Category: Iraq Veterans Against the War

  • Under the Hood; SSDD

    In case you’re interested in the Deviants or Disobedients or Defoliants or whatever they are at Under the Hood and their protest at Fort Hood today, there are some really boring “livestreaming” at UStream. Casey Porter Casey J Porter says their internet connection was shut down (probably because their audience had a bout of narcolepsy), Casey wrote on his Facebook page that the event was underwhelming. I think he was being generous.

    They claim they’re going to take direct action by blocking the buses with their bodies in about an hour…good for them. I’m sure that will stop an armor regiment. The latest word on their little chat room is that the Army changed it’s schedule because they’re frightened of a bunch of anarchist pussies hopped up on free coffee.

    Mostly the videos are of Matthis making out with the sound of his own voice. I put a link to the videos below the jump because it starts by itself;
    (more…)

  • Sergeant complains his troops aren’t trained for deployment

    One of the “actions” that IVAW is planning for this weekend is the deployment of Indiana-based 656th Transportation Company. According to one of their so-called Non-commissioned Officers, SGT Alejandro Villatoro, his troops aren’t trained for the up-coming mission to Afghanistan;

    The main reason I am doing this is that I want people to know the lack of training and education our soldier have been receiving, and the focus on the mission is just not adequate to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. All I am asking is more time to reevaluate the training and mental health of these soldiers before sending them into war.

    He claims that his troops haven’t had time to train on the weapons they’ll be using or the vehicles they’ll be driving. Sounds like they’ll be using Star Trek phasers and driving spacecraft, huh? Nope, the weapons he hasn’t had sufficient training on are the .50 cal machine guns which have been in the Army’s inventory since before World War Two – it was designed by John Browning just after WWI.

    Do you mean to tell me that there’s been no time in the last 90 years that Villatoro’s troops couldn’t find time to acquaint themselves with the simplest and most durable weapon on any battlefield in the history of warfare? Why would Villatoro complain about his shortcomings in public since it’s his job to train his troops to a standard for combat?

    The unit spent two weeks training up prior to the deployment and he didn’t go to the arms room and sign out an M2 and go over the weapon and it’s characteristics and maintenance? Firing it from a vehicle mount is easy – you put the wooden grips in your chest, squeeze the butterfly trigger and walk the rounds into the target with your body.

    And the vehicle they’re not trained on is the MRAP – I’m sure they’ll get training when they get there, because strangely, the Army figures it’s more important to have MRAPs where they’re needed rather than dormant in an Reserve unit motorpool.

    Villatoros claims he’s afraid that it’ll be a repeat of the invasion of Iraq when he had to drive a truck with a standard transmission and he didn’t know how to drive a stick. Really? A guy in a Trans Co. that couldn’t drive a stick? How stupid would we have to be to believe that one?

    First of all, besides 60s era duece-and-a-halfs, what Army vehicle has a stick? Even five tons were automatic before the 90s. Secondly, since the whole Advanced Individual Training for truck drivers is getting a license and qualified on trucks, who didn’t have the opportunity to drive the old stick shift trucks?

    Even if the Reserve Trans units still had old sticks, it was the NCO’s fault the troops didn’t know how to drive them. Just like it’s Villatoro’s fault his troops aren’t trained. Instead of training them the young sarge was probably playing spades instead of overcoming the shortfalls in the unit’s training plan. That’s what young sergeants are for, buck.

    In addition, Villatoro is claiming the unit is deploying “wounded” soldiers;

    Some mentally ill soldiers are able to keep their diagnoses secret from the military, which is not screening before deployment, while those with known mental illnesses are deployed regardless.

    Wait a second, troops don’t tell their supervisors that have mental problems and some how that equates to the military “not screening”? Sounds to me like those soldiers want to deploy with their unit – how is that the military’s fault?

