Author: Hondo

  • Looks Like the Secret Service Has Some More ‘Splaining to Do

    I’m beginning to believe there must be something funny in the water at 950 H Street NW in DC.  Once again, the Secret Service is in the news – and not in a good way.

    A gun belonging to a member of Mitt Romney’s U.S. Secret Service detail was found unattended in the bathroom of the candidate’s charter plane Wednesday afternoon. The Republican nominee was traveling from Tampa, Fla., site of his party’s convention, to Indianapolis, Ind., for a speech.

    I’m not a law enforcement professional, so maybe I’m looking at this all wrong.  But it seems to me that any LEO leaving his/her weapon behind in a public restroom is not exactly a good thing.  Particularly not when that public restroom is on an aircraft carrying a Presidential candidate.

    And this time, I’m afraid the “these were junior folks doing advance work” excuse doesn’t cut it.  Agents accompanying Presidential candidates as part of their protection detail aren’t – or shouldn’t be – rookies.  They simply shouldn’t be making these kinds of mistakes.

    It will be interesting to see what results from this faux pas.  But this, coupled with recent past incidents, does seem to indicate that there’s a problem at the agency.  Perhaps some changes are needed.

  • If You Wanna Play a Practical Joke on Your Neighbors . . .

    . . . I’d recommend you don’t try this at home.

    Randy Lee Tenley, 44, was dressed in a “ghillie” — an outfit favored by military snipers and game hunters — and standing in the middle of southbound lanes on U.S. Highway 93 near Kalispell on Sunday when he was struck twice in quick succession, Montana Highway Patrol spokesman Sergeant Steve Lavin said.

    “From what I understand, at least one of his friends said that he was trying to induce a sasquatch sighting by using the suit along the highway,” Lavin said. “This is a first for me after 20 years on the highway patrol. It’s strange.”

    With all due respect for the deceased:  “strange” isn’t the term I’d use.  Apparently The Refreshments were right.

     

  • Farewells for the Fallen

    Stu’s article the other day – the one commenting on and quoting Dr. (COL) Frank’s 2006 Stars and Stripes article – brought to the forefront a memory or two of my own.  And while all memories aren’t necessarily pleasant, they’re all important.

    Like Dr. Frank, I spent some time at Bagram AB.  But unlike Dr. Frank, here I’m not addressing the obvious waste and personal losses inherent in wartime death. Since that was Dr. Frank’s intent his article only briefly mentioned the departure ceremony held at Bagram for the fallen.  His article therefore really didn’t convey the impact of that unique sendoff.  And even many who’ve served in Afghanistan may not have felt that impact; the public ceremony at Bagram is different than any other I’ve seen.

    So I thought I’d try and describe that ceremony, and its impact, a bit more fully. I apologize in advance if I’m not as eloquent as the good doctor.  And I also apologize if anyone finds what follows boring – or if it brings back memories that might be disturbing.  It wasn’t that easy to write, so if you’re having a bad day – well, maybe it’s best to read this another time.  Or not at all.

    Why write this at all?  Dunno.  I guess I thought it was just a natural follow-on to Stu’s article.  Or maybe I just needed to write it.

    While I’m using Army-centric language, there’s no intent to slight any other service.  My background is Army;  I’m simply speaking from a soldier’s point of view.

    ———

    In war, soldiers die.  That is and always has been a universal truth.  IMO it’s likely to remain true throughout mankind’s history. Plato was right.

    Soldiers understand all that.  And although we don’t like to think of it, I believe soldiers accept the possibility of disability or death as a normal, routine risk to an extent not seen in other professions.  We know there’s a good chance we won’t come home from war whole; or, perhaps, not at all.  Soldiers know that a primary product of war is death – ours, or the enemy’s – and that we may easily be the ones who end up dead.

    We understand, far better than most, that there’s no guarantee we’ll see tomorrow’s sunrise.

    Soldiers also understand that death isn’t limited to war.  The profession of arms is inherently dangerous; risk is simply another part of the military environment. Deaths occur regrettably often in peacetime, too – either in training, or from random chance.

