![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.azuse.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Criminals-for-Gun-Control-232x300.gif\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
President Trump accurately identified the parties, on both sides, that were involved with violence. This was in the aftermath of the Charlottesville, VA, incident. The media, ignoring violent leftists, vilified the president for not carrying their narrative. In their eyes, only one side deserved this type of label and condemnation. <\/p>\n
Violent leftists were also guilty for the violence. Many in the media; however, deliberately disregarded them or deemphasized their involvement and impact. <\/p>\n
Shift to reporting on actual or assumed scandals and you’ll see a similar script. Liberal talking heads, and reporters, run fool’s errands regarding President Trump’s “scandals”. Yet, calls for pursuing actual scandals, by Democrats, are dismissed, swept under the rug, ignored, half baked, not seriously done, etc. <\/p>\n
Enter the Liberal Zombie manifesto. I also got this from the old Protest Warrior forums. As with the previous article, I did some major editing and adjustments. I also updated this as the years went by. <\/p>\n
The above photo is one of the protest signs that Protest Warrior used. One way they’d use this sign is to “blend in” with a group of people who were demanding gun control. <\/p>\n
Without further ado…<\/p>\n
I don’t pay for my mistakes or misfortunes. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If I…<\/p>\n
a. Never went to college…<\/p>\n
b. Was born into a poor family…<\/p>\n
c. Am lazy…<\/p>\n
d. Am unmotivated…<\/p>\n
e. Wish to portray myself as a victim of any situation or series of events…<\/p>\n
It’s other people’s responsibility to extricate me from my own mess.<\/p>\n
2. Receiving more Social Security than I deserve is great because it rewards me for failing to put money away when I was younger. <\/p>\n
3. Abortion is great because I should never have to deal with the consequences of my failure to use the following:<\/p>\n
a. Birth control.
\nb. Common sense.
\nc. Keep the gates closed to irresponsible partners. <\/p>\n
4. Government subsidized paid abortion is a right that I have for not being responsible in the first place. <\/p>\n
NOTE:<\/b> Please see Manifesto rules concerning my not having to pay for my mistakes. And society’s responsibility to get me out of the mess that I get myself into. <\/p>\n
Affirmative Action is great. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If I’m a minority, I can get a job with substandard qualifications over someone that’s more qualified than me for the job. It’s not about who is qualified or not, it’s about giving me the job because I want it. <\/p>\n
2. If I’m white, I’ll support affirmative action to the hilt if it doesn’t affect me. <\/p>\n
The best thing about affirmative action is that it allows us to make protected groups think we’re helping them. Instead, we’re keeping them down by allowing them to take the path of least resistance. “Gain with no pain” is the rule. It’s easier to sway them with fake news this way.<\/p>\n
3. Racism against whites is OK. Racism against minorities is horrible. <\/p>\n
a. If whites kill a member of a protected group, that’s a hate crime. If a member of a protected group kills a white person, it’s simply a misunderstanding of the races. <\/p>\n
b. If you fail to hire a member of a protected group, you’re a racist. If you fail to hire a white person, you’re doing your job in “hiring the most qualified person” for the task. <\/p>\n
c. If you call a white person a thief, chances are he’s actually a thief. If you call an illegal immigrant a thief, you’re a racist, even if he’s a thief. <\/p>\n
d. If a black kid is kidnapped and drugs are involved, only report the kidnapping. If a white kid is kidnapped and drugs are involved, report everything. <\/p>\n
Gender discrimination only occurs when applied against a woman. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If a man hits his woman, it’s domestic violence. If a man didn’t hit his woman, but she claimed that he did, it’s still domestic violence. <\/p>\n
2. If a woman hits her man, it’s domestic disturbance. Don’t worry, her hitting her man is her man’s fault. Scientific data proving that domestic violence is equally perpetrated by both genders is pure baloney. Numbers based on battered women’s shelters should be taken as gospel. <\/p>\n
Cherry picked “evidence” is better than data obtained via the scientific method.<\/p>\n
3. If a husband murders his wife in the heat of rage, prosecute him to the maximum extent of the law. If a wife murders her husband in the heat of rage, it’s due to self-defense. Even if he’d been long asleep when she had to “defend” herself… <\/p>\n
4. If the father kills the kids in the heat of rage, prosecute him to the full extent of the law, he should have controlled his anger in the first place. <\/p>\n
5. If the mother kills the kids because of post-partum depression, it’s because her husband subjected her to too much stress and she cracked. She wasn’t herself. <\/p>\n
NOTE:<\/b> If this starts to get confusing, remember… If a man does something wrong, he failed to exercise responsibility over his behavior. If a woman does something wrong, it’s because of some external extenuating circumstance “out of her control”. If a man is involved, it’s the man’s fault.<\/p>\n
You can’t say I’m wrong here. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If you think I’m wrong, you’re just exposing your own hatred, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness. <\/p>\n
