Author: Poetrooper

  • Struck by Lightning

    For years I’ve watched from a distance as our military services struggled to bring forth a 5th Generation, Joint Strike Fighter. As with all new major weapons developments this one has had plenty of naysayers and numerous setbacks during its creation. Most of the criticism has come from former military pilots who could not envision any aircraft being able to successfully meet the needs of their own service while simultaneously doing so for the other two military services. I confess to having joined that chorus of critics when the air Force announced it would be sending the A-10 Warthog to the barn once the F-35 was fully operational. Like most who read here, my criticism was born out of a very limited knowledge of the F-35’s battle space role and capabilities. We grunts complained that we didn’t need a high tech fast burner covering our butts, we need something low and slow with a fearful strafing cannon like the Hog.

    Well our complaints were heard and DoD put a hold on the Hog killers, ensuring it’s continued protective presence over our ground forces in current combat areas around the globe for a few more years while the developing Lightning II gets refitted to handle a strafing cannon. In the meantime the Air Force, Navy and Marines have continued to build their operational F-35 squadrons with those birds now rolling off the production line. Because the Lightning II is such a complex weapons platform, all three services are staffing those squadrons with their very best pilots and it is their evaluations of this aircraft that I have been waiting to hear. They are now speaking up, to the extent the government will allow them and what they are saying is that while there are still bugs to be worked out, this is the most amazing aircraft they’ve ever flown.

    Back in February the Air Force hosted Red Flag 17-1, their hyper-realistic combat flying exercise at Nellis AFB in Nevada (I had a friend fly his plane into the ground when he became too engrossed in a dog fight). For the first time, the Lightning II was a participant and aviator eyes all around the world were fixed on the exercise to see whether they were right or wrong about this much maligned aircraft. Well, if they bet on the bird, they made some bucks. The actual performance numbers vary but only in a good sense. The worst I’ve read anywhere is that the Lightning’s kill ratio was 14 to 1in air to air combat while the official report is 20 to 1. Those air combat kills were accomplished while the F-35’s and their pilots were also managing the battle space for far greater numbers of F-15’s, F-16’s, F-22’s and even close air support aircraft of various types. I don’t know if A-10’s were involved but common sense dictates they should be.

    And therein lies the rub, as they say. I think most of us ground-pounders envisioned the F-35 as just another fast burner with minimal capabilities in CAS. At Red Flag, due to their ability to fly undetected by the very realistic anti-air defenses set up at Nellis, they were the lead aircraft to enter the battle space where they destroyed virtually ALL the air defense positions, freeing the battle space of threats to the sorties of other aircraft following. Then, due to their ability to see the entirety of that battle space to a far greater distance and in far greater detail, the F-35’s were able to take stand-off positions where they successfully directed the other friendly aircraft to their targets while maintaining a protective air cover. The pilot interviews are universally positive, informative and reinforcing of my growing opinion that we just may have developed a winner here despite all the critics. I was particularly struck by a pilot from one of the two operational squadrons at Hill AFB, UT, who flew in RF 17-1, where he revealed that he and his amazed fellow pilots are continuously learning even greater capabilities of the aircraft as their leadership frees them to explore just what it can do. As those constraints are lifted, they are finding more and more to like.

    The Marine version of this aircraft will be of particular benefit because of its vertical take-off and landing capabilities which allow it to be carried aboard amphibious assault ships and other smaller craft that transport Marine expeditionary units. Even if there is no carrier task force in range, any Marine landing force will have state-of-the-art air cover in the F-35B sitting right offshore no matter how remotely deployed they may be.

    The more I learn about this aircraft, particularly from the young men whose lives will depend on its performance in combat, the more confidence I have that we birthed a wonder and not a boondoggle as the critics contend. Yes, it’s damned expensive but the unit costs decline substantially with mass production and at this time several governments other than the U.S. have committed to orders that could come to 700 aircraft in the next few years, and that’s in addition to the almost 2500 the United States intends to purchase. One nation’s imprimatur that impresses me is that of Israel, which already owns a handful of F-35’s and intends to buy a total of 50, and, no, I’m not Jewish. I do, however, have great respect for their military acumen and their pilots refer to the Lightning II as “awesome.”