    Acceptance doesn’t make such a loss any less painful.  But it does lead to a somewhat different perspective, perhaps, than that of most.  As well as to a more open, straightforward means of dealing with sudden loss.

    Still:  every loss remains painful; closure is required.  So whenever the Grim Reaper visits, virtually all units hold some sort of Fallen Comrade ceremony.

    ———

    Those who’ve been around the military for a while have almost certainly attended a Fallen Comrade ceremony – though the title may have been different.  In the Army the details of the ceremony may vary but in broad outline they’re similar, whether in peacetime garrison or in war zones:  a display of helmet/weapon/dogtags/boots, some words about the deceased, an opportunity to reflect, a brief prayer . . . .  All such ceremonies offer the opportunity to reflect on that absolute truth all of us know, but never like to think about: “There but for the grace of God . . . .”

    I’ve attended a number of such ceremonies over the years; more, frankly, than I prefer to remember.  And even some held in Afghanistan – specifically, those held in Kabul – were much like those elsewhere:  the standard display, the words about the deceased, the prayers, the brief time for reflection . . . and then back to duty.  For the living, duty calls and life goes on.

    But at Bagram, the final goodbye for Fallen Comrades was different. Very, very different.  And in a way that was dramatic, moving – and IMO, uniquely apropos.

    ———

    For those who haven’t been there:  Bagram AB is about 30 miles north of Kabul. It is the primary APOE/APOD for Afghanistan.  Virtually everyone in the military arriving in or departing that country does so through Bagram.

    It’s a base that’s seen much war during the last 35 years.  It was used by the Afghan government in the civil war which started in 1978; by the Russians during their nearly decade-long occupation of/war in Afghanistan, from 1979-1989; and by multiple factions during the more than decade of Afghan civil war which followed.  We took it over shortly after our intervention in Afghanistan began, and have been there since.

    Bagram AB  is oriented roughly southwest to northeast.  In 2007, the base was still rather long and narrow, with essentially one arterial road – Disney Avenue.  Most of the facilities were strung out along or within a couple of blocks of Disney to the east or west.  The runways are to the east of Disney; when I was there in 2007, a large and relatively undeveloped area existed west of the facilities clustered along the western side of Disney.  Things doubtless have changed somewhat since then.

    Bagram AB is also where a US KIA in Afghanistan begins the final journey home.

    I’d guess that units in Afghanistan hold internal, more private and traditional ceremonies for their fallen; my unit was fortunate enough not to have any KIAs while I was there, so we never held one.  However, at Bagram an additional, public ceremony was also held.  I understand it’s still done much the same way today as it was done 5 years ago.

    I’ll describe the Bagram public ceremony, as it was in 2007.

    The ceremony is announced over the base PA system.  The initial announcement tells everyone that a Fallen Comrade ceremony will be held at a future time.  That time may be hours in the future – or minutes.  The announcement is repeated periodically until shortly before the ceremony itself.

    The ceremony itself is very simple, even though it has many “moving parts”.  Every available person on base who can possibly be spared assembles along Disney Avenue. Time of day for such ceremonies is not set beforehand; it’s based on flight availability.   Return of KIA remains are accorded highest priority by CENTCOM, and change USAF mission flight schedules accordingly.  Thus, whenever the ceremony needs to occur, it happens.  0300?  Chowtime?  Mid-afternoon or mid-morning?  It doesn’t matter. Whenever a bird is available to depart and return the remains of those KIA to CONUS, the ceremony is held.

    If you’re not immediately required at your place of duty for operational reasons, you are expected to get yourself down to Disney posthaste and participate.  If you’re military, that means in proper uniform.  Civilians (there were some then, and are some today) wear their normal work attire.

    The assembled group along Disney Avenue is notified that the ceremony is about to begin.  Military assume parade rest; civilians stand quietly and respectfully.

    Near the western end of Disney, a vehicular procession begins.  (Though most of Disney runs generally northeast to southwest, near the south end of base it turns virtually due west – so as I recall, to avoid ambiguity the southern/western terminus is generally referred to as the “west end”.)   The procession begins at Mortuary Affairs

    In 2007, the vehicles used were generally HMMWVs pulling trailers; that may have changed since.  However, the trailers in the processions in 2007 – and presumably they still use trailers today – carry a particularly poignant cargo.

