Carolyn Stewart spoke up about intelligence at CENTCOM evaluations of the war against ISIS being based on cherry-picked intelligence and now, contrary to whistle blower regulations, she’s being canned because some special snowflake heard her say curse words, according to the Daily Beast.
“I went to other action officers to avoid Ms. Stewart,” one witness explained to the judge, in support of the decision to reassign her.
[…]
Stewart’s alleged cursing came at a turning point in the war in Syria and against ISIS. In August 2013, the Obama administration was considering launching strikes in Syria for crossing the self-proclaimed “red line” and deploying chemical weapons. That same month, Stewart supposedly used foul language when a subordinate wrote an incomplete report. A year later, just after the self-proclaimed Islamic State took control of Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, CENTCOM alleged that Stewart cursed at a subordinate for filing an overtime form incorrectly.
OK, everyone in this crowd who qualifies for dismissal under these same conditions, raise your hands. Look around the room.
The Defense Intelligence Agency chief of staff, the third-highest ranking member of that office, testified for hours over why she decided that a few curses could not be tolerated in an office that helped determine which suspected ISIS members should be targeted for death from above….
Yeah, I’d like to hear that testimony. I’d like to hear why the occurrence of two usages of unsavory language can eliminate the protections written into the Code of Federal Regulations and the United States Code.
Thanks to Chief Tango for the link