    This young buck sergeant needs to do a long, slow self-evaluation on the flight over and admit that he’s the one screwing his troops and not the command structure. Oh, by the way, Villalobo is an IVAW member.

  • How to not support the troops

    Emma Kaplan, the national student/youth coordinator for World Can’t Wait!, has an article on Salon supporting the Under the Hood Cafe/IVAW protests planned this weekend against the 3rd ACR’s deployment to the war against terror. In the article, Kaplan writes about the message her own organization is bringing to the protest;

    World Can’t Wait will be bringing the message, “What Are They Deploying For? Murder, Rape, Torture, War!”

    Just so little princess Emma knows, that’s not how you support the troops that you’re claiming to support. After all, those things that she complains are happening “murder, rape, torture…” are things that she’s accusing the troops of committing.

    I’m sure she knows someone who has deployed to the war…is she convinced those people who she knows committed those crimes? Does she really think the kid who delivered her family’s newspaper, or that kid who used to play with her on the playground so many years ago is capable of the atrocities with which she paints the entire military?

    If there are some real veterans of these wars left in the IVAW, why would they want to associate with some spoiled college girl princess who thinks this about them?

  • IVAW is cookin’ up stuff for Fort Hood

    Several people have sent me screen shots and text from several places on the internet about IVAW and Under the Hood Cafe and their plans for a protest this weekend at Fort Hood. This is from an IVAW newsletter;

    That caught my eye because out of a supposed number of 1700 members, they were bragging about “over 20 members” they had on a conference call. That’s pretty weak numbers, guys. That’s 1.1% of your membership. Losing your cachet?

    Of course, the Maoist-founded World Can’t Wait is in on the act, too;

    They’re so confused, they call the 3rd ACR, the 3rd Battalion. There aren’t any line battalions in an Armored Cavalry Regiment. I’m no Cav guy, but I’m pretty sure line battalions are called squadrons. But what do you expect of people who can’t take the time to understand the issue they’re protesting – they’re certainly not going to take the time to get to know the people they’re ostensibly protecting, are they?

    This last bit was lifted from matthis’ Facebook page;

    Attention Activists:

    There are only a few days left before actions kick off at Fort Hood Aug. 22 opposing the deployment of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment to Iraq.

    We will be engaging in radical direct action of which optional elements may risk minor legal ramifications. This is a multi-faceted action with various degrees of potential risk, and individuals unable to take on such risks are as needed as those who are. However, we have never won anything without sacrifice. We have never influenced our government by behaving submissively.

    Only weeks after announcing the 2nd “end” of combat operations in Iraq, the U.S. is preparing to deploy a combat unit to Iraq yet again. We know their claims are a semantics game; a rebranding of the same old bloody occupation. This time, however, we say “No More!”

    Thus far, all of our cleverly worded signs and chants have unsurprisingly failed to halt the biggest war machine in history. It is long past time we move beyond protest to resistance. We now ask not only for your signs and banners but for your bodies and your raised fists. Please stand with us at Fort Hood as we engage in direct action to jam the gears of the US Empire’s War Machine.

    There will be a final organizing meeting the evening of Saturday, August 21st at 8pm in the Killeen, Texas, area. Following this meeting, all participants will need to remain in the area for the next 24 hours. Contact forthooddisobeys@hushmail.com with your name, a brief bio and the degree to which you are interested in participating for more information and to learn the location of the meeting. Lodging can be provided on a first come, first serve basis. Contact us now to RSVP.

    This struggle must be waged here in our military community. Marches in Washington and New York can only do so much. Our Soldiers must see us in THEIR streets waging just struggle in the defense of human life. Only then will they find the courage to disobey Fort Hood.

    In Struggle,

    The Disobedient

    The “disobedient” child-followers of the Matthis crowd (mob) are hoping to get arrested. Of course, they’re going to continue to break laws and push the edge of the envelope because no one ever punishes them. How many times have IVAW members been arrested and the prosecutors drop charges? Countless. Of course, now they’re in Texas, and in a military town – things might be a bit different.

