Category: Economy

  • Two More Things That Are Bush’s Fault

    The numbers are in! The AP Reports that:Homelessness is down and Productivity is up! Someone must be to blame…
    Oh, yeah, it’s Bush’s Fault! Good news from the economy again. But, but, the democrats told us that tax cuts were BAD, and would ruin the economy…

    The number of people who are chronically homeless dropped by nearly 12 percent from 2005 to 2006, according to government estimates being released Wednesday.

    The Department of Housing and Urban Development credited government programs designed to move homeless people into permanent housing.

    Twelve percent fewer homeless in ONE YEAR!

    The Labor Department reported that productivity—the amount of output per hour of work—jumped at an annual rate of 4.9 percent in the July-September quarter. That was double the 2.2 percent rise in the second quarter and represented the fastest surge in worker efficiency since 2003

    Productivity up 4.9 percent in Three Months! Fastest surge in efficiency in four years!
    Damn that Bush and his economic policies…

  • Precursor to 2009

    Last year Maryland had a Republican governor, Robert Ehrlich, and a $billion year over year surplus and a “rainy day” fund. Now, less than nine months after Democrat Martin O’Malley was sworn in as governor of Maryland – and during a substantial economic boom in the State, surpluses and “rainey day” funds are gone. In fact, the Democrat governor has called for a 20% increase in the state’s sales tax, an increase in income taxes and plans to tax the poor with legalized gambling.

    Marylanders are acting surprised that a Democrat would raise taxes – well, most of them, anyway. Yesterday they had a protest in Annapolis, the State Capitol reports the Washington Examiner;

    “No new taxes” was the rallying cry Monday of demonstrations by taxpayer, conservative and Republican groups around the State House.

    The relatively modest turnouts of about 300 people came just hours before Gov. Martin O’Malley was set to give a short pep talk to a special session of the General Assembly he called to raise a series of taxes.

    “I’m going to stand up and oppose every stinking tax,” said Del. Donna Stifler, R-Harford, typifying the comments of dozens of GOP lawmakers.

    Stifler said she was getting 80 to 100 e-mails and phone calls a day opposing any tax increases.

    And the guilty white people were there to counter-protest;

    Progressive Maryland, an organization of liberal social and labor groups, mounted its own quickly called rally to counter the Republican theme and support the governor’s tax package.

    “We believe the governor’s package represents by far the best deal for working families,” said Sean Dobson, executive director of the Progressive Maryland.  

    “Working families”. That’s the code phrase for non-working families. When Democrats claim something is good for “working families”, that means they’re going to screw the living shit out of working families. Paying taxes for 40 years has taught me that. 

    Former Governor Ehrlich also took the opportunity today to write an op/ed piece in the Examiner detailing the failures of the current administration;

    Here’s what leaders in Maryland don’t get: We don’t have a revenue problem; we have a spending problem. With creativity and slower budget growth, legislators can align Maryland’s spending with its needs without raising taxes.

    Yet they inherently believe that low taxes are a problem that must be “fixed” in order to expand government’s reach into our wallets and our lives.

    Nowhere is that more evident than the bloated salaries doled out to political appointees. The new administration approved a whopping 58 percent pay raise for the head of the Public Service Commission, who then forced a 50 percent increase in electricity costs on one million state residents.

    The new comptroller gave three of his aides salary increases to $150,000 each — on par with Cabinet secretaries with infinitely greater responsibilities.

    These raises may be small in the context of a $30 billion budget, but they speak volumes about Annapolis’s lack of respect for Marylanders’ money. So, as our government leaders rush to Annapolis this week to raise our taxes, ask yourself: Have they made a real attempt to tighten government’s belt?

    O’Malley has threatened to cut $1.7 billion out of the budget – which probably isn’t a bad idea – but he plans to cut essential spending like fire and police services instead of cutting out the wasteful administrative spending in surveys and victim pandering ostensibly to force Republican lawmakers to pay the political price for the Democrats’ wasteful habits. O’Malley’s probably afraid to cut the wasteful spending because no one would notice the cuts except the lobbyists and he wouldn’t be able to hold the Republicans hostage.

