Posted in

Terror in Paris

by Jonn Lilyea••94

Paris terror1

Ex-PH2 sends us a link to an MSN article about the terror attack this morning on the offices of French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo this morning which took eleven innocent lives. The weekly apparently attracted the ire of terrorists when they republished cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that had originally appeared in Danish daily Jyllands-Posten in 2006.

A source close to the investigation said two men “armed with a Kalashnikov and a rocket-launcher” stormed the building in central Paris and “fire was exchanged with security forces”.

The source said a gunman had hijacked a car and knocked over a pedestrian while attempting to speed away. He added that two police officers had died in the attack.

[…]

The gunmen shouted “we have avenged the prophet,” according to a police source.

The editor of the weekly has received death threats recently and she lives under police protection. Oh, by the way, MSN also reports that the terrorists also had rocket launchers. Those are probably illegal in France. According to Wikipedia, France requires permits for semi-automatic weapons with a magazine capacity larger than three. I wonder if these terrorists had permits for their AKs.

France has raised it’s terrorist alert warnings to it’s highest level.

You might also like

“Change our policies”

Good news! Assault is free speech!

TAH in Business Insider

94 thoughts on “Terror in Paris”

  1. Sorry to see the shitbags have killed more people. When is the West ever going to wake up? Charles Martel must be rolling in his grave.

      2. Unfortunately, not in many of our big cities like New York or LA where far too many special snowflakes think guns are evil and want them banned.

      3. Depends on the city.
        Shit-cago, Sham Francisco, Lost Angels, New Yawk, District of Criminals – you’re probably right, the muzzies would have a field day of it.

        Salt Lake, Phoenix, Tucson – ummm, maybe not so much.

    2. After England. They have just as big a problem with Muslims in many parts of their large cities.

      1. Well, the followers of the Religion of Perpetual Outrage did manage to burn almost 1,000 cars on New Year’s Eve in Paris and it’s suburbs.

        1. I read today that some bright light decided not to announce the number of car burnings any longer b/c it would lead non-Muslim Froggies to think ill of all Muslim Froggies. Great strategy. It was akin to our Ebola Czar. The day he was named, all info about Ebola-infected Americans ceased. Goebbels would be so proud.

  3. Aww gee whiz, France has strict gun Control Laws, why didn’t those hadjis obey them? /sarc

  5. France has had several terrorist attacks the past month. When are they going to get serious about all the Islamists let allow in their country?

    An RPG? Good grief, France.

  6. Y’know, I’m a wee bit confused. I’m a Christian myself, specifically a Roman Catholic. As such, I’m the butt of a fair number of off-color jokes (even been known to make a couple myself). I also regularly hear from various libtards how my faith is oppressive, violent, dangerous, midieval, and generally bad. This despite the fact that Christianity openly condemns violence, promotes education for girls, Church-owned hospitals won’t bat an eye at treating atheists, pagans, or homosexuals (and won’t ask if you are one), etc.

    Media outlets do everything from posting casual jokes about Christian practices to blatant attacks all the time. Granted, a few will get hate mail from the basement-dwellers that exist on the fringe of any group. But when was the last time somebody shot up one of those places while shouting Christian scriptures? And when did somebody else do the exact same thing at the exact same time elsewhere? When was the last time a Christian suicide-bombed a shopping mall or elementary school? When was the last time Christians hijacked a couple of airliners and flew them into buildings? When was the last time the Pope issued a “fatwa” commanding all Catholics to hunt down and murder a particular individual for “blasphemy against the faith?” Okay, the last one has actually happened, about five hundred years ago! We grew out of that shit, and it was never nearly as common as some would have us believe (it’s really amazing all the myths that fall apart if you actually read history).

    These same libtards keep telling us that islam is the “Religion of Peace,” and how great and wonderful islam is. Remind me how many madrasas are willing to even teach girls how to read? And what is the cultural meaning of a hijab? And what about all those guys who’ve been, y’know, murdering people in broad daylight while shouting “allahu ahkbar!”? And how about all the mass-rape that’s been going on in IS territory? And explain to me why it’s anything but barbaric and uncivilized to stone to death or otherwise kill a female because she was the VICTIM of rape?

