A few years ago, Michael Moore made a coupla million bucks explaining to the world that “there is no terrorist threat”. Now, several hundred human bombs later, he explains why “we’re not broke”;
Thanks to ROS for the video.
A few years ago, Michael Moore made a coupla million bucks explaining to the world that “there is no terrorist threat”. Now, several hundred human bombs later, he explains why “we’re not broke”;
Thanks to ROS for the video.
Fox News reports that the USS Enterprise has left it’s station off the coast of Somalia and is steaming towards the Suez Canal and it’s ultimate destination, Libya with 13 captured pirates still aboard from their adventure last week. The Marines are looking for a force to place aboard the USS Kearsarge which is also steaming up the Red Sea entrance to the Suez.
The Washington Post reports that the US Treasury Department is busying itself freezing Libyan assets in US banks and their overseas branches.
In Geneva, U.S. and European leaders focused on sending aid to rebels and refugees, toughening sanctions and calling for the ouster of Gaddafi, who has ruled Libya for more than 41 years.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, addressing a meeting of the U.N. Human Rights Council, announced new efforts to stem the Libyan humanitarian crisis. Some $10 million in relief funds have been set aside by the U.S. Agency for International Development, and two teams of experts are being dispatched immediately to Libya’s borders to assess the refugee crisis and organize the delivery of aid.
Of course, these are not any of the things that Clinton’s husband did when hundreds of thousands of Rwandans were murdered – arguably a much larger crisis than Libya. The only difference is that the Libyans have oil and production has declined considerably in preceding weeks. At the pumps, Americans are feeling the pinch as gas soared seventeen cents in the last week. Of course, there’s no Halliburton or Dick Cheney or evil genius idiot McBushitler to blame, so no one is really interested in gas prices…well, except you and me.
Besides, Obama is doing all of the things that Bush did to Hussein in the run up to the Iraq War – isolating Qaddafi, cutting off his money, planning no-fly zones to protect dissidents, and Obama gets to do all of that stuff without members of Congress standing on the roof of Gaddafi’s palace announcing that Gaddafi is more trustworthy than Obama. There are no human shields streaming towards Libya.
You’d think Code Pink would have something to say about the US military forming up for war fighting with Libyan military…but you’d be wrong. Code Pink was marching across the San Francisco Golden Gate Bridge today “in solidarity” with the Egyptian people.
Obama just a few minutes ago, without ceremony, issued the first deep water drilling permit since the Deepwater Horizon exploded. Too little too late.
So after voting present on Libya for weeks, he’s counting on the military to pull his narrow ass out of a jam.
Sure enough with Retired General McChrystal, and General Petraeus, Rethink Afghanistan is calling for the firing of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell.
Lt. Gen. William Caldwell’s use of psychological operations (“psy-ops”) experts against Senators and congresspeople visiting Afghanistan is outrageous, and Caldwell should resign immediately.
Caldwell is one of Petraeus’ most important subordinates in Afghanistan, charged with training the Afghan National Security Forces. According to Rolling Stone, he sought to use psy-ops specialists to manipulate Congress into providing more funds and troops for the failing war in Afghanistan.
He and his staff reportedly sought psy-ops experts’ help to “secretly manipulate the U.S. lawmakers without their knowledge,” and wanted “pressure points” to “leverage” when pushing visiting legislators for funds. When they balked, a Caldwell spokesperson shouted, “It’s not illegal if I say it isn’t!”
Caldwell’s actions are disrespectful, dangerous and illegal. We demand his immediate resignation. If he will not give it, the president should fire him.
Really? This is getting birther level crazy. I think someone has watched Dr Strangelove too many times.
ADDED: Here is a good reply to the Stones article. Thanks again to Spade for the find.
Jeremy sends us a link to an article in the New York Times that celebrates Midshipman, Then Pacifist: Rare Victory to Leave Navy. Michael Izbicki graduated from the Naval Academy and then got a degree in computer science at Johns Hopkins, and then he decided that being in the Navy is wrong.
Navy officers tried to persuade Mr. Izbicki to consider alternatives to discharge: Could he become a Navy medical officer or dentist? He replied that his pacifist beliefs were irreconcilable with any effort to prepare troops for battle. “I could not contribute in any way whatsoever,” he said.
