This ain't Hell, but you can see it from here

Category: Barack Obama/Joe Biden

  • Ted Nugent booted from Fort Knox concert

    Ponsdorf wrote the other day about Ted Nugent’s troubles with the Secret Service, who are apparently more concerned with the rocker’s rants than paying for their hookers (ladies of the evening, there’s a reason hookers have been getting payment up front for centuries). For those of you might have missed it, at an NRA convention, Nugent said;

    If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will be either be dead or in jail by this time next year.

    Nugent also recommends decapitating Democrats: “We need to ride onto that battlefield and chop their heads off in November.”

    Of course, Nugent threatening to “chop off their heads in November” is worse than Muslims threatening to do the same. But, anyway, Fort Knox has decided that Nugent’s fairly tame rant is too political for them to allow him at a concert there;

    Because the concert is taking place on a military installation, it “would be a conflict of interest since the military has the obligation to be apolitical,” he said.

    Brus said they don‘t look at political or social views when booking performers but that Nugent’s comments about the commander in chief crossed the line.

    Yeah, whatever. Thanks to Old Trooper for the link.

  • The Doggie Wars

    I know…it’s best to let sleeping dogs lie. But I swear, this bit about Romney not liking animals because he strapped a dog carrier to the top of his car and transported his dog in it has me wondering just what kind of wimps are running the Democrat campaign. Well no, that’s not entirely true. I confess that I’ve considered David Axelrod a wimp since the first time I heard his whiny voice. Can you imagine that wussified elitist standing in front of a formation and calling out commands? Or running beside one and calling cadence? Didn’t think so.
    So what, exactly, are the Democrats flapping their gums about in the Doggie Wars? Flapping ears? What, in their minds, was wrong with what Mitt Romney did in strapping Seamus, his setter, in a canine carrier on top of his car, granting Fido his fondest wish? It seems Axelrod and the Democrats are as out of touch with dogs as they are with ordinary people.
    Anyone who’s spent any time at all around dogs knows that the very thing canines love most about cars, well other than lifting a leg on alloy wheels, is an open window to poke their heads from as the oncoming airflow pushes back their gums into a joyful grin and their ears flap wildly about their heads. Out here in cowboy country, the border collies run freely in the backs of pickups and one thing you can bet the rent money on is that when the vehicle is in motion, the dogs’ muzzles are facing into the wind. Follow one of the trucks down the highway and you will often see the mutts running back and forth, from one side to the other, poking their noses around the cab. It almost appears that they are seeking the side with the greatest wind velocity.

    This is such a universal behavior that I recently asked our country veterinarian about it. She grinned and responded, “You know, you’re right…they do seem to love the wind, don’t they? I have no idea why.” So, while the why remains a mystery, the fact that dogs love the wind in their faces every bit as much as bikers, remains an observable truth. But the real mystery “why” is, “Why did the Democrats make Seamus an issue in the first place?” Why all the flapping gums over flapping ears? Good grief, please don’t anyone show those Democrat pussies these pictures or they’ll be soiling their silkies. Furthermore, the thought just occurred to me that those SEAL’s are making those poor puppies jump out of perfectly good aircraft because their chain of command has ordered them to do precisely that.

    And guess who sits atop that chain.
    Ahem…

    This is turning into a real dog-eat-dog situation for you-know-who.

    POSTSCRIPT: a talking head on FOX just reminded me that you-know-who likes to take all the credit for the success of the raid on Osama bin Laden. Well, excuse me, Mr. Axelrod, but doesn’t that mean that your dog-eating Dear Leader directly and deliberately caused a canine to come under hostile fire? Omigod, the horror of it all! And Axelrod wanted a Doggie War? What’s next in his brilliant strategy, attacking Romney because he didn’t have to pay his own college tuition?

  • A Whore by any other Name…

    Quick question: Just what is the difference between what the Colombian femmes de noché did for our Secret Service agents and their military support team and what the mainstream media is doing for their anointed leader, Barack Obama? Actually I have more respect for women who lay back and allow their bodies to be used for the carnal pleasure of strangers than I do for journalists who lay back and allow their educational and professional credentials to be debased and defiled by a political candidate and his party.

    Both are whores.

    But, as is so often true in this world, there are whores and then there are whores. Those who sell their bodies tend to do so because they have few other skills with which to earn a living. Media whores are a totally different thing. They don’t have to worry about basic sustenance of themselves and their families as do so many of the working ladies. Through their learned skills they can make their way in society. Why they then tend so debase themselves remains a mystery.
    It is an entirely different thing that is for sale here. The ladies in Colombia were selling their sexuality and perhaps some of their self-respect. How much self-respect a woman gives up in the profession of prostitution has much to do with the culture in which she lives. From the up-front and in our faces flamboyancy of the ladies in question, I would guess that in Colombia, the stigma is not great, an attitude entirely different from that of our own culture where selling one’s body is just one small step above the most disgraceful behavior in which one can engage:

    Selling your journalistic soul.

    There is no group in America more openly engaged in overt prostitution than our mainstream media. And don’t be too quick to say, “Wait a minute, real whores do it for money.” Well so do the media whores. If they are successful in promoting their lefty candidate, then their perceived worth therefore increases. When they fall on the losing side, then their incessant hammering of the victor throughout his term of office endears them to the losing demographic until such time as they can throw their weight behind the election of one of their own. Make no mistake about it, they are for sale, wholly, totally completely for sale. Brian Williams might as well be perched on a barstool in a down-at-the-seams, Manhattan bistro with even bigger blow-dried hair and plenty of leg showing. Sliding way down-scale, Ed Schultz would be right at home under a streetlamp in Detroit. Examples could go on for paragraphs but you get the idea.
    So the irony is we have media whores screaming about the immorality and irresponsibility of sexual whores and those who employ the services of those whores. For my money, The Democrats should patriate one of those Colombian prostitutes and make her their candidate for president. She couldn’t possibly be a sleazier sell-out than the loser they and their media hustlers are fronting now.

