Category: Army News

  • Glen Coffee; NFL running back at Ranger School

    Glen Coffee; NFL running back at Ranger School

    Glen Coffee

    Glenwood Razeem “Glen” Coffee, Jr, after being a starting running back in his Junior year at the University of Alabama in 2008, became a third-round draft pick for the NFL in 2009 and he was picked up by the San Francisco 49ers. Before the 2010 season began, he retired from the sport after one year as a second stringer on the NFL team.

    According to ProFootballTalk, he told the Sacramento Bee that the NFL ruined too many lives;

    “As far as the NFL goes, I have a hard time putting it like this because it sounds kind of harsh, but I feel like it ruins a lot of lives more than anything else,” Coffee said. “And that goes for people who have short careers in the NFL and long careers in the NFL. Because what happens is they see that as success.”

    According to the Washington Post, he found Christ and football was no longer a dream.

    In 2013, he enlisted in the Army and he’s currently a specialist and part of the support staff for waterborne operations at the 6th Ranger Training Battalion at Eglin Air Force Base, near his home at Fort Walton Beach.

    The Post asked him if he is going to train to be a Ranger;

    “Not everyone can serve in combat arms, and not everyone can serve in a Special Operations capacity,” he said. “So that’s why I joined. I felt like I was able to do it. Physically and mentally, because there is a mental aspect to it, too.”

    Although not in Special Operations…he is asked regularly if he wants to attend Ranger School himself. The grueling leadership course is a minimum of 61 days long, with minimal sleep and food and stints at Fort Benning, Ga., and the mountains of northern Georgia before arriving in the swamps of Eglin Air Force Base.

    “That’s one of those things I ask myself right now, as a matter of fact,” Coffee said of attending the course. “Am I thinking about that because I want to do it out of pride, or because it would actually better me as a person? So, I’m debating that right now. I have to ask myself, why would I want to go?”

  • 2 women Ranger students advance to Florida swamps

    2 women Ranger students advance to Florida swamps

    The Washington Post reports that two of the three women who attacked the Mountain Phase of Ranger School have advanced to the Swamp Phase in Florida – the last phase of the school. So to recap;

    A third woman who advanced to the Mountain Phase was “recycled” along with 60 men. That means they did not advance, but will be allowed to try the course again and can still graduate later. All three women began the Mountain Phase on July 11 alongside 156 male students who also were attempting it for the first time, and 42 men who already were training in the mountains, but failed to pass there the first time. The phase includes 20 days of climbing, hiking, rappelling and patrolling in the mountains of the Chattahoochee National Forest, mostly with minimal sleep and little food.

    Good for them, I hope they both make through and prove that it is indeed possible for women to graduate at the current standard. But the Army has to decide whether it’s worth the cost to the force to continue a policy that doesn’t use the course of instruction to it’s best effect. 19 women started the course and 2 may complete it. That’s about 10% who will be successful. The washout rate among men from beginning to the end of the course is less than 50%.

    Thanks to Chip and Chief Tango for the link.

  • Army’s social media policy

    We got a copy of the letter from the Army’s ALARACT policy letter that we talked about the other day. It’s entitled “PROFESSIONALIZATION OF ONLINE CONDUCT” and it applies to active duty members, Reservists, Department of the Army civilians and family members (which means if your spouse can’t behave themselves on Facebook, you’re going to pay a price at work).

    WHEN USING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION DEVICES, MEMBERS OF THE ARMY TEAM SHOULD APPLY “THINK, TYPE, POST”: “THINK” ABOUT THE MESSAGE BEING COMMUNICATED AND WHO COULD POTENTIALLY VIEW IT; “TYPE” A COMMUNICATION THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH ARMY VALUES; AND “POST” ONLY THOSE MESSAGES THAT DEMONSTRATE DIGNITY AND RESPECT FOR SELF AND OTHERS.

    I do that every time I post, so it’s perfectly reasonable.

    PERSONNEL EXPERIENCING OR WITNESSING ONLINE MISCONDUCT SHOULD PROMPTLY REPORT MATTERS TO THE CHAIN OF COMMAND/SUPERVISION.
    ALTERNATIVE AVENUES FOR REPORTING AND INFORMATION INCLUDE: FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, SEXUAL HARASSMENT/ASSAULT RESPONSE AND PREVENTION, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, AND ARMY LAW ENFORCEMENT

    Yeah, I’d start at the lowest level and not lobby for an ARCOM at DoD if I ran into some sort of behavior that offended me, you know, if I couldn’t just click away from it.

