Author: Poetrooper

  • Racial Chips on Very Tall Shoulders

    In spite of my being opposed to Obama for being our president from the very outset, an opposition based entirely on the young solon’s executive inexperience and his propensity to vote present on any legislative issue that might prove later to be politically controversial, I truly hoped, after his election, that he would lead America to racial peace.

    For six years Barack Obama has insisted on insinuating his presidential presence and influence into every racial conflict that has proved newsworthy. And to the horror of white America, their duly elected leader has chosen to side with whoever the black participants are in any situation that posits black America against the rest of the country. It began with the cops are stupid at Cambridge, then was buttressed by his “If I had a son” comments regarding the Trayvon Martin affair.

    Throughout all the rising racial tensions, Obama has made a criminal race-baiter, Al Sharpton, a frequent guest at the White House, an action that white America must realize is a big middle finger to the huge majority of us who rightly recognize Sharpton as a semi-literate black opportunist who leaps into every racial conflict to promote and enrich himself, sometimes pouring fiery racial rhetoric onto already incendiary situations. That an American president would openly associate with such a despicable figure is the equal of George W. Bush having a similar relationship with the national leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

    Now comes the presidential spouse who was never proud of her native country until her husband was nominated for the presidency to demonstrate for us all how a single encounter in a Target store can be characterized initially as a racial bridge yet, when politically expedient, redefined as a glaring example of white racism. I have a question for the president and his spouse: “Just what the hell do you think you are going to accomplish with such a one-sided alignment with black America?”

    The only conclusion that can be drawn from most thinking white Americans is that they have a half-white president who has taken a firm stance on the black side of American culture, a stance that affects virtually every domestic issue he is called upon to decide. What we are belatedly discovering is that racial resentment isn’t limited to urban ghettos; it’s also in the White House, where the American electorate elevated a half-black man to the most powerful office in the world.

    Yet he and his wife still bristle at past racial slights.

    I submit to you, America, that as long as blacks up to the highest levels of American culture remain so racially sensitive to the most insignificant insults and become resentful to the most minor of perceived slights, we have no hope of racial reconciliation and cultural harmony in this country. Think about this: an overt race-baiter and riot-inciter like Al Sharpton is an honored guest in the American White House – your White House.

    My momma always warned: “You, your character and your worth, are all a reflection of whom you choose as friends.” That old conventional wisdom tells me that Barack Obama is not my president; he is a too racially sensitive president of black America.

  • Unrewarded Valor

    Unrewarded Valor

    At a time of so much racial strife and discord, we should never lose sight of the fact that our military forces were the first, and remain the best, example of a fully integrated America. Yes there are problems from time to time, but there are few other places in our society where blacks, whites and Hispanics have learned to live and work together with a common mission as in our military. And that is an example that we seldom hear about from our media.

    Instead we are treated by our sensationalist media to endless examples of lawlessness in black communities and the vitriol of the race-baiters like Farrakhan, vowing “We’ll tear this go**amn country up!” and unending charges of racism leveled against whites who question the values of black culture. However, we all, black, white, brown and whatever, should keep in mind the reality that we have family members out there serving shoulder to shoulder around this world, with some of them dying in the process.

    Such is the case of Sergeant First Class Alwyn C. Cashe, who, on October 17, 2005, sacrificed his life to save those of the troops in his care. With his unit under enemy fire, SFC Cashe, his uniform soaked with fuel from a roadside explosion which ruptured the fuel tank of his Bradley Fighting Vehicle and set it afire, repeatedly entered the fiery interior to rescue his men who were trapped inside. Even with his uniform burned away and his flesh ablaze, SFC Cashe managed to pull six soldiers from the flaming interior. Four of them later succumbed to their burn wounds as did, some three weeks later, SFC Cashe.

    For his incredibly selfless valor, SFC Cashe was awarded the Silver Star, an award that seems to many of us in the military and veteran communities, insufficient to the events of that terrible day. Colonels have been known to be awarded the Silver Star for monitoring and directing ground combat from the relative comfort of an overhead helicopter. I would wager that among all warriors, soldiers, sailors, aviators, etc., fear of death by burning or being horribly injured and disfigured by fire is greater than any other dread associated with combat. Yet SFC Cashe overcame that fundamental fear and charged directly into the flames repeatedly to save his young soldiers. A Silver Star seems a bit inadequate to reward that level of courage and self-sacrifice.