    The trailers carry the flag-draped coffins of US KIAs beginning their final journey home.

    As the procession nears, those lining the road come to attention.  As the procession passes, military personnel salute as a final token of respect to those in the coffins passing by.  Civilians cover their hearts with their hats or hands.  The salute/honor is held until after the last vehicle – with its mournful cargo – has passed by.   Then one returns to attention.

    The procession proceeds roughly a mile or so along Disney Avenue, receiving silent honors from those assembled as it passes.  It then turns east and proceeds to the Bagram flight line.

    At the Bagram flight line, the CG, his staff, and elements of all the units stationed at Bagram are assembled for the final send-off.  They render appropriate honors to those beginning their final journey home as their remains are loaded onto waiting aircraft.

    All remain at attention along Disney Avenue until the ceremony’s end is announced, paying their respects.

    The complete ceremony is recorded on video.  A DVD of the ceremony is made available to the families of the fallen.

    At the conclusion of the ceremony, an announcement is made that the ceremony has ended.  Personnel then return to whatever they were doing prior to the ceremony.

    Yes, it’s a short, simple ceremony.  I’d guess it takes 5 or 10 minutes.

    Yet the ceremony is also incredibly moving and powerful – so powerfully moving that I simply cannot adequately express the impact. It is a correct and dignified way of paying respects to a fallen brother- or sister-in-arms.  I personally cannot conceive of a more fitting farewell for a fallen comrade than for them to pass through a cordon of literally thousands of their peers rendering final honors.  It’s uniquely apropos.

    Standing alongside Disney Avenue, saluting, during one of these ceremonies is something you just don’t forget.

    ———

    On occasion, civilian visitors are present.  And on those occasions the impact of the ceremony on those visitors is particularly noticeable.

    One such ceremony occurred on an August day in 2007.  At the time, the NFL Cheerleading Squad for the Buffalo Bills – the Buffalo Jills – was visiting Bagram AB as part of a MWR tour; my duties also brought me to Bagram that day.   Prior to the ceremony, the Jills were a typically energetic, outgoing group of attractive young women. Indeed, their visit very nearly caused a fight – because during their visit, they’d all been convinced to sign a “Terrible Towel” belonging to an off-duty Pittsburgh Steeler fan.  The owner later very nearly went ballistic when he discovered what his buddies had convinced the Jills to do.

    Not long after the Jills had signed the Terrible Towel, there came the announcement of an immediate Fallen Comrade ceremony.  Immediate, as in 10 or 15 minutes from now.

    Along with everyone else, the Jills proceeded to Disney Avenue.  They stood with the troops, on the east side of the Disney near the entrance to the JOC compound.  I was standing across the road, and could see them clearly.

    That day, a procession of five flag-draped coffins traveled down Disney Avenue beginning their final journey home.

    The ladies from the Buffalo Jills were indeed properly respectful.  But afterwards, their demeanor was changed.  It was obvious that they now realized war wasn’t a “game” being played for dollars and accolades, like the sporting “combat” they were used to observing up close and personal.  And afterwards, they were – for a while, anyway – a much more somber group of women than they had been earlier in the day.

    How much longer, I can’t say.  They left not long afterwards; my duties required me to remain.

    It’s rather hard to forget standing at attention, saluting, on a hot summer day while 5 flag-draped coffins pass by a few feet away.  That’s true even when you’re a hardened-by-life, cynical middle-aged guy who’s seen a number of such ceremonies before, and who didn’t know any of those beginning their final journey home.  I can only imagine what it was like for a bunch of bubbly 20-something young ladies who’d possibly only attended one or two funerals in their lifetime.

    But if I had to guess, I’d be willing to bet that that was the event they will remember most vividly about their time in Afghanistan.  I certainly know it’s something I won’t ever forget.

    Rest in peace, my brothers- and sisters- in-arms.

