraq makes his abduction that much more difficult to bear.

    The second Marine, a linguist named Corporal Wassef Ali Hassoun, was a fraud – after being seemingly abducted by insurgents in Iraq in June 2004, and rumored to have been beheaded (following a video being aired on al-Jazeera with a masked man holding a sword over his head), Hassoun was later charged with desertion and his abduction was subsequently deemed an elaborate hoax. He remains at large, and is thought to be hiding in Lebanon. His despicable acts have tainted the true horror of every American MIA since.

    Just a reminder that not all of the troops came home last month. And America never forgets.

  • Back to the future

    Leon Panetta unfurled his plan for slashing defense spending yesterday. I got the feeling that we are now in the post-Korean War era, with Eisenhower touting the “bigger bang for the buck” strategy of relying on our nuclear dominance for our defense. Except now Panetta thinks that relying on our technological dominance is the cure-all for our national security concerns.

    Panetta cloaked the smaller force in terms like “agile” to make it seem as if he’s improving the force.

    Although some have been predicting slashes to manpower up to 100k troops, the Washington Post says 57,000 slots will be cut;

    Aside from the cuts to the Army, which will eventually reduce the number of active-duty soldiers to 490,000 from 547,000, most of the reductions revealed Thursday had been previously announced or involved less costly items. Panetta noted that the Army and the Marine Corps will still be slightly larger than they were in 2001, before the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent war in Iraq.

    The plan for Europe is to leave just two brigades behind says Stars & Stripes;

    The move will send the 172nd Separate Infantry Brigade, based out of Grafenwöhr and Schweinfurt, and the Baumholder-based 170th Infantry Brigade, back to the States.

    The 2nd Cavalry Regiment in Vilseck, Germany, and the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team in Vicenza, Italy, will remain as the only Army brigades permanently based in Europe.

    Ya know, all of that is fine, if the Europeans are willing to pick up their end of the rope and pull for a change instead of relying on the US to rush to their aid, And while Eisenhower was planning on the nuclear edge for our defense, history had other plans and we were later embroiled in a close-up, hand-to-hand primitive sort of warfare that negated any impact our nuclear arsenal. In other words, our enemies will make plans to exploit our weaknesses, not our strengths.

    So while Panetta and Obama plan to fight the next next war with drones and ninjas, our enemies are planning a manpower-intensive war.

  • Dog Collar SF soldier

    ROS sent us this link to an article I’ve seen around the internet about a guy named Michael Lee Mitchell near Eglin AFB who was arrested for using an electric dog collar on his two small girls.

    Michael Lee Mitchell, 28 — an Army Special Forces soldier living in Crestview — was arrested this week when detectives discovered that he allegedly shocked two girls, ages 8 and 4, and made them do extreme physical exercise regularly until they threw up, according to FOX 10.

    Yeah, you knew he had to be a Special Forces soldier, right? I mean only someone trained in the most martial of arts would be that cruel to torture children. And it was probably the things he was made to do at bidding of Darth Chaney which made him spend his garrison time torturing children. I mean that’s the standard line right?

    Well, it seems that Mitchell is indeed assigned to a Special Forces unit at Eglin Air Force base, but he’s a mechanic;

    Yeah, he was little too butter-ballish to be a “special forces soldier”. He may have eaten a special forces soldier once recently. It’s like Jeffrey MacDonald who murdered his wife and children in 1970 will always be known as The Green Beret Doctor even though he never trained as a “green beret” and was merely assigned to a Special Forces group as their surgeon, this Mitchell guy will probably be the Green Beret Dog Collar Guy.

  • No Murtha Ship

    I mentioned the other day that Ponsdorf called me to tell me that he couldn’t tell me something. Well, this is it, from our friend, Captain Larry Bailey;

    Folks, this is the official launch of our effort to convince the Secretary of the Navy that LPD-26, the ship that is to be launched next year, should be named after either a great American city (like her sister LPD, the USS San Antonio) or a true American hero.