    Can anyone see this happening after the 2008 national election? So far, Republicans in the Senate and the President have been able to stop wasteful spending habits of the Democrat Congress to some degree – but I suspect that if we had a Democrat president, Republicans would cave on nearly issue to protect their jobs. Remember how the Hagel Gang caved to Democrat pressure on the Iraq War right after last November’s elections? Well, imagine eight years of that behavior on every single spending bill.

  • Higher taxes imminent in Maryland

    Well, when the electorate votes in Democrats they get higher taxes – that’s just the way Democrats work – it’s how they insure their jobs. Here in Montgomery County, we have Democrats as far as the eye can see – the governor proposed raising taxes and the Montgomery County legislators are falling right in line behind him, according to the Washington Examiner;

    Montgomery County Executive Isiah Leggett praised the governor for offering “a fair and comprehensive solution” to the state’s budget problems, and he said the counties would suffer by “shifting responsibility” for education and public safety.

    “We can’t use this as a scare tactic,” Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon said of the possibility of reducing funds.

    But “citizens need to understand” the consequences of cutting local aid, she added. “It could take us back two, three steps” in the progress made in the city.

    “A fair and equitable solution” – raise taxes. Fair and equitable to whom? Especially when one takes into account, in another Examiner article, Governor O’Malley wants to increase  Medicaid spending $250 million by adding another 100,000 people to the roles. Doesn’t that seem a bit at odds with his threats to slash spending by $1.7 billion?

    The proposal hinges on passing new taxes and slot machine gambling in a special session of the General Assembly that begins Monday, O’Malley said Thursday. The plan comes two days after he disclosed $1.7 billion in budget cuts he would have to make if the legislature does not raise taxes, including doubling the cigarette tax.

    “They are really part of the same mission to make our state a better place,” O’Malley said. “There is broad consensus in the General Assembly” for health care improvement. “If we’re unable to make progress, we will continue to backslide” on this issue.

    So, the truth is; O’Malley doesn’t really want to cut spending, he just wants to spend my tax money on paying off constituents for their votes. “Backslide” must mean that he’ll lose the elction in three years unless we fund his campaign with tax dollars.

    “It is very easy to be against tax increases in the abstract,” Howard County Executive Ken Ulman said. “We’re all making progress. The people in Howard County do not want their library system eroded. It’s time for the structural deficit to be solved at the state level.”

    In the abstract? The abstract being, I suppose, that I can’t afford to pay higher taxes and still be able to fund my retirement savings. When you’re talking about a state solution for your library in Howard County, you’re telling me to fund your library in your county where I don’t live. You’re shaking me down for your stupid library.

    In yet another Examiner article, a spokeman for Ike Leggett, the County Executive, touched briefly on the impending problem for the State of Maryland;

    “Our concern is not whether people making that much could or should pay more taxes,” Lacefield said. “… But one unintended consequence could be that people might not choose to live in Montgomery County. They can move across the district line, they can move to Virginia.”

    And then there goes your source of revenue – while you’re still stuck with bloated spending. Just like planning on the tobacco taxes to fund soending – if people quit smoking, no more revenue – but still higher spending. Doesn’t it take just a little bit of common sense to realize that maybe the problem is revenue – it’s spending you goofballs!

    I’ve seen it devastate the economy of New York State, and it can happen in Maryland – of course if it does happen, I’ll be watching it from across the Potomac.

  • Democrat economic childishness

    So who’s surprised? The Democrats get the power of the sound of their own voice in Congress again and they try to hammer the economy to pieces. This morning’s Wall Street Journal Washington Wire reports that Dennis Kucinich wants to do awy with private health insurance;

    Kucinich is calling for a pretty dramatic overhaul of the health-care system — abolishing for-profit insurance, for one thing, and instituting universal coverage.

    “Is health care a right or is it a privilege?” he said. “If it’s a right then it’s appropriate for the government to have a role. If it’s a privilege, then we’re left to the predations of the market – if you can’t pay for it, you’re out of luck.”

    When the WSJ’s Laura Meckler asked what would become of insurance companies, Kucinich said the government would buy them out. “Where there is a conversion of a for-profit institution to not-for-profit, there would be a market-value compensation,” he said. “You’re not going to have an expropriation here of resources.” He didn’t say how much that would cost, but said it would be funded with Treasury bonds.