    Here’s a hint for those IVAW members who sending their bios to the “hush mail” account…it’s not as secure as you think it is…but, hey, you know more than I know. Go ahead. I’m just an old, ignorant war monger who spreads propaganda and rumors about IVAW. So knock yourself out.

    This has Seth Manzel’s fingerprints all over it – he led the protests in Washington State trying to block the deployment of the Stryker Brigade there. That didn’t work either. But, hey, you guys go ahead and get yourselves arrested for yet another hare-brained scheme of Matthis and Bobby Whittenberg. Of course, their lives are over – they’re the Bill Perry and Ward Reilly of their generation. Go ahead and throw in with them and see where it gets you.

  • James Branum the big-hearted leech

    We haven’t had an opportunity to discuss James Branum (background here and here) lately because I’d heard he’d been keeping his nose clean and actually helped soldiers instead of getting them tossed in jail for “The Cause” and story lines for Dahr Jamail. But someone sent me this link to his website “GI Rights lawyer” that I just couldn’t let pass.

    This is the story of Robert Bulechek and his family. His wife has written a plea for donations because apparently Robert is doing time for being AWOL. Poor guy joined the Army to get ahead, but unfortunately, the Army didn’t pay him enough to take care of his wife, two kids and their invalid parents, so after basic and AIT, Robert went AWOL to get a better job. Then for some reason the Army swore out a warrant for his arrest and he was picked up last February. For some reason the Army doesn’t trust him and kept him confined to barracks, blah, blah, blah.

    Now she wants you to send her money. But that’s not the worst part – Branum feels sorry for her to the point that he’ll blame the Army for punishing the law breaker and give her some bandwidth to beg for money, but that’s where his charity ends;

    50% of the donations raised in this appeal will go to pay for Robert’s legal bills.

    Translation; 50% of the money will go to buy Slurpees and Gut-busters. First of all, who thinks they can just walk away from the Army and get another job because E-1 pay sucks? Secondly, does knowing that 50% of the money Branum collects with his PayPal account is going in Hefty Boy’s gullet make you want to donate more or less? Seems to me that if Branum had any concern for this family, like he tries to tell us, all of the money would go to the family and he’d worry about his legal expenses later. But that’s just me.

    Now, I’m told that IVAW, (Seth Manzell, actually) is spreading the word around that Robert Bulechek didn’t go AWOL because of his family, but because he turned against the war. they did the same thing for that other fat turd, Leo Church who did the same thing as Bulechek – they turned Church into an anti-war boob from an average run-of-the-mill AWOL boob.

    ADDED:

    But I looked him up on FaceBook and there is a lot of things that raise a few questions. Like if he was arrested in February, then why does he have photos of himself outside of confinement. Some of the photos are of him and Family in New Mexico dated March 2010?

    Or his comment on FaceBook saying that he is on Staff Duty in June 16th 2010.

    on staff duty. not much to do but sit here, lol

    Also married to the same Tonya Bulechek that started the page for him. This whole things feels weird to me.

    ADDED 2nd

    Found out more about the unit he was a part of from this photo. Also he is a 21 series according to AKO. Seems he is part of the 1st Sustainment Brigade that deployed this March. But get this, they deployed to Kuwait in order to help with the troop drawdown in Iraq. So when Seth says that this deployment is Illegal does that mean he really wants our troops to stay there? Or does it reinforce that the is not paying attention to what is happening in Iraq and just repeating slogans like he always does.

