Posted in

Woman Calls Transgender a Man – Held in Cell for 7 Hours

by thebesig••63
Stephanie Hayden initiated the complaint that resulted in Kate Scottow’s arrest. Photo from the Daily Mail.

A UK woman, Kate Scottow, called a transgender a man instead of the preferred “woman”. Additionally, she was accused to linking the transgender to the transgender’s birth name, known as “dead naming”. That’s like our using “Bradley Manning” instead of “Chelsea Manning”. A series of events happened that led the police to Kate’s door.

From the Daily Mail:

Mrs Scottow denied harassing or defaming Miss Hayden and said she holds a ‘genuine and reasonable belief’ that a human ‘cannot practically speaking change sex’, but Deputy Judge Jason Coppel QC issued an interim injunction that bans her from posting any personal information about Miss Hayden on social media, ‘referencing her as a man’ or linking her to her ‘former male identity’.

She got arrested, taken in for questioning, then held in a cell for 7 hours without the basic necessities that she needed. A couple months after her arrest, she’s still waiting on the return of her laptop.

More details can be read here.

 

You might also like

Why I believe Michael Weinstein is a bottom feeding opportunist.

Transgender ‘woman’ competes against female teens, changes in same locker room

Debunking Yet Another False Claim

63 thoughts on “Woman Calls Transgender a Man – Held in Cell for 7 Hours”

  1. Ms. Scottow should apply for political asylum in the USA. She actually has more of a case than the gajillions of Central Americans economic obamagrants trying to rush our border…

      1. I’m convinced England is lost. I wonder how long before the same can be said with certainty about America? If I were years younger I would live my life with the intention of living in Japan some day. I understand they have virtually no rag heads.

  2. If search engines pick up names and info, then Stephanie Hayden is a man. Stephanie Hayden is a man.
    Actually, Anthony George Steven Halliday is a man, born a man, will die a man, regardless of what he has done to his plumbing and what name he assumes.

    1. And….in 200 years when anthropologists happen upong Anthony George Steven Halliday’s remains, they will say: “These present as the remains of an X years old male.”

    1. Reminds me of that “This is an Apple” commercial CNN made stating the obvious that an apple is not a banana even if someone tries to tell you otherwise.

      1. But Nowadays CNN is into either, “well if it identifies as a banana, we don’t want to offend it because it says it’s a banana”

        Or:

        “It is whatever we say it is because we’re the trustworthy journalists that are always correct and truthful!”

  4. It’s a jail-time crime to be truthful in the UK?

    XX chromosomes = female
    XY chromosomes = male

    Can’t change genetics no matter how much surgery and hormone crap you engage in.

    Geezo Pete. I am stunned. Might have been better if Scotlow had just used the pejorative “bitch”.

    1. Give the a.h. a dna test and see what it says! Too bad the retarded judge wasn’t smart enough to do that! imo

      1. Yes, SFC D, Stephanie Hayden is a man, born a man, will die a man.
        Jay, you know it, Stephanie Hayden is, was and will always be, a man, man.

        1. He can whack off as many parts as he likes, HE will still be a MAN. This is insanity. Go to jail for something as minor as this. And, yes, any of you reading this, I don’t care how offended you are, it is minor. Damn

  7. JESUS H. Christ on a brokedick bamboo raft stuck up Shit Creek without a paddle, talk about political correctness run amok!!! A Priest whose Church I used to attend referred to political correctness as Cultural, Social and Spiritual Suicide and I still agree with that to this day!

  8. “I guess a drag queen’s like an oil painting: You gotta stand back from it to get the full effect.” ` Harvey Fierstein

  10. The ultimate solution to Ms. Scottaw’s “crime” is for the government to re-educate her in order for her to get her mind right.

    …and they call it progress.

  11. Also, isn’t it funny how, in these circumstances, it’s perfectly okay among the progressives to separate mothers from their children.

  12. This old world just keeps getting crazier and crazier. Ms calls itself a girl is not. The fools in the linked article (Dave’s comment /UK) need to go to prison for child abuse.

    Glad I’m old. Just how much worse is it gonna get?

  13. You are FREE to believe as you wish.
    You do not have a right to make me believe or act according to YOUR beliefs.
    If this *simple* tenet of Classical Liberalism fails completely, Lord help us, the Inquisition is next.

  14. Unfortunately, the Brits have become clinically insane. They are suffering from the terminal mental illness known as progtardism. I am beginning to think it may be worse than Mad Cow disease, since most of their culture is now infected and doomed.

  15. What is going to be entertaining is when their Muzzie population gets large enough to impose its Sharia law on everyone in Britain. I hope they broadcast the stonings and the gays/trannies being thrown off buildings, so we can all see the end result of this type of thinking. It will be the terminal end result of PC BS enacted into what they call law.

    1. “Nothing to see here. Move along.”

      It will not be spoken of, until there is nothing spoken of it but applause.

  16. I’m glad I got my foreign travel bug out of when I was young. Speak the wrong word in Western Europe or Canada and end up in jail. Too many cameras and too many PC police.

  17. OK IM AM PISSED!

    Hence 4th and hintertwo, I require all you dickweeds to refer to me as Irish.

    Because, if you get that wrong I can just tell you to “kiss my royal Irish ass”.

    1. I, too, am of Irish descent, although not from royalty. I will be referred to as Irish, or you can kiss my pasty white Irish ass!

