Category: Military issues

  • Pentagon may force troops out to meet reduction quotas

    Zero and Old Trooper sent us a link to Bloomberg which says that, in order to reduce the Army’s ranks by 67,000 warm bodies in the next five years, they may force people out.

    The military will first try buying out contracts or offering bonuses for people to leave, while working to keep those with valuable specialties such as cyber warfare and acquisitions, according to Travis Sharp, a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, a Washington policy group, who attended a Pentagon briefing for analysts last month.

    “I was surprised that they were going to complete the reductions to the Army and the Marine Corps in just five years,” Sharp said in an interview before the budget was released. “What they told us is that they will try to use those types of positive incentives to the greatest extent possible, but that involuntary separations would probably still be necessary.”

    Yeah, I remember the early 90s when they tried the same thing, then a few years later, they were begging us to come back, because the mission wasn’t getting completed with a force that was depleted of the experience.

    And you can be sure that they’ll be forcing out the trigger pullers and not the paper shufflers.

  • Life of Duty: Warrior Wives

    The Life of Duty folks from Brownells and the NRA pay tribute to those who have the toughest job – waiting at home while out of the communication loop.

  • Pucker up, Reservists

    The Stars & Stripes recounts a discussion that Lt. Gen. Jack Stultz, chief of the Army Reserve had with 75 reservists with the 7th Civil Support Command at a town hall meeting last week at Daenner Kaserne in Kaiserslautern.

    “The word I’m getting from the very top is, ‘Hey, we don’t want to touch the Reserve; you’re too important. We’re going to rely on you even more.”

    “What it means is, you’re more relevant than ever,” he said.

    He says that like it’s a good thing. It’s been my experience that most soldiers who go into the Reserves aren’t looking for the full time employment of the active duty force. They’re looking to transition to civilian jobs and finish college after doing all of that full time stuff for several years. But, here it looks like the Defense department and the Obama Administration is planning on filling the deployment gaps caused by drawing down the active force with Reservists who are going back on rotation schedules.

    Yeah, if all things remain constant, it’s a good plan…well, except for when Reservists start leaving when their hitch is up because they’re tired of not being civilians, and recruiters can’t fill the positions, because they discover that folks who want to be deployed would rather be on active duty, not ripping up their roots every other year to deploy on some AfriCom deployment to hand out MREs to AIDS patients.

    The goal, he said, is to create a five-year model in the Reserve, whereby soldiers would train and build readiness for four years, and in the fifth year, be available to mobilize for a contingency or other missions, Stultz said in an interview after the town hall meeting.

    Yeah, that didn’t work so well for those Marines who ended up in the battle at the Chosin Reservoir. Funny how reality always intercedes in the best laid plans of men. I don’t know how you “build readiness”, but it sounds interesting. Enjoy your sky-pie.

  • Oliver North and Wayne LaPierre at CPAC

    I met Oliver North briefly one evening a few weeks after 9-11-01 and I’ve always been a fan. The good folks at the NRA sent us his address to CPAC during which he does what he does best and most often – honoring the troops;

    Being the NRA, they also sent the video of the NRA’s CEO and Executive Vice President, Wayne LaPierre, TSO’s former boss, who says that when Barack Obama is defeated in November, he’ll have gun owners to thank for it;

    He goes on to say that the Obama Administration made a conscious decision to avoid the gun issue during his first term, looking forward to his second term to address the divisive issue. I honestly don’t doubt that because the Giffords shooting was the perfect opportunity for them to begin restricting our rights to gun ownership, but they passed on it for the time being. Voting for Obama in 2012 is voting for gun control.

    LaPierre also lays out the case against the Obama Administration in regards to the Fast and Furious operation for people who haven’t been seriously following it thus far.

  • Michelle Obama attacks the DFAC

    More social engineering, this time in the messhall. This Reuters story starts out telling us how fat Americans can’t get in the military and somehow it’s the messhall’s fault;

    Obese Americans in the military are a national security hazard and U.S. first lady Michelle Obama wants to see that change.

    Obama, who has led a healthy eating and fitness program for children for two years, lent her voice on Thursday to the military’s efforts to overhaul the food it serves.

    In an event at Little Rock Air Force Base, Obama announced a new Pentagon obesity and nutritional awareness campaign that will change nutrition standards across the services for the first time in 20 years.

    Yeah, if they’re eating in the messhall, they got into the military, so they’re not among those 25% who are too obese to get into the military. See how that works?

    Flagwaver sends us a link to The Blaze which reports that Obama, the hairless Wookie, is giving nutritional advice to airmen at the DFAC;

    She encouraged healthy habits during a visit with individual airmen at their tables.

    “Don’t worry, you’ll be a vegetable guy soon,” she reassured one airman.

    She stressed that it’s not just about giving members of the armed services a more svelte profile: There are big national security and budget implications.

    Yeah, I weighed 155 pounds when I got out of the military and ate at least once-a-day in the messhall. It wasn’t the food, it was the activity that kept me svelte. I needed the SOS I had every morning to replace the energy I’d burned off during PT.

    Now, unless she plans on having Americans line up outside the DFAC for their meals, this is just political posturing. Yeah, good nutrition is important to the military, but they don’t need the first lady telling them to become vegetarians. Maybe she should knock off those cheeseburgers and chilifries and drop a few pounds off of that fanny pack she’s carrying around first.