    Here’s a great example of the difference: a particularly aggressive Christian (not me; as far as I’m concerned, your belief or lack thereof is between you and God, and none of my business) will tell you that you’re going to hell someday if you don’t convert to Christianity. A moslem will tell you that you must either convert or die while threating you with a knife or gun, and even if you agree to convert, there’s a pretty good chance that he’ll say, “Too bad, we need some more dhimmi slaves right now. So you’re dhimmi now! And I’m going to rape your daughter!”

    What was that about the “Religion of Peace” again?

    1. Come to think of it, when was the last time anyone ever heard of Christians practicing “honor killings” of their Daughters as well as the practice of throwing acid in their faces for not wanting to marry who their fathers demanded them to?

      1. [Looking at my daughter in her playpen as I type this]

        Should my daughter (once she’s all grown up) pursue a marriage I don’t approve of, the worst I MIGHT do is not pay for her wedding dress (I probably still would anyway; I can’t possibly begin to express how much I love my baby girl). If anybody ever attempts to harm my little girl in any way whatsoever, I WILL KILL THE FUCKER. Period fucking dot. 150 grains at 2800FPS, and/or 230 grains at 850FPS, and/or a 10-inch blade, repeat as needed.

        That is how a Christian father regards his daughter.

        1. Concur 100% and more, Whitey! When my daughter (the absolute apple of my eye) was dating the young man she eventually married, I pulled him off to the side and told him, in no uncertain terms, “If you make her cry … I will make YOU cry.” He never has made her cry.

    2. When did someone issuea ‘fatwa’ to hunt down, etc.

      I believe that was Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont in France on Nov. 27, 1095. I believe it was a Wednesday.

        1. No, I’m pretty sure it was après le déjeuner (after lunch).

          You know the French: la nourriture est de première, puis tout le reste.

    3. These people are still living in the 14th century (by way of mindset). Imagine what the Catholic church would have done if this same sort of thing would have happened back then. Good thing we have outgrown this way of thinking.

      1. Sweetie, read my comment and remember that the Crusades started shortly after Pope Urban II’s potboiler speech, with Peter the Hermit

    4. As the closest thing to a ‘libtard’ here, let me first say that you’re absolutely correct that the severity of fanatical Muslim rage dwarfs that of ‘fanatical’ Christian rage to the point where drawing direct comparisons is somewhat unfair.

      So, to address your first question, why do you hear about how oppressive Christianity is? Because you probably talk chiefly with other Americans, and our country is predominantly Christian, and Congress is 92% Christian. The ‘average libtard’ has far more run-ins with Christians pushing their agenda than they do Muslims pushing theirs, even if the ‘push’ in the first case is a gentle one, and in the latter has a fairly good chance of coming from the business end of a weapon.

      Now, a bit of background on me – I’m not religious myself, but I have zero problems with people who are. I figure life can be difficult, and if people find something that helps them find meaning and make them better people, that’s fantastic. But by simple virtue of not being Christian, I’ve had friends cut ties with me, I had a family member angrily blame me for September 11th because, apparently, had I prayed more it wouldn’t have happened, and I watched a gay friend be disowned and kicked out on to the street by his Christian father because of his sexuality. Now, this sort of interaction isn’t daily, obviously – in fact, it’s thankfully quite rare, but it does happen. And it’s also true that in none of these scenarios was I ever at risk of death or physical harm, whereas that’s considerably more likely in a Muslim environment. But when I add up these moments, and look at their frequency, and look at the frequency with which I’ve personally had to deal with Muslim fanatics, which group has a more direct impact on my life? Christians.

      By way of analogy, it’s sort of like being told you have a small chance of getting a lethal cancer at some point in the future, while also dealing with regular mild headaches. Assuming you’re currently dealing with the headaches, are you going to ignore them because the cancer could be much worse? Probably not. You’re going to recognize that, but still aim to reduce the headaches you face on a regular basis.

      My two cents.

      1. I’m not religious either.

        “But by simple virtue of not being Christian, I’ve had friends cut ties with me” Boo fucking hoo. If you were Wahabi Muslim, they would probably have stoned you until dead.

        “… and I watched a gay friend be disowned and kicked out on to the street by his Christian father because of his sexuality.” Iran has no gays. It seems they don’t do well there. Maybe it’s the climate.

        Go to Afghanistan sometime and watch how they treat women. Or Africa…maybe they’ll let you cut off a clitoris or two. In Saudi maybe you can stone an alleged adulteress, or a driver.