    Like me, I think they’ve been struck by lightning.

  • A Patriotic Portrait of Liberal Stupidity

    A Patriotic Portrait of Liberal Stupidity

    Most of us shake our heads in wonder at the insistence of Hollywood in making movies and television series that are so relentlessly politically liberal as to alienate nearly half their potential customers. In a business that rarely produces the Hollywood Blockbuster of old, an industry that constantly faces meager ticket sales and declining television ratings, common sense should dictate that it just might improve the bottom line if that industry would quit insulting the politics and beliefs of so many of its prospective viewers.

    But no, the disdain for conservative views and conservative people continues as in this picture now appearing at Breitbart and across the Internet just in time for our nation’s birthday:

    The Hollywood genius pictured is one Debbie Gilpin who plays a wrestler in a Netflix series, GLOW, about the 1980’s women’s’ wrestling scene in Los Angeles. Gilpin, whose wrestling and acting persona wears patriotic colors and is dubbed Liberty Belle, tweeted the image with this:

    Liberty Bell wishing the GOP a happy 4th! pic.twitter.com/DFd0rHfqhI
    — Betty Gilpin (@bettygilpin) July 4, 2017

    While most Hollywood liberals are content with just showing contempt for conservatives and their beliefs, Little Debbie, visibly demonstrating her limited math skills, takes it a step further in quite clearly saying “F**k off!” to a potentially huge segment of her television audience. A significant number, like yours truly, certainly intend to heed her instruction. It might behoove Gilpin to seek out the numero uno Republican for both some wrestling advice and tweeting tips.

    As a much more famous, and no doubt wiser, entertainer used to say, “What a maroon!”

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Earned Valor Refused

    Earned Valor Refused

    Some of you regulars here at American Thinker may know that I also post at a combat veteran-operated military website called This Ain’t Hell. Its primary mission is exposing Stolen Valor fraud, that is, going after those sleazy types who dishonestly claim military service, deeds, heroism, and awards which they did not perform or earn, and shining the bright, hot light of Internet fame on them. Since 2008, TAH has exposed more than 2,000 of these valor thieves, many of whom appear in this rogue’s gallery, a place you most surely do not want your mug to be plastered, for as they say, the Internet is forever.

    Vietnam War hero Lieutenant General Hal Moore was made famous by his heroic leadership at the Battle of Ia Drang, the U.S. Army’s first major set-piece battle in that war where Moore and the legendary 7th Cavalry fought off a much larger North Vietnamese Army force. A widely acclaimed book, We Were Soldiers Once… And Young, written by Moore and Joseph L. Galloway, a war reporter present throughout the battle, made Moore famous outside the military. A movie based on that book starring Mel Gibson as Moore made the by-then-retired, three-star general an American icon. Sadly, the old warhorse left us earlier this year.

    My involvement with Moore was very brief and strictly by chance. My unit, the 2d Battalion, 327th Airborne Infantry was engaged with a much larger NVA force at a hamlet called Trung Luong in June 1966. The 1st Air Cavalry Division was tapped to assist. Moore, a full colonel and brigade commander by then, led the relief force, a battalion of the 8th Cavalry Regiment. He blew through the blackout flaps of our Forward Tactical Operations Center like a tall, lean whirlwind and within minutes I found myself designated his tactical net radio operator within the TOC. For the better part of the next two days, I issued and rescinded endless streams of commands and instructions as his voice to the rifle companies except when he grabbed the handset, as he did frequently, and barked out orders himself. At the conclusion of the battle, when the enemy regiments had withdrawn from the field, he boarded his command chopper and I never saw him again. However, for the remainder of my life, much of which was spent on military installations all over the country, I have told countless listeners of this fierce colonel who embodied the image of the lean, mean Airborne Ranger infantry officer. That statue at Fort Benning could well be him.