    Among those who feel that Cashe’s bravery deserves more is the officer who was his battalion commander at the time, now Brigadier General, Gary Brito. According to this account in the LA Times, then Lieutenant Colonel Brito, was unaware of the full extent of Cashe’s actions because those soldiers immediately involved were too seriously wounded to provide many details and soon most would die from their injuries. And more so than for any other combat valor award, detailed documentation and corroboration are required for the Medal of Honor.

    However, one of the two survivors and an eyewitness, now retired Army Sergeant Gary Mills, who was himself pulled from the burning vehicle by SFC Cashe, says there is no doubt in his mind that Cashe’s gallant actions warrant the highest award for valor and sacrifice. BG Brito, SGT Mills and Cashe’s sister, Kasinal Cashe White have been conducting a campaign for several years but the Obama Department of Defense seems unable or unwilling to do the right thing despite support for the award from multiple general officers.

    One of the phrases frequently found in citations that accompany awards for valor, particularly those awarded posthumously, is “with selfless concern for his fellow soldiers and complete disregard for his own safety,” and a wonderful example of how deeply imbued that trait was in SFC Cashe is revealed in the Times article:

    Cashe’s sister, Kasinal Cashe White, spent three weeks at her brother’s bedside at a military hospital in Texas as doctors treated his extensive burns.

    She knew nothing of his actions during the bomb attack until a nurse asked her, “You know your brother’s a hero, don’t you?”

    When Cashe was able to speak, White said, his first words were: “How are my boys?” — his soldiers, she said. Then he began weeping, she said. He told her: “I couldn’t get to them fast enough.”

    Cashe died Nov. 8, 2005.

    “My little brother lived by the code that you never leave your soldiers behind,” White said. “That wasn’t just something from a movie. He lived it.” White says her family hopes Cashe is awarded the medal while his mother, who is 89, is still alive.

    “How are my boys?” I have to tell you that this old former combat infantryman choked up on reading that account for the first time. Enduring unbelievable pain and suffering from a horribly burned body for three weeks, SFC Cashe’s first conscious words were of concern for his troops. I don’t know if that quote can be included in a Medal of Honor citation but it damned well should be. It should also be inscribed above the command entrance of every NCO academy in the United States Army.

    An interesting aspect of this issue is the absence of support from the Congressional Black Caucus. Why are they missing in action? Are they too busy pontificating and demonstrating on behalf of dubious heroes to convene their members in the office of the Secretary of Defense and demand action on behalf of a genuine hero, of whom all of America, black and white, can be unified in their pride and admiration? They should pause the racial grandstanding long enough to secure a richly deserved Medal of Honor for SFC Cashe. Perhaps then his elderly mother can be brought to the White House for the presentation of the medal so that she can then go to her grave knowing her son’s valor and sacrifice have finally been recognized and rewarded by a genuinely grateful nation.

    Readers might want to contact their own senators and congressmen just in case the Black Caucus is too busy supporting misguided demonstrations to fight for this gallant warrior. Arkansas Senator-elect Tom Cotton’s office has communicated to me that they will pursue the matter after he is sworn in, but the more representatives and senators pursuing the matter, the better.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • A Different Take on Chuck Hagel

    A Different Take on Chuck Hagel

    Over at American Thinker is a piece by a fellow named Ed Timperlake, which not only presents an insider’s supportive view of Chuck Hagel, but describes a procedural tactic that can be employed by Senate Republicans, with the support of Chuck Hagel, to add some transparency to the administration’s nomination of a new SecDef.

    Apparently Chuck Hagel was once considered to be a friend of the veteran community. I was unaware that, prior to becoming a senator, he had resigned his position as a VA official in protest against policies he thought harmful to veterans. Timperlake is Naval Academy, a former Marine fighter pilot and disabled vet who worked many years in DoD and is now a defense industry expert, author and pundit. His biography can be found here.

    As soon as I read this piece, I thought it would be grist for this grinding mill we call This Ain’t Hell. Please go to American Thinker and read this piece then offer your opinions here.