        Keep on rationalizing your anger at Christians. It’s so PC.

        1. I have no anger at Christians. I quite clearly stated that if these scenarios repeated themselves in a Muslim environment, I’d have a good chance at being hurt or killed. My point wasn’t that America’s Christianity is in any way comparable -it’s far more benign!- but that to the average non-Christian American, I experience it

          . Not once did I say that the Christian environment we have here in the US treats people worse than Muslim environments do. On the contrary!

          1. Somehow that got all messed up and posted before I’d finished. The point is, I and people like me experience negative Christian ‘influence’ far more often than we experience the considerably more severe Muslim influence. Hence why people here tend to pick on Christianity for its perceived faults, mild as they may be.

            Again, get a cold or a flu often and it’s annoying, even if it isn’t terminal cancer. The severity matters less than the personal experience.

          2. “which group has a more direct impact on my life? Christians”

            You’re right, I assumed the anger.

      2. LC, I’m Christian, but that doesn’t mean I ever check my brain at the door of a church. As a result, I’ve left every church I’ve ever belonged to, and it has nothing to do with not liking the rules. It has to do with the fact that they aren’t there for God, they’re there for structure, tradition, and social interaction. I ask the hard questions, and when I upset their little apple carts, I end up finding myself unwelcome.

        You know what Jesus said about people who are sick needing a physician, not those who are well? You find an awful lot of sick people sitting in the pews. They’re afraid, and they will reject anything that doesn’t make them feel better. You throw spiritual cold water on them, and they’ll throw you right out the door.

        Just my opinion — and 35 years or so of rabble rousing in American religion.

        1. Oh, I understand that mentality perfectly – and I certainly didn’t intend to say anything negative about Christians in my response; I was simply trying to illustrate why people here, in the US, focus on Christianity’s issues when Muslims are profoundly more violent.

          As far as I’m concerned, one’s religious habits are a personal decision – some people want to focus on God, others want community and structure, some it’s just what they’re used to, and ultimately if it helps them as a person, and in turn helps us as a society, I’m happy for them.

      3. LC,

        I’m not very religious, but you can’t draw comparisons to Christianity today and Islam today. Maybe if you compared Christianity, more to the point, Catholicism of say the middle ages to Islam today, then you would have a point. Throwing your homo son out on the street, because of your hardcore Christian beliefs, pales in comparison to that same scenario being played out by a hardcore muslim, who would probably have to kill him for the honor of the family. THAT is where we are right now. Of course, there are still some nutbags that claim they’re Christian, that do things like blowing up abortion clinics (which hasn’t happened in a couple decades), but we have to face reality and that is that hardcore muslims haven’t evolved past the 10th century and expect the rest of us to acquiesce to their primitive doctrinal philosophies and they have no interest in assimilating into Western society. They want us to not offend their sensibilities or they will kill us. That sounds like a good trade. Couple that with the linguine spined liberals that have no problem offending Christianity suddenly bowing and scraping to not upset muslims.

        The common mantra is that only 15% of muslims are extremists. Ok, I’ll buy that. That equates to approx. 225 million of the roughly 1.5 billion muslims are goat raping Neanderthals. The “moderate” muslims don’t allow you to even carry a bible in their country, which means they are very insecure in their own religion to believe it can’t withstand someone wearing a cross necklace around other muslims. Makes it appear they’re not as tolerant, peaceful, or advanced as the apologists claim the “moderates” are.

        1. I think we’re actually in agreement – at the very beginning I said that drawing comparisons is unfair. My goal wasn’t to compare Christianity with Islam, it was just to address the question I come across pretty often, “Why do (libtards) complain about Christianity when Islam is so much worse?”

          There is zero question that any of the above scenarios I mentioned would be worse in the Muslim environments we see around us today. I stated as much, I believe. And, honestly, I think most people know that. But on a daily basis, how often does your typical American have to personally deal with Muslims seeking to impose their way of life on them? Bear in mind that this audience here, on TAH, has a different perspective and life experience than most people. The fact is, for a random 42-year old woman who wants to marry her long-time girlfriend in Missouri, her Christian politicians are a bigger hassle in her day-to-day existence than some jihadi in Syria.

          Put another way, what’s going to impact you more, a minor annoyance you deal with pretty regularly, or a lethal threat that’s so far off your radar that it’s essentially a non-issue, at least in your mind?