    But here’s the whole policy letter if you missed it (I put it order now);

    ALARACT Policy1ALARACT Policy 2ALARACT Policy 3ALARACT Policy 4

  • Army to crack down on internet trolls in the ranks

    Dallas Wittgenfeld sends us a link to the Army Times article about the Army cracking down on “Harassment, bullying, hazing, stalking, discrimination, retaliation and any other type of misconduct” on the internet. Of course, Dallas, in his infinite wisdom and his inability to examine his own behavior, thinks that, somehow, this pertains to us.

    First of all, the Army’s policy only affects members of the Army and the DoD civilians. It doesn’t affect folks who have been retired from the Army for more than 20 years. Secondly, we don’t harass, stalk or bully anyone. We just publish facts about people, and if they think that telling the truth about them is somehow bullying, well, that’s their problem isn’t it?

    We don’t approve of the type of behavior that the Army seeks to regulate;

    [Behavior] that undermines dignity and respect are not consistent with Army values and negatively impact command climate and readiness,” said Paul Prince, an Army spokesman, in response to an Army Times request regarding the [All-Army Activities] message. “Soldiers or civilian employees who participate in or condone misconduct, whether offline or online, may be subject to criminal, disciplinary and/or administrative action.”

    We agree completely and many of the new commenters who engage in that type of behavior get whacked.

    Note to 1SG Moerk;

    Online-related incidents should be addressed “at the lowest possible level,” Prince said, adding that Army Regulation 600-20, “Army Command Policy,” contains “punitive language regarding harmful use of electronic media.”

  • Jumpmaster cited in Sergeant Shaina Schmigel’s parachute death

    Jumpmaster cited in Sergeant Shaina Schmigel’s parachute death

    Sgt.-Shaina-Schmigel

    SSG E sends us a link to the Army Times article about the investigation in the death of paratrooper Sergeant Shaina Schmigel during a jump in May over Fort Bragg;

    Sgt. Shaina Schmigel died during a nighttime static line jump May 30, 2014, over Fort Bragg, N.C. According to the investigation, Schmigel’s equipment was misrouted so that, when exiting the plane, she became a “towed jumper.” While be being towed, the subsequent jumper exited the plane and Schmigel became entangled in his T-11 parachute. Schmigel reportedly died from fatal lacerations to the throat and a broken neck. The entire incident lasted only 3 to 4 seconds, according to the investigation.

    The collision has likely knocked SGT Schmigel loose from being a towed jumper and her parachute deployed normally. No one, including the jumper who had collided with her, realized that anything was wrong until she found on the drop zone and she was unresponsive.

    The investigator found that the safety had only given a cursory check of her static line, and that the safety hadn’t accomplished his refresher training in a timely manner. Schmigel’s rucksack was too light by four pounds and the investigator claims that the accident probably wouldn’t have happened if she’d been jumping with a T-10.

    We reported Sgt Smigel’s death last month.

  • Three females remain in Ranger School

    Three females remain in Ranger School

    Female Army Rangers

    The Washington Post reports that all three women who are still in Ranger School have passed on to the second phase, Mountain Phase, of the course, having successfully completed the first phase.

    Army officials announced the result Friday, saying in a news release that 158 men and all three women will move on to tackle the next portion of Ranger School at Camp Merrill in Dahlonega, Ga., about 65 miles north of Atlanta, beginning Saturday. It was the third and final attempt for the remaining women, who had failed the initial Darby Phase at Fort Benning, Ga., twice before. A total of 362 men began the course with them June 21.

    Well, I congratulate them. they’ve certainly accomplished more than I accomplished during my military career, in regards to the physical aspect of the course. I may be one of the few people out here pulling for at least one of them to graduate, you know, since a female Ranger is in the cards, inevitably. It’s better for that graduate and all future graduates if they succeed at the current standard rather than some politically expedient standard designed to force a female graduate out of the course.

