Author: Hondo

  • F-16 Down In Arizona

    Our aerial brethren are short an aircraft this morning – and may be short one pilot.

    The 162nd Fighter Wing, Arizona ANG, based in Tucson, AZ, lost an aircraft last night.  The bird – an F-16 – went down near Douglas, AZ, during a night training operation.

    The status of the aircraft’s pilot is not currently known.  If you’re inclined to pray, a prayer for that individual’s safe recovery might be in order.

    The military is a risky business, both in war and peace.

  • That Prestigious NDSM!

    That Prestigious NDSM!

    One of our regulars here (sj) speaks very highly of the National Defense Service Medal – though from the context of his comments, if I’m reading him right I believe he’s doing so somewhat tongue-in-cheek.  But it turns out that there is a surprising quirk when it comes to this medal.

    Here’s a trivia question.  True or false: it is not possible for someone legitimately to rate the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) unless they also qualified for the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM).

    It turns out that the answer to that question is somewhat surprising. At least, I was surprised by what I ran across the other day.

    Best I can tell, the answer to the question is, believe it or not, “False.”  It does appear possible for someone to legitimately rate the VSM without also qualifying for the NDSM.  In fact, there appear to be at least two different scenarios in which an individual might do exactly that.

    Here are the details.

    1.  DoDM 1348.33-V2, dated November 23, 2010, w/Change 2, specifies the eligibility criteria for the NDSM and VSM. The NDSM’s criteria are given in Enclosure 3, pp. 59-61, of the document; the NDSM’s, on pp. 66-70.

    2.  Per the DoDM, the NDSM Vietnam eligibility period runs from 1 January 1961 to 14 August 1974. The VSM’s eligibility period is from July 4, 1965, and March 28, 1973.

    So, that means it is not possible to have a legit VSM without the NDSM, right?  Well, that would seem to be true.

    Except it’s not.  There’s another thing that DoDM 1348.33-V2 also allows – called “AFEM conversion”.

    3.  Personnel serving in Vietnam between 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 were eligible to receive the AFEM for service in Vietnam.  On application, DoDM 1348.33-V2 allows these personnel at their option to elect to convert their AFEM for service in Vietnam to the VSM.

    (They may also opt to retain the AFEM – but they can’t receive both the AFEM and VSM for service in Vietnam.  So if an individual served in Vietnam both before and after 4 July 1965, it appears that DoD policy requires that they must remove any AFEMs awarded for service prior to that date to receive the VSM.)

    4.  Conversion of AFEM to VSM is also allowed for those personnel awarded the AFEM for service in Operation Frequent Wind (the evacuation of Saigon) on 29-30 April 1975.  The two conversions are specifically authorized in para 17.e.(2)(a) and para 17.e.(2)(b) of DoDM 1348.33-V2.

    What that means is that there are at least two hypothetical scenarios in which a person could technically – at the individual’s option – legitimately rate the VSM without rating the NDSM. The first such scenario would be that of a young Soldier who joined the Army in 1956, served in Vietnam very early (during 1959-1960), and then left active duty prior to the end of that year. The second scenario would be a young Airman, Sailor or Marine who enlisted in 1974 on or after 15 August, went to training, was assigned to a unit or ship supporting Frequent Wind, and later left the service prior to 2 August 1990.

    In both cases, the individual would have originally received the AFEM for their service in or supporting Vietnam.  However, conversion of that AFEM to the VSM would be authorized.  They could apply to the appropriate Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records to do so.  (I believe I’ve seen a case or two where an early Vietnam vet did exactly that – e.g., applied to the appropriate Board well after discharge to have their AFEM converted to the VSM.)

    But in neither case would the individual be eligible for the NDSM.  All of their service would be outside a qualifying period for award of the NDSM.

    So, I guess sj is right:  the NDSM really is a big deal after all.  It turns out you can rate a campaign medal and still not qualify for that prestigious NDSM!