    Last week I received an email from an old Cav trooper buddy which I thought might interest readers of American Thinker but especially the valor hunters at This Ain’t Hell:

    via Lt General Hal Moore’s son.

    Missing award?

    I had a question about Dad’s Purple Heart. As you can see from his official picture, it is not on his chest. In this letter home from Vietnam, he explains: “By the way please send me back that Purple Heart and award certificate. I cannot keep it as I feel that a minor punji stake wound in the foot is no reason. Many get it for that when so hurt, but I have my own self-respect to live with. I intend to turn them back. Although it was properly earned, I cannot wear it or keep it in conscience.”

    Dad was unsuccessful in his effort to return it. Once something is awarded, it is final. But, it was his choice not to wear it out of respect for those who paid a much higher price.

    As someone who saw others wounded by punji stakes and who himself once came within inches and seconds of planting his jump boots into a punji pit, I can assure you that such wounds can be no small matters, even life-threatening. Yet here was an infantry leader turning down a duly awarded Purple Heart, his nation’s oldest and most cherished award, for a legitimate injury, because he considered it too minor.

    Now can you, for even a moment, imagine John Kerry possessing the honor and self-respect to do that? It would be a most fitting punishment to all Stolen Valor thieves exposed by This Ain’t Hell and other such organizations for local judges to require the perpetrators to stand in their courtrooms and eat a copy of General Moore’s award citation, printed on heavy formal presentation stock. John Kerry should have to do that, too, except while standing on the steps of the Capitol holding a wooden model Swift Boat.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Do we really need a Space Corps?

    The excellent defense reporting website Breaking Defense is reporting that the Air Force is engaged in political combat with the House Armed Services Committee, in particular the chairman of the Strategic Services Subcommittee, Republican Mike Rogers of Alabama. The cause of this fight is the brainchild, as Breaking Defense phrases it, of Rogers: an entirely new branch of the military, a U.S. Space Corps, to take responsibility for defending America in the coming battlespace out there beyond traditional air warfare altitudes.

    The Air Force is adamant that no such branch is necessary, insisting that it is quite capable of managing, as it now does, its space battle sphere to include the realm of satellites and space stations. Newly appointed Air Force secretary Heather Wilson insists that her existing branch is already heavily invested in the concept of space warfare and is quite prepared to effectively continue this mission into the future as long as Congress provides the necessary funding. Current Pentagon leadership appears to be unified in opposing this idea of an entirely new and independent service.

    Critics point out that the United States Air Force split off from the United States Army almost seventy years ago, and they still have issues as to who’s responsible for what. Space Corps supporters point out the more than 200-year-old symbiotic relationship between our Navy and the Marine Corps, two very different services under the leadership of a single service secretary, the secretary of the Navy. Following that model, Space Corps advocates would have their new service reporting to the existing Air Force secretary. I would point out that the Navy-Marine model has a major flaw: it is quite easy to determine the dividing line between ocean and land mass, whereas no sandy beaches exist in space.

    This old soldier is unconvinced that a need exists currently for such a move. If future wars should shift their focus to a space battle area, then we should take another look at a special service branch, but for now, this is an idea still a bit too futuristic. While I’m not now perfectly comfortable with our existing services’ capabilities in this battlespace, we can improve our overall strategic capability through the concept of multi-domain operations, wherein we integrate the warfighting capabilities of all our existing forces into a seamless, deadly grunt’s ground-to-space station killing machine.

    Someone should tell Congressman Rogers his rocket’s fizzling on the launch pad.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Georgia can’t be bought, a sweet, sweet victory

    The Democrats pulled out all the stops and threw in everything including the kitchen sink. I’ll wager those clichés will be repeated incessantly all across America tomorrow to describe the huge effort the Democrats made to win the most expensive congressional district election in history. And they lost. How sweet it is that citizens of Georgia refused to sell their birthright, their vote for their congressional representative, to a bunch of liberal, airhead, Hollywood fat cats who, like the Democrat National Committee, believe everything’s for sale at the right price.

