Author: Poetrooper

  • Wendy Smacks the Wrong Piñata

    What a joy it is to sit over here in Arkansas and watch the Wendy Witch self-destruct in my former home of Texas. First, Wendy, whose personal past does not bear close examination without revealing her to be a self-serving gold digger, goes after her opponent, Greg Abbott, who is a paraplegic and wheelchair bound due to a freakish accident of a falling tree during a storm, but now she’s calling her opponent a racist bigot, a man long-married to a lovely Hispanic woman, a loving spouse who exhibits much more grace than the soulless, grasping Wendy. I’d venture that Wendy’s chances for trying to rally the Hispanic vote in Texas are at best confused and at worst, disastrous. Like so many Yankees, Wendy has a very poor grasp of Anglo/Hispanic relationships in a state where such intermarrying is so common as to attract few remarks nor require no public comment. Unaware of that apparently, Yankee Wendy jumped out there and smacked that big racial piñata without considering that it might be a hornets’ nest.

    Oh Wendy, how bearest you that terrible sting?

    Wendy, who is pure Northeast Yankee white-bread, product of an out-of-wedlock birth, was married to a similar pure Texas white-bread, who was, of all things, a filthy capitalist who raided his own ill-gained retirement funds to send Wendy to Harvard Law School. The very next day after he had paid off her school debt, Wendy dumped him and left their kids to be his sole responsibility. How crass is that, Texas voters? Engenders your confidence, no?

    Well, it’s right up there with her being so crass and insensitive that she attacked Abbott, for the very same handicap that has not prevented him from being one of the very best Texas attorney general’s the state has ever had. That bit of misguided cynicism appears to have blown up in her face.

    Let us as conservatives and/or Republicans pray for more Wendy type Democrat candidates in our political futures.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Operation Inherent Resolve?

    Operation Inherent Resolve?

    The Obama High Command today issued a press release to inform the uninformed that it had now vanquished one of the major obstacles in the campaign to do something about ISIS: they found a name for the operation. Inherent Resolve. Could they have submitted a request to the ivory towers of academia to come up with a name for the operation that could possibly be less understood by the American public? It is doubtful that our assembled politically correct camp leadership could have done better than the focused circle of sycophants surrounding our C in C.

    Take a microphone and a camera out in the streets and interview everyday folks as to their interpretation of “Inherent Resolve.” If you can find one in a hundred who knows both words and is familiar with their usage, you will have done quite well. Float that same term through faculty lounges across the country, and you will likely get a lot of approving nods and grunts of acceptance. Why is that? Well, it has the inherent capability of meaning whatever its creators want it to mean. That was likely the goal of those inside the administration who came up with this indefinable tag for an apparently pointless attempt to stem militant jihadists in their fervent drive to create a Muslim caliphate in the very regions this same ineffectual administration so recently abandoned, walking away from the battlefield, arrogantly proclaiming victory while the enemy cleverly lay low and rebuilt their martial capabilities.

    What is a more laughably foolish way to initiate a battle campaign than to burden the efforts of your engaged warriors with a label that is inherently based upon your previous lack of resolve, and therefore absolutely laughable to your enemies? And to the world?

    I’m an old combat infantryman who has no problem with an enemy who hates me with a deadly determination to destroy me. But I swear to all of you out there, I cannot support a commander in chief and his politically correct administration who subject our nation in general and our military in particular to this sort of international ridicule.

    I do believe I am inherently resolved to oppose these silly Democrat fools who profess to lead us.

    Thomas Lifson adds: “Resolve” cannot by its nature be “inherent.” Resolve is an act of will. The phrase is self-contradictory.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Cruel Democrat Chestnuts Fall in Arkansas This Year

    Three things I’ve learned about my former political party: they have no conscience, no shame, and no new ideas. Confronted with serious competition from Republican candidates, they seldom show us any new, creative concepts in their television advertising. In fact, they could probably save a lot of bucks by simply running their old campaign ads and dubbing in the current names of the candidates. I’m serious: how many years now has the Democratic Party in the closing months of political campaigns trotted out the old political chestnuts that Republicans are going to eliminate Social Security and Medicare, in the hope they’ll terrify the old folks into voting a straight Democrat ticket?