  • Member of British government puts bounty on US Presidents

    In what has historically been seen as an act of war, a left-wing Labour Party member of the upper house of British Parliament has apparently put out a $16 million bounty on President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush. The Baron Nazir Ahmed, a life peer of the House of Lords, placed the bounty in response to the US bounty on Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, the head of Islamist terror organization Lashkar-e-Taiba. HuffPo is reporting that Labour has since suspended his membership in the party. The Baron Ahmed is the first Muslim life peer in the House of Lords.

    It’ll be interesting to see the results of this investigation. Booting a life peer from the House of Lords is incredibly difficult and he’s a darling of the radical anti-war left. If it can be substantiated he said what he’s accused of saying and he really did place a unilateral bounty on the head of two US Presidents I’m even more interested to know what the Obama administration’s response will be. Being an election year we could even see the notoriously flexible Obama find some spine.

  • 5 service members confined in Secret Service scandal

    As an addendum to the previous post, the Associated Press is reporting that while the Secret Service members were returned to the States, 5 members of the military are confined to their quarters in Colombia, supposedly in relation to the same incident.

    White House spokesman Jay Carney said the incident with the military personnel stems from the same episode involving about a dozen members of the Secret Service who were called back to the U.S. for an investigation into possible misconduct.

    Carney referred questions about the episode, which includes allegations that U.S. personnel procured prostitutes, to the Secret Service and to the military.

    Carney said the president retains confidence in the Secret Service and said the incidents under investigation, which preceded Obama’s arrival, had no impact on presidential security.

    So I guess we know who will eventually take the fall for this shit; some troops who apparently caught the PTSD during multiple deployments during the Bush Administration solicited the poor innocent Secret Service agents who had never stuck their penises in anything that didn’t have fingers.

    Where’s the President’s continued confidence in the military, by the way?

  • Compared to Biden, we’re all “leading scholars”

    I love Bite Me Biden, I’m going to miss him after January. Apparently, according to the Washington Examiner, yesterday Bite Me told an eager crowd of reporters that Al Franken is a “leading legal scholar”;

    “He has been one of the leading legal scholars,” Biden said of Franken today, according to the pool report. He also said that Franken “is deadly serious” as a senator. He made the comments while recalling concerns that then-candidate Franken could not be taken seriously as a Senate candidate given his SNL work.

    Of course, compared to Joe Bite Me, Coco the Chimp is a leading legal scholar.

  • Silly me

    The subject line of this email from my BFF Barry HO was “Now we know who our opponent is” and silly me I didn’t think it was going to be about this;

    I thought maybe him and Biden had put their empty, pointed heads together and decided that our opponent is the Taliban, but, no they’re better at fighting Americans than they are at fighting our real enemies who want to kill Americans.

    I honestly don’t need anyone to “fight” for me. Just get out of my way and allow me room to fight for myself. Seriously.

  • ABC/Post poll: Republicans say war in Afghanistan “not worth fighting”

    The Washington Post writes a half-assed story (as usual) that leans heavily on a poll they did with ABC which says that a majority of Republicans who they polled say that the war in Afghanistan is not worth fighting. In their half-assed way, the Post strikes a glancing blow at Obama and merely touches on the reason that poll might have turned out that way;

    The poll findings are likely to present a challenge for Republican front-runner Mitt Romney, who has said that the goal in Afghanistan should be to defeat the Taliban on the battlefield.

    President Obama stepped back from that goal during his 2009 strategy review and has set the end of 2014 as the departure date for all U.S. combat forces.

    Overall, the Post-ABC News poll reflects a country bone-weary of war after more than a decade of fighting in Afghanistan and, until late last year, an almost nine-year engagement in Iraq.

    Romney is correct; the goal should be to defeat the Taliban (and al Qaeda) in Afghanistan, but as I’ve said countless times since the summer of 2009, victory isn’t even in the vocabulary of the Obama Administration. Their goal in Afghanistan begins and ends with “withdrawal” – I’m pretty sure that Republicans don’t support the war in Afghanistan, not because of it’s length or their bone-weariness. But because this administration has continued the presence of troops in Afghanistan just so he could ride on their shoulders into the next election. Witness the Post quoting his latest campaign meme;

    “For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq,” Obama told an audience in Hollywood, Fla., at a campaign fundraising event Tuesday. “And we’ve begun to transition in Afghanistan to put Afghans in the lead, bring our troops home.”

    You can play back an interview on YouTube that I did with Adam Kokesh back in early Spring of 2009 wherein I told Kokesh that I support Obama’s war policy, however, by the Fall, my support of his policy fell off when he ignored his generals’ recommendation for 60,000 troops and made a political decision to compromise between his generals’ recommendation and the anti-war crowd. At that point, I knew any decisions that came out of the White House weren’t going to be in support of our National Defense, or in support of our troops – it was going to be in support of Obama/Biden 2012.

    Republicans are disillusioned with the war in Afghanistan because they know what victory should look like, and we’re not going to see it Afghanistan. The only victory that the Obama Administration can see in Afghanistan is the one in November. Who wants to be the last to die in Afghanistan for the Obama/Biden 2012 campaign?