     

    (Author’s Postscript:  the original version of this article contained a minor error.  It’s been revised to correct that error, as well as to include additional details concerning Bagram’s ceremony not previously known by the author.  Thanks to regular TAH reader TopGoz for the correction and new information.  TopGoz was personally involved in arranging these ceremonies in 2008-2009.  He was therefore privy to information concerning the ceremony I did not have when I wrote the original version.)

  • Talk About Yer “Oh Sh*t” Moments

    Well, it appears two Georgia skydivers got just a bit more of a thrill recently than they bargained for.

    It seems that on August 12, 2012, a couple of skydivers landed a bit off-target after a jump. They landed on a nearby military reservation.

    What installation? The reservation for the Kings Bay Submarine Base near Saint Mary’s, Georgia.

    In the past three years, seven errant jumpers have landed on base property. By sheer good luck, none have been killed when apprehended by the base’s security forces.

    The military authorities were not amused. You see, the Kings Bay Submarine Base is a rather sensitive installation. Per Wikipedia, two submarine squadrons are based there. One squadron primarily has SSGNs; the other, SSBNs.

    For the nautically challenged, in layman’s terms those are called “Trident submarines”.

    Yeah.  That kinda explains why base authorities were not amused.

    All of the wayward jumpers appear to have been clients of a local firm, called “The Jumping Place”, operating out of the nearby Saint Mary’s airport. After the latest incident, the local airport authority revoked their license to operate from airport property. However, The Jumping Place’s ownership has announced it’s intent to file a complaint with the FAA regarding the action, claiming the local airport board exceeded its authority in the matter.

    As much as I support free enterprise, this business needs to move it’s operations to another airport.  Otherwise, one day luck will run out and an errant skydiver is going to get shot by base security forces.

    And before anyone asks:  no word on whether any of the skydivers involved in the recent incident called themselves “Thunder Fowl” or any other such nom de beauxeau. (smile)

  • Just In Case You Wondered . . . .

    Some years ago a famous American asked: “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”  And from what I can gather, lots of folks are asking that same question today.

    Well, now we have the answer to that question.  Unless you received a major promotion at work – and maybe not even then – in general, you are not.  Nor are you better off than you were when the recession “ended” three years ago, either.

    In fact, you’re relatively worse off when today is compared to three years ago than you were comparing three years ago to the beginning of the current recession.

    Here’s the background.  The current economic hard times began with an 18-month recession:  from Dec 2007 to June 2009.  But the “recovery” (yes, in technical terms there has been one, though it’s been essentially a jobless recovery) has actually hit people much harder than did the recession.  From the cited article:

    Median household income fell 4.8 percent on an inflation- adjusted basis since the recession ended in June 2009, more than the 2.6 percent drop during the 18-month contraction, the research firm’s Gordon Green and John Coder wrote in a report today. Household income is 7.2 percent below the December 2007 level, the former Census Bureau economic statisticians wrote. (emphasis added)

    Let that sink in for a minute.  During the 18-month recession, in real terms the average household lost 2.6% of of their income.  But during the 36-month “recovery” since, in real terms the  average household lost 4.8% of their income – close to twice as much.

    I’m no economist, so I can’t offer an expert’s perspective on how to fix things.  But it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that whatever we’re doing today is making things worse vice better; the raw numbers show that very clearly.   Other recessions in our history have shown a clear economic recovery – well, whenever sane economic policy was used, that is.  Here, not so much.

    However, as a layman I’ll offer two observations.  First, it seems that if the government is soaking up much of the available capital through deficit spending, that just might be a drag on the economy.  If the government is borrowing that much, that same capital isn’t available for businesses to use in creating new jobs.

    And second:  I’m pretty sure this isn’t exactly the “change” most people were hoping for in late 2008.  I think they wanted things to get better, not worse.

  • Three Historical Social Security “Whoppers”

    The other day, I ran across the text from an interesting little historical document on the Social Security Administration’s web site.  In 1936 the Federal Government published a short pamphlet describing the “new” Social Security system.  That pamphlet said – in plain, easily-understandable English – a few things that turned out to be . . .  well, lies.  Big,  big lies – think whoppers good enough to make the Burger King proud.  (smile)

    Since things on the SSA website seem to get revised periodically, I thought I’d go also ahead and save a copy of this pamphlet.  I’ve printed that particular SSA webpage to a downloadable PDF file.  It can be downloaded here.

