![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/vindman-2-500x333.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Not long after President Trump was forever acquitted of the impeachment charges against him, Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman received a different assignment. He was seen escorted from the White House.<\/p>\n
Not long after his testimony in the House, information became available from one of Vindman’s superiors. One of the claims about him was that he put the US down in front of his subordinates and in front of Russian counterparts.<\/p>\n
The media managed to find a former supervisor who didn’t have bad things to say about Alexander Vindman. According to this individual, Vindman was someone you could trust, and who did a good job. This supervisor served with Vindman at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. This is in contrast to what President Trump said about him:<\/p>\n
From Newsmax:<\/span><\/p>\n Trump, after dismissing Vindman on Friday, tweeted the next day:<\/p>\n “He was very insubordinate, reported contents of my ‘perfect’ calls incorrectly, & was given a horrendous report by his superior, the man he reported to, who publicly stated that Vindman had problems with judgment, adhering to the chain of command and leaking information.<\/span><\/strong>“<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Done to humiliate? A reading of the transcripts was clear cut regarding President Trump’s innocence. An Army Officer, putting service before self, would’ve ignored political differences, and disagreements, and would have followed orders. While testifying, he should’ve stuck with the facts instead of injecting his speculation about what the President was doing.<\/p>\n Newsmax has more here<\/a>:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"