    That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it. (smile)

    . . .

    For what it’s worth:  the same is true for the AFEM regarding service in a whole laundry list of operations.  And it’s also true for a number of operations qualifying for the Navy Expeditionary Medal or Marine Corps Expeditionary Medal.

    It’s also true for service qualifying for the Kosovo Campaign Medal if the individual joined the military after November 1995 and their service ended prior to 11 September 2001, too (provided they didn’t join the Selected Reserve or a National Guard unit after leaving active duty).

    . . .

    Remember, folks:  we’re talking DoD policy.  It doesn’t have to make any sense. (smile)

  • Yeah, That REALLY Makes Sense

    Well, it appears that the current       group of fools and tools running things in DC     Administration has a solution to the problem of American citizens being kidnapped by terrorists.

    To help ensure the safety of Americans overseas, they’re going to allow families to pay ransoms to the terrorist if they so desire. And, better yet – they’ll facilitate the families doing so.

    No, I’m not joking. I’m dead serious.

    Yeah, that will really discourage terrorist organizations like ISIS and al Shabaab from targeting Americans. And it will really ensure that all unfortunate enough to be kidnapped get returned safely.

    Sheesh. Does anyone in this Administration have a freaking scrap of common sense? Or a single vertebra in their spine?

  • I Think I Finally Found It!

    “Secret societies” have their rites and codes. And many have their own songs.

    Well, lo and behold – I think finally found it. I believe I “broke their code”. This has GOT to be the Dutch Rudder Gang’s secret theme song!

    (smile)

  • The WaPo Misrepresents Propaganda as News – Again

    Yesterday, the Washington Post published        some anti-gun propaganda     an article.  Its title tells you all you really need to know about it:

    The “legal loophole” that allowed Dylann Roof to get a gun

    I’ve put “legal loophole” there in quotes for a couple of reasons.  The first reason is – it’s absolute bullsh!t, and it’s misleading as hell. IMO, that’s by intent.

    The second reason is that it the whole article appears to be factually incorrect.  No “legal loophole” – imaginary or otherwise – appears to have been involved at all.

    Here are the facts of the case.

    The apparently-racist bastard named Dylann Roof who murdered 9 innocents in Charleston was arrested for felony drug possession 28 February of this year.  According to the WaPo        propaganda       article, he obtained the weapon used in his crime as a birthday present this April.  (This now appears to have been proven false – I’ll cover that below).

    The WaPo writer seizes on this, claiming that this is the result of the “gun show loophole”.   He does so after acknowledging that it was already illegal under current Federal law for him to have been given a weapon as a gift while under indictment for a felony crime – see 18 USC 922(d)(1).

    So, even if the original reports of Roof receiving the firearm he used in his murders as a gift had been true, the reporter’s article would still have been bullsh!t.  Why?  Because there was no freaking “legal loophole” here.  Roof was facing felony charges – and his family had to know he’d been arrested.  They thus had good reason to suspect he could be facing felony charges – and therefore giving him a weapon would have already been illegal under Federal law.  There’s no “loophole” there, folks.

    In fact, later news reports indicate that Roof in fact bought the gun himself at a local gun shop.  My guess is that he probably falsified the purchase form (ATF Form 4473) and claimed he was not under “indictment or information” for any felony crime.  (I’m pretty sure that being out on bail after arrest while awaiting further court action virtually guarantees the latter – e.g., that Roof was legally considered “under information” of a felony, even if he hadn’t been formally indicted by a grand jury.)  Falsifying an ATF 4473 is also a Federal felony.  I suppose it’s theoretically possible that the gun shop was “dirty” and ignored a truthful answer – but since that’s kinda easily discovered, I rather doubt it.  Most business owners want to stay in business and stay out of jail.

    I’ll spell it out for any logic-challenged “liberal brethren” who might be reading this. Roof was apparently willing to lie on the purchase form in order to purchase a firearm himself.  That is itself a felony.  So, how would requiring him to take a firearm received as a gift down to the same firearms shop to “complete the transfer” for a gift have made any difference?