    I’ve seen folks on here asking whether it’s normal practice to allow soldiers a couple of shots at the course. I know of one fellow, before 9-11, who failed out of every phase for various reasons. He spent almost a year as a Ranger student until he finally graduated. I don’t know if they still do it, but I know that it’s not unheard of.

  • How the Army will cut troops

    The Washington Post got a look at the PowerPoint slides which details how the Army will slash troop strength over the next few years to get to the 450,000 number which has been mandated by the White House which wants to balance the budget on the back of our national security. The Post points out that number will bring troop strength to the lowest point since before the Second World War;

    The most significant cuts will occur at Fort Benning, Ga., and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richard, Alaska, where the 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, and the 4th Airborne Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, respectively, will be targeted. Each brigade combat team has about 4,000 soldiers, and will be reduced to a battalion of about 1,050, Army officials said.

    The 2nd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division in Hawaii will become a leg infantry unit, waving goodbye to their Stryker armored vehicles. Considering that the Pentagon’s focus is shifting to the pacific, that makes little sense. I think I’d rather face the Chinese hordes from inside an armored vehicle than from the bottom of a foxhole. Ask a Korean War veteran. The vehicles are being transferred to the National Guard’s 81st Armor Brigade Combat Team back on the mainland.

    Fort Hood in Texas won’t have any brigade combat teams eliminated, but nonetheless will drop from about 37,475 soldiers now to about 34,125.

    […]

    Significant cuts are also planned at Fort Bliss in Texas (dropping 1,219 soldiers to 25,146), Fort Bragg in North Carolina (cutting 842 soldiers to 38,830) Schofield Barracks (shedding 1,214 soldiers to 14,473) and Fort Stewart in Georgia (down 947 soldiers to 18,457)

    The Pentagon is also planning on reducing the number of DoD civilians by 17,000, as well. The talk I’ve heard indicates that the 450k number won’t be the end of it. Folks at the Pentagon have been told to expect another loss of 30,000 troops. It isn’t just the White House to blame – Congress isn’t stepping up and doing their job to “provide for the common defense” like the Constitution tells them they should.

    Thanks to Chief Tango for the link.

  • Army to announce another 30k reduction in troops

    Army to announce another 30k reduction in troops

    Yesterday, we talked about the Army drawing down to four hundred and fifty thousand troops in the next two years, but according to the Associated Press, that’s just the beginning. If the administration and the Congress can’t dismount from the sequestration pony, strength will fall another thirty thousand to 450,000 in the next few years;

    If a new round of automatic spending cuts, known as sequestration, goes ahead, the Army says it will have to reduce even further, to 420,000 soldiers.

    Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army chief of staff, has said he can accept the planned reduction of 40,000 soldiers over the next two years, which the Army plans to implement by trimming the size of numerous units. The biggest cuts would be to an infantry unit at Fort Benning, Georgia, and an airborne infantry unit at Fort Richardson in Alaska. Each would shrink from about 4,000 soldiers to about 1,050, defense officials said Wednesday. Those details were first reported Tuesday by USA Today. The full plan for specific cuts is expected to be made public by the Army on Thursday.

    The brigade (the 193rd Infantry Brigade) at Fort Benning was used as the round-out 3rd Brigade of the 24th Infantry Division when they deployed to Desert Storm, so reducing it to the size of a Battalion takes that out of the Army’s toolbox in case of an unplanned excursion, like Desert Storm where many units were cobbled together at the last minute.

    The Army complains that they can’t train and retain the force given the year-by-year funding from Congress, but it’s really not Congress’ fault entirely;

    It may not get any smoother anytime soon. Congressional Republicans are proposing to give President Barack Obama the extra billions he wants for defense in the budget year starting Oct. 1. But Obama says he can’t accept their plan because it maneuvers around spending caps in a way that does not also provide spending relief in non-defense areas of the budget. This portends a September showdown between Congress and the White House.

    So the White House, is going to hold defense spending hostage to fund the domestic spending, you know, like they always do. Of course, this gives our enemies hope. I’m sure ISIS thinks that these domestic political maneuvers are the light at the end of their tunnel, much the way that they thought that they could win in Iraq in 2006 when Congress changed hands because of the anti-war rantings of Reid and Pelosi.

    When are Congressmen going to contribute their salaries and operating costs to the sequestration process?

    Thanks to Bobo for the link.