    His health plan would be paid for by a higher Medicare payroll tax, a tax on stock transactions and higher income taxes on top earners.

    Yeah, that’s pretty looney – how many doctors are going to want to work for a government system, because that’s the end result. When we lived on the Canadian border in New York, the local hospital was staffed with Canadian doctors and nurses who didn’t want to work for the Canadian government – they’d prefer to drive over the Saint Lawrence River to get a decent paycheck instead of the “fair” wages of the government.

    S.A.Miller of the Washington Times writes that Charlie Rangel has done some major tinkering with the tax code;

    The Democrats’ top tax-writer yesterday introduced a massive plan to give tax relief to 90 million working families, a long-anticipated tax-code overhaul that Republicans criticized as the largest proposed tax increase in U.S. history.

    The bill would expand income-tax breaks for the middle class while limiting deductions and adding taxes on high-end earners, increase the tax rate on “carried interest” fund managers earn on investments, and cut corporate tax rates. The Democratic plan also would repeal the alternative minimum tax (AMT), because it is set to penalize middle-income families this year.

    House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel, New York Democrat, said the changes would provide Americans a “greater sense of equity and fairness” about the tax system.

    Whenever a Democrat talks about “equity and fairness” in the tax system and middleclass tax cuts, I grab my wallet. I’m middleclass, but the Democrats idea of equity and fairness is me shelling out a couple of thousand dollars a year in taxes.

    Key provisions include a refundable child tax credit, an increase in the standard deduction and enhanced earned income tax credit — relief measures aimed at the middle class. It adds fairness, supporters say, by targeting rich Wall Street elites with the higher tax on carried interest, which is currently taxed at the lower capital gains rate of 15 percent but the Rangel proposal would put under the higher personal income-tax rate.

    I’m sorry, but my retirement savings is in the hands of those “rich Wall Street elites” and they’ve been doing just fine so far – please don’t get them upset.

    The bill would recoup some of the revenue lost by repealing the AMT — about $800 billion in 10 years — by adding a 4 percent surtax on individuals earning $200,000 to $250,000 a year and a 4.6 percent surtax on individuals making more than $250,000 and families making more than $500,000 a year.

    I wonder why they never go after people with trust funds – like the Kennedys and the Kerrys. It’s always people who EARN over $200,000/year. How about taxing those people who SPEND over $200,000/year and don’t pay any taxes on it because they didn’t EARN it? I’m not in favor of raising anyone’s taxes – but if it has to be done, don’t target the people who producing and working to keep the rest of us employed, f’Pete’s sake.

    Rep. Jim McCrery of Louisiana, the ranking Republican on the committee, said the “crushingly high” surtax would hit about 10 million taxpayers directly, including small-business owners and farmers who report business income.

    “The damage will ripple throughout our economy,” he said in a memo to Republican committee members. “This is a massive tax hike on the engine that drives job growth in this country.”

    He also said Mr. Rangel is “selling pure snake oil” by claiming the bill offers tax relief for 90 million families, since the Democrat counted taxes that most families currently do not pay, such as the AMT.

    Hmmm, the Democrats want to insure people who can afford health insurance and save them money on taxes they don’t pay. Sounds to me like they’re just engaging in a little pre-election class warfare.

  • Third world Montgomery County, MD

    Life among the bluest blue staters is is difficult sometimes…this is one of those times. reading the Washington Examiner on my commute this morning, I could feel my blood pressure rise. On page 2 was an article that Montgomery County government flunkies (which borders the District of Columbia on the north and northwest and Virginia across the Potomac River) had heard reports that illegal immigrants are streaming into relatively safe Montgomery County to escape the law enforcement entities in Prince William County ;

    Montgomery County officials have received reports that illegal immigrants from Virginia are moving into the county after several Virginia counties began cracking down on them, officials in the county say.

    Juan, a Peruvian immigrant who declined to give his name because he does not have immigration papers, said that two weeks ago he left a “great job” driving a construction truck in Prince William County because of concerns about deportation. He previously made $16 an hour, had community college tuition partially covered and received health insurance from his Virginia employer. Now, he looks for day labor jobs on a street corner in Wheaton, but he hasn’t found one yet.