          And I agree, it annoys me when people mention random acts of violence perpetrated by Christians and claim parity with Muslims – you and I both know that these sorts of acts will always happen, but rare incidents aren’t the same as a cultural trend. Where you and I maybe diverge is that I’m not convinced this is so much of an issue with the religion itself as it is with the cultures the religion is pervasive in, but that’s a long discussion for another time. The point, getting back to the beginning, is that I’m most certainly not comparing Christians to Muslims, I’m simply illustrating why I feel Christians take more flack in the US. And it boils down to the simple fact that most of us are more impacted by Christians than Muslims.

          For another analogy, it’s a bit like the tides – the moon and the sun both influence the tides, and though the sun is something like 27 millions times larger, it’s also almost 400x farther away from us than the moon, so its gravitational effect is ultimately less. Islamic fundamentalists may be millions of times worse than a Christian politician, however you measure such things, but it’s his proximity and influence that makes him have a greater effect on daily life for your typical American.

          1. Well, I live in Minnesota and you know what’s been going on around here over the last few years in regards to muslim influence. I walk amongst them on a daily basis and interact with them, also. My take is from that experience. I watched as my former college, which is a public college, spent a lot of money to install special foot baths in the bathrooms to accommodate muslim students, while not allowing Christian prayer, etc. If we are going to have the separation of church and state, then we can’t start making exceptions for one religious group over another in the name of diversity. My daughters, in school, weren’t allowed to engage in Christian prayer, but a special room was set up for EID/Ramadan for the muslim students. The double standard/hypocrisy that the left and our government exercises is mind boggling and if you point it out; you’re a hater/bigot/xenophobe. We are engaged in appeasement of one group and it’s going to come back to bite us in the ass, thanks to the liberals. The left and liberals want to live in a state of denial about what is going on, but when you ask those that experience it on a daily basis, they will tell you the truth and it differs greatly from what you read in the paper or watch on the news, all in the name of diversity. I could list many more examples, but I think you get my point. They don’t want to assimilate into Western culture and because of our good nature, they aren’t required to.

  7. Terrorists can kill damn near anyone and attack damn near any institution, with much of the media going through their blah, blah, blah reporting of the matter and some of the media barely mentioning it at all. BUT note how this attack is covered. It will be nonstop and over the top b/c it was one of their own who took the hit. I do not take an iota of pleasure in the deaths of the newspaper employees but I do appreciate that, little by little, more people worldwide are beginning to open their eyes and recognize that kid gloves, sweet talk, and kowtowing to the religion of peace isn’t working out well.

    Here’s part of the official reaction from the Golfer in Mom Jeans:

    “France, and the great city of Paris where this outrageous attack took place, offer the world a timeless example that will endure well beyond the hateful vision of these killers.”

    Can anyone tell me what the hell he just said? A timeless example of what?

        1. Well, he is on his way to Phoenix. Maybe he’ll be able to squeeze in 18 while he’s there?

      2. “He said, and I quote, “blah, blah, blah, blahblahblah… ””

        Which translated thus: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. What’s my tee time?”

    2. A timeless example of a President opening his mouth, talking, but not having a single thing to say.

      Conversely a timeless example of what talking out of your ass looks like.

    3. No, you don’t “endure” beyond the hateful vision of killers, you die because of it. The only way to survive is fight — but Obama wouldn’t know anything about that, would he?

  9. Just another case of the West not taking a threat seriously. I’m surprised Obumbles didn’t call this one “workplace violence” as well.

  10. France has a horrible problem with millions of un-assimilated Islamists, many from Algeria, a former colony. Many places in France are no-go for law enforcement because they are run under Sharia law.

    Until countries like France, England and Spain get serious about dealing with the issue of violent extremists hiding within their borders, this will never go away and will in fact only get worse.

    And yes, it will happen here. Not the home grown single shooter we are used to, but an all out attack by a well trained and well armed terrorist group.

    Even then the political chattering class will continue to deny that it exists at all.

          1. Jonn, do yourself a favor and do not use Google to search for recent images of BB.

            I saw a picture of her a few years back when she got arrested for something. It might have been her last “hate speech” arrest, but I think she’s also a big animal rights supporter too – so it could have been something related to that instead.

            Let’s just say she’s not exactly a “hottie” these days.