  • Ann Wright arms our enemies

    The hard Left doesn’t admit that they arm our enemies with propaganda demonstrations. One of our readers, TD, sent me a series of videos and links of Ann Wright (I wrote about Wright a few months ago). Here are some of the stuff TD sent. Wright recruits for the next Gaza flotilla;

    Wright tells us how scary it was for her to be on a ship in the last flotilla, even though she wasn’t on the boat that was raided by Israeli commandos;

    Yesterday, CNN reported that Ayman al-Zawahiri, reportedly al Qaeda’s #2 man, spoke out to Muslim Turks on the subject of the Gaza flotilla;

    In an audio message released Sunday, a speaker identified as al Qaeda’s second-in-command offers condolences to the Turkish people on the loss of nine activists in a May 31 Israeli raid on an aid flotilla headed for Gaza.

    The incident badly frayed Israel’s once-close relationship with Turkey. The speaker, who was identified as Ayman al-Zawahiri, said in the message the incident underscores the need for Turkey to stop cooperating with or recognizing Israel.

    Of course, that’s the intention of Wright and the organizations to which she belongs. Ann Wright, a former Army colonel and member of Code Pink, Vets for Freedom Peace, Iraq veterans Against the War, World Can’t Wait and who knows how many other organizations which are tied to the Maoist ANSWER and the Revolutionary Communist Party, has no problem providing our enemies with propaganda moments. In fact they see it as their duty to arm our enemies and destroy our fragile coalition.

  • Turning up the heat

    Under the Hood’s den of pirates is cranking up the heat on the Army’s 3rd Armored Cavarly Regiment at Fort Hood by calling nationwide for participants in their protest against the 3rd ACR’s deployment on the 22nd;



    Of course, using the image of soldiers loading on aircraft with missing limbs and wrapped in straitjackets by calling for a halt to deploying “wounded soldiers” is just ridiculous. What use would there be to send crippled and incapable soldiers to a war? It makes no sense.

    I’d like Bobby or Cindy or some other member of the UtH’s Brady Bunch to give me the names and “wounds” of some soldiers who are being forced to deploy with the 3rd ACR.

  • IVAW wants to prosecute Bush Administration

    Taking up the clarion call from Geezers for Sitting on Our Hands (VFP), the Iraq Veterans Against the War, announced that they voted last month to pursue the Bush Administration for their prosecution of the Iraq War. So let’s look at their statement for their justification (Here’s the link, but you’ll have to paste it into your browser because IVAW doesn’t allow traffic from TAH http://www.ivaw.org/node/6087).

    They claim that Bush violated the Constitution by not getting the authorization from Congress.

    Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution vests the power to authorize use of military force in the Legislative Branch, not the Executive.

    That’s funny because the October 16, 2002 Joint Resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq of the 107th Congress (it’s right there in the name) in section 3, paragraph (a) states;

    Authorization.–The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to– (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

    If you’ll remember, Democrats controlled the Senate in October 2002 and it still passed.

    By the way, have you guys ever heard of the War Powers Act of 1973? It says;

    In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced– […]

    The President shall provide such other information as the Congress may request in the fulfillment of its constitutional responsibilities with respect to committing the Nation to war and to the use of United States Armed Forces abroad.

    So you see, there’s no requirement to get a declaration of war from Congress to engage troops in combat.

    IVAW also alleges that there was no “imminent threat” from Iraq. Do you mean aside from shooting at our aircraft patrolling the skies over the No-Fly Zone while our aircraft enforced the UN-mandate? Like the three times in ten years that the Iraq Army drove their armored divisions to the Kuwait border and rattled sabers – causing us to deploy troops back to Kuwait?

    Or this;

    And why limit the prosecution to just the Bush administration? The Clinton Administration called Hussein an imminent threat on December 18, 1998;

    Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. … Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors. … Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.

    The IVAW also writes;

    IVAW further alleges that the Bush administration’s alterations to Iraqi laws were made for the intended benefit of U.S. multinational corporations and are illegal under international law.

    What has the Obama Administration done to correct the supposed changing of Iraqi laws?

    IVAW is just clinging to the last shred of their relevance while trying to avoid pissing off the Democrats.

    It is time for America to hold the officials responsible for this war to account for their decisions.

    Why just the Republican officials?