  • Gruberisms

    Gruberisms

    Over at American Thinker, writer/editor Rick Moran wrote a piece about new additions to the political lexicon based on the name of the Obamacare architect who bragged about how the Obama administration lied rrepeatedly and often about that POS legislation to get it passed. Moran noted these neologisms from the Washington Times: Grubergate, gruberish, grubered, grubermanie, moneygrubering and gruberpalooza. Moran then offered some of his own creations: grubermentia, disgrubered, foregruber, gruberful.
    He then invited commenters to come up with more and boy did they.
    Federal Gruberment, Gruber-in Chief, Holy gruber! Scoobygruber, gruberphobia, GRUBAR, Grube Goldberg, grubies, gruberites, gruberesque, grubertopia, Gruberfest, Gruberizing of America, gruberballs, grubertastic, gruberlicious, gruberphobic, grubermania, gruberosis, gruberitis, and on and on.
    Based on some of the colorful terms I’ve seen here at TAH used to describe Stolen Valor miscreants, I thought I’d toss out a challenge: you guys and girls got any more gruberisms?

  • ‘Hail Mary’ Landrieu

    There’s simply no other way to call the desperate play of Mary Landrieu defending her long hold on the championship in a political playoff down in Louisiana, where it appears that the serving senator’s re-election prospects are headed the same direction as the 4-5 New Orleans Saints playoff possibilities. When QB Mary got her hands on that hot political football yesterday, her first offensive play was as truly offensive as any offense can be. Ailing Mary resurrected a long-dead play she had long ago introduced as a sop to her racist, sexist constituents, and threw a true Hail Mary at a Capitol press conference, where she desperately urged her fellow Democrat senators to hastily enact legislation approving construction of the long Reid-lined Keystone Pipeline. It was a flagrant and flailing bid to save her collapsing career.

    That such legislation has been long stymied by greedy Democrats, hungry for handouts from environmentalist Tom Steyer, himself a living monument to capitalist/environmentalist hypocrisy, renders Mary’s Hail Mary an act of desperation dripping with Democrat duplicity. Overnight, a greedy capitalistic Koch brothers project that was going to destroy a wide swath of the environment, a dagger of developmental disaster driven through the heart of America, is transformed by the Democrats into “Gee, what a great idea!”

    Good grief! Even low-info Dem voters should be able to see the huge hypocrisy in that little deceptive sidestep.

    Last week the Democrats were humiliated by the thinking portion of the American electorate, who performed their civic duty and tossed a very deserving bunch of them off the field. Now we see one of those losers trying to come back out of the locker room, disguised as a cheer-leader for a play her team publicly disdained up until Tuesday, when the big game was played and they lost equally big time. Sorry, Mary, but in your latest frantic cynical cheer-leading we can see under that shrinking political skirt you’ve worn far too long:

    And it ain’t a pretty sight, girl….

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Hillary Clinton: Serving Out Obama’s Third Term

    Hillary Clinton: Serving Out Obama’s Third Term

    On The Kelly File on Fox News, Ron Fournier, political pundit with National Journal, echoed an observation that should be the major theme of the entire 2016 presidential campaign:

    A vote for Hillary is a vote for Obama’s third term.

    Devastating, both in its brevity and its effect as a national alarm to voters fed up with Obama’s incompetence and indifference.

    Fournier has refocused attention on what should be reverberating throughout the burgeoning campaigns of every potential Republican contender. The election results of Tuesday show us that Hillary is most certainly not the invincible shoo-in the Democrats would have us believe her to be. Here in Arkansas, the Clintons’ launching pad to national prominence and home to endless airports, buildings, and other landmarks bearing that Clinton surname, every candidate endorsed by the Clintons was soundly defeated. That’s in Arkansas, folks, last Democrat stronghold in the South, which is now solidly Republican like the rest of America’s interior. That, for Democrats and Hillary, is the modern-day equivalent of LBJ’s observation that when you’ve lost Walter Cronkite, you’ve lost the nation. When you’ve lost Arkansas…

    Here it is folks – the bumper sticker to get America back on the right track:

    Hillary: Obama’s 3rd Term

    It just doesn’t get any more humanly succinct and politically pithy than that. I would be grateful if the first bumper sticker manufacturer of that message would contact Thomas Lifson here at AT and arrange to send me a few of those little jewels.