  • Expanding women’s roles in combat

    I don’t what I can say about this I haven’t already said but here’s the story at Stars & Stripes;

    Citing defense officials, the AP reported that the new rules are expected to continue the long-held prohibition that prevents women from serving as infantry, armor and special operations forces. But they will formally allow women to serve in other jobs at the battalion level, which until now had been considered too close to combat.

    AP said the changes would formally allow women to be assigned to a battalion and serve in jobs such as medics, intelligence, police or communications officers.

    About twenty years ago I wrote a letter to the S&S when the military was contemplating this move after the Gulf War. I said then, like I say now; that’s fine and dandy with me, except that if they’re going to start putting women closer to the fight, they have a responsibility to train them for it. That means eliminating gender-specific standards for training. If they’re going to do men’s jobs in men’s environment, they have to do it to the same standard.

    Combat doesn’t discriminate. Bullets don’t don’t go less far or slower for women.

    From Associated Press;

    “We believe that it’s very important to explore ways to offer more opportunities to women in the military,” Pentagon press secretary George Little said Thursday. “This review has been thorough and extensive,” with input from all branches of the military.

    It’s not a matter of career opportunities, it’s more related whether you’re going to train to an acceptable standard that doesn’t discriminate. This isn’t the movies where men are trying to keep women out of our boy’s club. Generally, when women get trained to a man’s standard, they cry that they’re being treated unfairly.

    Take that cow, Shannon Faulkner, who spent years battling for her chance at The Citadel who dropped out after a few days because she thought she was going to be treated differently and spent not one minute preparing for the rigors of the college. In a 2009 interview she still blamed men for her one week tour of duty;

    She spent just one week at the Citadel. During that time, Faulkner battled extreme physical and mental stress, and passed much of the week in the infirmary, suffering severe dehydration.

    Yeah, you don’t get dehydrated from stress, you get dehydrated from not being prepared. Women every where are celebrating this decision by the Pentagon, but they need to understand that there’s a price still to be paid.

  • Act of Valor and security concerns

    ROS sends this trailer to the upcoming film “Act of Valor” which purports to include real SEALs in the cast of performers;

    Coincidently, Tman sent us link to an article about Lt. Gen. James Vaught who confronted Special Operations Commander Adm. Bill McRaven on the media cooperation that the SEALs have enjoyed in their recent successes;

    “Since the time when your wonderful team went and drug bin Laden out and got rid of him, and more recently when you went down and rescued the group in Somalia, or wherever the hell they were, they’ve been splashing all of this all over the media,” Vaught, 85, said. “I flat don’t understand that.

    “Now back when my special operators extracted Saddam [Hussein] from the hole, we didn’t say one damn word about it,” he continued. “We turned him over to the local commander and told him to claim that his forces drug him out of the hole, and he did so. And we just faded away and kept our mouth shut.

    I understand that the media attention can be intoxicating, well, until you fail at something. But I sort of agree with the good general. Saddam Hussein used Black Hawk Down as a training video for his commanders on how to fight American soldiers.

    Vaught continued;

    “Now I’m going to tell you, one of these days, if you keep publishing how you do this, the other guy’s going to be there ready for you, and you’re going to fly in and he’s going to shoot down every damn helicopter and kill every one of your SEALs. Now, watch it happen. Mark my words. Get the hell out of the media,” he concluded….

    I’m not going to stick my neck out and say “Mark my words…” but it should certainly be a consideration in some of these cooperative projects. By the way, if it does happen, and I pray every night that it doesn’t, I hope the SEALs don’t expect to get some sympathy from the media.

  • Not balancing the budget on the backs of the military

    Back in September at the American Legion Convention, the President promised that he wouldn’t balance the federal budget on the backs of veterans or at the expense of national security, but I haven’t seen any cuts anywhere else in the budget except to veterans’ benefits and defense. Have you? The latest example is cutting combat pay for troops serving in hazardous areas…like in a war. Hazardous duty pay $225/month, but DoD will start paying by the days that your in a combat area – $7.50/day.

    GruntSgt sent us a link to Shark Tank who reports that one soldier was notified through his MyPay account;

    So I just got a letter from MyPay (the way we get paid in the military), saying that I will only reason Combat Pay while deployed for the days that I take fire or am in a hostile area. Now, as an Infantry Marine, I’m constantly in a combat zone…it may not always be popping off, but for them to take that away from us is bullshit. Now, the aviation tech who sits on Camp Leatherneck, sure, I can see him not getting Combat Pay, but to take it away from the grunts, the ground pounders, the front line of defense…come on, Uncle Sam.

    You should go to the link above to see the conditions that have to exist before a servicemember gets his measly $225/month. Basically someone has to shoot at you or try to blow you up everyday. I wonder if DoD can see how the accounting practices for this pay is hardly worth the savings they expect to accrue from this mess.

    I guess the accounting will have to be handled by squad leaders when they return from patrols. This may be making a mountain out of a molehill, but I guess it all depends on how DoD interprets “subject to” and “imminent danger of being exposed”. good news, though; if you’re killed or wounded, you’ll get your $7.50 for that day.