Mr. Izbicki said he had made no plans for the future other than a return to his parents’ home in California. His discharge, he said, “has opened the whole world up to me.”
Funny how none of “his beliefs” occurred to him until he’d completed his studies and it was all paid for by the American taxpayer. The article doesn’t say whether or not he’ll be burdened with a bill for not completing his commitment.
And I’m sure the Quakers will be glad to pay it for him.
Maybe getting a couple six-figure bill for his education will open up the whole world of work for him.
I hate writing book reviews, but since this one was written by Tony Camerino (aka Matthew Alexander), I felt a responsibility to keep you updated, since I’m the guy who tracked him down and came up with his real name. So Camerino wrote another book under his alias, Matthew Alexander entitled Kill or Capture: How a Special Operations Task Force Took Down a Notorious al Qaeda Terrorist about his two months in Kirkuk tracking a Syrian named Muhammed.
Of course, the theme of this book follows the theme of his first “How to Break a Terrorist: The U.S. Interrogators Who Used Brains, Not Brutality, to Take Down the Deadliest Man in Iraq” – the story of how Zarqawi was located. As I mentioned in my review of his first book, no one was able to verify that Camerino was the guy who broke the guy who gave the interrogators information leading to Zarkawi’s demise. Camerino claims that everyone hated him so he had to interview the detainee off of the books, so there is no record of Camerino getting the information using his techniques (which, by the way, weren’t his techniques because he admits that he learned the techniques at the “schoolhouse” at Fort Huachuca).
From what I’ve learned, everybody does hate him, so that much is true. But not because he’s some guru of everything OSI (the Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations). He’s a dick and when everyone at the OSI convention last year found out who he is (somehow), no one even wanted to talk to him. Especially when they learned he was living on Soros Foundation money.
Well, as soon as you open his second book, you begin to hate him as he tells us how he shaved his sandy blond hair and hung up his surf board to answer his country’s call. I hate those guys. As near as I can tell from his military records, after several months of training, he spent four months in Iraq and from those four months, came two books on what a special expert he is on interrogating Iraqis and al Qaeda. Four months. There are interrogators who have that much time in the shitter in Iraq.
But, anyway, let’s get to the story. It’s a simple story, really; The Stryker platoon he’s with captures a guy. The guy claims he doesn’t know anything, but if Camerino let’s him go, the guy will find out stuff for him. So Camerino recommends to his commander that they let him go, so on that recommendation, the commander releases the guy. Then they lose track of him, then they catch another guy who tells them that the first guy was their target Muhammed so they spend the rest of the book trying to recapture the guy that Camerino recommended that they release. So much for Camerino’s new methods of interrogation, huh?
Throughout the story, he interjects innuendo and hints that Abu Garaib and Guantanamo rumors make his job so difficult. No proof, just blather. At one point, an infantry captain grabs a detainee by throat with one hand and briefly cuts off the detainee’s air in front of Camerino. That’s it – that’s all of the detainee abuse Camerino sees. And he doesn’t report it, so, if it happened, Camerino must not have thought it was very important at the time. He doesn’t even mention the Captain’s name, so how do we check to see if it happened?
Through out the book, he tries to convince us that his life is harder than an infantryman’s life. That’s just immature and he tries too damn hard. Like that commercial the Air Force did last year claiming AF basic training was tougher than the Marines.
And, as most of you know, I’m a professional editor and little shit bothered the piss out of me. For example, in one part of the book, he tells us that something “peaked” his interest. It’s “piqued”, damn it! How did an editor not catch that? Well, besides me. And also, throughout the book, in referring to the various branches of the armed services, every service was all lower case letters, like “the army”, “the air force”, “the marines”. I don’t know if it was intentional or not but it bugged the shit out of me.
One telling feature of the new book is that it wasn’t published by the same publisher as the first. That’s because he never even made his advance back on the first book and the first publisher wasn’t willing to get burned again. The first book wasn’t that bad, but he sold it in televised interviews as an anti-Bush book instead of letting it stand it’s own merit, and everyone knows that the anti-Bush crowd can’t read past the title and have no money. Most of his interviews about the book were on the defunct Olbermann Show, so I don’t see him on a book tour these days. Maybe he is, I didn’t look, really.