    Mark Pryor, the Democrat senator running for re-election, is in a very tough contest, as he should be. A senator from an essentially conservative state, Pryor has shown his constituents that in his eagerness to adhere to holy Democrat dogma, he is willing to be one of Father Reid’s all too eager altar boys. Any examination of his voting record shows that Mark votes Democrat, not Arkansas. His reward for that loyalty to the party and disloyalty to his constituents has brought him some serious backing from liberals in California, where he goes to raise campaign funds. I can just hear the behind-the-hands snickering by those Left Coast sophisticates as Mark offers up his pleas and promises in his best Arkansas lawyer delivery.

    But all that aside, what truly pains this seasoned citizen is the Democrats’ willingness – nay, eagerness – to open up the graves of past campaigns and extract the malodorous corporeal remnants of their old poisonous lies buried there and try to prop them up as alive and well in 2014. They know it’s worked for them in the past, so who cares how bad it smells to the general electorate? It will scare the hell out of the old folks…and they always vote.

    My wife and I cared for her parents in their last years. Intelligent, successful people, but very old, they believed what they saw and heard on the major networks. They never watched FOX because the big three networks pronounced it evil. Bush was the devil, and Republicans were going to take away their Medicare and Social Security. They were seriously fearful of the Republican Party because of all the left-wing propaganda pumped out of that screen they watched all day long. As much as I tried to alleviate those fears, the Democrats and their network/media henchmen had succeeded in making these people so afraid that they would ignore any reasoned efforts to dissuade them, to assure them that the Republicans weren’t the bogey-men.

    Democrats terrorized those two old people whom we loved and cared for, and for that we can never forgive them. They robbed those two old people of the comfort and security we were doing our best to provide in their very last years. For their deliberate and despicable attempts to scare vulnerable seniors into voting for them, I, a former Democrat, will, until my last breath, forever hold the Democratic Party in utter and complete contempt.

    And here we are in Arkansas in 2014, and those cruel, cynical Democrats are doing it again.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • So Why Are We Allowing ISIS to Export Oil?

    So Why Are We Allowing ISIS to Export Oil?

    Mideast Islamic State

    I just fought down my natural revulsion to anything that comes from the major networks to watch “Sixty Minutes.” Teased into it by the promise that former SecDef, Leon Panetta, was going to blow the whistle on his former boss, Obama, I allowed myself to be sucked in. Panetta did say that it was a mistake to remove all American troops from Iraq, but to characterize that as a denouncement of Obama’s foreign policy was a bit lame. What became more readily apparent was that Leon was speaking up and speaking out for that oldest and most venal of reasons, to sell his new book.

    From the entire interview what came across to me as completely unbelievable – no, unacceptable — was the revelation that ISIS is a self-funding movement due to its control of producing oil fields in Northern Iraq. King Abdullah of Jordan estimated the ISIS revenues from energy production were approximately $6,000,000 per day, a helluva lot of income for a ragtag terrorist organization. He then went on to say that they are, in fact, bootlegging their product at well below the market price, as low as $30.00 per barrel at a time when legitimate product is moving through major markets at triple that figure.

    When I heard that my immediate response was to look at my spouse in astonishment and yell, “What the hell? Why are we allowing them to do that?” That question should be one that every tuned-in citizen asks of his elected representatives in Washington. To gather production from an oilfield into a central, marketable product requires a well-engineered network of collection processes that are quite visible to aerial observation and equally vulnerable to aerial attack and destruction. If all that black gold is moving through underground pipelines, there still must be major gathering points and transshipment terminals.

    So why are these key targets not being bombed into oblivion by our military, thus cutting off ISIS’ cash flow? An age-old tenet of war is to strangle your enemy’s economy. Why then are we allowing these murderous thugs to extract, transport and sell on the international market a product that feeds their murderous atrocities? I’ve spent a large portion of my life around west Texas oilfields and you can believe me when I tell you that while all the geological exploration takes place mostly underground, the actual drilling and the subsequent collection processes take place right out there in the open, totally vulnerable to attack from the air. Even underground pipelines have periodic, above surface pumping stations just sitting there waiting for a smart bomb.

