Posted in

Protesters support Obama no matter what they say

I received my marching orders this afternoon from the Democrat National Committee;

[Obama’s job bill is] a bill that will put people to work immediately, and it contains proposals that members of both parties have said in the past that they’d support.

But Senate Republicans want to block it. Not because they have a plan that creates jobs right now — not one Republican, in Congress or in the presidential race, does. They only have a political plan.

Their strategy is to suffocate the economy for the sake of what they think will be a political victory. They think that the more folks see Washington taking no action to create jobs, the better their chances in the next election. So they’re doing everything in their power to make sure nothing gets done.

After I got this letter from the DNC, Old Trooper sent us this video of the Occupy DC protesters invading the Hart Senate Office building.

Demonstrators Arrested inside Senate Hart Office Building: MyFoxDC.com

Yeah, and earlier today, the protesters in New York marched on the homes of some billionaires in support of Obama’s millionaire tax proposals. It doesn’t matter what they say about “too much money in government”, that doesn’t mean they aren’t the soldiers of the Obama Administration.

11 thoughts on “Protesters support Obama no matter what they say

  1. None of the billionaires and millionaires who had their homes marched upon were Democrats. So the

    Senate Majority Leader Reid (D-NV), and 50 other Democrat Senators unilaterally changed the rules to prevent GOP input into the Senate legislative process. The so-called tac-nuke of Senate parliamentary procedure.

    Now that the GOP is no longer a factor in the upper chamber of Congress, Senator Reid still can’t find enough Democrats and RINOs to support Obama’s so-called jobs bill (which Reid re-wrote the GOP-written House version – so the email lies once). According to Senators Reid and Durbin (D-IL), the #2 Dem in the Senate, they have no intention of taking up the jobs bill until much later. The email lies a second time: Dems trying to block legislative action on Obama’s demand.

    Fortunately, most Dems are products of public school education – written English escapes them.

  2. The word “folks” just became my un-safe word and I will go full retard every time I hear it henceforth.

    Christ, I’m sick of that word.

  3. While the media and Democrat leadership fawn over these A-holes, they ignore young Americans truly sacrifing in Afghanistan and Iraq. Hopefully, the majority of Americans wake the hell up in 2012.

  4. The protests are misdirected and are certainly being hijacked by special interest groups (moreso than the Tea Party rallies)…yet, there is the point being made that the GOP has not pushed forward a plan of its own. Have you seen one?

  5. #6: Yup. Called the Ryan plan. There are also plans to privatize SSI, and make welfare and other such programs TEMPORARY. lastly slash capitol gains tax, get rid of the inheritance tax, and lastly completely undo the “community reinvestment” act.

    I’ve also heard of bimetalism floated as a way to end the era of fiat money (its not as rigid as the gold standard). and if those ideas don’t work for you, we could literally do exactly what Reagan did, and we’d be fine.

  6. These protestors are the perfect example of how the public has become sheep! They flock together, then blindly follow the administration, whatever happens… And they wonder why we call them sheep, and us sheep dogs!

  7. I’m not sure, Lucky, but I think you may be giving sheep a bad name, at least as it pertains to the cretins that are OWLS. Perhaps lemmings would be a better comparison.

  8. UpNorth, it depends on the kind of sheep. Churros are pretty dang smart (for sheep-type critters). The protesters remind me more of alpacas – decorative, useful if you sheer or comb them, but dumber than bricks and occasionally nasty at both ends. (No offense to any alpacas reading this post.)

  9. Thanks, Doc. I thought the Ryan plan and SSI privatization were defeict-reduction plans and not job creation plans. Maybe they’re supposed to be both, I dunno.

Comments are closed.