    Answer: it wouldn’t have.  He’d have simply lied on the ATF 4473 then, too.

    However . . . having him do that to “complete the transfer” would indeed assist in later compiling a database of who owns firearms, should anyone in the future want to do so.

    Bottom line:  that WaPo        propaganda       article yesterday wasn’t about gun safety at all.  It was about misleading people.  It was designed to convince people to support whatever is necessary to facilitate backdoor gun registration in the future – plain and simple.

  • A Little Tune for Someone

    Just think of this as a little early Father’s Day serenade for someone – in honor of their “resounding victory” in court the other day.

    King of the Sh!tbird Mountain

    I’m a heel, true sh!theel
    I can lie, dirty deal
    The truth won’t stop me trying

    ‘Cause it’s such fun, in the sun
    Watch me duck, watch me run
    Even after I’m caught lying

    I crashed in the corn
    Looked so lost and forlorn

    I crashed in a field
    Found the ground did not yield
    Someone’s screaming a name
    Calling me “Noah Gas” again

    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain
    Yes, the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

    Scheme all night and all day
    I can show you the way
    To get stuff that you don’t rate

    Sham all day and all night
    Love the dark hate the light
    Beady eyes show anger and hate

    I get the Bar’s ire
    ‘Cause they think I’m a liar
    Now they’re calling my name
    They want to slam me once again

    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain
    Yes, the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

    I get the Bar’s ire
    ‘Cause they think I’m a liar
    Someone’s screaming my name
    Might disbar me, what a damn shame

    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain
    Yes, the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

    Well I’m beyond help, you know I am

    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain
    Yes, the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

    Just look at me and listen
    I’m a fool, a tool, against me they’ll rule
    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

    I get the Bar’s ire
    ‘Cause they think I’m a liar
    I’m the King of the mountain
    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

    I’ll tell tales all night
    Never true or right
    I’m the King of the Sh!tbird Mountain!

     

    With apropos apologies to Richie Blackmore and Ronnie James Dio.

  • Even DRG Members Need A Break Sometimes . . .

    . . . so let me suggest an appropriate time and place for their next “periodic in-person get-together”.

     

     

    Makes perfect sense to me.  The DRG are IMO already kinda “out there” – and you can’t get much farther “out there” than that.  They should feel right at home!

    Who knows – maybe they’ll even great each newly arrived DRG member by asking them, “What’s shakin’!” (smile)

     

    (Note: no, I didn’t make that image, and it isn’t a joke – that’s a real eventSeriously.)

  • A Green “Fantasy” Come to Life

    Here, let me run a fantasy by you.

    . . .

    The story begins, and the hero is on the town council of a small New England town. The town’s electricity bills are killing them.

    The hero decides they’ll go solar. Notwithstanding the fact that New England isn’t exactly a primo location for solar because of its environment – no place that gets less than 200 sunny days annually is, exactly – solar is trendy and popular.  And hey:  the town might be able to get some help if they sell it just right.

    In fact, the town decides to ask for a $1.2+ million grant.  Who cares if it will only save $500,000 over the life of the project?  And who cares if the project will be owned by an overseas company – or if other citizens of the state will end up eating the cost?

    Later:  well, whaddaya know?  The hero’s plan worked!  They pulled it off!

    The town conned the Public Utility Commission into coughing up the grant, and found some foreign company willing to bite.  And they’ll save some money – by making everyone else in the state pay extra to subsidize their power!

    And they’re also saving the planet from global warming to boot.  Hooray!

    . . .

    That fantasy kinda sucks, doesn’t it? Yeah, I agree.

    Except is isn’t a fantasy. The above actually happened in Peterborough, NH – a town of less than 6,300 people.

    Watchdog.org has an article giving the details. It’s worth a read – unless you’re worried about your blood pressure.