    Well, in the case of Georgia Congressional District Six where the Dems ran a sophisticated, metrosexual, political operative, John Ossoff, who didn’t even live in his district and refused to move back to it so that he could vote in the election where he was the candidate, (How truly elitist Democrat is that?) it didn’t work “I deign to represent you in Congress but that doesn’t mean I must live among you.” His opponent was a former Georgia Secretary of State, Karen Handel, a down to earth, solid campaigner who didn’t flinch in the face of all the largess flowing in to her opponent from those super-rich elites out on the Left Coast. The reported numbers vary but most reports say that Ossoff received close to 70% of his donations from a single state: California.

    Georgia voters told ‘em where to put it…and it’s not in Congress.

    Author’s note: Though I do not live in Georgia, I contributed to Handel’s campaign and wrote a piece here at American Thinker urging readers to do the same. Those who did can bask in the sweet satisfaction that we ordinary folks can stand up to the billionaire bullies on the left who believe that all of America is for sale. MAGA!

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • No, the Left and Right are NOT morally equivalent

    One thing you can be assured of here at TAH is that when Jonn or I or any other author posts a piece critical of liberals and their Democrat party, especially when it deals with a particularly despicable action on their part, there will quickly follow a comment by one or more of our resident liberal trolling apologists saying in effect, “Yes, well, while that may be despicable, you have to admit that both sides do it.” That moral equivalence counter-punch is a favored weapon of the Left, like calling you a racist, a jab designed to shut your mouth and close off further discussion which they know they can’t win fairly. With most of us it fails because it lacks the weight of truth behind it, although sadly there are a few here who will meekly agree with Lars or Joe that “Yes, you’re right—both sides do it.”

    Well, if that’s true, it is true only in the broadest, most general sense and ignores two critical factors: frequency and intensity. Sure, there’s always going to be some hothead conservatives out there who get fed up and throw some punches, but unlike the Left’s viciousness, ours tends to be spontaneous and disorganized. When some more daring challenger here at TAH does bring those two realities up to counter our resident trolls, the immediate response is, “Show me some proof, show me some Google links,” which as we all know is a daunting, time consuming task that no one really wants to take the time to do just to prove some liberal twit like Lars is wrong.

    Well the folks over at Daily Caller, obviously fed up with getting the same crap from liberal provocateurs, have begun the compilation of such a list. A quick read shows that it is far from complete so I am going to ask Jonn to post it as part of this piece so that TAH readers can in their comments make additions and help to flesh it out. I will then recompose the list in chronological style and when complete ask Jonn to repost it in full. Future events can then be added to the comments section of that second posting. Periodically I will update the list to include those new events taken from comments. From the point of first posting forward, anytime one of our liberal trolls throws out that lame moral equivalence argument, we will have evidence to point to and say, “Put up or shut up. Show us a list of equal conservative misbehaviors and criminality.

    Herewith the list from Daily Caller with some minor modification:

    July 2016: A Hillary Clinton supporter lights a flag on fire and attacks a Trump supporter in Pittsburgh.

    Protesters jumped on cars, stole hats, fought with and threw eggs at Trump supporters outside a Trump rally in downtown San Jose. Trump supporters sued San Jose over the violence.

    August 2016: Anti-Trump protesters attacked pushed, spit on and verbally harassed attendees forced to walk a “gauntlet” as they left a Trump fundraiser in Minneapolis, Minn., and beat an elderly man. Protesters also attacked Trump’s motorcade.

    A Tennessee man was assaulted at a garage sale for being a Trump supporter.

    A Trump supporter in New Jersey was attacked with a crowbar on the street.

    September 2016: Protesters in El Cajon, Calif., chased and beat up a Trump supporter.

    October 2016: A GOP office in North Carolina was firebombed and spray painted with “Nazi Republicans get out of town or else.”

    November 2016: A high school student was attacked after she wrote that she supported Trump on social media. The perpetrator ripped her glasses off and punched her in the face.

    The president of Cornell University’s College Republicans was assaulted the night after Trump won the election.