      2. My family had a habit of ending up on the wrong side of royalty. Had to flee France because of an incident involving a nobleman’s daughter, got on the wrong side of the Brits for something similar, ended up in County Westmeath sometime in the 1600’s where they promptly sided against the British. So, as you can see, my DNA has a long history of fighting the powers that be. And I have no plans to change that.

      3. Originally posted by MCPO NYC USN Ret.

        I am of Royal Irish descent.

        No shitter.

        I descended from from a line of English Barons/Knights. One of them was knighted by Edward I of England (Longshanks).

        1. I am of non-royal Norman descent. “Norse” up to 880; “Frankish” as of 10th century; “English” as of 1066; “Irish” as of 1172 …. and “AMERICAN” as of 1836.

          My ancestor Robert accompanied Henry II to Ireland and was granted, by royal charter, the city of Waterford and “the whole provence thereabouts;” and made Marshal of Ireland. In 1179 he was one of the Lords Justices of Ireland.

          NORMANS RULE OK!

  18. There were darn good reasons we declared ourselves independent of Britain.

    It only went downhill after that.

    Pity.

    2. Or be ‘unpersoned’, shut off from; credit, travel, voting.
      It’s phase two of this technocratic utopia.

  22. These drag Queens are really giving woman a bad name. Some that I have seen around town look like they were hit by a Mack Truck head on. They are as rough as grade 8 sand paper. A man is a man, a woman is a woman and the only way they will change is in the second coming.

    1. It’s like Stolen Valor, isn’t it, Kenneth? In both instances, people claim to be what they are not. Don’t you agree, Kenneth? Don’t you?

    2. Saw one at Trader Joe’s the other night. Why do most of them stand more than 6ft tall? This one had obviously fake tits that he was proudly throwing about and tried too hard to look like a girl — my wife killed herself laughing.

      Another was THE chief scientist of an unnamed federal research center. He stood over 6ft and made a butt-ugly girl … it was a stretch saying “her” about him. Oops … see: I did it again.

      1. Kenneth says he’s a Vietnam Veteran. Kenneth says he served with the Australian Army there. Kenneth used to use his middle initial here, then someone (let’s call him 2/17 Air Cav) looked up his name in the Australian records and, lo and behold, there listed was every serviceman and civilian who ever was in Vietnam and Kenneth’s name was not there. Imagine that. And Kenneth erred with respect to the dates. He was there when the rest of the Australians were not.

  23. This is why I give the ACLU money to defend 1st amendment cases for Nazis and Commies…

    As crazy as those fuckers are I don’t want anyone making any “reasonable” restrictions on the first (or second) amendments on my behalf.

    Any respect I had for England’s government has long since dissipated. They never had protected free speech and this is the natural result of that lack of foresight when it comes to dissent.

    This is similar to the asshole who looks like He-Man from the Masters of the Universe insisting we call him “ma’am”…and then getting pissy when some kid has no fucking idea the 220lb linebacker looking asshole in front of him wants to be a fairy princess for fuck’s sake…

    Don’t ask me to participate in your delusions, you won’t like the results.

    1. You are deluding yourself if you think the ACLU (American Communist Lawers Union) really cares about defending any portion of the Constitution. You might want to read what Roger Baldwin, its founder, said about its true purpose, defending Communists from criminal charges.

      1. They’ve defended Limbaugh’s rights in his drug case as well.

        They do some dumb shit, I won’t argue that point. But there’s no one else doing what they do on behalf of first amendment rights on a regular basis.

        1. They just do high profile cases to maintain their cover. Roger covered this in one of his confabs with his crew when he said: “Remember comrades, communism is the goal.” I’ll believe they have lawers who care about the Constitution when they start handling cases defendant the Second Amendment. Not goin to happen since all their lawers are progs.

          1. Fuck the ACLU. They occasionally go through the motions of defending certain parts of the Constitution when it is to their advantage to do so. They need occasional ‘we feel your pain’ time to justify their existence to conservatives when they need to rattle their cup.

        2. With you on this one, VoV. It’s pretty simple, really. While I do not particularly support the ACLU, I certainly support the concept that they are free to exist. In America, if the ACLU is silenced, every one of us is at risk.

          Yes, they are very selective of the cases they take. Doing business with whoever you want while not doing so with others sounds like what most of us do.

          In other words, I don’t want to do business with the ACLU but I want to live in a world where the ACLU is free to exist.

  25. If we called a tail a leg, how many legs would a dog have?

    Answer: 4. Calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it one. Same thing here.

    2. I have been watching British TV shows covering the past 20 years. I have seen these series I have binge watched becoming increasingly pussified and proglodyzed each year/season. Britain is doomed, both culturally and demographically.

  28. No, no, no! None of you understand what’s going on here!

    This doodie-brained twig wants to be a girl, and is probably already partly through the change. That means that “he” is neutered and can’t reproduce, period. No ovaries, no uterus, no kids.

    Now, think about that for a minute. No offspring means no genes passed on. No children, no grandchildren, no descendants of any kind, end of lineage, and nobody will care. And women who want to get laid but don’t want kids and “get rid” of them because they won’t use birth control are doing the same things – ending their line.

    The term for that is ‘thinnning the herd’. They are doing it for us. And when they die, no one will be left behind to remember anything about them. End of that story.

    1. But the progs in the so-called education system want to have chapters in their school books about these deviants as powerful important historical figures.

Comments are closed.