    Here is our brand-new website: No Murtha Ship Take a look. Scott Swett did a great job of putting it up, and Linda Eddy did a great job of designing our logo.

    We intend to serve notice on Navy Secretary Ray Mabus that it is intolerable to name this fine vessel after John P. Murtha, arguably (and demonstrably) one of the most corrupt politicians ever to sit in Congress.

    It should be made clear that we are not connected to any political party or movement; we just want our Navy’s ships to be named appropriately.

    Pass the word, please, to your mailing lists. And tell recipients that any money raised over what our actual costs are (website management, advertisements, etc.) will be donated to a worthy military charity. Nobody is on salary, but contributions will be required to keep us up and running.

    You will note that checks must be made out to “Larry Bailey/Sink Murtha.” That is because my bank (USAA Bank) would not allow me to open an account under an organizational name. We also have a PayPal account, as you’ll see on the website.

    You have my permission to simply forward this e-mail. However you pass the word is all right with me; just get the message out there that we will not allow a corrupt congressman to be honored by the US Navy!

    Many thanks to you all!

    Larry Bailey

    It’s especially timely now that the Haditha trials are all but finished.

  • Citizen soldiers no more?

    Paul Huard, a high school teacher, military father and former journalist, published a piece in The Oregonian this past weekend talking about the increasing disconnect between Americans and their professional military.

    Sometime in February, I will quietly remove a small pennant that has been a fixture in my classroom for more than six years. It is a Blue Star service flag, the symbol of a son or daughter on active duty in the U.S. military and a tradition dating back to 1942 when the banner allowed mothers to show publicly a child was fighting as a soldier, Marine, sailor or airman. Each star represented one child, and many families had flags with multiple stars. Entire neighborhoods often had these flags in their windows during World War II, and people were proud to display them.

    …experience and education have shown me that for better or for worse the American soldier and America’s wars are things that educated people need to understand for the sake of understanding and keeping American democracy.

    …awareness is becoming harder and harder to find in a nation where few choose to serve. About 1 percent of the nation’s population is currently in uniform as either active duty or reserve such as the National Guard, and that number will dwindle as factors such as budget cuts and the inevitable drawdown because of the end of the Iraq War take effect. During World War II, about 12 percent of the population was in uniform.

    Because of the hatred expressed by the counterculture during the’60s toward returning Vietnam vets or because society today lives like a nearly nine-year war had no impact on the lives of a majority of Americans, we owe the military a free lunch at every Applebee’s from coast to coast. Most of the young people I know in the military just wish the average American understood what the military does and why it does it. They are grateful for the meal, but they want their fellow citizens to understand what the military does, how it gets the job done, and what the military should (or should not) be asked to do.

    When Matt enlisted, a few friends and acquaintances asked me how I felt about sacrificing my son. I replied by stating that I was not sacrificing my son, but that I was supporting his informed decision, a decision that he made as an adult. He had other options in life. He received excellent advice from two veterans: a grandfather who served in the U.S. Army during World War II and a grandfather who served in the U.S. Army during the Cold War. He knew exactly what he was doing.

    The crux of Huard’s argument is that military service has disappeared from the common American experience, that military culture is no longer American culture. I happen to believe this is true and, like Huard, I find it to be a disturbing development. A culture apart from its military is not only more likely to fail to give its military the tools it needs for successfully defending the national interest, it more likely to misuse and ignorantly abuse, or allow the abuse, of its military.

    The ancient, and very Western, tradition of the citizen solider is crucial to the heath of any Republic but the demands of both modern warfare and personal liberty require a force of professional volunteers. It’s a balancing act that we’re failing at. We’re returning to a system of military clans, separate in culture and social status from the general population. Most American families and their soft, spoiled and entitled children don’t even conceive of military service as an option much less an opportunity. Yet nearly everyone I’ve known in the military either has kids in or are themselves children of veterans.