    Students protesting Trump punched and kicked a Maryland high school student wearing a Make America Great Again hat.

    A high school student was arrested in Florida after he punched a classmate for carrying a Trump sign at school.

    A group of black men in Chicago attacked a white man while raging against Trump.

    Maryland high school students punched a student who was demonstrating in support of Trump, and then kicked him repeatedly while he was on the ground.

    “You support Trump. You hate Mexicans,” a California high school student yelled at a Trump supporter, before viciously beating the girl.

    An anti-bullying ambassador was arrested for shoving a 74-year-old man to the ground in a fight outside Trump tower where people upset over his win had gathered. The woman tied to Black Lives Matter caused the man to hit his head on the sidewalk.

    A Texas elementary school student was beaten by his classmates for voting for Trump in a mock election.

    Two men punched and kicked a Connecticut man who was standing with an American flag and a Trump sign.

    December 2016: A Trump supporter was beaten and dragged by a car.

    January 2017: A Trump supporter was knocked unconscious after airport protesters repeatedly beat him on the head.

    A Trump supporter was attacked after putting out a fire started by anti-Trump protesters.

    When Trump protesters encountered a driver with a pro-Trump flag on his car, they surrounded the vehicle, ripped off and began burning the flag, and pounded the car. They also punctured on the tires.

    February 2017: California GOP Rep. Tom McClintock had to be escorted to his car after a town hall because of angry protesters. The tires of at least four vehicles were slashed.

    Protestors knocked a 71-year-old female staffer for California GOP Rep. Dana Rohrabacher unconscious during a protest outside the representative’s office.

    Milo Yiannopoulos’ speech at the University of California-Berkeley was cancelled after rioters set the campus on fire and threw rocks through windows. Milo tweeted that one of his supporters wearing a Trump hat was thrown to the ground and kicked.

    March 2017: Masked protesters at Middlebury College rushed AEI scholar and political scientist Charles Murray and professor Allison Stranger, pushing and shoving Murray and grabbing Stranger by her hair and twisting her neck as they were leaving a campus building. A stranger suffered a concussion. Protesters then surrounded the car they got into, rocking it back and forth and jumping on the hood.

    April 2017: -A parade in Portland, OR, was canceled after threats of violence were made against a Republican organization.

    Fears of violent protests shut down Ann Coulter’s UC Berkeley speech. Campus police had gathered intel on protesters who were planning to commit violence.

    May 2017: Republican Rep. Tom Garrett, his family and his dog were targeted by a series of repeated death threats deemed credible by authorities.

    FBI agents arrested a person for threatening to shoot Republican Rep. Martha McSally over her support for Trump.

    Police in Tennessee charged a woman for allegedly trying to run Republican Rep. David Kustoff off the road.

    Police in North Dakota ejected a man after he became physical with Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer at a town hall.

    A former professor was arrested after police said they identified him on video beating Trump supporters with a U-shaped bike lock, leaving three people with “significant injuries.”

    June 2017:

    James Hodgkinson opened fire with a 7.62 mm rifle on a congressional GOP baseball practice, injuring five, including House Majority Whip Steve Scalise.

    Republican Rep. Claudia Tenney received an email threat that read, “One down, 216 to go,” shortly after the shooting at the Republican congressional baseball practice.

    A man driving a white Malibu reportedly fired several shots at a man driving a truck displaying a “Make America Great Again” flag in Indiana.

  • MSM white-washing terrorists

    Just a few days before the shooting of a Republican congressman and several others, the Washington Post published an article reviewing last year’s shooting in Orlando by a Muslim male in which 49 American citizens died. Would you believe that other than his name there was no mention of the shooter being Muslim or his motive being Islamic? That despite this headline a year ago. Rather, WAPO’s emphasis a year later was on the gay aspects of the shooting, coloring the event in rainbow shades with only one thing left starkly white, the shooter. Not that WAPO said such a thing; oh no, they’d never do that, not now at least. But just wait a few years and see if WAPO, as well as the rest of the liberal media, hasn’t filed away for posterity the Orlando shooting as a white terrorist hate crime against gay people.
    Now the liberal media is tap dancing all over the place to minimize the undeniable reality that this latest shooter is a full-on liberal Democrat, a card-carrying, poster-waving loyalist, and sadly, the ultimate product of their violence-tinged resistance operation against the Trump presidential victory which they refuse to accept.