    So, Barack, why are you sitting on your butt and allowing ISIS to fill its coffers by exporting oil?

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • An Old Soldier’s Last Farewell

    An Old Soldier’s Last Farewell

    Fred Fairman

    Crossposted from American Thinker and one of Poetrooper’s friends;

    Being mortal, there are limits imposed on the flower of our flesh that are non-negotiable. We thrive in the sun for a short season, only to submit to the inexorable decay from which there is no appeal. Death is a curse. It is a monstrosity that we cannot gaze fully upon, lest it turn our fragile and fleeting joy into stone. Say what you will about the cosmic harmony of coming into being and passing from it. Rhapsodize on the wise rhythm of nature or in maturely coming to terms with our impending exits with stoic resolve. However it is sliced, Death is an unspeakable evil that cannot be whitewashed. For the Christian, it is only made palatable by the Doctrine of the Cross. But even so, in the end, Death, and its entire attending process, is that great indigestible absurdity we wrestle with as our hearts are pierced through with the stark implications of our loved ones being torn away — as they pass, never to return from “sleep’s dark and silent gate.’

    Upon tearfully kissing the forehead of my dear mother who passed from us a year hence, and who joined my father who departed fifteen months before her, we children came to the realization that we were now orphans of sorts. It is hard enough losing one of a matched pair, although the anchor still weighs heavy enough to ground those who dutifully close ranks and absorb the blow. But as the last link is severed and the home and possessions are divvied, sold or carted away to a dumpster, the centrifugal tendency towards drift infects even the strongest of families; and great effort must be taken to reinvigorate the sibling connection when the source of their orbit is dissolved. That burdensome mantle of patriarch has fallen upon my dubious shoulders, and I am ill-suited to perform the duties at hand. The inclination of each adult child to retreat to his own tent is already far advanced, and heroic means are necessary if the sclerosis of our family bond is to be arrested.

    Riverside National in Southern California’s Inland Empire is a beautifully manicured garden of graceful requiescence, as are many of our nation’s veterans’ cemeteries. Unlike the haughty indifference that seems to characterize the attitude of hard-boiled government employees, the staff there cuts against the grain of this stereotype, and most likely this is because veterans themselves almost exclusively comprise the staff that interacts with the public. My father, who served in the Army during the Korean War Era, had wanted to be cremated and his ashes humbly scattered without fanfare, and my mother was of the same mind. Both waited patiently on my brother Eric’s mantle to be deposited “God knows where” when the time was ripe. So on June 27th of this year, perhaps not totally in harmony with their wishes, both were interred in a silver urn near the quiet west end of Riverside National. The seven children of Fred and Carole Fairman now possess a sanctuary we can come to in which to remember — and to draw strength from the continuity of those memories. And perhaps this will be a good first step in the rejuvenation of our kinship.

    I had always been of the opinion that the tradition of burying loved ones in hermetically sealed caskets reeked of futility and was in no small way a morbid relic. After all, the fantastic sums that people spend on the business of dying appear to be motivated more by guilt than by reason, and funeral home grifters are well placed to pluck the heartstrings of the vulnerable. Moreover, The Almighty is more than capable of locating, identifying, and resurrecting His own without the aid of grave markers or embalmer’s preservatives. And yet, perhaps the ritual is not solely for the departed, but for those who remain and must follow later. To be honest, there is much to be said for coming to a special place on an appropriate occasion and being in close proximity with a loved one’s discarded earthly form, even though we are confident that our beloved is no more there than on the surface of Mars. Human beings are perhaps strange but beautiful in the odd way we pay tribute. A handful of flowers and the polishing of a weathered marker convey that acceptable offering of respect, burnished by the sunshine of private recollections where no shadows are admitted.