  11. When are the “civilized” nations of the world going to have enough of this shit, band together and vaporize these friggin’ assholes. America has been damned lucky that we have not had another 9/11 type of attack and I feel like our time is coming. But instead of being proactive, we sit on our hands and wait for it. Guess we don’t want to offend the “good” Muslim’s. You know, the ones who aren’t actively involved in trying to attack us (yet) but who cheer whenever us or our allies take one in the junk.

    1. My thought too, Gunny. Somehow we need to wrap our heads around the idea that any muslim not actively seeking to put a muzzle on the jihadists is one giving them tacit support. We’ve gone past the point of being able to afford the luxury of neutrality.

  12. Never been a question of if, but when. Sane people understand this. Too bad that so many around the world have little to no sense of survival left within them.

    1. Then there was this gem, “This is what we call smart power: using every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security, and leaving no one on the sidelines, showing respect, even for one’s enemies, trying to understand and insofar as psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of view“. Hillary Clinton, who wants to be our next pResident.

  14. Anyone want to take a bet on how long it will be before some lefty group starts complaining about “backlash” violence against Muslims because of this attack? It will probably even come with its own cute hashtag.

    1. proper response to such attacks on the freedoms we hold dear is not to vilify any faith, but instead to marginalize extremists of all backgrounds who seek to stifle freedom and to create or widen societal divisions.” That’s part of CAIR’s official response to the attack in France. I have a question. How, exactly, does one marginalize the fellows using the guns and explosives in the name of Allah? How about those mass and individual beheadings? What do we do, call them names and say they don’t matter? Do we invite them to Times Square and turn our backs to them. CAIR is silly.

      1. CAIR is also listed as a supporter of terrorist organizations, IIRC. Why that group is allowed to spew is beyond me.

  16. I noticed that CAIR did not mention Islam or terrorists in its official comment from its director, Nihad “Panties in” Awad. He referred only to “extremists of all backgrounds.” Yeah, I can see that. It’s not about IS/ISIS/ISIL, Boko Harem, Al Qaeda or any of the myriad other exclusively Muslim groups. And it’s not about terrorists, at least to him. It’s about all people in the undefined category of extremists, whether they use violence or not.

  17. Not being particularly religious I never understood the rationale for The Crusades.
    Getting a little clearer every day.

    1. The Crusades began because the ME was at one time almost entirely Christian. Various Popes wanted to safeguard Christian holy sites from the muslim hordes. Islam continued to expand-right up to the borders of Europe, hence Charles Martel, Sobieski, et al. Centuries later, the Left scoffed at religion and the cultural differences they engendered and began agitating for wholesale emigration from muslim countries. We are now paying for their hatred of the West.

  18. FUBAR’d the email address.

    Not being particularly religious I never understood the rationale for The Crusades.
    Getting a little clearer every day.

  19. Let’s hope the French authorities are able to locate and capture/kill the shooters. Things will go from bad to worse in a hurry when this scum starts getting away with attacks like this.

      1. Eventually, the real threat that is Islam will be addressed in Europe. Japan has done a good job of keeping Muslims out but the country has done that on the front end, by denying Muslims citizenship, denying them visas, and ensuring that there are very few places of worship for Muslims. It’s a far different matter once, as in France, England, Germany, and elsewhere, you open the gates and then ask that they be nice and not blow you and yours up.

      2. And people complain because the Uighurs in western China are ‘suppressed’.

        Yeah, it’s coming here unless someone gets a dose of common sense and stops it at the borders… which I do not see happening.

  20. As much as it may pain French polite society and the body politic, France’s only hope for preservation of its national identity may have to be the election of Marine Le Pen and her National Front to become the ruling party of France. Desperate times call for desperate measures, and these are desperate times for the French and any hope of preserving what’s left of France’s national identity and heritage; I have a feeling the National Front will pick up SIGNIFICANTLY more votes than the 17% it got in the last national election…

  21. Ah, well, at least we have a hashtag now. It’s nice to know that there’s no act so horrific that it can’t be trivialized almost immediately.

