Category: Antiwar crowd

  • Robert Jensen: There Are No Heroes In Illegal And Immoral Wars

    There was a time when I respected the opinions and thoughtfulness of college professors – of course, after spending time with them during my own college experience (it can’t be called an education anymore because I learned more in high school than I did in college) and afterwards, I’ve come to the conclusion that most educators in this country are idiots.

    Case in point; Robert Jensen is a professor of journalism at the University of Texas in Austin. Professor of journalism. One of his books is entitled “Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity”. His most current work is an article in OpEdNews entitled “There Are No Heroes In Illegal And Immoral Wars“. In that article he tries to make the case that because the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan aren’t legal war, there are no legitimate American heroes in those wars.

    Of course, we all know that those wars are legal, but somehow Jensen ignores the fact that both were sanctioned by the United Nations. But, for the sake of argument, let’s say that Jensen is right when he tells us;

    The legal case is straightforward: Neither invasion had the necessary approval of the United Nations Security Council, and neither was a response to an imminent attack. In both cases, U.S. officials pretended to engage in diplomacy but demanded war. Under international law and the U.S. Constitution (Article 6 is clear that “all Treaties made,” such as the UN Charter, are “the supreme Law of the Land”), both invasions were illegal.

    is that really what Article IV of the Constitution says? Let’s look at the whole paragraph, shall we?

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

    What the paragraph says is that the Constitution, the Public Laws AND treaties are the Supreme law of the land and JUDGES are bound by the Constitution, P.L.s and treaties. It certainly doesn’t say that treaties are the supreme law of the land all by themselves as Jensen would have us believe. Of course, he wrote that knowing the average lazy intellectuals of the Left wouldn’t bother to read the whole paragraph.

    By the way, Jensen, both the Afghanistan government and Iraq government had already attacked the US. The Taliban harbored al Qaeda leadership in Afghanistan. Countless missiles had been fired at US aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones over Iraq in enforcing UN mandates, an assassination attempt on former-president George HW Bush and no less than three times the Iraqi government rolled out it’s troops to the Kuwait border to rattle sabers in a threat of a replay of the Kuwait invasion – each resulting in an expensive redeployment of US troops to the region.

    Just because this idiot professor makes up shit to prove his point, it’s certainly not necessary for him tell the American troops they aren’t heroes. What would this doofus in Austin, among countless other doofuses, by the way, know about heroes and the real world? Ensconced in his cramped college office, writing books about how he lost his masculinity watching porn. A journalism professor who can’t read the Constitution properly and quotes selectively from that sage document (stealing the argument, by the way from a communist lawyer by the name of Marjorie Cohn).

    Of course, the anti-war far Left is reproducing this specious anti-scholarly work across the internet as proof of something. That’s the danger of giving out degrees and teaching jobs to imbeciles.

  • VoteVets on Cordoba House

    I hinted in the TAH Facebook Fan page about this the other day. Those peckerwoods at VoteVets have decided that President Obama’s endorsement of the building of the Cordoba House is the greenlight they need to weigh-in on the issue. First Tony Camerino, VoteVets member who blogs at VetsVoice writes in the Huffington Post;

    Imagine an al Qaeda recruiter attempting to sway a potential charge by citing an imaginary American war against Muslims but having to face the counterargument that Americans built a Muslim community center near the site of the former Twin Towers.

    Yeah, that’s just how any al Qaeda recruiter would phrase the situation. Or maybe, more likely, an al Qaeda recruiter would point out to a prospective recruit that they’re winning against the Americans since we acquiesced on this important issue. But this isn’t the first time Camerino has used his former profession as an interrogator to lend credence to the president’s policies using his position at the Soros Foundation.

    Then we have little Jon Soltz, also writing in the Huffington Post about the issue – of course, the Army captain who attacked a young sergeant at the Yearly Kos three years ago pleads with veterans to sign his petition and support the project;

    when we signed up for service, we swore to uphold the Constitution. For all the talk these days from some quarters about the importance of protecting the Constitution and allowing the free market to work unfettered, those same people are fighting against a person’s right to buy property and worship freely. Our duty to protect the Constitution doesn’t end when our service does. It’s up to us to stand up for the right for all Americans to enjoy the Constitutional freedoms that so many around the world don’t have.

    Aside from the fact that the issue isn’t about religious freedom (the Bill of Rights was written to protect citizens from the government…not from each other…so far the government hasn’t interfered, so Soltz should really avoid a career in law), it’s about common decency and mutual respect.