    As the day arrived and my party and I queued up for our turn at the staging area, we were quietly informed that we had dropped the ball and neglected to successfully negotiate the gauntlet of necessary bureaucratic forms. Had this have been any other government agency, we would have invariable had to return on another day with the appropriate stamps and signatures. But these honorable men and women, who must perform each ceremony with the same meticulous solemnity many times daily, allowed us to proceed without a hitch.

    When he began, our host informed us that the honor we were witnessing could never be purchased – it had to be earned diligently through military service. As the sharp report of the rifles reverberated throughout the grounds and the lonely bugle movingly wafted through our respectful gathering of family and friends, I could see in my mind’s eye my father and mother waving proudly as I spoke at my high school graduation. And now, they too had commenced on a journey — at least symbolically — to a place they would occupy together for all time — just as they had endured together for 55 wonderful and often financially difficult years. Our host then presented my brothers with the spent cartridges while the Honor Guard ceremoniously wrapped and placed the tautly folded tri-cornered American flag into my trembling hands — which I gently kissed. As a tear ran down my cheek, I found myself proud that my country would bestow such honor upon those who had faithfully served their America – some having paid the ultimate price for this solemn dignity. In truth, I had not associated conscious pride with the Federal government for a very long time, and it strengthened me with the hope that things will not always be as they are now.

    Riverside National is a most democratic place. A colonel and a dogface are laid to rest at close quarters, each with an understated marker that bespeaks the classical ends of equality — both under the rule of law and in the eyes of their Common Master. I don’t think you will find any ornate individual shrines here. However, collective memorials are evident: like the Congressional Medal of Honor Monument containing the names of every American war’s recipient since the medal’s founding. Inscribed in black marble are hundreds of names honoring selfless courage in its highest incarnation, and mere words can do no justice to the power of this civic shrine; you must see it.

    My parents are together now in the cemetery’s newest area. As I write, there is no grass in their section; but when each parcel fills, it is soon covered with luxurious sod. I expect I will return there on many occasions to pay homage to my parents and the men and women whose nearby identical stones are inscribed with: a name or names, the appropriate dates, an optional religious symbol, and a short 23 character message or verse. Like America herself, one might find a pauper, a grocer, a Muslim, Catholic, Jew, or Agnostic keeping silent watch side by side in symmetrical columns. Any differences are now deemed moot. They are an abiding Band of Brothers; a legion of fathers and mothers lovingly ordered “at ease” in phalanxes as far as the eye can see. Having answered when their Homeland called, they may now redeem that full and lasting share of their country’s reward — nestled beneath the verdant fescue of repose.

    This piece started out as a cry of despair, but it ended as something far different than I had intended. For a short time, I had forgotten that death is not terminal, but heralds the great turning point. It is a curious circular paradox: death gives urgency to life with its veneer of finality, just as our deaths are made holy by manifesting life’s courage – by sanctifying the heroic ideal that points us to a glory beyond human life. Selfless love ultimately mutes the sting that death holds over us. There is an eternal truth here: ultimately, nothing great-hearted passes in vain. Keeping glued to our pain takes our eyes off the horizon of God’s Big Picture, and we are made small whenever we fail to make common cause with the virtue of sacrifice – especially that greatest of sacrifices which has changed everything. I will never look at any veteran’s cemetery the same again. They are more than a last farewell for old soldiers, but a continuous living monument to the idea of America: not only for what she once was, but for what she can, indeed, be once again.

    Glenn Fairman writes from Highland, Ca. and welcomes your correspondence at arete5000@dslextreme.com. He can be followed at www.stubbornthings.org and on Twitter.

  • Bromides about Bombing

    Bromides about Bombing

    last convoy out of Iraq

    A fact that every politician and news talking-head in the world seems to be certain of is that you can’t win a war by air power alone. Even the media-hired retired generals throw it out as an absolute truth of warfare, as if it had fallen from the lips of Sun Tzu himself. Ask anyone, civilian, military, whatever, and he will quickly inform you of the truth of that unassailable rule of modern warfare.