The back of his new book has his testimony to Congress on torture based on his four months of experience in Iraq. And the very last part is an ad for “Open Society”. If you Google the Open Society Foundation, you’ll see it sits on soros.org’s servers. What else do you need to know?
Hmm.Longest post I’ve written in a while.
Should have known this was coming since I first read about it.
The provincial governor of Kunar province, Fazlullah Wahidi, told AFP that military operations and airstrikes have killed 63 people in the past week, alleging most were civilians including 20 women and three elderly men.
He said they were killed mostly in air raids by NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) against suspected rebels in Kunar.
“In total 63 people have died,” he said, adding that at least 20 of the civilians killed were women, 27 were males – the youngest just seven – and three were elderly men.
However they leave out minor details like these.
Another patient there, Hamidullah, 21, who like many Afghans uses only one name, described an air attack and subsequent occupation of his village, Haigal, by Afghan Army soldiers over the last three days and said that 26 of his family members were killed or wounded. He conceded that the area had been used to launch attacks on NATO convoys.
“I am not sad that I lost my family members,” he said. “They died for God, and I am also willing to die. If the infidels kill me, then it is something that God wishes. These people will, I am sure, God willing, be defeated. I hope God destroys Americans.”
Or this
The NATO account said the assault began around 7 p.m. Thursday and lasted for five hours. The target was Taliban fighters who were gathering on a hillside, said Rear Adm. Gregory J. Smith, the strategic communications chief. After reviewing footage of the assault and intelligence, he said that he saw no sign that civilians or civilian houses were attacked, but that it was not possible to rule it out entirely.
But in response Rethink Afghanistan is accusing the ISF of blaming the “victims” of these attacks.
Let me tell you something else I understand about human psychology. I get, Warren, that you can’t shoot people if you actually think they are like you. I get that you have to make them less than yourself in order to harm them. I get that… you cannot continue to serve unless you continue to “otherize” your enemies.
I know you are a medic. So was my father. But you are still part of the war machine.
Yea, and who is the one who is generalizing now?
It seems that the argument that if we only send back 150 troops from Afghanistan then the entire problem in Wisconsin. Also you think that those that get sent back will not need funding? Or the fact that it ignores how those in Wisconsin got themselves into this mess. Kinda like the same short sighted idea that was put out a few months ago.
Also it completely ignores the fact that several budgets have been put forward to cut troop levels in active service by 70,000 and over 78 billion in cuts. So you really think a additional 150 soldiers will have that much affect on State budget issues?
Added:Oh and if this was not bad enough, lets have this on Russia Today for more fuel for propaganda of which the IVAW is so fond of giving to RT.
It seems that the one of the many groups that will be cut off from funding is a group called US Institute of Peace At first glance I thought that it might be a side project from groups like Veterans for Peace. But it seems that it has been around for awhile saying that they gave a review about Iraq headed by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Congressman Lee Hamilton. So when it’s funding was cut people on Facebook were quick to respond about their disapprove.
“How ironic, even as our nation is at war in Afghanistan and shifting from war to peace in Iraq, that anyone in Congress could decide that now is the right time to undermine a proven, innovative congressional institution on the frontlines — helping US men and women in uniform, and on the civilian side, to save lives,” USIP President Richard Solomon wrote at Politico Thursday.
What training? Has anyone here heard of anything benefiting to the situation in any form or action? If so I certainly did not see it.
Of course some of the facebook comments give the stereotypical reply.
We are still fighting 2 wars.With whom?With shadows of ourselves.How anybody can call it wars??We invaded 2 countries on very questionable base.No MWDs in Iraq.But,they have had capacity,like GWB said.Yes,capacity.Al Qaida in Afganistan?Fab…ricated as we please.8 years bloody spending and we are very close to VICTORY.Victory??You read me??We lost it very next day we started.No win situation.We are biggest Warmongering country in the world ,but we are #1 in global peace achievement.Something is deadly wrong about this picture.Almost in all our allies countries,people protesting against government,who is pro America.Government only-not citizens.How long we can sustain the satus-quo bribing governments to our interests ??The game is over I think.
Ugh, yea is about all I can say to that without going crazy trying to reply to that one.