    “The police were going to stop me and ask for documents,” said Juan, who lives in Prince George’s County. “I decided not to go [to Virginia] anymore because if they deport me, then I’m not saving any money. … So I stay here, like many people do, because I can’t stay there anymore. My job is there waiting for me, but I can’t go there anymore.”

    Poor Juan. First of all, he’s wrong – the police in Prince William County, VA are only checking the immigration status of people they arrest – so unless Juan is planning on breaking any other laws (besides being here illegally), he probably won’t be checked by Virginia police. And second of all, if he went back to Peru and filed the paperwork he needed to file and proves he has a job here already, he’d probably be able to return quickly. But, I guess it’s just much easier for Juan to move somewhere else and continue being a criminal and complain unanomously to a reporter about it.

    But, see that’s not why I call Montgomery County a 3rd World country – it’s the legal residents of Montgomery County, the natives of Montgomery County that make it like a 3rd World country. Like Ike Leggett, probably the biggest idiot to ever occupy the office of Montgomery County Executive who said;

    “When one jurisdiction tries to force people to move around, they don’t leave,” Leggett said. “They either shift the burden from one community to another, or they go underground. That’s why this is not a solution.”

    First of all, who taught this imbecile to talk-an ape? Secondly, if all of the local governments applied the law equally, there wouldn’t be anyone to shift around – it’s bumbling illiterate morons like Leggett that have created this problem by making it attractive for people to break the law – knowing weak-kneed politicians wouldn’t have the guts to enforce our laws. Idiot Leggett blaming Prince William County for Montgomery County’s illegal immigrant problem is the very definition of ignorant imbecile.

  • Rangel proposes corporate tax cut

    I’m stunned – absolutely stunned. Charlie Rangel is proposing a 35% corporate tax cut that will replace the Democrat teddy bear tax break to induce companies to keep their business in the US according to Sarah Lueck in the Wall Street Journal;

    Rep. Charles Rangel (D., N.Y.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, has drafted legislation that would trim the 35% companies now pay to between 30% and 31%, according to people familiar with the bill. The change would be funded in part by eliminating an existing tax deduction for manufacturers aimed at keeping production in the U.S.

    Imagine – a Democrat that sees value in reducing corporate taxes. I never thought I’d see the day.

    Now, companies will have to weigh the impact of the rate cut against the other changes the legislation will include. Manufacturing companies, for example, would lose a deduction for domestic production that now reduces their tax rate on manufacturing income to 32%. But the lower corporate tax rate would be attractive and would apply to all income.

    Mr. Rangel’s corporate proposal is similar to an idea floated in a Treasury Department report released in July. The report suggested that getting rid of many of the tax preferences now available to corporations — including the manufacturing deduction — would generate enough revenue to reduce the corporate tax rate to 27%.

    I will admit that Rangel is indeed stalwart on fairer taxation (as opposed to his whackier social programs and his military draft ideas) – he’s been promising a revision of the Alternative Minimum Tax for years, though and I’d prefer he work on that before he gets a corporate tax cut.

    Lueck predicts in her article that Rangel will be the only sponsor of his corporate tax cut – I can’t see Pelosi standing beside him and advocating lower taxes for evil corporations and ending the outsourcing tax incentive. I suspect Pelosi’d explode before she does anything like that to her base.

  • The Cow and the Putz want a Woodstock Museum

    Also from the Examiner, written by Susan Ferrachio, more pork from the Senators for New York; “Schumer, Clinton get skewered over $1M Woodstock earmark

    It was a little like throwing a juicy steak into a pit of hungry lions. Republicans could hardly contain their glee Thursday at the prospect of skewering Democrats on the Senate floor over a $1 million earmark for a museum in upstate New York commemorating the 1969 Woodstock concert.

    The earmark was requested by New York’s two Democratic senators, Charles Schumer and presidential contender Hillary Rodham Clinton, who said the money would help build a performing arts center that could boost the area’s depressed economy.