2. There should be no restrictions on behavior or restriction against consumption of certain substances. There should be no restrictions on censorship in free media.<\/p>\n
3. Accepting a lifestyle only applies to lifestyles my friends and I accept. It’s okay to be intolerant of lifestyles that embrace conservatism, moderation, class, and modesty. I refuse to acknowledge the inherent hypocrisy in this. <\/p>\n
4. If our views of what’s “right” and what’s “wrong” came from different upbringing… Then what’s “right” and “wrong” for me is different from what’s “right” and “wrong” for you. <\/p>\n
5. There’s no universal rights or wrongs… There’s no absolute evil… My sense of what’s “right” and “wrong” always trumps yours. <\/p>\n
Drugs are good. Smoking is bad. I’ll defend that to the death!<\/p>\n
Censorship applies only when I want it to.<\/b><\/p>\n
1. Say you give me a forum and an outlet. I subsequently make a donkey out of myself. <\/p>\n
a. If you call attention to that fact, you’re infringing on my freedom of speech.<\/p>\n
2. If you refuse to buy my albums or watch my movies because of my political rants, you’re infringing my freedom of speech. <\/p>\n
3. If we deny you of a forum and an outlet, we’re not denying you your freedom of speech. We’re just silencing bigotry and hatred. <\/p>\n
Abortion is good. The death penalty is bad. I’ll defend that to the death to! <\/p>\n
I don’t like facts because they go against most of what I believe in. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If you destroy my drivel and tripe with the facts, you’re just expressing your opinion. <\/p>\n
a. For the sake of not hurting anybody’s feelings, there’s no right or wrong when we debate. Facts are what my emotions say they are. <\/p>\n
b. The empirical evidence you present against my drivel is just your opinion. <\/p>\n
c. Facts are what my emotions say they are. <\/p>\n
d. Being right is in the eye of the beholder. <\/p>\n
e. If you refuse to see my emotions as fact, you’re narrow minded and stuck in a “black and white” mindset. <\/p>\n
Changes in society should fit my tastes. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. I’ve suffered a traumatic experience in my life and I have not gotten over it. Instead of changing myself and moving on, I’m going to change the world to fit my perception. It’s easier for me if the world did the hard work of changing to accommodate my habits and beliefs. <\/p>\n
2. Change is good if it fits my perceptions. Evidence that this change is harmful should be dismissed as…<\/p>\n
a. Conservatives’ refusal to be inclusive…<\/p>\n
b. Right wing religious extremism…<\/p>\n
c. Denying a group their rights…<\/p>\n
d. Discrimination…<\/p>\n
e. Refusing to share\u2026<\/p>\n
Corruption by liberals, whether moral or political, will be ignored. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If you call me out on my corruption, you’re a bigot consumed with hatred. <\/p>\n
2. If I’m minority and you call me out on my corruption, you’re a racist. <\/p>\n
3. If I’m a woman and you call me out on my corruption, I’ll accuse you of being misogynist. <\/p>\n
4. If I’m Muslim and you call me out on my corruption, I’ll accuse you of Islamophobia. <\/p>\n
5. If I’m gay, and you call me on me out on my corruption, I’ll accuse you of homophobia. <\/p>\n
I hate guns… There shouldn’t be guns.<\/b><\/p>\n
1. If nobody had guns, they’d be unable to stop me from stealing their property and rights. That’s my ultimate goal.<\/p>\n
2. We need to think of the safety of the person that’s going to rob your house or rape your loved one. Robbers and rapists are people too. <\/p>\n
Exception:<\/b> Only the government, representatives of the government, and my security, shall have guns. <\/p>\n
I attended some liberal arts school in a left-wing university and got a degree in Postmodern Feminist Studies or some such horse poop. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. As a result of this useless degree, I consider myself a foreign policy, political, historical, economic, and crime expert. I know better than military veterans, policemen, and other residents of the real world. <\/p>\n
a. I also know how to raise and educate your kids better than you do.<\/p>\n
b. Let’s make this simple so that you’ll know what I am talking about. <\/p>\n
Say I have a degree in basket weaving. Say you’re a fire fighter and we’re arguing about disaster operations dealing with fire. Say, in this argument, you’re wiping my rear end all over the floor. Even under those conditions, I’m right and you’re wrong. <\/p>\n
My watching fire fighters (military, police, or other profession) in action on the news, or in the movies, has more weight over what those professionals experience firsthand. Even though I may never have access to the information they have access to. <\/p>\n
Diversity is great only when we’re talking about having both genders, almost all races, most religions, and almost all ethnic groups being represented. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. Diversity does not apply to those with conservative views, to Christians, and to white males. <\/p>\n
a. Don’t ask why, because my explanations of this concept always tend to be circular in nature. So we’ll just skip to the end and I’ll call you a bigot, racist, narrow minded, xenophobe, misogynist, NAZI, etc., right now, to save time. <\/p>\n
Or, I could be nice about it and just tell you that you’re wrong.<\/p>\n
b. The absence of Christians, Republicans, white males, conservatives, etc. does not constitute a lack of diversity. Don’t ask about this, either you narrow-minded racist.<\/p>\n