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Why Not Send Mercy and Comfort?

    Why Not Send Mercy and Comfort?

    300px-USNS_Mercy_off_Dili

    With the Ebola crisis apparently far from being controlled in Africa, the Obama administration has committed a large contingent of American troops to the fight and now is reportedly weighing the possibility of bringing African victims to the U.S. for treatment.

    I have a suggestion to make: why not send Mercy and Comfort into the battle zone to inject the tremendous life-saving resources they possess?

    For those of you who don’t know, the USNS Mercy (pictured above) and her sister ship, the USNS Comfort, are two huge hospital ships maintained by the United States Navy to provide stand-off, life-saving medical care for U.S. forces in combat. These two vessels share the distinction of being the second-largest ships in the fleet, bested in length only by the Nimitz-class supercarriers. The Mercy, home-ported in San Diego, has a maximum patient capacity of 1,000 beds, as does the Comfort, which is home-ported at Norfolk. True, with all the special precautions required in treating Ebola patients, that capacity would no doubt be substantially reduced. Still, the augmentation they could provide the beleaguered medical community in West Africa at this critical time would be tremendous.

    And yes, there is plenty of precedence for such a non-military humanitarian mission. The Comfort was docked in midtown Manhattan immediately following the 9/11 attacks. She stood offshore in the Gulf of Mexico below New Orleans following Katrina, treating victims of that terrible storm, and did the same off Haiti following the 2010 earthquake there. Mercy has conducted similar humanitarian missions in the Pacific Rim, most notably following the 2005 tsunami in Southeast Asia.

    So I will ask this administration this: why bring Ebola patients within our borders and risk the possibility of a wildfire epidemic that could have a devastating impact on our nation when we could very capably treat hundreds of those same patients aboard those two floating hospitals sitting a few miles offshore from West Africa?

    Crossposted at American Thinker

  • Getting It Exactly Wrong

    FOX News is reporting that the Canadian government is responding to the terrorist attack in Ottawa by ordering all Canadian service members to avoid wearing their uniforms in public so that they do not present themselves as available targets. The order is in response to ISIS’s recent public urging to its minions in Western societies to seek out and murder military men and their families, as well as yesterday’s shooting of the unarmed ceremonial soldier at the Canadian monument paying tribute to past soldiers’ sacrifices and military achievements.

    Hiding its warriors is exactly the opposite of the tactic that a nation with any sense of national fortitude, not to mention dignity, should be using when it comes under attack by terrorists. Instead of kowtowing to terrorist threats and ordering his soldiers into hiding, the Canadian prime minister should order all Canadian reserve forces onto national active duty and instruct Canada’s military command that all active-duty personnel will be required to carry a loaded military-issued weapon – at the very least a prominently displayed sidearm, either hip-mounted or in a shoulder holster.

    In support of such a display of arms, the Canadian military should immediately present to its forces up-to-the-minute classroom and range instruction on how to respond to a terrorist event that unfolds in their presence, with heavy emphasis on immediate and permanent elimination of the threat to innocent Canadian citizens. They should be taught to shoot to kill, to destroy in the shortest possible time the threat to them and other citizens. They should be taught to disregard the ingrained tendency to shout commands to halt and desist and instead put rounds on target.

    Good grief, Minister Harper, where the hell is the strength that built your huge frontier country? Are you so neutered by political correctness and fear of violence that you would instruct your military forces to hide among your helpless civilians? Sorry, Harper, but that is a weasel’s response when your country is threatened. It is time, man, to set loose your sheepdogs to protect your sheep.

    ISIS has declared its intent to bring death to America by urging traitors among us to murder military service members and their families. The evidence indicates that these Muslim terrorists have mounted such attacks on American service members in the past and, on the occasion of the Fort Hood shooting, their families as well. But this is the first time that we have seen a general public call by any jihadist organization for American embeds to attack the families of our warriors. We, as a country, should consider that call for miscellaneous murder of innocents to be a major change of the rules of engagement and respond accordingly.

    I predict that the day the first American soldier’s family is murdered by ISIS thugs will be the first day of the eventual, but total, destruction of this deadly Islamic infestation.

    Crossposted at American Thinker