    “I’m proud of this earmark, it’s the right type of earmark,” Schumer said on the Senate floor during a debate over a Republican amendment to remove the money from a health and human services spending bill.

    Yes, that’s what New York needs – a museum to celebrate smelly hippies. I’ll give Mr. Schumer a little history lesson about the “area’s depressed economy” – Mrs. Clinton should read, too, because I’m sure the carpetbagger doesn’t know about New York recent history.

    In the 70s, Upstate New York was a booming economy – manufacturing and retail facilities across the State. Several chain stores were founded there, auto manufacturers, typewriter-makers, breweries, even chocolate factories kept the hard-working locals employed. Then we got Mario Cuomo for governor.

    Before Cuomo, there was a six-month residency requirement before anyone could collect welfare in New York State – which paid some of the highest benefits in the country because the economy there did so well. Cuomo waived that requirement.

    Well, a blind man could see what would happen next – welfare recipients streamed into New York State from the South and cashed in on their good fortune. New York State’s economy flourished for a while, but the State government had a hard time paying out the benefits to so many people – so Cuomo’s answer to the problem was what you might expect from a tax-and-spend liberal. Raise taxes on businesses – and a blind man could also see the impending result. Businesses left New York for the lower tax States in the South.

    Now Upstate New York is a wasteland of closed factories and department stores. But Albany still can’t get off of the tax teat – despite 12 years of Govenor Pataki (who was quite a disappointment to me) – and Spitzer isn’t helping either. New York State is like a third world country – since there is no real money in the State, they depend on out-of-Staters to bring them cash in the form of tourist dollars.

    Now Schumer and Clinton want to perpetuate that strategy by using taxpayer dollars to build, of all things, a Woodstock Museum – a monument to sloth and marginal talent. Why attract musicians to New York State? They don’t have any money – that’s why they’re musicians. 

    UPDATE: Apparently the museum was shot down in the Senate, but I suspect that Republicans wouldn’t have blocked it if it’d been two different Democrats trying to spend tax payer dollars. For example, if the museum was being built in Nancy Pelosi’s district. 

  • Wake up, Republicans

    The other day I got an email from the RNC – it was addressed to me, by name, so I know that whoever sent it at least read enough of my blog to get my name right. It complimented my support of the party in my blog, announced the launch of new GOP blog and asked me to link that blog to mine. I get email like this occasionally – usually from less reputable people than the GOP. But I answered that I wouldn’t link the GOP to this blog, for the same reason I quit donating to the GOP and the Republican Senate Caucus three years ago – I don’t donate to the Democrats, why would I donate to Republicans acting like Democrats?

    Here’s a case in point; Timothy Carney, in the Washington Examiner this morning writes “Congress porks up waterways bill“;

    The Senate recently passed a bill authorizing money for the Army Corps of Engineers with a price tag of about $14 billion. The House version of the Water Resources Development Act passed at $15 billion. In a conference committee, lawmakers from both chambers hammered out the differences, and in the end came to a compromise: $23 billion.

    While not that unusual, this bill’s growth behind closed doors certainly defies the civics-textbook explanation of how a bill becomes a law. The 450 earmarks in the final bill, including many that appeared only in the final version, also don’t quite reflect the promises Democrats made after passing their “ethics reform” bill earlier this year. Looking closely at this legislation — and who stands to get rich off of it — gives a good education in the way Washington really works.

    So the bill almost doubled in spending from $14 billion to $23 billion. Although Carney lays the largesse squarely on the Democrats’ shoulders, I blame Republicans;

    President Bush has threatened to veto the bill. But having garnered 81 votes in the Senate and 381 votes in the House, Democratic leaders have enough votes to override a veto — and they are being lobbied hard to do so.

    81 votes in the Senate means 30 Republicans have their fingers in the pie – the Democrats had to give earmarks to at least 30 Republicans to garner their votes. It also means that at least 30 Republicans out of 48 are acting like Democrats. If whoever that was from the GOP who wrote me is reading this, now you have the reason you’re not linked to my blog.

    When the Republican Senate holds the line against spending instead of hoping the President does it for them, maybe I’ll open up my wallet and my blog to Republicans and the GOP organization. Until then, pound sand.