    It’s a good thing we didn’t have Twitter during WWII. I can only imagine the horror of #PearlHarborStrong, #CorregidorStrong, #IShallReturn, #DunkirkStrong, #WeWillFightOnTheBeaches, #LondonStrong, #UBoatsSuck, #OperationTorch, #PattonSlap, #DDay, #ParisLiberated, #V1sSuck, #V2sSuck, #ArdennesStrong, #Nuts101, #HitlersDead, and of course the very last hashtat of the war, #NagasakiStrong. [rolling eyes]

    1. Are you serial?? A fucking hashtag? I did see a picture of them holding a candle light vigil, which is about as effective. What do you expect from leftists? Every time there’s some violent act, the commies come out with a hashtag and a candle light vigil, like that will do jack shit to stop the violence.

        1. True. Sorry I blew up.

          As for the rock worshiping goat fuckers; I hope you get raped by a syphilitic gorilla and the bastard that gave it to him.

          2. For these assholes I would prefer the much older French method of breaking them on the wheel (google it but not at lunchtime.)

    2. Say what you will, but #UBoatsSuck really turned the tide in The Atlantic. #FukTheHun was another masterstroke.

  22. The experts are saying the cowards are “highly trained”. How trained does one need to be to kill unarmed civilians. Just saying.

  23. They two didn’t look to me in a video that they were crazed amateurs. They looked quite steady and deliberate. They executed a wounded police officer like they were strolling through a park, then returned to their waiting vehicle and drove off. They apparently shot who they wanted to shoot at the mag office and left others alone. In short, they appear to be veterans of terrorism. My guess is that they have a nice safe place they are cooling their heels at now, knowing that nearly all police response would be focused on the mag office for a goodly amount of time after the attack.

    1. No doubt they’re not rookies, but I refuse to give them credit for being anything other than murderers.

  24. Reportedly the French authorities have identified the terrorists as 3 French national muslims ages 32, 34, 18 w/ two oldest being brothers.

  25. I guess one of the cartoonist, now deceased, was quoted as saying “I would rather live standing than die kneeling.” I bet they made him kneel. Too bad “I would rather die shooting” is not in the French lexicon.

    If every person in France publishes the cartoons on their Facebook pages, will the government provide them all with around the clock police protection?

    At what point will the French people demand the right keep and bear arms in order to protect themselves from a threat enabled and emboldened by The Government?

    Look at what happened when that Muslim nutter beheaded that woman in Oklahoma. The Boss came out of his office, and shot him. No waiting on cops, no mass casualties of the defenseless. No search, no siege, no trial, etc.

  26. I hate to make fun of the situation in France but when I heard that the first French Cops to show up did so on bicycles and then beat a hasty retreat because they were not armed I couldn’t help but think of the joke “what do you call a million frenchmen with their hands in the air”? “The French Army”
    They opened their borders years ago to muslims, bent over PC Style and let them set up 10th Century enclaves complete with their own Shiria Courts and Police cow towed to them every way possible and this is what the result is. You reap what you sow.
    America: Are you paying attention to the southern invasion happening right now?

  28. “We stand by you in solidarity and in commitment both in the cause of confronting extremism and in the cause in which extremists fear so much…” John ‘Jungle Stroll with Camerman’ Kerry’s statement regarding the French terrorist attack. Notice that he refused to use the word terrorism and terrorists. The killers engaged in extremism and are extremists. WTF is up with this administration, anyway? Do they think that reality can be altered by word choice? I realize that language matters and is purposefully twisted and toyed with in order to rearrange one’s thinking but this has gotten sickeningly ludicrous. I guess we can call it extreme semantics or extreme gamesmanship or something.

    1. Uh, yes… yes, they do.

      You see, if any of those braindead pissants in WDC actually expressed a real emotion or displayed a valid thought or idea, it would expose their World of Denial to the light of day. And they would look very stupid. Which, as we already know, they are.

    2. We can’t expect Leader O to say anything against those that raised him and gave him his values, his guiding light, a supporter with great insight to the islamist cause. His minions (kerry & etc.) follow the Leaders path. Leader has forbid them to speak poorly of his fellow muslim terrorist.

  29. This is an updated excerpt from the MSN News article posted below:

    The Associated Press, citing police officials, named the suspects as Frenchmen Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi. The news agency identified the 18-year-old as Hamyd Mourad. It quoted one official as saying the suspects were linked to a Yemeni terrorist network.

    The entire article is linked here:

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/french-police-identify-gunmen-who-stormed-satirical-newspaper-killing-at-least-12/ar-AA7SpP7

Comments are closed.