    Here’s the first “whopper” that jumped out at me.  From the above pamphlet:

    The checks will come to you as a right. You will get them regardless of the amount of property or income you may have. They are what the law calls “Old-Age Benefits” under the Social Security Act.

    Well, obviously that’s not exactly the case.  The SCOTUS says otherwise – see Fleming v. Nestor.  Bottom line:  if Congress says you don’t get Social Security, you don’t get it – regardless of whether or not you’ve paid into the system enough to qualify.  You have no contractual right to “your” Social Security – because it’s not “yours”.  It’s a government benefit, and Congress can change the rules (or the benefits paid) any time it likes.  It’s not something you own.

    The correct way to phrase this would have been, “The checks will come to you as an entitlement.  But Congress will tell you how much you get, and can end your benefits at any time if they like.”

    Here’s the second “whopper”.  Again, from the 1936 Social Security pamphlet published by the Federal government:

    YOUR PART OF THE TAX

    The taxes called for in this law will be paid both by your employer and by you. For the next 3 years you will pay maybe 15 cents a week, maybe 25 cents a week, maybe 30 cents or more, according to what you earn. That is to say, during the next 3 years, beginning January 1, 1937, you will pay 1 cent for every dollar you earn, and at the same time your employer will pay 1 cent for every dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. Twenty-six million other workers and their employers will be paying at the same time.

    After the first 3 year–that is to say, beginning in 1940–you will pay, and your employer will pay, 1.5 cents for each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. This will be the tax for 3 years, and then, beginning in 1943, you will pay 2 cents, and so will your employer, for every dollar you earn for the next 3 years. After that, you and your employer will each pay half a cent more for 3 years, and finally, beginning in 1949, twelve years from now, you and your employer will each pay 3 cents on each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. That is the most you will ever pay. (emphasis and underlining added)

    Gee – a 3% tax on the first $3,000 of income is “the most you will ever pay”.  Even adjusting for inflation and the fact that a dollar in 1936 is worth $16.48 in 2012, that translates to a 3% employee tax rate on the first $49,440 of earned income  – not the 6.2% employee tax rate applied to the first $110,110 of earned income we have today.  (Yes, I know – it’s been temporarily reduced to “only” 4.2% until the end of the year.)

    Obviously that rather clear promise also turned out to be bullshit.

    Here’s the third “whopper” – and it’s my personal “favorite”.  From near the end of the pamphlet:

    What you get from the Government plan will always be more than you have paid in taxes and usually more than you can get for yourself by putting away the same amount of money each week in some other way.  (emphasis and underlining added)

    Yeah, right. Ask most people retiring today if they agree with that statement.  We all know that’s total bullshit.  The average guy or gal retiring today will get less in Social Security benefits than they paid in in taxes.

     

    Oh, and in case you’re wondering, insipid:  the 1936 Social Security pamphlet doesn’t say a damn thing about “insurance” or “premiums”; those words don’t even appear in the pamphlet’s text.  (The pamphlet does, however, sell Social Security as a de facto national retirement plan.) The payments made to retirees are termed “Old-Age Benefits”; payments made by employees and employers are clearly identified as “taxes”.  Even at this early date, Social Security never called itself – or sold itself as — some type of “insurance”.  Calling Social Security “insurance” is simply a bogus smokescreen used by those who wish to obscure Social Security’s true nature:  a inter-generational income transfer program, AKA welfare.

    Why?  Probably because it’s easier to sell insurance than welfare.

  • Yet Another Green on Blue in Afghanistan

    From Fox News:

     A man in an Afghan police uniform shot and killed an international service member on Sunday, NATO said, raising the death toll to 10 in such attacks in the space of just two weeks.

    The nationality of the ISAF soldier killed was not released.

    Yeah, I’d guess the numerous repetitions we’ve seen of this kind of thing qualifies as a “pattern”.  And when patterns appear repeatedly in the enemy’s operations, as I recall that’s generally called a “tactic”.

    At least we finally seem to be treating this sort of thing as an enemy tactic vice an aberration.  It’s about damn time.