    Okay, I’ll grant the liberal media the easy part: the guy is unquestionably white, but how are they going to twist history to move this ultra-liberal, would-be, assassin/mass-killer into the white terrorism column? In future discussions of violence in America, you can be sure the MSM will trot out the numbers regarding white violence and today’s leftist perp will be among them, as will the Muslim killer in Orlando. At that oft-quoted, little backwater, super-left, white racist-exposing outfit down there somewhere in Alabama or Georgia, whose organizational engines are fueled on high octane liberal feelings of self-righteousness, these guys will be very helpful poster boys for demonstrating the huge presence of white supremacy. They may even get their own dots on that infamous map of right wing lunatics.

    Think they can’t and won’t do it? Then you simply do not understand the degree of liberal duplicity that exists in our media and their readiness to employ it. Think I’m exaggerating? Then ignore my warning–after all, the most you can lose is your basic freedoms, such as your ability to speak critically of your government and its policies–perhaps, your ability to speak out at all.

  • Excuse me…but isn’t the president, in actual fact, the chief prosecutor?

    In all the Comey brouhaha beating on our senses is an organizational issue that none of the pundits seems to have picked up on: the simple fact that Donald Trump was really and truly James Comey’s boss. The media and the urban elites seem perfectly happy to grant James Comey and the federal attorney general the unlimited power of making a determination of prosecution for any suspected federal wrongdoing. If a high-profile case gets killed in Comey’s office or the attorney general’s office, there may be some blowback in the media and the general population, but no one ever challenges the legal authority of either the director of the FBI or the attorney general to make such prosecutorial decisions.

    Think about that: the media are willing to grant these two presidentially appointed individuals this virtually unlimited power of prosecutorial discretion, yet when it comes to their boss, the man with hiring and firing powers over them, the liberal media contend that he has no such rights. According to them, even though he is the highest executive authority above these people who exercise such broad discretionary powers, he, our president, has none, zero, zip, nada. He can’t voice a single concern about how a particular case is proceeding or express discomfort that a loyal friend may be wrongly prosecuted. He, as the boss of these two government officials who exercise this virtually limitless discretionary power of prosecution, must remain haplessly mute. The liberal media and the Democrats say he has no legal means of intervention to suggest to his employees that he may possess information, or simply an understanding of the situation that they do not, that leads him as chief executive and chief legal officer, as their boss, to believe that further investigation is unwarranted.

    The question begging to be asked here is, just when did a president lose his authority as the chief executive of this country to insert his input, his opinion, his direct orders, in fact, into a federal legal investigation? I would suggest that, in the eyes of the media, that long established power mysteriously disappeared the moment a Republican became president. I would further suggest that this whole Russia business is a concerted plan by the dirty-tricks Democrats to keep President Trump and his administration preoccupied and off-balance so that he is unable to enact the political changes he promised those who elected him. Their hope is to make him look like an ineffectual and failed president, vulnerable to losing the election for his party in 2018.

    They should know it’s not working; nothing irritates this old voter more than seeing some smarmy California congressman get on a TV talk show and whine about how Trump’s travails are holding up the normal conduct of government when that snake knows full well that it is his party’s carefully planned program of political obstruction that is holding up legislation the country needs. It is my further belief that James Comey and his testimony are an integral part of that carefully organized program. Typically, the Democrats put their cards on faux heroes. Hoping for a high-ranking insider who could give Trump a shiner, they instead got their more typical Democrat whiner, a larger than normal guy whose drama-queen testimony left a large part of the nation shaking their heads in hopeless wonder that he was in charge of our national Federal Bureau of Investigation. Bet he went through the female course at Quantico.

    Talk about the need for an inquiry…

    Crossposted at American Thinker