    The letter Jon Soltz wants veterans to sign is addressed to Sharif El-Gamal, the developer of the planned Cordoba House – yes, it’s a letter of support to the intended beneficiaries of the facility. Quoting from Tony Camerino Soltz writes in that letter;

    …allowing the Community Center to move forward will deal a blow to the propaganda of al Qaeda and Islamist extremists….

    Isn’t that logic so naive that you just want to run out and buy Soltz a teddy bear?

    And for an added bonus, Vets Today’s Robert Hanafin urges his robots to sign the VV letter to deal a blow against the Judeo-Christian Crusade;

    And Hanafin hopes that IVAW will take up the mantle of Vote Vets, too, with their “thousands” of members. And all the crazy intersects at Tony Camerino and Jon Soltz. yeah, let me sign that letter and be associated with those clowns.

  • Latest message from the land of Rainbows and Unicorns.

    I really have a strong love/hate relationship with this group. On one hand I respect that while other people talk about what is going on in Afghanistan they are there and have been for quite a while. They are trying to help by talking to the population to give a connection to the people outside of Afghanistan. But that is where the respect ends.

    On the other side they have managed to do nothing productive besides making feel good videos with such generic like “Why not love”. Think Bobby Whittenberg without the anger management issues. Todays videos are no exceptions.

    To make matters worse and more insulting is that JTC has been working with people that have not only not using him as a way of finding out how to have a direct impact on Afghanistan with needed supplies and other items, but actively ignored it. Preferring to make stories about how nothing we are doing is working and indirectly giving press to the Taliban. Yes DC am talking to you on this one.

    Stop making the risk that these people are taking in vain and get a program started to see that they are not just wasting their time and health.

    Like now, yes you Rethink Afghanistan, get off your computer and do something about this.

  • More UtH propaganda

    More video of the Fort Hood protest.

    I hate to keep bring these ‘tards up, but ya know it’s my job….

    I guess the funniest part is towards the end when Matthis keeps loving the bullhorn and the buses are miles away. “Die for your government”. And the video editor has to slo-mo the protesters blocking the buses to stretch it out to three seconds.

    Yeah, I see dogs, but still no automatic weapons.

  • Responses to the Fort Hood Protests.

    Some of the responses to the Fort Hood protest Fail are worth looking at.

    This was posted over on the Rag Blog, a site I have been following for sometime now. So I wanted to highlight two posts there.

    Great story, Al, and three cheers for these courageous war resisters! This is how the war in Viet Nam was finally brought home, by the active participation and leadership from veterans and now, as significantly, from active duty family members.

    I also remember the Oakland draft protests that stopped the troop trains in, I think, 1965 Based, as are these present protests, in total solidarity with the soldiers who are being sent to die in the meat grinder of capitalism.

    We know why kids enlist. Fun, travel, adventure — and now, promises of relevant training and education in a tight, competitive employment market. For working single parents, it can be the only way to support a family. And certainly, the courts continue to channel youthful offenders to the military to get some “discipline”.

    But the so-called all-volunteer military is no more voluntary than it has ever been. In times of economic prosperity, a draft is needed to support the personnel requirements of war. In times of recession or depression, it isn’t. But we don’t have to send our military off to fight and die as oppressors. Can’t we think of useful, peaceful work that can be done here?

    Besides the obvious, has anyone even heard of these Oakland protests? If they did happen in 1965 you can see how much of a impact they really had. Very similar to the Fort Hood protests.

    The second was was to me.

    I say RIGHT ON to the veterans & military family members who took part in this blockade/protest action!!!

    @ masterspork who suggests we should be “looking into Matthis Chiroux past” I have this to say:

    In March 2008 Matthis was a soldier at the US Army’s 5 Corps in Heidelberg Germany when myself and another Vietnam vet named Darnell Summers addressed the troops during a 24 protest at the entrance to this base. I ended my speech saying:

    “To you other men and women on guard duty or listening out of the barracks windows I have this to ask: Are you going to be a sucker for the lying politicians? Are you going to be a mindless fool and obediently march off to take part in the murderous occupation of people in a foreign land who never did you any harm? Or are you going to follow the great traditions of GIs during the Vietnam War by Refusing, Resisting and Rebelling against this unjust war? The choice is your’s. Do the right thing!”

    I first directly met Matthis in April 2009 immediately following the mass anti NATO protests in France which I also took part in.