All religions-especially Christianity and Judaism-are bad. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. Crazy Muslim radicals are the only exception to this rule. <\/p>\n
2. “Separation of church and state” means “A churchless state.” <\/p>\n
3. “Freedom of religion” means “Freedom from having to acknowledge the right to practice religion. It also means the freedom from having religious morals and values.” <\/p>\n
4. Atheists that follow a moral code are lumped in with the religious people. <\/p>\n
5. We don’t care for atheists that support religious rights for others, who are conservative, who are white, etc. <\/p>\n
6. All mention of religion should be kept out of schools, even if it means revising the Declaration of Independence, fudging the facts about the first Thanksgiving, or suing the school if winter break is called Christmas Break. <\/p>\n
I will not accept any historical-primary source evidence-that the Founding Fathers were Christians and embraced Christianity.<\/p>\n
I’ll quote Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, John Adams, etc. completely out of context to make my case against religion and against war. <\/p>\n
Aggression is never good… It’s never okay to use force. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. Instead of using force to defend yourself, concede immediately. I’ve no concept of honor or national pride.<\/p>\n
2. I’d rather jeopardize my own family, economy, and security, in lieu of using force. It’s never okay to use force! <\/b> Now, when my security is present, that’s a different story.<\/p>\n
The military should be eliminated. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. They’re all a bunch of brainwashed savages anyway who parrot what their bosses say. <\/p>\n
2. They just joined for education benefits and for the money (after we severely cut their budget). <\/p>\n
3. We totally<\/b> support the troops<\/b>, but not the military<\/b>, its mission success, or its Commander in Chief-unless he is a Democrat. <\/p>\n
What’s that? Pointing out indefensible contradictions in my ideology? Why you fascist narrow minded racist, misogynist, xenophobe, Islamophob! Did you have to point that out to me with one or more big, long, multi paragraphed posts when you could’ve said it with less? <\/p>\n
I’ll never accept the fact that sometimes, people just get offended. <\/b><\/p>\n
That’s life in my world. In my perfect world, nobody-except conservatives-would ever be offended. <\/p>\n
I refuse to follow the rules of logic or rhetoric. <\/b><\/p>\n
Proper debate rules do not apply to me. I can argue however I want; please see my rules on what constitutes fact. <\/p>\n
I must win every argument even if I have to pull things out of my arse to do it! <\/b><\/p>\n
1. You must cooperate with me by not pointing out the errors of my argument.<\/p>\n
2. You must cooperate with me by using less words. Remember, less is more when you argue, more is more when it’s my turn.<\/p>\n
3. You must cooperate with me by conceding to me without requiring me to do the same.<\/p>\n
4. If I can’t win, I’ll resort to insults such as calling you a racist, anti-gay, right wing… By giving you a name that matches “Fantasy land” or any other false and derogatory descriptions. <\/p>\n
I refuse to acknowledge the validity of an analogy or metaphor. <\/b><\/p>\n
When you use them, I’ll make sarcastic remarks and\/or give myself some omnipotent powers in dealing with the analogy. <\/p>\n
Say we’re arguing about gun control. Then you use an analogy. You point out the fact that gun free zones, and other gun laws didn’t stop mass shooting. Then you ask me if criminals, who didn’t follow the current laws in the books, would all of a sudden follow these new laws. I’ll tell you that we’re not talking about psychology. I might talk about some cartoon character. I’ll get emotional with you. Or I’ll simply conduct the verbal equivalent of evasive maneuvers. <\/p>\n
The best way to react when my statement has been disproved is for me to repeat myself. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. You’ll eventually get tired and give up, which is my actual goal<\/b>. If you don’t, I’ll simply call you names.<\/p>\n
2. If you don’t fall for my ploy, I’ll accuse you of repeating yourself and ignore the fact that you’re doing so because I’m repeating myself.<\/p>\n
a. You see, only I can repeat myself. You can’t. <\/p>\n
Censoring conservative dialog is not censorship but preventing hate speech. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If you’re minority, and you’re debating as a conservative, you’ll be labeled as a sell out to your race, ethnic group, etc… Even if you use proper debate etiquette and follow the rules.<\/p>\n
2. If you’re a woman that’s arguing as a conservative, you’ve sold out your gender. <\/p>\n
3. If you’re a democrat that’s arguing as a conservative, you’ve sold out the Democratic Party. <\/p>\n
4. If you’re a Republican arguing as a liberal, you’re arguing your conscience. You’re also a part of the center and the mainstream. <\/p>\n
It’s OK to criticize the the United States, but not OK to criticize the UN or any other country that hates the US. <\/b><\/p>\n
1. If you’re a foreigner and you bash your own country, you’re ashamed when you shouldn’t be. <\/p>\n
2. If you’re American and you bash your own country, you’re giving good and honest criticism. <\/p>\n
3. If you point other nation’s shortcomings out, you’re preaching hate. <\/p>\n
4. If these nations bash the United States, they’re giving “legitimate” criticism. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"