If I saw the London 2012 Olympic mascots coming towards me in Arizona, I would probably be within my legal rights to blast them:
Apparently they are “gender-neutral”, which will make stuffed animal versions of these creatures perfect gifts for the children of DU posters.
Run!, its Kang and Kodos!!
I’m not sure they’re all that gender neutral. It seems that the orange one is sort of phallic looking, while the blue one is rounder and even has an conveniently highlighted area.
Of course, I could just be imagining things given I’m in a dry spell with Tanker out of town this week.
LMAO.. Truer words were never spoken!
Pokemon meets sex toys with lobster claws.
They’re from London, for the London Olympics.
Think of ALL the surveillance cameras in London. . . .
Now sleeeeepppp. . . . You are safe and secure. . . . . You will not have nightmares. . . . . .
I think even Dr Who would have problems with these.
DID YOU SAY LANCE!?
– Kirk Lazarus, Tropic Thunder 2008
“gender-neutral”? I’d be suspicious of anyone with a bright blue crotch!
My God, and I just got over my PTSD from Barney and the Teletubbies…
Visual cues aside, do I see a ‘W’ on the left one and a ‘M’ on the right? “Woman” and “Man”? “Wacky” and “Moron”? “Weep” and “Misery”?
An aside, did Londonistan get their Muslim overlords’ permission for these abominations?
Why does this remind me of those terrible “Starman” movies from Japan back in the middle 60’s?
WTF?! The Ambigously Gay Duo meets the Teletubbies!
gender neutral, and species neutral. The ambiguously specific duo. What the hell are they supposed to be? Why is it that olympic mascots are always carefully designed to look thoroughly ambiguous?
Sparky!!
I was going to say why didn’t they use The goddamned teletubbies. And, isn’t the rainbow a nice touch?
Damn, they kinda creep me out.
Well, since they’re (supposed to be) gender-neutral, they can’t be accused of being “gay”.
Can they?
Riveting…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KatN365jaBg
Androgeny never looked so gay……