    But when has any nation ever in history attempted to prevail in war by the singular use of airpower? “It has never happened because it just won’t work.” And how do you know that with such certainty if you acknowledge it has never been tried?

    The first use of massive airpower and strategic bombing took place in WWII, in Europe and in the Pacific war. The allied air forces were bombing Nazi Germany into rubble when we launched our invasion of Europe. What if we had just continued the strategic bombing campaign and hadn’t invaded? We were in the very deliberate process of destroying the German homeland with massive bombing raids, which, if continued, would have eventually eliminated Nazi Germany’s ability to wage war and demoralized the population. German troops deployed about Europe required huge logistical support from the homeland, and the allied bombing campaigns were destroying both the sources of those essential supplies and the supply lines needed to get those materials to the troops. And the cruel reality the Germans had to swallow was that America could build bombers and bombs undeterred while German infrastructure had no hope of being rebuilt under the bombing onslaught.

    Who can say that the allied bombing campaign, pursued with the same intensity and ferocity, couldn’t have brought Nazi Germany to the surrender table? Want to know the real reason why it was necessary to invade Europe? Because if we hadn’t, the massed and marching Russian Bear would have erected its Iron Curtain on Omaha Beach, extending north to Denmark and south to Gibraltar, to effect its Sovietized Europe.

    It was a bit different with the Japanese, whose major population centers we were burning into oblivion with our firebombing campaigns, designed specifically to take advantage of the Japanese tradition of building their homes cheek by jowl in metropolitan areas with highly flammable materials. Yes, we nuked two cities, to bring them more quickly to the surrender table, but how much more of the non-nuclear incendiary destruction of their cities could they have withstood before acknowledging that we had bombed them into submission? Their capability to wage war had been reduced to the point that such civilian casualties no longer justified continuing.

    I was an infantry NCO in Vietnam in an area where the B-52 Arc Light Operations took place. A part of our mission was to patrol into the targeted areas post-bombing to assess the effectiveness of the aerial raids. The assessment was easy because it was a slam-dunk; nothing lived in those long, wide, and unfortunate carpet bombing patterns except perhaps recently arrived insects in the water pooled in the huge craters. Human and animal life simply was no longer to be seen. Did it work? Well, by the end of the 1972 bombing campaign, our battle assessment experts were finding it difficult to locate additional targets worthy of a B-52 sortie.

    The North Vietnamese came to the peace table in Paris because they had come to the realization that we were quite capable of bombing their ancient civilization, of which they are so proud, all the way back into the very pre-civilized Stone Age. Or rather, we would have rendered them so militarily defenseless that the always feared invasion from the ancient enemy to the north would be a cakewalk, and they would once again be enslaved by the hated Chinese for a few additional centuries.

    So, again, just whose conventional wisdom is it that you can’t win wars by bombing alone? Agreed, you cannot seize and hold terrain. But if your strategic objective is not to occupy your enemy’s homeland, but rather just to render that enemy incapable of further and future aggression against you and your allies, then where does an all-out bombing campaign come up short? Lastly, how do we know the truth of this so-called wisdom if we’ve not tried it?

    With today’s technology, America may still not have the ability to prevent the formation and depredations of terrorist organizations, but it damned well has the capability of denying such organizations the ability to form the maneuverable forces needed to seize geography from other nations. There is no way in hell ISIS can form into a boundaried, functioning caliphate if we choose not to let it do so. Let them declare their caliphate, but then let them live with the reality their religious fervor has brought them: a bleak and barren no-man’s land, where every human movement is suspect and carries the peril of sudden death from the skies.

    Before we risk any more American lives on the ground in this conflict, let’s test this hypothesis that we can’t win with just airpower.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Obama’s Looking Up…

    Obama’s Looking Up…

    Barack Obama

    At least he was in his speech about dealing with Middle Eastern terrorist organizations. It was a bit disconcerting to those of us who have become accustomed to watching the usual puppet-like, swivel-necked delivery – left to right, then quickly back to left – of past major pronouncements to the nation, delivered in the full glory of this politician’s unusually adept mastery of teleprompters.