    To see a news article about his role during this 4 day protest action see:

    From these past actions; through his flag burning back in March of this year; up to his present work supporting GI Resistance Matthis appears to be following the slogan of the GI Movement during Vietnam: “MAKE YOU OWN HISTORY–OR THE MAN WILL MAKE IT FOR YOU!!”

    So once again it is more important about what he is supporting then who he is. Also this person goes by the name Dave. Does that ring a bell about who this person is?

    Also with this in mind I found a article that states that the “anti-Troop” message of the Vietnam era protesters was just a myth of the media. I wonder if when they will do that for the OIF/OEF.

  • 4,000 US imperialists to invade another helpless crap hole

    Well, actually, the USS Kearsarge group is setting sail for Pakistan later this week to lend aid and comfort to Pakistanis ravaged by floods. But how long before we start seeing “Out of Pakistan” signs like we did earlier for Haiti?

    The group originally was scheduled to deploy in September. The Navy said earlier this month that the departure would be moved up because of the massive flooding, which so far has claimed 1,600 lives and affected nearly 20 million.

    The group is expected to be gone for seven months. After their work in Pakistan, they’ll continue with their previously planned tour around the Middle East.

    I wonder if the Under the Hood crowd will be protesting this deployment. Like Pablo Paredes, a future IVAW member who refused to board his ship, the USS Bonhomme Richard, in San Diego as it set sail to relieve the destruction of the tsunami which struck Indonesia in 2004. He said he did that to avoid service in iraq. he was only off by a few thousand miles.

    Regardless of the money we’ll spend helping flood victims, somehow it’ll be tied to an increase in terrorist ranks.

  • What Under the Hood really looks like

    Yeah, I know three days straight of this stuff, about Under the Hood and IVAW board members protesting one single day at Fort Hood. But every day they release something that they think is significant, and an unjaundiced eye can see that the protesters are a bunch on pussies and morons. You can sit through the entire ten minutes of this video is you want, but actually the first ten seconds and the last minute are you really need.

    Five people stop six buses for three seconds, Bobby Whittenberg gets thrown to the ground by cops while the other four move back (I don’t see any automatic weapons or dogs like Matthis claimed in yesterday’s press release). It makes me sick to my stomach that this is being trumpeted across the internet as some great meaningful event. Five ignorant turds hopped up on free coffee stand on the side of the road and shout idiot chants.

    They tout the fact that they weren’t arrested like it’s a sign that the police secretly support them. That America is behind them. If any of them had a brain in their skulls, they’d look at how no one shows up for their antics and arrive at the conclusion that no one cares what they think – especially since they spent nearly a month begging people to join them.

    Total freakin’ success. Hu-Man!

  • Today’s lecture from the Left

    So I got this email this morning from someone I’ve never heard of before now. Apparently she thinks I used one of her articles in discussing serial terrorist Bradley Manning. I can’t find where I ever used her tripe. A quick Google search turned up her masters thesis on saving some bids somewhere, but nothing on her Brad Manning article.

    In any event, here’s her vacuous lecture;

    name = Charlotte Sheasby-Coleman
    email = xxx@xxx.com
    comments = Hi “thisainthell”.

    Re your comments on Bradley Manning and the article “Please Don`t Shoot the Messenger“, I wrote the article and so I am happy to respond, although I do not, of course, speak for Bradley Manning. We don’t know if he is the source of the leaks but, if he is, I support him and hope that the sharing of real information about the wars will help to end them and usher in a better future. As for the message from Bradley, or whoever is responsible for the leaks, how’s this — rather than bringing democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan, and security to the United States, the invasions have further destabilized the fragile Middle East, have created a breeding ground for terrorists and have ensured that thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of hitherto peaceful Iraqi and Afghan citizens now hate the U.S. and may embrace radical Islamic sentiments that they never would have before. The fact that thousands upon thousands of those people have died and suffered because of American/coalition action and that thousands of young coaltion soldiers have died needlessly is abominable. The message being delivered is that arrogant American foreign policy as well, as the apathy of the people who vote for the people who deliver it, is responsible for death and destruction and hatred that completely overwhelms the horrors of what happened in New York and elsewhere on 9-11. The ultimate message being delivered is that acknowledgement of our shared humanity, respect and the desire to work towards a peaceful co-existence on our planet, is the only thing that will ensure that our children and grandchildren and this earth we live on will survive. How’s that for a message?

    In peace, Charlotte

    I’m pretty sure that dear Charlotte would never see a legitimate reason for the US to apply force of arms to any situation. And I’m not sure who she thought she was talking to, that’s why I shared this with you – because her message is wasted on me. So you can respond to her.