    But not this time. Nope, we got the full-face, straight-on delivery, with those eyes boring straight into America’s soul. Well, except when they weren’t – as in when they were shifted upward to read his speech from some other prompting device positioned over the camera, focused on his face. Go back and look at the video, and you’ll see Obama’s eyes flicking up frequently to that electronic miracle of eloquence, that screen that displays the contrived and carefully constructed words and phrases that his administration wants to be heard by this nation and the world.

    You can bet some really clever media advisor suggested to White House staff that another swivel-necked presidential delivery at such a serious moment in history might appear to Americans to be contrived and insincere. Well, then, let’s not have that; we have to project gravitas, and we need an American commander-in-chief who doesn’t have to rely on two teleprompter panels straddling the podium to project his serious determination and his focused intent to deal with world events.

    Nope, we’ll just put one screen up there above the full frontal camera and let him read all his sincerity and determined intent from that screen above the camera. No more obvious swivel-necking for this transparent administration! Nope, these open and transparent liberals have come up with a way to make their exalted leader look straight into that camera as he makes his grand pronouncements…well, with maybe just a few of those frequent eye shifts upward to make sure he’s staying on script.

    Hey, no matter how they set it up, the guy is still reading a script, written for him by the real powers behind the throne. It’s the only way he knows how to communicate – a skillful but empty, soulless orator. When Obama announced that this would be the most transparent administration ever, he didn’t know the half of it:

    Transparent, brother, these turkeys are indeed…

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Geraldo, You Had Me from ‘Declaration’

    Geraldo, You Had Me from ‘Declaration’

    Geraldo_Rivera

    Quick, someone at [This Ain’t Hell] tell the Devil to check his ponds for skim ice. I know it’s gotta be starting to freeze over down there, because I just found myself nodding my head and agreeing with Geraldo Rivera in his appearance on the O’Reilly show.

    Geraldo pointed out to Bill that the optimal course to take in dealing with ISIS is to formally declare war on the Islamic State, uniting the Congress and the nation in a determined campaign to ensure the total and complete destruction of said Islamic State. He made the excellent point that ISIS has declared itself a state and has real military and political control over large geographical areas, which means it has therefore self-identified as a nation and is consequently subject to a declaration of war.

    Why? Because the world’s newest nation has defiantly thrown down a gauntlet of challenge to the United States by publicly executing two American citizens in the most bloodily brutal way imaginable. Further, they have publicly announced their determination to attack the United States on its home soil. Even the Germans and the Japanese never publicly executed American citizens as an act of provocation, nor did they announce to the world prior to our declarations of war against them any avowed intentions to destroy us.

    I confess that Geraldo caught me completely off-guard with his proposal. I previously hadn’t drilled down far enough to consider a declaration of war as being the course to pursue in bringing down this new manifestation of fascism cloaked in Islamic clerical garb. But it does make sense that we turn the tables on ISIS by giving them the formal recognition they want and then use that affirmation of their political existence to pound them into smoking rubble. A formal declaration takes away some of the restraints that have limited our offensive attempts up to now. In a declaration, our Congress can make it crystal-clear that the intent of our nation is to obliterate theirs, thus making it one of the most short-lived nation-states in history. With such a declaration, America’s gloves come off, because in said declaration we have informed the world of our intention to unconditionally and totally destroy this Islamic State. Surrender or a formal ceasefire is not an option – only obliteration.

    And then, as if I hadn’t been surprised enough by the common sense flowing from beneath that ridiculous moustache, Geraldo floored me again with a second recommendation that made at least as much sense as the first: bring Gen. Stanley McChrystal back to active duty and put him in charge of building a Kurdish Army, now loosely defined as the Peshmerga, to help defeat ISIS and then serve as a counter-force to the rise of another such fanatical foe. The general may be a bit too liberal in some of his views for die-hard conservatives, but he’s a tough SOB who knows the terrain and the Middle East mindset.

    Damn all, Geraldo, you ruined my Friday night. I’m still sitting here shaking my head at the possibility that we could be in agreement.

    Crossposted at American Thinker.